BOMBSHELL VIDEO: Peter McCullough, MD testifies to Texas Senate HHS Committee

Highly credentialed doctor’s raw testimony about failure to treat covid resulting in unnecessary death and more.


https://youtu.be/QAHi3lX3oGM


*Unedited transcipt in case YouTube disappears the video

00:00

good afternoon I’m Dr. Peter Mccullough

00:02

and I’m an internist and cardiologist

00:04

and professor of medicine at Texas a m

00:06

university school of medicine I’m on the

00:08

Baylor Dallas campus

00:11

and I’ve been integrally involved in the

00:14

response to covet 19.

00:16

now the opinions I’ll express are those

00:19

of my own

00:20

and not necessarily those of my

00:21

institution

00:23

I can tell you that in my field I’m an

00:26

academic doctor I see patients but I’m

00:28

very involved in research

00:30

I’m an editor of two major journals in

00:32

my field

00:34

I’m the most published person in my

00:36

field which deals with the heart and the

00:37

kidneys

00:38

in the world in history and when covet

00:41

19

00:42

hit I saw it as our medical super bowl

00:45

and there were going to be doctors like

00:46

Dr. Urso coming out of

00:49

wherever they worked to face the virus

00:52

and there were doctors in the hospital

00:54

that just had to receive

00:55

the virus and then there were those who

00:58

headed for the sidelines

01:00

and then there were those that were

01:02

detractors against the pandemic

01:05

and so as i started to survey the

01:07

literature

01:08

i had patients with heart and lung

01:10

disease who needed urgent treatment

01:13

and i refused to let an illness which

01:15

lasted for two weeks at home

01:18

before they got sick enough to be

01:19

Hospitalized

 

