{"id":114611,"date":"2022-05-03T08:54:27","date_gmt":"2022-05-03T12:54:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=114611"},"modified":"2022-05-03T13:04:27","modified_gmt":"2022-05-03T17:04:27","slug":"leaked-bombshell-supreme-court-set-to-overturn-abortion-rights","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=114611","title":{"rendered":"<h1><span style=\"color: #ff00ff;\">LEAKED BOMBSHELL!<\/span> <b>Supreme Court Set To Overturn Abortion Rights<\/b><\/h1>"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_114612\" style=\"width: 650px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-114612\" class=\"wp-image-114612 size-large\" src=\"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/www.politico-1024x682.webp\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"426\" srcset=\"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/www.politico-1024x682.webp 1024w, http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/www.politico-300x200.webp 300w, http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/www.politico-768x512.webp 768w, http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/www.politico.webp 1160w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-114612\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Abortion rights supporters and anti-abortion demonstrators rally outside the U.S. Supreme Court on Nov. 1, 2021. | Drew Angerer\/Getty Images<\/p><\/div>\n<h1><strong>Supreme Court has voted to overturn abortion rights, draft opinion shows<\/strong><\/h1>\n<h3 class=\"dek\">\u201cWe hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled,\u201d Justice Alito writes in an initial majority draft circulated inside the court.<\/h3>\n<section class=\"page-content__row page-content__row--story mobile-spacing\">\n<div class=\"container container--story story-layout--fluid-fixed\">\n<div class=\"container__column container__column--story\">\n<div class=\"container__row container__row--story story-layout--fixed-fluid\">\n<div class=\"container__column container__column--story center-horizontally\">\n<div class=\"story-text\">\n<p>By JOSH GERSTEIN and ALEXANDER WARD<br \/>\nPOLITICO<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \">The Supreme Court has voted to strike down the landmark\u00a0<i>Roe v. Wade<\/i>\u00a0decision, according to an\u00a0<a class=\" js-tealium-tracking \" href=\"https:\/\/www.politico.com\/news\/2022\/05\/02\/read-justice-alito-initial-abortion-opinion-overturn-roe-v-wade-pdf-00029504\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" data-debug-source-uuid=\"00000180-8763-d3ee-a392-97fbdfc80000\" data-debug-source-site=\"POLITICO\" data-tracking=\"mpos=&amp;mid=&amp;lindex=&amp;lcol=\" aria-label=\"initial draft majority opinion (opens in a new window)\">initial draft majority opinion<\/a>\u00a0written by Justice Samuel Alito circulated inside the court and obtained by POLITICO.<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \">The draft opinion is a full-throated, unflinching repudiation of the 1973 decision which guaranteed federal constitutional protections of abortion rights and a subsequent 1992 decision \u2013\u00a0<i>Planned Parenthood v. Casey<\/i>\u00a0\u2013 that largely maintained the right. \u201c<i>Roe<\/i>\u00a0was egregiously wrong from the start,\u201d Alito writes.<\/p>\n<div id=\"pol-05-wrap\" class=\" content-group ad\" aria-label=\"Advertisement\">\n<div id=\"pol-05\" class=\"ad-slot placeholder placeholder--250 \" aria-hidden=\"true\" data-ad-refresh=\"30\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \">\u201cWe hold that\u00a0<i>Roe<\/i>\u00a0and\u00a0<i>Casey<\/i>\u00a0must be overruled,\u201d he writes in the document, labeled as the \u201cOpinion of the Court.\u201d \u201cIt is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people\u2019s elected representatives.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"container__column container__column--story hide-under-small\">\n<div id=\"pol-02-wrap\" class=\" content-group ad\" aria-label=\"Advertisement\">\n<div id=\"pol-02\" class=\"ad-slot placeholder placeholder--250 \" aria-hidden=\"true\" data-ad-refresh=\"30\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<section class=\"page-content__row page-content__row--story main-section\" data-content-section=\"0\">\n<div class=\"container container--story story-layout--fixed-fluid\">\n<div class=\"container__column container__column--story center-horizontally hide-under-medium\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"container__column container__column--story\">\n<div class=\"container__row container__row--story story-layout--fluid-fixed\">\n<div class=\"container__column container__column--story center-horizontally\">\n<div class=\"story-text\">\n<aside class=\"story-enhancement standard\" data-content-child-index=\"0-0\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"SCOTUS Initial Draft (Hosted by DocumentCloud)\" src=\"https:\/\/embed.documentcloud.org\/documents\/21835435-scotus-initial-draft\/?embed=1&amp;responsive=1&amp;title=1\" width=\"700\" height=\"905\" sandbox=\"allow-scripts allow-same-origin allow-popups allow-forms allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox\" data-mce-fragment=\"1\"><\/iframe><\/aside>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \" data-content-child-index=\"0-1\">Deliberations on controversial cases have in the past been fluid. Justices can and sometimes do change their votes as draft opinions circulate and major decisions can be subject to multiple drafts and vote-trading, sometimes until just days before a decision is unveiled. The court\u2019s holding will not be final until it is published, likely in the next two months.