Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola<\/p>\n
<\/iframe><\/p>\n<div id=\"bcr_UpdPnlStory\">\n<div id=\"bcr_pnlStoryAtAGlance\" class=\"story-glance\" data-swiftype-name=\"saag\" data-swiftype-type=\"text\">\n<div class=\"story-highlights\">\n<h3 id=\"expanderHead\" data-jsid=\"expanderHead\">Story at-a-glance<\/h3>\n<div id=\"expanderContent\" data-jsid=\"expanderContent\">\n<ul>\n<li><span id=\"bcr_rptStory_cslStory_0\">April 1, 2022, another batch of 11,000 Pfizer documents were released by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Pfizer trial data reveal natural immunity was as effective as the jab, and that shot side effects were more severe in those under 55. Since the risk of severe COVID is dramatically lower in younger people, an elevated risk of side effects unacceptable, and the shot should have been restricted to those at high risk of severe COVID<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span id=\"bcr_rptStory_cslStory_1\">The adverse event rate per dose for Pfizer\u2019s mRNA jab, based on their own studies, is nearly 1 in 800, and the myocarditis rate is 10 in 100,000 \u2014 far greater than the 2 in 100,000 rate previously reported<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span id=\"bcr_rptStory_cslStory_2\">Pfizer\u2019s consent form specifies that the effect on sperm, fetuses and nursing children are unknown. Yet health authorities and media have espoused as \u201cfact\u201d that the shot does not affect reproductive health or fertility and is perfectly safe for pregnant and nursing mothers<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span id=\"bcr_rptStory_cslStory_3\">Pfizer\u2019s documents show they\u2019ve not ruled out the risk of antibody-dependent enhancement. Vaccine-associated enhanced disease (VAED) is listed as an \u201cImportant Potential Risk.\u201d As of February 28, 2021, Pfizer had 138 cases of suspected VAED, 75 of which were severe, resulting in hospitalization, disability, life-threatening consequences or death; a total of 38 cases were lethal and 65 remained unresolved<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span id=\"bcr_rptStory_cslStory_4\">Pfizer and FDA also knew that people of all ages experienced transient suppression of immune function for one week after the first dose<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"bodytext\" class=\"bodytextdiv\" data-swiftype-name=\"postbody\" data-swiftype-type=\"text\">\n<p>With another batch of 11,000 Pfizer documents, released April 1, 2022, old suspicions have gained fresh support. As reported by \u201cRising\u201d cohost Kim Iversen (video above), the first bombshell revelation is that natural immunity works, and Pfizer has known it all along.<\/p>\n<p>The clinical trial data showed there was no difference in outcomes between those with previous COVID infection and those who got the shot. Neither group experienced severe infection. Natural immunity was also statistically identical to the shot in terms of the risk of infection.<\/p>\n<h2>Younger Adults More Likely to Experience Side Effects<\/h2>\n<p>The second revelation is that side effects from the shots were more severe in younger people, aged 18 to 55, than those aged 55 and older. (The risk of side effects also increased with additional doses, so the risk was higher after the second dose than the first.)<\/p>\n<p>As many of us have said all along, the risk of severe COVID is dramatically lower in younger people than those over 60, which makes an elevated risk of side effects unacceptable.<\/p>\n<p>As noted by The Naked Emperor on Substack,<sup><span id=\"edn1\" data-hash=\"#ednref1\">1<\/span><\/sup> \u201cwith a vaccine that is producing more frequent and more severe reactions and adverse events in younger individuals, the vaccine should have been restricted to those who were actually at risk of severe COVID-19.\u201d<\/p>\n<h2>Pfizer Documents Show High Rate of Myocarditis<\/h2>\n<p>Interestingly, Pfizer\u2019s documentation also includes medical information that mainstream media and fact checkers have labeled as misinformation or disinformation. A pediatric consent form lists several possible side effects, including a myocarditis rate of 10 in 100,000 \u2014 far greater than the 1 in 50,000 (i.e., 2 in 100,000) rate previously reported.<\/p>\n<div class=\"MidProductAd\"><\/div>\n<p>We also know that myocarditis is far more frequent in young males, so for them, the risk is significantly higher than 10 in 100,000, as they make up the bulk of these injuries.