i refused to let a patient

01:22

languish at home

01:23

with no treatment and then be

01:25

hospitalized when it was too late it was

01:27

obvious that was obvious in

01:28

april that that was the case so i used

01:31

the best

01:32

tools or drugs available at the time and

01:35

these are

01:35

appropriately prescribed

01:38

off label remember a label is an

01:40

advertising label a label isn’t a

01:42

scientific document

01:43

sure it’s there is an

01:44

appropriately prescribed

01:46

off-label use of conventional medicine

01:49

to treat

01:50

an illness and i uh in may i put

01:54

together a team of doctors

01:55

because the the group that was

01:57

facing the pandemic to the greatest

01:59

degree was in milan italy so most of

02:00

them were in the coracle

02:02

italian research network we summarized

02:04

all we knew about the available drugs

02:07

and we published our findings in the

02:08

august

02:10

8th issue of the american journal

02:12

medicine and the title of that paper was

02:14

the pathophysiologic basis and rationale

02:17

for early ambulatory treatment and it

02:19

had a premise

02:20

there’s two bad outcomes to covet 19

02:22

hospitalization and death

02:24

the second premise if we don’t do

02:26

something before the hospitalization

02:28

we can never stop it. and i have to tell you when

02:32

i was a lead author in that paper but we

02:34

had dozens of authors from italy

02:36

india ucla emory we had the best

02:39

institutions in the united states

02:40

i can tell you the interesting thing was

02:42

there was 50 000 papers in the

02:44

peer-reviewed literature on covid

02:46

not a single one told the doctor how to

02:48

treat it

02:49

not a single one. when does that happen? i

02:52

was absolutely stunned and when this

02:54

paper was published in american journal

02:55

medicine it became a lightning rod oh my

02:57

gosh it became the most cited paper

02:59

in basically all of medicine at that

03:00

time the world started and boy the world

03:03

started knocking down my door and i said

03:04

oh my lord i just can’t believe what

03:06

became untapped and um i

03:09

had never been on social media before

03:12

and

03:13

my daughter who was home from law school

03:15

was talking to her about it she said

03:16

well why don’t i make a youtube video

03:18

so i made a youtube video with four

03:20

slides from the paper

03:22

this is a peer-reviewed paper published

03:23

in one of the best medical journals

03:25

in the world four slides i even wore a

03:27

tie in a suit and she showed me how to

03:29

record it in powerpoint and i posted on

03:31

youtube

03:32

it went absolutely viral and within

03:34

about a week

03:35

youtube said you violated the terms of

03:38

the of the um

03:39

community and that’s when senator

03:41

johnson’s office got involved in

03:43

washington said oh my gosh this is

03:44

important scientific

03:45

information to help patients in the

03:48

middle of this crisis

03:49

and social media is striking it down

03:51

based on what authority

03:53

well one thing led to another uh and i

03:55

became the lead witness for the u.s

03:57

senate testimony of

03:58

november 19 2020 and the reason why

04:00

there was senate testimony

04:02

is because there was a near total block

04:05

on any information of treatment to

04:07

patients

04:08

a near total block and so what had

04:11

happened over time

04:12

is that we had gotten into a cycle in

04:14

america

04:15

uh of no information on treatment

04:18

patients actually think

04:19

that the virus is untreatable and so

04:21

what happens is they go out to get a

04:23

diagnosis

04:24

now i’m a covid survivor my wife in

04:26

the galley is a covid survivor my

04:27

father in a nursing home is a covid

04:28

survivor

04:30

you get handed a diagnostic test it says

04:34

here you’re covid positive go home

04:37

is there any treatment no. is there any

04:39

resources i can call

04:41

No. any referral lines hotlines no. any

04:43

research hotlines

04:44

No. that’s the standard of care in the

04:47

united states

04:48

and if we go to any one of our testing

04:50

centers today in the in texas

04:51

i bet that’s the standard of care i bet

04:54

that’s the standard of care

04:55

no wonder we have had 45 000

04:58

deaths in texas the average person in

05:00

texas thinks there’s no treatment

05:03

they honestly think there’s no treatment

05:05

they don’t even know about these eua

05:07

antibodies you heard from

05:08

a 90 year old gentleman who got bam

05:10

terrific

05:12

where’s the focus there’s such a focus

05:14

on the vaccine where’s the focus on

05:16

people sick right now

05:17

this committee ought to know where all

05:19

these monoclonal antibodies are they

05:21

ought to know where all the treatment

05:22

protocols are

05:23

they ought to have a list of the

05:24

treatment centers in texas that actually

05:27