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<section class=\"page-content__row page-content__row--story main-section\">\n<div class=\"container container--story story-layout--fixed-fluid\">\n<div class=\"container__column container__column--story\">\n<div class=\"container__row container__row--story story-layout--fluid-fixed\">\n<div class=\"container__column container__column--story center-horizontally\">\n<div class=\"story-text\">\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \">The immediate impact of the ruling as drafted in February would be to end a half-century guarantee of federal constitutional protection of abortion rights and allow each state to decide whether to restrict or ban abortion. It\u2019s unclear if there have been subsequent changes to the draft.<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \">No draft decision in the modern history of the court has been disclosed publicly while a case was still pending. The unprecedented revelation is bound to intensify the debate over what was already the most controversial case on the docket this term.<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \">The draft opinion offers an extraordinary window into the justices\u2019 deliberations in one of the most consequential cases before the court in the last five decades. Some court-watchers predicted that the conservative majority would slice away at abortion rights without flatly overturning a 49-year-old precedent. The draft shows that the court is looking to reject\u00a0<i>Roe<\/i>\u2019s logic and legal protections.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"container__column container__column--story center-vertically right-zone hide-under-small\" aria-hidden=\"true\">\n<div id=\"aside-2\" class=\"story-enhancement\" data-aside-index=\"2\">\n<div class=\"ad\" aria-label=\"Advertisement\">\n<div id=\"pol-07-small-102\" class=\"ad-slot js-lazy-load\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<section class=\"page-content__row page-content__row--story is-medium-width\">\n<div class=\"container container--story\">\n<div class=\"container__column container__column--story\">\n<aside class=\"story-enhancement bump-out has-borders \">\n<blockquote class=\"pullquote\">\n<p class=\"pullquote__text\">\u201c<i>Roe<\/i>\u00a0was egregiously wrong from the start. Its reasoning was exceptionally weak, and the decision has had damaging consequences. And far from bringing about a national settlement of the abortion issue,\u00a0<i>Roe<\/i>\u00a0and\u00a0<i>Casey<\/i>\u00a0have enflamed debate and deepened division.\u201d<\/p>\n<footer>\n<p class=\"pullquote__authors\">Justice Samuel Alito in an initial draft majority opinion<\/p>\n<\/footer>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/aside>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<section class=\"page-content__row page-content__row--story main-section\" data-content-section=\"12\">\n<div class=\"container container--story story-layout--fixed-fluid\">\n<div class=\"container__column container__column--story\">\n<div class=\"container__row container__row--story story-layout--fluid-fixed\">\n<div class=\"container__column container__column--story center-horizontally\">\n<div class=\"story-text\">\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \" data-content-child-index=\"1-0\">A person familiar with the court\u2019s deliberations said that four of the other Republican-appointed justices \u2013 Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett \u2013 had voted with Alito in the conference held among the justices after hearing oral arguments in December, and that line-up remains unchanged as of this week.<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \" data-content-child-index=\"1-1\">The three Democratic-appointed justices \u2013 Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan \u2013 are working on one or more dissents, according to the person. How Chief Justice John Roberts will ultimately vote, and whether he will join an already written opinion or draft his own, is unclear.<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \" data-content-child-index=\"1-2\">The document, labeled as a first draft of the majority opinion, includes a notation that it was circulated among the justices on Feb. 10. If the Alito draft is adopted, it would rule in favor of Mississippi in the closely watched case over that state\u2019s attempt to ban most abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy.<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \" data-content-child-index=\"1-3\">A Supreme Court spokesperson declined to comment or make another representative of the court available to answer questions about the draft document.<\/p>\n<aside class=\"story-enhancement standard has-borders \" data-content-child-index=\"1-4\"><\/aside>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \" data-content-child-index=\"1-5\">POLITICO received a copy of the draft opinion from a person familiar with the court\u2019s proceedings in the Mississippi case along with other details supporting the authenticity of the document. The draft opinion runs 98 pages, including a 31-page appendix of historical state abortion laws. The document is replete with citations to previous court decisions, books and other authorities, and includes 118 footnotes. The appearances and timing of this draft are consistent with court practice.<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \" data-content-child-index=\"1-6\">The disclosure of Alito\u2019s draft majority opinion \u2013 a rare breach of Supreme Court secrecy and tradition around its deliberations \u2013 comes as all sides in the abortion debate are girding for the ruling. Speculation about the looming decision has been intense since the December oral arguments indicated a majority was inclined to support the Mississippi law.<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \" data-content-child-index=\"1-7\">Under longstanding court procedures, justices hold preliminary votes on cases shortly after argument and assign a member of the majority to write a draft of the court\u2019s opinion. The draft is often amended in consultation with other justices, and in some cases the justices change their votes altogether, creating the possibility that the current alignment on\u00a0<i>Dobbs v. Jackson Women\u2019s Health Organization<\/i>\u00a0could change.<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \" data-content-child-index=\"1-8\">The chief justice typically assigns majority opinions when he is in the majority. When he is not, that decision is typically made by the most senior justice in the majority.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"story-text__heading-large has-bottom-margin\" data-content-child-index=\"1-9\">\u2018Exceptionally weak\u2019<\/h2>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \" data-content-child-index=\"1-10\">A George W. Bush appointee who joined the court in 2006, Alito argues that the 1973 abortion rights ruling was an ill-conceived and deeply flawed decision that invented a right mentioned nowhere in the Constitution and unwisely sought to wrench the contentious issue away from the political branches of government.<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \" data-content-child-index=\"1-10\">Alito\u2019s draft ruling would overturn a decision by the New Orleans-based 5th Circuit Court of Appeals that found the Mississippi law ran afoul of Supreme Court precedent by seeking to effectively ban abortions before viability.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<section class=\"page-content__row page-content__row--story main-section\" data-content-section=\"26\">\n<div class=\"container container--story story-layout--fixed-fluid\">\n<div class=\"container__column container__column--story\">\n<div class=\"container__row container__row--story story-layout--fluid-fixed\">\n<div class=\"container__column container__column--story center-horizontally\">\n<div class=\"story-text\">\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \" data-content-child-index=\"1-1\"><i>Roe<\/i>\u2019s \u201csurvey of history ranged from the constitutionally irrelevant to the plainly incorrect,\u201d Alito continues, adding that its reasoning was \u201cexceptionally weak,\u201d and that the original decision has had \u201cdamaging consequences.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \" data-content-child-index=\"1-2\">\u201cThe inescapable conclusion is that a right to abortion is not deeply rooted in the Nation\u2019s history and traditions,\u201d Alito writes.<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \" data-content-child-index=\"1-3\">Alito approvingly quotes a broad range of critics of the\u00a0<i>Roe<\/i>\u00a0decision. He also points to liberal icons such as the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Harvard Law Professor Laurence Tribe, who at certain points in their careers took issue with the reasoning in\u00a0<i>Roe\u00a0<\/i>or its impact on the political process.<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \" data-content-child-index=\"1-4\">Alito\u2019s skewering of\u00a0<i>Roe\u00a0<\/i>and the endorsement of at least four other justices for that unsparing critique is also a measure of the court\u2019s rightward turn in recent decades.