Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola <\/p>\n
The video above features Collette Martin, a practicing nurse who testified before a Louisiana Health and Welfare Committee hearing December 6, 2021.1<\/span>,<\/sup>2<\/span><\/sup> Martin claims she and her colleagues have witnessed \u201cterrifying\u201d reactions to the COVID shots among children \u2014 including blood clots, heart attacks, encephalopathy and arrhythmias \u2014 yet their concerns are simply dismissed.<\/p>\n Among elderly patients, she\u2019s noticed an uptick in falls and acute onset of confusion \u201cwithout any known etiology.\u201d Coworkers are also experiencing side effects, such as vision and cardiovascular problems.<\/p>\n Martin points out that few doctors or nurses are aware the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) even exists, so injury reports are not being filed. Hospitals also are not gathering data on COVID jab injuries in any other ways, so there\u2019s no data to investigate even if you wanted to. According to Martin:<\/p>\n \u201cWe are not just seeing severe acute [short term] reactions with this vaccine, but we have zero idea what any long-term reactions are. Cancers, autoimmune [disorders], infertility. We just don\u2019t know.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n We are potentially sacrificing our children for fear of MAYBE dying, getting sick of a virus \u2014 a virus with a 99% survival rate. As of now, we have more children that died from the COVID vaccine than COVID itself.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n And then, for the Health Department to come out and say the new variant [Omicron] has all the side effects of the vaccine reactions we\u2019re currently seeing \u2014 it\u2019s maddening, and I don\u2019t understand why more people don\u2019t see it. I think they do, but they fear speaking out and, even worse, being fired … Which side of history will you be on? I have to know that this madness will stop.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Martin also states she believes the hospital treatment protocol is killing COVID patients. Doctors agree that it\u2019s \u201cnot working,\u201d but that \u201cit\u2019s all we have.\u201d But \u201cthat\u2019s simply not true,\u201d she says. \u201cIt\u2019s just what the CDC will allow us to give.\u201d<\/p>\n I recently interviewed Jessica Rose, Ph.D., a research fellow at the Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge in Israel, about what the VAERS data tell us about the COVID jabs\u2019 risks. As noted by Rose, the average number of adverse event reports following vaccination for the past 10 years has been about 39,000 annually, with an average of 155 deaths. That\u2019s for all available vaccines combined.<\/p>\n The COVID jabs alone now account for 983,756 adverse event reports as of December 17, 2021, including 20,622 deaths3<\/span><\/sup> \u2014 and this doesn\u2019t include the underreporting factor, which we know is significant and likely ranges from five to 40 times higher than reported. Most doctors and nurses don\u2019t even know what VAERS is and even if they do, they chose not to report the incidents.<\/p>\n You can\u2019t even compare the COVID shots to other vaccines. They\u2019re by far the most dangerous injections ever created, yet there doesn\u2019t appear to be a cutoff for acceptable harm. No one within the CDC or Food and Drug Administration, which jointly run VAERS, has addressed these shocking numbers. Both agencies outrageously deny that a single death can be attributed to the COVID jabs, which is simply impossible. It\u2019s not statistically plausible.<\/p>\n The FDA and CDC are also ignoring standard data analyses that can shed light on causation. It\u2019s known as the Bradford Hill criteria \u2014 a set of 10 criteria that need to be satisfied in order to show strong evidence of causal relationship. One of the most important of these criteria is temporality, because one thing has to come before the other, and the shorter the duration between two events, the higher the likelihood of a causative effect.<\/p>\n Well, in the case of the COVID jabs, 50% of the deaths occur within 48 hours of injection. It\u2019s simply not conceivable that 10,000 people died two days after their shot from something other than the shot. It cannot all be coincidence. Especially since so many of them are younger, with no underlying lethal conditions that threaten to take them out on any given day. A full 80% have died within one week of their jab, which is still incredibly close in terms of temporality.4<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n Aside from the immediate risk of death, children are also at risk for potentially lifelong health problems from the jab. Myocarditis (heart inflammation) has emerged as one of the most common problems, especially among boys and young men.<\/p>\n In early September 2021, Tracy Beth Hoeg and colleagues posted an analysis5<\/span><\/sup> of VAERS data on the preprint server medRxiv, showing that more than 86% of the children aged 12 to 17 who report symptoms of myocarditis were severe enough to require hospitalization.<\/p>\n Cases of myocarditis explode after the second shot, Hoeg found, and disproportionally affect boys. A full 90% of post-jab myocarditis reports are males, and 85% of reports occurred after the second dose. According to Hoeg et. al.:6<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n \u201cThe estimated incidence of CAEs [cardiac adverse events] among boys aged 12-15 years following the second dose was 162 per million; the incidence among boys aged 16-17 years was 94 per million. The estimated incidence of CAEs among girls was 13 per million in both age groups.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n No doubt, doctors are seeing an increase in myocarditis, but few are willing to talk about it. In a recent Substack post, Steve Kirsch writes:7<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n \u201cI just read a comment on my private \u2018healthcare providers only\u2019 substack. An estimated100X elevation in rate of myocarditis, but nobody will learn of it since cardiologists aren\u2019t going to speak out for fear of retribution.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n His comment was a private conversation he had with a pediatric cardiologist. The cardiologist is never going to say this in public, to the press, or have his name revealed since his first duty is to his family (keeping his job).<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n If a \u2018fact checker\u2019 called the cardiologist, he might either refuse to comment or say \u2018I\u2019m seeing somewhat more cases after the vaccine rolled out.\u2019 Here\u2019s the exact comment that was posted to the private substack:<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n \u2018Pre-jab, one or two cases per year of myocarditis. Now, half his waiting room. Tells parents they are \u2018studying\u2019 the causality. Refers them to infectious disease specialist for discussions on their other children.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Admits he and about 50% of his colleagues know what\u2019s going on but are too terrified to speak out for fear of retaliation from hospitals and state licensing boards.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Other 50% don\u2019t want to know, don\u2019t care and\/or are reveling in the cognitive dissonance (like Dr. Harvey [Cohen] at Stanford) and\/or letting loose their authoritarian demon. Good luck with these former colleagues of mine. The stench is overpowering.\u2019<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n … From 1 or 2 cases per year to \u2018half his waiting room.\u2019 I don\u2019t know the size of his waiting room, but it\u2019s at least two people since he said \u2018half.\u2019 So, the rate has increased by: 250 day per year open\/1.5 avg cases per year=166X.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\nWhat the VAERS Data Tell Us About COVID Jab Risks<\/h2>\n
Children Risk Permanent Heart Damage<\/h2>\n
Myocarditis Is Not a Mild, Inconsequential Side Effect<\/h2>\n