<\/p>\n<h2>Effects on Reproductive Health Are Unknown<\/h2>\n<p>The consent form also specifies that the effect on sperm, fetuses and nursing children are unknown. Yet health authorities and media have espoused as \u201cfact\u201d that the shot does not affect reproductive health or fertility and is perfectly safe for pregnant and nursing mothers.<\/p>\n<p>If an effect is unknown, by definition you cannot claim it to be harmless. If you do, you are lying, plain and simple, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention director Dr. Rochelle Walensky is but one in a long list who is guilty of this. She has repeatedly assured the public that the jab poses no health risks to pregnant women or their babies. Here\u2019s Walensky in May 2021:<\/p>\n<div class=\"video-rwd\">\n<figure class=\"op-interactive aspect-ratio\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" id=\"iFrameResizer0\" class=\" mlazyloaded\" title=\"YouTube video player\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/WSgNTUjzwxQ?wmode=transparent&rel=0\" width=\"560\" height=\"315\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\" data-mlazyload-src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/WSgNTUjzwxQ?wmode=transparent&rel=0\" data-mce-fragment=\"1\"><\/iframe><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>And here she is, in October 2021, still claiming there are no risks.<\/p>\n<div class=\"video-rwd\">\n<figure class=\"op-interactive aspect-ratio\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" id=\"iFrameResizer1\" class=\" mlazyloaded\" title=\"YouTube video player\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/yKh_kPptRGY?wmode=transparent&rel=0\" width=\"560\" height=\"315\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\" data-mlazyload-src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/yKh_kPptRGY?wmode=transparent&rel=0\" data-mce-fragment=\"1\"><\/iframe><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>Similarly, in August 2021, when Comirnaty was licensed, Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, claimed the COVID jab was safe during pregnancy:<\/p>\n<div class=\"video-rwd has-figcaption\">\n<figure class=\"op-interactive aspect-ratio\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" id=\"iFrameResizer2\" class=\" mlazyloaded\" src=\"https:\/\/www.c-span.org\/video\/standalone\/?c4975287\/dr-fauci-urges-pregnant-women-vaccinated\" width=\"560\" height=\"350\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\" data-mlazyload-src=\"https:\/\/www.c-span.org\/video\/standalone\/?c4975287\/dr-fauci-urges-pregnant-women-vaccinated\" data-mce-fragment=\"1\"><\/iframe><figcaption class=\"op-center op-large\"><strong>Video may not work on all browsers<\/strong><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) also make definitive statements about safety, claiming \u201cVaccination may occur in any trimester, and emphasis should be on vaccine receipt as soon as possible to maximize maternal and fetal health.\u201d<sup><span id=\"edn2\" data-hash=\"#ednref2\">2<\/span><\/sup> Yet even the Comirnaty label<sup><span id=\"edn3\" data-hash=\"#ednref3\">3<\/span>,<\/sup><sup><span id=\"edn4\" data-hash=\"#ednref4\">4<\/span><\/sup> states that \u201cavailable data on Comirnaty administered to pregnant women are insufficient to inform vaccine associated risks in pregnancy.\u201d<\/p>\n<div class=\"productad\"><\/div>\n<h2>Antibody-Dependent Enhancement Has Not Been Ruled Out<\/h2>\n<p>Many who have warned about the possibility of mRNA shots causing antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) \u2014 a situation in which you end up being more susceptible to serious infection than you would have been otherwise \u2014 have been smeared and demonized by media and labeled as disinformation spreaders.<\/p>\n<p>Yet Pfizer\u2019s own consent form clearly states: \u201cAlthough not seen to date, it cannot yet be ruled out that the studied vaccine can make a later COVID-19 illness more severe.\u201d As noted by Iversen, if ADE truly was of no concern at all, the consent form would not include it. Yet there it is.<\/p>\n<p>Vaccine-associated enhanced disease (VAED) is also listed as an \u201cImportant Potential Risk\u201d in Table 5 on page 11 of a document called \u201c5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports.\u201d<sup><span id=\"edn5\" data-hash=\"#ednref5\">5<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n<p>As of February 28, 2021, Pfizer had 138 cases of suspected VAED, 75 of which were severe, resulting in hospitalization, disability, life-threatening consequences or death; a total of 38 cases turned out to be lethal and 65 remained unresolved.