\u00a0<i>Roe\u00a0<\/i>was decided 7-2 in 1973, with five Republican appointees joining two justices nominated by Democratic presidents.<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \" data-content-child-index=\"1-5\">The overturning of\u00a0<i>Roe\u00a0<\/i>would almost immediately lead to stricter limits on abortion access in large swaths of the South and Midwest, with about half of the states set to immediately impose broad abortion bans. Any state could still legally allow the procedure.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<aside class=\"story-enhancement standard has-borders \" data-content-child-index=\"1-6\">\n<section class=\"media-item orient--horizontal-fixed-fluid parenthetical \">\n<div class=\"media-item__image\">\n<div class=\"media-item__image-wrapper\"><a class=\" js-tealium-tracking \" href=\"https:\/\/www.politico.com\/news\/2022\/05\/02\/read-justice-alito-initial-abortion-opinion-overturn-roe-v-wade-pdf-00029504\" data-tracking=\"mpos=&amp;mid=&amp;lindex=&amp;lcol=\"><picture><source srcset=\"https:\/\/www.politico.com\/dims4\/default\/d1b5532\/2147483647\/strip\/true\/crop\/1386x1109+0+154\/resize\/250x200!\/format\/webp\/quality\/90\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.politico.com%2F08%2F5b%2Ffe3be6ba43b99770ba7ac2c03598%2Fscreen-shot-2022-05-02-at-20.51.46.png\" type=\"image\/webp\" \/><source srcset=\"https:\/\/www.politico.com\/dims4\/default\/aa938bd\/2147483647\/strip\/true\/crop\/1386x1109+0+154\/resize\/250x200!\/quality\/90\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.politico.com%2F08%2F5b%2Ffe3be6ba43b99770ba7ac2c03598%2Fscreen-shot-2022-05-02-at-20.51.46.png\" \/><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"Image\" title=\"The first page of the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade opinion\" src=\"https:\/\/www.politico.com\/dims4\/default\/aa938bd\/2147483647\/strip\/true\/crop\/1386x1109+0+154\/resize\/250x200!\/quality\/90\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.politico.com%2F08%2F5b%2Ffe3be6ba43b99770ba7ac2c03598%2Fscreen-shot-2022-05-02-at-20.51.46.png\" alt=\"The first page of the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade opinion\" data-image-size=\"small1x125\" \/><\/picture><\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"media-item__summary \">\n<header class=\"summary-header\"><\/header>\n<div class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"meta__details\">\n<hr \/>\n<p class=\"authors\">\u201cThe Constitution does not prohibit the citizens of each State from regulating or prohibiting abortion,\u201d the draft concludes. \u201c<i>Roe<\/i>\u00a0and\u00a0<i>Casey<\/i>\u00a0arrogated that authority. We now overrule those decisions and return that authority to the people and their elected representatives.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/aside>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \" data-content-child-index=\"1-8\">The draft contains the type of caustic rhetorical flourishes Alito is known for and that has caused Roberts, his fellow Bush appointee, some discomfort in the past.<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \" data-content-child-index=\"1-9\">At times, Alito\u2019s draft opinion takes an almost mocking tone as it skewers the majority opinion in\u00a0<i>Roe,<\/i>\u00a0written by Justice Harry Blackmun, a Richard Nixon appointee who died in 1999.<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \" data-content-child-index=\"1-10\">\u201c<i>Roe\u00a0<\/i>expressed the \u2018feel[ing]\u2019 that the Fourteenth Amendment was the provision that did the work, but its message seemed to be that the abortion right could be found\u00a0<i>somewhere<\/i>\u00a0in the Constitution and that specifying its exact location was not of paramount importance,\u201d Alito writes.<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \" data-content-child-index=\"1-11\">Alito declares that one of the central tenets of\u00a0<i>Roe<\/i>, the \u201cviability\u201d distinction between fetuses not capable of living outside the womb and those which can, \u201cmakes no sense.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \" data-content-child-index=\"1-11\">In several passages, he describes doctors and nurses who terminate pregnancies as \u201cabortionists.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \" data-content-child-index=\"1-14\">When Roberts voted with liberal jurists in 2020 to block a Louisiana law imposing heavier regulations on abortion clinics, his\u00a0<a class=\" js-tealium-tracking \" href=\"https:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/supremecourt\/text\/18-1323#writing-18-1323_CONCUR_4\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" data-tracking=\"mpos=&amp;mid=&amp;lindex=&amp;lcol=\" aria-label=\"solo concurrence (opens in a new window)\"><u>solo concurrence<\/u><\/a>\u00a0used the more neutral term \u201cabortion providers.