![\"\"](\"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/A-devastated-nation-featured-image-.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Guest Post<\/p>\n
There is evidence that the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC), as well as the governments of Italy and China \u2013 and thus likely many other governments \u2013 are or have been essentially cooking their COVID books to fake an epidemic by falsely counting deaths from other conditions as COVID or \u201cCOVID-associated\u201d deaths. The Chinese in particular appear to have faked the virus, as they have neither isolated, photographed or biochemically and structurally characterized it, nor have they or world scientists subjected it to peer review. A UC Davis \u201cgenomic data scientist\u201d\u00a0computer-modeled<\/a>\u00a0the presumed new virus\u2019s structure.<\/p>\n In reality this may have more to do with the existential question of the virus, very interesting material about which is still forthcoming. Suffice it to say preliminarily: One cannot culture and grow a virus in a petri dish like a bacterium can be grown. This is well known to scientists. Culturing a virus requires the addition of other cells, which are then, if there are \u201ccytopathic\u201d changes to the cell, presumed to have been caused by what is presumed to be a virus. From Wikipedia:<\/p>\n Viral culture is a laboratory test in which samples are placed with a cell type that the virus being tested for is able to infect. If the cells show changes, known as\u00a0cytopathic effects<\/a>, then the culture is positive.[1]<\/sup><\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n What the Chinese (along with some Australian scientists) have done is\u00a0sequence a nucleic acid<\/a>\u00a0in some material they suspected but did not confirm of causing antibiotic-resistant pneumonia, which is found\u00a0here<\/a>. Why should they have conclusively assumed a virus was to blame? Antibiotic-resistant bacteria is known to be a top global health problem,\u00a0cited as such<\/a>\u00a0by the World Health Organization (WHO) and in\u00a0many<\/a>\u00a0scientific papers<\/a>. And pneumonia due to air pollution is well known to be an actual epidemic in China, especially Wuhan, which saw\u00a0vigorous air pollution protests\u00a0<\/a>in the summer of 2019. Still the Chinese CDC recorded the cause as\u00a0\u201cunknown origin\u201d.<\/a><\/p>\n Earlier in the alleged global pandemic crisis, it was found that a\u00a0change in counting methods<\/a>\u00a0created a soaring death toll in China. Hubei province, which accounted for roughly 80% of Chinese cases, saw its greatest one-day jump \u2013 a familiar pattern also seen in other countries \u2013 when officials decided to use \u201clung imaging\u201d (i.e., a CT scan) instead of PCR (polymerase chain reaction) tests to \u201cclinically diagnose\u201d patients. \u201cIf lung images show pneumonia, patients who are already marked as suspected cases are confirmed as infected without the need for a positive RT-PCR test,\u201d reported Channel News Asia in an article now removed from the Internet. \u201cSuspected\u201d cases included anyone who had traveled to Wuhan or surrounding areas, or who had contact with confirmed COVID cases or Wuhan visitors, and had symptoms such as a fever or low white blood cell count.<\/p>\n Of course, the PCR tests used in China (and everywhere else, for many purposes) are widely known to be\u00a0neither precise<\/a>\u00a0nor reliable<\/a>\u00a0either: \u201cPatients test positively if the genetic sequence of their blood or respiratory tract sample has a \u201chigh degree\u201d of similarity with that of the virus.\u201d Reports of 80% false positives in \u201casymptomatic individuals<\/a>\u201d and\u00a0recovered patients<\/a>\u00a0were reported from China at that time. The former was retracted however. The creator of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, who\u00a0died<\/a>\u00a0perhaps not uncoincidentally in August 2019,\u00a0long ago acknowledged<\/a>\u00a0it could not work for the purposes for which it is routinely used in medical science.<\/p>\n These facts, taken together with China\u2019s epic lockdown move, its separation of suspected infected family members, its passage of\u00a0mandatory vaccination laws<\/a>\u00a0and the 2019 ramping-up of vaccine production, as well as the participation of Chinese CDC official George Gao in the Event 201 exercise and the \u201clive exercise\u201d (he\u2019s been reported to have been in tears over the pandemic), seem to present sufficient cause for skepticism as to everything the Chinese have put out.<\/p>\n As for Italy, Angelo Borelli, its chief of \u201cCivil Protection\u201d,\u00a0has stated\u00a0<\/a>that Italy \u201ccount[s] all the deceased. We do not differentiate between corona infected people who have died and those who have died because of the CV.\u201d A\u00a0March 20 report<\/a>\u00a0by its ISS (National Institute of Health) reported that 12% of deaths \u201chave shown a direct causality from coronavirus, while 88 percent of patients who have died have at least one pre-morbidity \u2013 many had two or three,\u201d according to Professor Walter Ricciardi, scientific adviser to the Italian government.<\/p>\n From the\u00a0UK Telegraph<\/em><\/a>:<\/p>\n The Italian health system counts not only people who died directly from coronavirus but also who died with coronavirus, regardless of whether or not they were suffering from one or more serious diseases when they contracted it.<\/p>\n \u201cThe way in which we code deaths in our country is very generous in the sense that all the people who die in hospitals with the coronavirus are deemed to be dying of the coronavirus,\u201d said Prof Walter Ricciardi.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n A much-read Bloomberg report noted that three days earlier, March 17, the Italian health authority reported that\u00a099% of COVID-19<\/a>\u00a0cases in Italy \u201chad other illnesses<\/a>\u201d.<\/p>\n Northern Italy is also widely known to have bad air quality.<\/a><\/p>\n Similarly, in the US, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) issued\u00a0guidance to health care professionals<\/a>, as is widely reported, as of March 24: \u201cCOVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death.