treat patients with covet 19. so i led

05:30

the initiative

05:31

the second paper was published in a

05:32

dedicated issue of reviews in

05:34

cardiovascular medicine now i had

05:36

57 authors including dr urso dr

05:39

emanuel lead doctors in houston san

05:42

antonio all over and it was

05:43

another worldwide paper and now we have

05:45

it updated integrated

05:47

so yes we used drugs to affect viable

05:49

replication the antibodies are terrific

05:51

we can use intracellular anti-infectives

05:54

in that box

05:55

we use corticosteroids and inflammatory

05:57

drugs the best anti-inflammatory drug is

05:59

colchicine

06:00

you’ve probably never heard about it in

06:01

the largest highest quality randomized

06:04

trial

06:04

over 4 000 patients, double blind

06:07

randomized placebo-controlled trial

06:09

there’s a 50 %

06:10

reduction in mortality. no word of it

06:13

none complete block to anybody

06:16

culture scene how can that be how can

06:19

that be and then the most deadly part of

06:21

the viral

06:22

infection is thrombosis so i have always

06:25

treated my patients

06:26

with something to treat the virus

06:28

something to treat inflammation and

06:30

something to treat thrombosis just as

06:31

dr urso had

06:33

and i have very very sick patients and

06:35

i’ve lost two

06:38

but i have to tell you what has gone on

06:40

has been beyond

06:41

belief how many of you have turned on a

06:44

local news station

06:45

or a national cable news station and

06:48

ever gotten an

06:49

update on treatment at home

06:52

how many of you have ever gotten a

06:54

single word about what to do when you

06:56

get

06:57

the hand of the diagnosis of 19. no

07:00

wonder

07:01

that is a complete and total failure at

07:04

every level

07:05

okay let’s take the white house how come

07:07

we didn’t have a panel of doctors

07:09

assigned to put all their efforts and

07:12

stop these hospitalizations

07:13

why don’t we have doctors who actually

07:15

treated patients get together

07:17

in a group and every week give us an

07:19

update

07:20

why didn’t we have that why didn’t we

07:22

have that at the state level zero

07:24

why don’t we have any reports about how

07:26

many patients were treated

07:27

in spared hospitalizations from all that

07:29

i listen to six hours of testimony today

07:31

zero zero we have a complete and total

07:36

blank spot

07:37

on treatment it is a blanking phenomenon

07:41

at least in the united states there’s

07:42

some heroes now the american society of

07:44

physician and surgeons

07:45

took the lead they’re the group they’ve

07:47

identified 35 treatment centers in texas

07:49

they know who they are

07:50

they have emergency hotlines they helped

07:53

dr hall put together

07:54

this very brief pamphlet but there’s

07:56

more an extensive one we can pass it

07:58

around to everyone

07:59

that at least gives people half a chance

08:01

to find out

08:02

about information okay this is a

08:06

complete and total travesty to have a

08:08

fatal disease

08:09

and not treat it now the national

08:11

institutes of health and the infectious

08:13

disease design of

08:14

america started putting out guidelines

08:16

in the treatment of covet 19

08:17

and to this date they nearly exclusively

08:20

deal with a hospitalized patient

08:22

the two papers that i have published as

08:24

the lead author

08:25

and supported by wonderful people by dr

08:27

urso are the

08:28

only publications in the peer-reviewed

08:31

literature

08:32

that tell doctors how to treat covet 19

08:34

as an outpatient

08:36

based on the support of scientific

08:37

information the only two

08:39

the home treatment guide by the american

08:41

physicians and surgeons

08:42

is the only source of information

08:45

available to patients

08:46

on how to treat cova 19 at home the only

08:49

source

08:50

so what can be done right here right now

08:51

there’s going to be more people that die

08:53

in texas and it’s an absolute tragedy

08:54

how about tomorrow let’s have a law that

08:57

says there’s not a single result given

08:59

out

08:59

without a treatment guide and without a

09:02

hotline of how to get into research

09:04

let’s put a staffer on this and find out

09:06

all the research available in texas and

09:07

let’s not have a single person go home

09:10

with with a test result with their fatal

09:12

diagnosis

09:13

sitting at home going into two weeks of

09:15

despair before they succumb to

09:17

hospitalization and death

09:19

it is unimaginable in america that we

09:22

can have such a complete and total blind

09:23

spot

09:24

i blame the doctors for not stepping up.

09:26

where was the medical society

09:28

stepping up and putting effort on this?

09:30

how about from the federal and state

09:31

Agencies? there never was

09:33

a single bit of group collaborative

09:36

effort to stop the hospitalizations.