\u201d In contrast, Justice Clarence Thomas used the word \u201cabortionist\u201d 25 times in\u00a0<a class=\" js-tealium-tracking \" href=\"https:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/supremecourt\/text\/18-1323#writing-18-1323_DISSENT_5\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" data-tracking=\"mpos=&amp;mid=&amp;lindex=&amp;lcol=\" aria-label=\"a solo dissent (opens in a new window)\"><u>a solo dissent<\/u><\/a>\u00a0in the same case.<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \" data-content-child-index=\"1-15\">Alito\u2019s use of the phrase \u201cegregiously wrong\u201d to describe\u00a0<i>Roe<\/i>\u00a0echoes language Mississippi Solicitor General Scott Stewart used in December in defending his state\u2019s ban on abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy. The phrase was also contained in\u00a0<a class=\" js-tealium-tracking \" href=\"https:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/supremecourt\/text\/18-5924#writing-18-5924_CONCUR_5\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" data-tracking=\"mpos=&amp;mid=&amp;lindex=&amp;lcol=\" aria-label=\"an opinion (opens in a new window)\">an opinion<\/a> Kavanaugh wrote as part of a 2020 ruling that jury convictions in criminal cases must be unanimous.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<section class=\"page-content__row page-content__row--story main-section\" data-content-section=\"42\">\n<div class=\"container container--story story-layout--fixed-fluid\">\n<div class=\"container__column container__column--story\">\n<div class=\"container__row container__row--story story-layout--fluid-fixed\">\n<div class=\"container__column container__column--story center-horizontally\">\n<div class=\"story-text\">\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \" data-content-child-index=\"1-0\">In that opinion, Kavanaugh labeled two well-known Supreme Court decisions \u201cegregiously wrong when decided\u201d: the 1944 ruling upholding the detention of Japanese Americans during World War II,\u00a0<i>Korematsu v. United States<\/i>, and the 1896 decision that blessed racial segregation under the rubric of \u201cseparate but equal,\u201d\u00a0<i>Plessy v. Ferguson.<\/i><\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \" data-content-child-index=\"1-1\">The high court has never formally overturned\u00a0<i>Korematsu<\/i>, but did\u00a0<a class=\" js-tealium-tracking \" href=\"https:\/\/www.politico.com\/story\/2018\/06\/26\/supreme-court-overturns-korematsu-673846\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" data-tracking=\"mpos=&amp;mid=&amp;lindex=&amp;lcol=\" aria-label=\"repudiate the decision (opens in a new window)\"><u>repudiate the decision<\/u><\/a>\u00a0in a 2018 ruling by Roberts that upheld then-President Donald Trump\u2019s travel ban policy.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"story-text__heading-large has-bottom-margin\" data-content-child-index=\"1-2\">The legacy of Plessy v. Ferguson<\/h2>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \" data-content-child-index=\"1-3\"><i>Plessy<\/i>\u00a0remained the law of the land for nearly six decades until the court overturned it with the\u00a0<i>Brown v. Board of Education<\/i>\u00a0school desegregation ruling in 1954.<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \" data-content-child-index=\"1-4\">Quoting Kavanaugh, Alito writes of\u00a0<i>Plessy<\/i>: \u201cIt was \u2018egregiously wrong,\u2019 on the day it was decided.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \" data-content-child-index=\"1-5\">Alito\u2019s draft opinion includes, in small type, a list of about two pages\u2019 worth of decisions in which the justices overruled prior precedents \u2013 in many instances reaching results praised by liberals.<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \" data-content-child-index=\"1-6\">The implication that allowing states to outlaw abortion is on par with ending legal racial segregation has been hotly disputed. But the comparison underscores the conservative justices\u2019 belief that\u00a0<i>Roe<\/i>\u00a0is so flawed that the justices should disregard their usual hesitations about overturning precedent and wholeheartedly renounce it.<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \" data-content-child-index=\"1-7\">Alito\u2019s draft opinion ventures even further into this racially sensitive territory by observing in a footnote that some early proponents of abortion rights also had unsavory views in favor of eugenics.<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \" data-content-child-index=\"1-8\">\u201cSome such supporters have been motivated by a desire to suppress the size of the African American population,\u201d Alito writes. \u201cIt is beyond dispute that\u00a0<i>Roe<\/i>\u00a0has had that demographic effect. A highly disproportionate percentage of aborted fetuses are black.