<sup><span id=\"edn6\" data-hash=\"#ednref6\">6<\/span>,<\/sup><sup><span id=\"edn7\" data-hash=\"#ednref7\">7<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n<p>Moreover, as noted by the Daily Expose,<sup><span id=\"edn8\" data-hash=\"#ednref8\">8<\/span><\/sup> \u201cPhase 3 clinical trials are designed to uncover frequent or severe side effects before a vaccine is approved for use, including ADE. But herein lies the problem, [because] none of the COVID-19 vaccines have completed Phase 3 trials.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Pfizer\u2019s Phase 3 trial is due to be completed February 8, 2024<sup><span id=\"edn9\" data-hash=\"#ednref9\">9<\/span><\/sup> \u2014 nearly two years from now! Despite that, Pfizer concluded in its FDA submission that \u201cNone of the 75 cases could be definitively considered as VAED.\u201d<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>\u201c[H]ow on earth could they not definitively conclude that VAED was to blame when 75% of the confirmed \u2018break-through\u2019 cases reported to them were severe disease resulting in hospitalization, disability, life-threatening consequences of death?\u201d<\/em> The Daily Expose asks.<sup><span id=\"edn10\" data-hash=\"#ednref10\">10<\/span><\/sup><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<h2>Pfizer Knew About Immunosuppression<\/h2>\n<p>Another revealing statement found in the documents is this:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>\u201cClinical laboratory evaluation showed a transient decrease in lymphocytes that was observed in all age and dose groups after Dose 1, which resolved within approximately one week …\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>In other words, Pfizer knew that, in the first week after the shot, people of all ages experienced transient immunosuppression, or put another way, a temporary weakening of the immune system, after the first dose.<\/p>\n<p>As noted by Iversen, this may have skewed infection rates, as people were not considered partially vaccinated until 14 days after their first shot,<sup><span id=\"edn11\" data-hash=\"#ednref11\">11<\/span><\/sup> and officially fully vaccinated two weeks after the second dose.<\/p>\n<p>If people are susceptible to infection during that first week, yet are counted as unvaccinated during that time, this makes it appear as though the unvaccinated are more prone to infection when that\u2019s simply not true. Pfizer\u2019s own trial showed infection was significantly more common in the vaccine group than the placebo group \u2014 409 versus 287 \u2014 within the first seven days of the jab.<sup><span id=\"edn12\" data-hash=\"#ednref12\">12<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n<h2>Fully Vaxxed Are More Likely to Die From COVID<\/h2>\n<p>The fact that Pfizer and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration were aware the shot caused immunosuppression is incriminating, now that U.K. government data show that, compared to the unvaccinated, those who have received two doses are:<sup><span id=\"edn13\" data-hash=\"#ednref13\">13<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Up to three times more likely to be diagnosed with COVID-19<\/li>\n<li>Twice more likely to be hospitalized with COVID-19<\/li>\n<li>Three times more likely to die of COVID-19<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The Pfizer documents admit there was a temporary drop in immune function after the first dose, but the real-world data showing an increased risk of severe infection and death due to COVID among the double jabbed suggest ADE may indeed be at play later on as well.<\/p>\n<p>The chart below, created by the Daily Expose,<sup><span id=\"edn14\" data-hash=\"#ednref14\">14<\/span><\/sup> using data from the UKHSA Vaccine Surveillance Report for week 13, 2022<sup><span id=\"edn15\" data-hash=\"#ednref15\">15<\/span><\/sup> (pages 40 and 45), reveals who\u2019s more likely to get COVID. And the infection rate for triple-vaxxed is even higher than the double vaxxed.<\/p>\n<div class=\"center-img\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\" mlazyloaded\" src=\"https:\/\/media.mercola.com\/ImageServer\/public\/2022\/April\/covid-19-case-rate.jpg\" alt=\"covid-19 case rate\" data-mlazyload-src=\"https:\/\/media.mercola.com\/ImageServer\/public\/2022\/April\/covid-19-case-rate.jpg\" \/><\/div>\n<p>The next chart was created by the Daily Expose<sup><span id=\"edn16\" data-hash=\"#ednref16\">16<\/span><\/sup> using data from pages 41 and 45, comparing COVID hospitalization rates.<\/p>\n<div class=\"center-img\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\" mlazyloaded\" src=\"https:\/\/media.mercola.com\/ImageServer\/public\/2022\/April\/covid-19-hospitalization-rate.jpg\" alt=\"covid-19 hospitalization rate\" data-mlazyload-src=\"https:\/\/media.mercola.com\/ImageServer\/public\/2022\/April\/covid-19-hospitalization-rate.jpg\" \/><\/div>\n<p>And, finally, there is a comparison of the death rates, based on pages 44 and 45 of the UKHSA Vaccine Surveillance Report for week 13, 2022.