09:39

nobody even kind of thought about it bob

09:41

hall had me hana

09:42

teleconference in in april or may and

09:44

we’re like wait a minute

09:45

how come where’s ut southwestern i’m a

09:47

graduate of ut southwestern

09:49

where’s a m where’s the rest of the

09:51

universities how come we’re not stopping

09:52

this

09:53

but it

09:55

gets worse because

09:57

in the paper i published in december of

09:59

of 2020 you know what he did. i had

10:01

a terrific

10:02

doctor from brazil we went through

10:04

country by country by country and just

10:06

asked the question what

10:07

are the countries doing was the last

10:09

time you turned on the news and ever got

10:11

a window to the outside world

10:13

when did you ever get an update about

10:15

how the rest of the world is handling

10:17

covet

10:19

never what’s happened in this pandemic

10:21

is the world has closed in on us there’s

10:23

only one doctor

10:25

whose face is on tv now one not a panel

10:28

doctors we always work in groups we

10:29

always have different opinions there’s

10:32

not a single media doctor

10:34

on tv who’s ever treated a covid patient

10:37

not a single one there’s not a single

10:40

person in the white house task force has

10:41

ever treated a patient

10:43

why don’t we do something both why don’t

10:44

we put together a panel of doctors that

10:46

have actually treated outpatients of

10:48

covet 19

10:49

and get them together for our meeting

10:51

and why don’t we exchange ideas

10:53

and why don’t we say how we can finish

10:55

the pandemic strongly

10:56

isn’t it amazing think about this think

10:59

about the complete and total blind spot

11:01

so what happened i can tell you what

11:02

happened in around may

11:04

it became known that the virus was going

11:06

to be amenable to a vaccine

11:09

all efforts on treatment were dropped

11:11

the national institutes of health

11:12

actually had a multi-drug program

11:14

they dropped it after 20 patients said

11:15

we can’t find the patients

11:17

the most disingenuous announcement of

11:18

all time and then warp speed went

11:21

full tilt for vaccine development and

11:24

there was a silencing of any information

11:27

on

11:27

treatment any silencing

11:31

scrubbed from twitter youtube can’t get

11:34

papers published on this

11:35

you can’t we can’t even get information

11:37

out in our own medical literature on

11:39

this

11:39

there’s been a complete scrubbing so

11:41

this program has been one of

11:43

try to reduce the spread of the virus

11:45

and wait for a vaccine

11:47

and when we’ve when we vaccinate all

11:49

efforts have to be on vaccination and

11:51

probably if i had four hours of

11:52

vaccination on here think about it as we

11:54

sit here today

11:56

the calculations in texas on herd

11:58

immunity

11:59

the calculations are we’re at eighty

12:01

percent herd immunity right now

12:03

with no vaccine effect 80%

12:05

and more people are developing covid

12:07

today

12:07

they’re gonna become immune.
people who

12:09

develop covid have

12:10

complete and durable immunity and a very

12:14

important principle

12:15

complete and durable you can’t beat

12:17

natural immunity you can’t vaccinate on

12:19

top of it and make it better

12:21

there’s no scientific clinical

12:24

or safety rationale for ever vaccinating

12:28

a covid

12:29

recovered patient.

there’s no rationale

12:31

for ever testing a covid recovery

12:33

patient my wife and i are covered

12:34

recovered

12:34

why do we go through the testing outside

12:36

there’s absolutely no rationale

12:38

i’d encourage this committee to actually

12:40

look at what’s being done

12:42

and ask is there any rationale is there

12:44

any rationale for anything?

12:46

listen there’s plenty of covid to

12:48

recover patients let them forego the

12:50

vaccine

12:51

and let people who are clamoring for it

12:53

get it but at 80 percent

12:55

hurt immunity in the vaccine trials

12:57

fewer than one percent

12:59

in the vaccine in the placebo actually

13:01

get coveted fewer than one percent

13:03

the vaccine is going to have a one

13:04

percent public health impact that’s what

13:06

the data says

13:08

it’s not going to save us we’re already

13:09

80 hurt immune

13:11

if we’re strategically targeted we can

13:14

actually close out the pandemic

13:15

very well with the vaccine but

13:17

strategically targeted people under 50

13:19

who fundamentally have no

13:21

health risks? there’s no scientific

13:24

rationale for them to ever become

13:26

Vaccinated.

13:28

there’s no scientific rationale. one of

13:30

the mistakes i heard today as a

13:32

rationale for vaccination as

13:33

asymptomatic spread and i want you to be

13:34

very clear about this my opinion is

13:38

there is a low degree if any of

13:41

asymptomatic spread

13:42

sick person gives it to sick person.

the

13:45

chinese have published a study british

13:46

medical journal

13:47

11 million people that try to find

13:49

asymptomatic spread you can’t find it

13:51

and that’s been you know one of

13:53

important pieces of

13:55

Misinformation.

when senator hall called

13:58

a conference call

13:58

what should we do in the capitol when we

14:00

reopened i said you know what you know

14:03

what we do at baylor

14:04

you walk in and they zap your

14:05

temperature you got a temperature check

14:06

and go in.

14:08

i mean do we test everybody who walks in

14:10

the baylor hospital no are they a lot

14:12

sicker than everybody in this room you

14:13

better believe it

14:14

so why would we do something here at the

14:15

capitol

14:17

that has absolutely positively no

14:19

scientific rationale

14:20

and then do it in this context?
so my

14:23

testimony as i said here today

14:25

is covet 19 has always been a treatable

14:27

illness

14:28

a very large study from mckinney texas

14:30

another one from new york city

14:32

show that when doctors treat patients

14:35

early

14:35

who are over age 50 with medical

14:37

problems with a sequence multi-drug

14:39

approach with the available drugs uh

14:41

four to six drugs that are available

14:44

to them now the monoclonal antibiotics

14:46

are better there’s an

14:47

85 reduction in hospitalizations and

14:50

death

14:51

85 85 percent i want you to remember

14:56

that number 85 percent

14:58

we have over 500 000 deaths in the

15:00

united states

15:03

the preventable fraction could have been

15:05

as high as 85 percent

15:07

if our pandemic response would have been

15:10

laser focused

15:11

on the problem the sick patient right in

15:13

front of us we’re focused over here and

15:14

focused over there and focused on masks

15:16

and

15:16

what have you laser focused sick patient

15:19

treat them

15:20

we lost focus on the most fundamental

15:22

doctor that’s my that’s my testimony.