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \" data-content-child-index=\"1-9\">Alito writes that by raising the point he isn\u2019t casting aspersions on anyone. \u201cFor our part, we do not question the motives of either those who have supported and those who have opposed laws restricting abortion,\u201d he writes.<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \" data-content-child-index=\"1-10\">Alito also addresses concern about the impact the decision could have on public discourse. \u201cWe cannot allow our decisions to be affected by any extraneous influences such as concern about the public\u2019s reaction to our work,\u201d Alito writes. \u201cWe do not pretend to know how our political system or society will respond to today\u2019s decision overruling\u00a0<i>Roe<\/i>\u00a0and\u00a0<i>Casey<\/i>. And even if we could foresee what will happen, we would have no authority to let that knowledge influence our decision.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \" data-content-child-index=\"1-11\">In the main opinion in the 1992\u00a0<i>Casey<\/i>\u00a0decision, Justices Sandra Day O\u2019Connor, Anthony Kennedy and Davis Souter warned that the court would pay a \u201cterrible price\u201d for overruling\u00a0<i>Roe<\/i>, despite criticism of the decision from some in the public and the legal community.<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \" data-content-child-index=\"1-12\">\u201cWhile it has engendered disapproval, it has not been unworkable,\u201d the three justices wrote then. \u201cAn entire generation has come of age free to assume\u00a0<i>Roe<\/i>\u2018s concept of liberty in defining the capacity of women to act in society, and to make reproductive decisions; no erosion of principle going to liberty or personal autonomy has left\u00a0<i>Roe<\/i>\u2018s central holding a doctrinal remnant.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \" data-content-child-index=\"1-13\">When\u00a0<i>Dobbs<\/i>\u00a0was argued in December,<i>\u00a0<\/i>Roberts seemed out of sync with the other conservative justices, as he has been in a number of cases including one challenging the Affordable Care Act.<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \" data-content-child-index=\"1-14\">At the argument session last fall, Roberts seemed to be searching for a way to uphold Mississippi\u2019s 15-week ban without completely abandoning the\u00a0<i>Roe<\/i>\u00a0framework.<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \" data-content-child-index=\"1-15\">\u201cViability, it seems to me, doesn\u2019t have anything to do with choice. But, if it really is an issue about choice, why is 15 weeks not enough time?\u201d Roberts asked during the arguments. \u201cThe thing that is at issue before us today is 15 weeks.\u201d<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"story-text__heading-large has-bottom-margin\" data-content-child-index=\"1-16\">Nods to conservative colleagues<\/h2>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \" data-content-child-index=\"1-17\">While Alito\u2019s draft opinion doesn\u2019t cater much to Roberts\u2019 views, portions of it seem intended to address the specific interests of other justices. One passage argues that social attitudes toward out-of-wedlock pregnancies \u201chave changed drastically\u201d since the 1970s and that increased demand for adoption makes abortion less necessary.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<section class=\"page-content__row page-content__row--story main-section\">\n<div class=\"container container--story story-layout--fixed-fluid\">\n<div class=\"container__column container__column--story\">\n<div class=\"container__row container__row--story story-layout--fluid-fixed\">\n<div class=\"container__column container__column--story center-horizontally\">\n<div class=\"story-text\">\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \">Those points dovetail with issues that Barrett \u2013 a Trump appointee and the court\u2019s newest member \u2013 raised at the December arguments. She suggested laws allowing people to surrender newborn babies on a no-questions-asked basis mean carrying a pregnancy to term doesn\u2019t oblige one to engage in child rearing.<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \">\u201cWhy don\u2019t the safe haven laws take care of that problem?\u201d asked Barrett, who adopted two of her seven children.<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \">Much of Alito\u2019s draft is devoted to arguing that widespread criminalization of abortion during the 19th and early 20th century belies the notion that a right to abortion is implied in the Constitution.<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \">The conservative justice attached to his draft a 31-page appendix listing laws passed to criminalize abortion during that period. Alito claims \u201can unbroken tradition of prohibiting abortion on pain of criminal punishment\u2026from the earliest days of the common law until 1973.