<sup><span id=\"edn17\" data-hash=\"#ednref17\">17<\/span><\/sup> Anyone over the age of 40 who has been double jabbed is now more likely to die of COVID than an unvaccinated person of the same age.<\/p>\n<div class=\"center-img\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\" mlazyloaded\" src=\"https:\/\/media.mercola.com\/ImageServer\/public\/2022\/April\/covid-19-death-rate.jpg\" alt=\"covid-19 death rate\" data-mlazyload-src=\"https:\/\/media.mercola.com\/ImageServer\/public\/2022\/April\/covid-19-death-rate.jpg\" \/><\/div>\n<h2>Negative Vaccine Effectiveness in the Real World<\/h2>\n<p>The Daily Expose goes on to calculate and graph the real-world effectiveness rate of the COVID jab, and it\u2019s dire news:<sup><span id=\"edn18\" data-hash=\"#ednref18\">18<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>\u201cIf the rates per 100,000 are higher among the vaccinated, which they are, then this means the COVID-19 injections are proving to have a negative effectiveness in the real-world. And by using Pfizer\u2019s vaccine effectiveness formula we can accurately decipher what the real-world effectiveness among each age group actually is.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><em>Pfizer\u2019s vaccine formula: Unvaccinated Rate per 100k \u2013 Vaccinated Rate per 100k \/ Unvaccinated Rate per 100k x 100 = Vaccine Effectiveness …<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><em>This data shows that all double vaccinated people over age 18 are between 2 and 3 times more likely to be infected, with a minus-87% vaccine effectiveness among 18 to 29 year olds, and a minus-178% vaccine effectiveness among the over 80\u2019s.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><em>[A]ll double vaccinated people over age 30 are between 0.2 and 2 times more likely to be hospitalized, with a minus-1% vaccine effectiveness among 30 to 39 year olds, and a minus-76% vaccine effectiveness among the over 80\u2019s.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><em>The following chart shows the real world COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against death among the double vaccinated population in England, based on the death rates provided above …<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><em>[A]ll double vaccinated people over age 40 are between 2 and 3 times more likely to die of COVID-19, with a minus-90% vaccine effectiveness among 30 to 39 year olds, and a minus-156% vaccine effectiveness among the over 80\u2019s.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<div class=\"center-img\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\" mlazyloaded\" src=\"https:\/\/media.mercola.com\/ImageServer\/public\/2022\/April\/covid-19-vaccine-effectiveness.jpg\" alt=\"covid-19 vaccine effectiveness\" data-mlazyload-src=\"https:\/\/media.mercola.com\/ImageServer\/public\/2022\/April\/covid-19-vaccine-effectiveness.jpg\" \/><\/div>\n<h2>Pfizer Hired 600 to Process Unprecedented Report Load<\/h2>\n<p>For the last two years, we\u2019ve been keeping an eye on the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), shaking our heads in disbelief as the numbers shot up by the hundreds every single week, rapidly outpacing injuries for every other vaccine combined over the past 32 years.<sup><span id=\"edn19\" data-hash=\"#ednref19\">19<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n<p>As of March 25, 2022, there were 1,205,753 COVID jab-related reports, including 145,781 hospitalizations and 26,396 deaths.<sup><span id=\"edn20\" data-hash=\"#ednref20\">20<\/span><\/sup> There has never been a medical product in modern history that can compare. Nothing has been as injurious and lethal as these experimental injections.<\/p>\n<aside class=\"takeaway tamiddle\">Between December 2020 and the end of February 2021, Pfizer shipped out 126,212,580 doses of its mRNA jab worldwide. Divided by 158,000 side effects, we get an adverse event rate per dose of nearly 1:800.<\/aside>\n<p>In an earlier batch of documents, we learned Pfizer received 42,086 case reports containing a total of 158,893 events in the first three months of the rollout. In that release, the number of doses shipped was redacted, but in the April 1, 2022, release, it was left unredacted, which means we can now calculate the rate of adverse events reported to Pfizer in those first three months.