 

15:24

yeah thank you i can tell how passionate

15:27

you are and certainly i have been a

15:29

leader

15:29

in talking about preventive protocols

15:32

and also the ambulatory stage and i do

15:35

think that that has been missing

15:37

and it’s been a concern because covid 19

15:39

is going to be with us right i mean it’s

15:41

uh

15:42

you know i hope we’re at 80 percent

15:44

heard immunity i don’t know yet i’ll

15:46

read your papers but

15:47

um i appreciate that and the message is

15:50

is that there are drugs out there that

15:51

work

15:52

there are therapies out there that work

15:54

but no single one works alone

15:56

and so the the the dismissive mistake

15:58

was to do a very small study oh we

16:00

studied 200 patients

16:01

and we used ivory hydroxychloroquine and

16:04

it didn’t work that’s like

16:05

cancer and picking one drug and saying

16:07

oh it doesn’t reduce cancer mortality we

16:09

never do that in cancer we never did

16:10

that in aids we don’t do in hepatitis c

16:13

what we look is for is signals of

16:14

benefit and acceptable safety and then

16:17

we combine them

16:18

and that’s what that’s all we’ve done so

16:20

but but but this

16:21

independent declaration drug by drug

16:23

that drugs don’t work

16:25

has been uh and that’s on that’s on us

16:27

that’s been our medical house

16:28

that’s been a a giant um error

16:31

that we’ve made on our side we never

16:33

should have expected single drugs to

16:35

reduce mortality

16:36

but drugs in combination against a fatal

16:38

vital infection

16:39

we should have

this entire session is

16:40

less learned from lessons i know we’re

16:42

running short on time

16:44

uh center hall you have one question or

16:49

real quick um i’d ask the question

16:51

earlier when dr hellestad was here

16:54

about the idea that fits in with what

16:55

you’ve talked about

16:57

is that when we test someone rather than

17:00

just say

17:00

give them yep you’re positive you’re

17:02

negative be on your way

17:04

that we at least provide them

17:06

information

17:07

of what we know out there can be

17:10

can be used. not trying to play the role

17:13

of doctor

17:14

out there would you do you agree with

17:18

dr hellestadt’s interpretation that that

17:21

should not be done

17:22

because it’s setting up a doctor-patient

17:24

relationship

17:25

and simply informing people or providing

17:28

with

17:29

over-the-counter drugs that

17:32

so that we could possibly have the early

17:36

treatment

17:36

for these folks rather than wait till

17:39

they show up in the hospital?

 

 

17:40

we could at least have a physician group

17:44

approved a guide the aaps guide has been

17:47

used in over 500

17:48

000 cases in the united states in fact

17:50

the early treatment is probably

17:52

what prevented us from overflowing the

17:54

hospitals in the

17:55

in the last quarter of the year. when i

17:57

testified i said listen we’re on track

17:59

and i was very

17:59

convinced of this we’re on track of

18:01

overflowing our hospitals our break

18:02

point was 135 000 in the hospitals

18:04

united states we hit 128.

18:06

now the curve started going down long

18:08

before the vaccine so i can tell you

18:10

herd immunity

18:11

long before the vaccine showed up

18:12

started to go down but the early

18:14

treatment kicked up ivermectinus

18:16

skyrocketed hydroxychloroquine

18:18

monoclonal antibodies as much as we can

18:20

push them sadly the monoclonal

18:21

antibodies are still sitting on the

18:22

shelf

18:23

in a lot of places but committees like

18:25

this ought to be saying listen where are

18:26

those monoclonal antibiotics

18:28

are do we stock them at the nursing home

18:29

what are the big nursing home chains

18:31

what are the big urgent care chains in

18:33

texas and what are they doing what are

18:34

their early treatment protocols

18:36

you know these are blank spots i bet

18:38

nobody here has even thought about this

18:40

this is this is really low hanging fruit

18:43

that we can

18:44

uh we can tackle the bottom line is

18:47

a lot of doctors have checked out and

18:48

when patients call them they say i don’t

18:50

treat covet

18:52

and when i asked those doctors i said

18:53

you don’t treat how come they go well

18:54

there’s no treatment

18:56

i said but do you do you call them two

18:57

days later to see how they’re doing

19:00

no so what’s that that’s not that’s not

19:03

i don’t treat covet

19:04

that’s i don’t care anymore that’s a

19:06

loss of compassion

19:08

so we have a crisis of compassion in our

19:10

country in the medical field that’s in

19:12

our house right now

19:13

but for every doctor that’s ever told a

19:15

patient that they don’t treat covid

19:17

okay but then they call them two days

19:19

later and help them get oxygen or see

19:21

how they’re doing

19:22

if the answer is no that that’s the

19:24

hippocratic oath going out

19:26

and that’s on us and i’m telling you we

19:28

have a real self-check to do

19:30

uh in the house of medicine yep

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.