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \">\u201cUntil the latter part of the 20th century, there was no support in American law for a constitutional right to obtain an abortion. Zero. None. No state constitutional provision had recognized such a right,\u201d Alito adds.<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \">Alito\u2019s draft argues that rights protected by the Constitution but not explicitly mentioned in it \u2013 so-called unenumerated rights \u2013 must be strongly rooted in U.S. history and tradition. That form of analysis seems at odds with several of the court\u2019s recent decisions, including many of its rulings backing gay rights.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<section class=\"page-content__row page-content__row--story is-medium-width\">\n<div class=\"container container--story\">\n<div class=\"container__column container__column--story\">\n<aside class=\"story-enhancement bump-out has-borders \">\n<blockquote class=\"pullquote\">\n<hr \/>\n<p class=\"pullquote__text\"><strong>\u201cWe hold that\u00a0<i>Roe<\/i>\u00a0and\u00a0<i>Casey<\/i>\u00a0must be overruled.<br \/>\nThe Constitution makes no reference to abortion,<br \/>\nand no such right is implicitly protected by any<br \/>\nconstitutional provision&#8230;.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<footer>\n<p class=\"pullquote__authors\"><em>&#8212; Justice Samuel Alito in an initial draft majority opinion<\/em><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<\/footer>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/aside>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<section class=\"page-content__row page-content__row--story main-section\">\n<div class=\"container container--story story-layout--fixed-fluid\">\n<div class=\"container__column container__column--story center-horizontally hide-under-medium\"><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Liberal justices seem likely to take issue with Alito\u2019s assertion in the draft opinion that overturning <\/span><i style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Roe<\/i><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">\u00a0would not jeopardize other rights the courts have grounded in privacy, such as the right to contraception, to engage in private consensual sexual activity and to marry someone of the same sex.<\/span><\/div>\n<div class=\"container__column container__column--story\">\n<div class=\"container__row container__row--story story-layout--fluid-fixed\">\n<div class=\"container__column container__column--story center-horizontally\">\n<div class=\"story-text\">\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \">\u201cWe emphasize that our decision concerns the constitutional right to abortion and no other right,\u201d Alito writes. \u201cNothing in this opinion should be understood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \">Alito\u2019s draft opinion rejects the idea that abortion bans reflect the subjugation of women in American society. \u201cWomen are not without electoral or political power,\u201d he writes. \u201cThe percentage of women who register to vote and cast ballots is consistently higher than the percentage of men who do so.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \">The Supreme Court remains one of Washington\u2019s most secretive institutions, priding itself on protecting the confidentiality of its internal deliberations.<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \">\u201cAt the Supreme Court, those who know don\u2019t talk, and those who talk don\u2019t know,\u201d Ginsburg was fond of saying.<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \">That tight-lipped reputation has eroded somewhat in recent decades due to a series of books by law clerks, law professors and investigative journalists. Some of these authors clearly had access to draft opinions such as the one obtained by POLITICO, but their books emerged well after the cases in question were resolved.<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-text__paragraph \">The justices held their final arguments of the current term on Wednesday. The court has set a series of sessions over the next two months to release rulings in its still-unresolved cases, including the Mississippi abortion case.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<p>___<br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.politico.com\/news\/2022\/05\/02\/supreme-court-abortion-draft-opinion-00029473\">https:\/\/www.politico.com\/news\/2022\/05\/02\/supreme-court-abortion-draft-opinion-00029473<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-114611","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114611","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=114611"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114611\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=114611"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=114611"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=114611"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}