<\/p>\n<p>Between December 2020 and the end of February 2021, Pfizer shipped out 126,212,580 doses of its mRNA jab worldwide. Divided by 158,000 side effects, we get an adverse event rate per dose of nearly 1 in 800,<sup><span id=\"edn21\" data-hash=\"#ednref21\">21<\/span><\/sup> which is just crazy irresponsible.<\/p>\n<p>We now also have documentation showing Pfizer, by the end of February 2021, had hired 600 additional full-time employees to process the unprecedented influx of adverse event reports, and they predicted that by the end of June 2021, they\u2019d end up hiring more than 1,800.<sup><span id=\"edn22\" data-hash=\"#ednref22\">22<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n<p>In the end, the COVID jab will go down in history as the biggest medical malfeasance ever to occur with the willing participation of both drug companies and regulatory agencies. And there\u2019s no end in sight.<\/p>\n<p>In March 2022, the FDA went ahead and authorized doses 4 and 5, based on a preprint study<sup><span id=\"edn23\" data-hash=\"#ednref23\">23<\/span>,<\/sup><sup><span id=\"edn24\" data-hash=\"#ednref24\">24<\/span><\/sup> that found a fourth Moderna shot was 11% effective and caused side effects in 40% of recipients, and a fourth Pfizer shot was 30% effective and caused side effects in 80% of people.<\/p>\n<p>I\u2019m not sure what it\u2019ll take for this public health nightmare to end and for the responsible parties to be held to account for their criminal negligence, but apparently, we\u2019ve not hit critical mass outrage yet.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"bcr_divfootnote\" class=\"sources-references narrow-width\">\n<h3 id=\"heading\" class=\"title link16\" data-jsid=\"sourcesReferencesBtn\">– Sources and References<\/h3>\n<div id=\"contentrefsources\" class=\"contentrefsources\" data-jsid=\"sourcesReferences\">\n<div class=\"sources sourcesfoot\"><\/div>\n<div id=\"bcr_divReferences\" class=\"references\">\n<ul id=\"footnote-references2\">\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref1\" data-hash=\"#edn1\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">1,<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<sup><span id=\"ednref12\" data-hash=\"#edn12\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">12<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"https:\/\/nakedemperor.substack.com\/p\/new-pfizer-document-shows-immunosuppression?s=r&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The Naked Emperor Substack March 29, 2022<\/a><\/li>\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref2\" data-hash=\"#edn2\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">2,<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<sup><span id=\"ednref3\" data-hash=\"#edn3\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">3<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"https:\/\/childrenshealthdefense.org\/defender\/pfizer-fda-documents-contradict-covid-vaccine-safety-narrative\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The Defender March 15, 2022<\/a><\/li>\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref4\" data-hash=\"#edn4\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">4<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"https:\/\/merylnass.substack.com\/p\/official-documents-reveal-enormous?token=&s=r\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Meryl Nass Substack March 14, 2022<\/a><\/li>\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref5\" data-hash=\"#edn5\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">5,<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<sup><span id=\"ednref6\" data-hash=\"#edn6\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">6<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"https:\/\/phmpt.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/reissue_5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports, Page 11, Table 5<\/a><\/li>\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref7\" data-hash=\"#edn7\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">7,<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<sup><span id=\"ednref8\" data-hash=\"#edn8\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">8,<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<sup><span id=\"ednref10\" data-hash=\"#edn10\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">10,<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<sup><span id=\"ednref13\" data-hash=\"#edn13\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">13,<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<sup><span id=\"ednref14\" data-hash=\"#edn14\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">14,<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<sup><span id=\"ednref16\" data-hash=\"#edn16\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">16,<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<sup><span id=\"ednref18\" data-hash=\"#edn18\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">18<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"https:\/\/dailyexpose.uk\/2022\/04\/03\/confidential-pfizer-docs-official-gov-data-vaccinated-suffering-ade\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Daily Expose April 3, 2022<\/a><\/li>\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref9\" data-hash=\"#edn9\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">9<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"https:\/\/clinicaltrials.gov\/ct2\/show\/NCT04368728\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Clinical Trials NCT04368728<\/a><\/li>\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref11\" data-hash=\"#edn11\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">11<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"https:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/mmwr\/volumes\/70\/wr\/mm7011e3.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">MMWR March 19, 2021; 70(11): 396-401<\/a><\/li>\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref15\" data-hash=\"#edn15\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">15,<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<sup><span id=\"ednref17\" data-hash=\"#edn17\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">17<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"https:\/\/assets.publishing.service.gov.uk\/government\/uploads\/system\/uploads\/attachment_data\/file\/1066759\/Vaccine-surveillance-report-week-13.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">UKHSA Vaccine Surveillance Report for week 13, 2022<\/a><\/li>\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref19\" data-hash=\"#edn19\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">19,<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<sup><span id=\"ednref21\" data-hash=\"#edn21\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">21,<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<sup><span id=\"ednref22\" data-hash=\"#edn22\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">22<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"https:\/\/childrenshealthdefense.org\/defender\/pfizer-hired-600-people-vaccine-injury-reports\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The Defender April 5, 2022<\/a><\/li>\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref20\" data-hash=\"#edn20\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">20<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"https:\/\/openvaers.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">OpenVAERS As of March 25, 2022<\/a><\/li>\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref23\" data-hash=\"#edn23\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">23<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"https:\/\/www.medrxiv.org\/content\/10.1101\/2022.02.15.22270948v1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">MedRxiv February 15, 2022, DOI: 10.1101\/2022.02.15.22270948<\/a><\/li>\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref24\" data-hash=\"#edn24\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">24<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nejm.org\/doi\/full\/10.1056\/NEJMc2202542\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">NEJM Correspondence March 16, 2022 DOI: 10.1056\/NEJMc2202542<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>___<br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/articles.mercola.com\/sites\/articles\/archive\/2022\/04\/14\/covid-shot-caused-immunosuppression.aspx?ui=2ef086a5d8d87036029a1c887166f6da30129ed82a668a2632dfe0ec90b288e9&sd=20210916&cid_source=dnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art1HL&cid=20220414&mid=DM1152390&rid=1461745506\">https:\/\/articles.mercola.com\/sites\/articles\/archive\/2022\/04\/14\/covid-shot-caused-immunosuppression.aspx?ui=2ef086a5d8d87036029a1c887166f6da30129ed82a668a2632dfe0ec90b288e9&sd=20210916&cid_source=dnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art1HL&cid=20220414&mid=DM1152390&rid=1461745506<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-112737","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/112737","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=112737"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/112737\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=112737"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=112737"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=112737"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}