\u201d The new diagnostic code was in actuality issued to the CDC by the World Health Organization (WHO) \u201cfor clinical or epidemiological diagnosis of COVID-19 where a laboratory confirmation is inconclusive or not available.\u201d This occurred before the US epicenter of the alleged virus outbreak, New York City and New Jersey, reached their peak cases reports and deaths.<\/p>\n In its April 2020\u00a0guidance<\/a>, the CDC, as the\u00a0New York Times<\/em>\u00a0has it: \u201cinstructed officials to report deaths where the patient has tested positive or, in an absence of testing, \u2018if the circumstances are compelling within a reasonable degree of certainty.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n Trump\u2019s COVID Task Force member Dr. Deborah Birx confirmed in the Coronavirus Task Force\u00a0press conference<\/a>\u00a0of April 7 that the CDC is taking a \u201cliberal approach to mortality\u201d. She said in response to a question about coronavirus \u201cdeaths being misreported\u201d:<\/p>\n \u201cI think the reporting here has been pretty straightforward over the last five to six weeks\u2026. There are other countries that if you had a preexisting condition and let\u2019s say the virus caused you to go to the ICU and\u00a0then have<\/em>\u00a0a heart or kidney problem, some countries are reporting that as a heart issue or a kidney issue and not a COVOD-19 death. Right now we\u2019re still reporting it. And we\u2019ll, I mean the great thing about having forms that come in and a form that has the\u00a0ability to market<\/em>\u00a0[?] as COVID-19 infection, the intent is right now if those, if someone dies with COVID-19, we are counting that as a COVID-19 death.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n One will note that Brix directly contradicts what the Italian government has maintained all along, which is that Italy has also counted other morbidities as \u201ccomorbidities\u201d of COVID-19 deaths.<\/p>\n CDC\u2019s statistics show that pneumonia and other deaths plummeted this year relative to prior years\u2019 rates for the end of March and early April, as COVID rates began to rise around the US.<\/p>\n And yet, deaths from COVID-19 with \u201ccomorbidities\u201d are the overwhelming majority not only in Italy but also in the US. An early\u00a0mid-March CNN report<\/a>\u00a0of the US\u2019s first \u201ccoronavirus\u201d victims showed a majority of elders with pre-existing conditions \u2013 but no names reported by CNN. One New Jersey man with \u201cdiabetes, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, gastrointestinal bleeding and emphysema\u201d\u00a0and\u00a0<\/em>who had had two heart attacks was listed as a COVID-19 death.<\/p>\n More recently\u00a0USA Today<\/a>\u00a0reported that 86% of New York COVID-19 decedents had \u201cunderlying illnesses\u201d, while\u00a0The Gateway Pundit<\/a>\u00a0cited official New York City statistics as of April 2 showing that only 1.29% of New Yorkers alleged to have died from COVID-19 had no \u201cpre-existing conditions\u201d. As the Pundit noted, these statistics were in line with the\u00a0picture from China and Italy<\/a>, with 99% having pre-existing conditions as of the date reported.<\/p>\n And, it should be noted that the 61-year-old Chinese man who was reported as the first \u201cWuhan coronavirus\u201d death in December 2019 also suffered from \u201cabdominal tumors and chronic liver disease\u201d, according to a January 11\u00a0Science Magazine report<\/a>.<\/p>\n China now reports a\u00a0lower comorbidity rate<\/a>\u00a0of 25% based on an analysis of 37% of hospitals in China.\u00a0Another more recent study<\/a>, however, shows 74.4% of decedents had one or more preexisting condition, of which 50% was hypertension. But this is data derived from a study of only nine days in January and appears to be directed at the idea that the alleged virus has an ACE2 (angiotensin-converting enzyme II) receptor, which plays a critical role in cardiac physiology among other bodily processes. The new report notes: \u201cclinical studies are also needed to confirm whether angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers could be beneficial for patients with COVID-19\u201d. Several articles have appeared suggesting these types of drugs would or already\u00a0benefit<\/a>\u00a0COVID-19 patients.<\/p>\n But, given this issue of statistical reporting (among other issues of testing and identification of the alleged pathogen itself), it is an absolutely legitimate question as to who,\u00a0if anyone,\u00a0<\/em>has actually died of COVID-19. Since much evidence indicates the virus does\u00a0not<\/em>\u00a0actually exist, we\u2019d answer this in the negative, but this is yet to be proven in later work. The statistic picture shown here already already suggests circumstantial evidence that the virus does not exist as such.<\/p>\n Data indicating that\u00a0more males than females<\/a>\u00a0have officially died of COVID-19 globally also suggest that it is other morbidities and not \u201ccomorbidities\u201d that have driven the alleged deaths, which are generally greater in men than women globally.<\/p>\n Official explanations<\/a>\u00a0from the CDC state that comorbidities indicate a \u201chigher risk\u201d for \u201csevere illness from COVID-19\u201d.<\/p>\n New York City\u00a0hospitalization and death figures<\/a>\u00a0of 29,335 and 6,182 respectively as of April 13 continue to defy the on-the-ground reality seen at empty local hospitals and unverified reports of overflowing morgues.<\/p>\n Today, April 14, New York City added another 3,700 deaths to the COVID-19 death toll \u201cwho were presumed to have died of the coronavirus but had never tested positive\u201d, as reported by the\u00a0New York Times<\/a><\/em>\u00a0and\u00a0others<\/a>.\u00a0This increased the US COVID-19 death toll by 17%<\/em>. The deaths were reported as coming from hospitals, nursing homes and long-term care facilities from March 11 to April 13. The\u00a0Times<\/em>\u00a0however sees this, like all mainstream media, as providing evidence of \u201cshortcomings in testing\u201d, not as complete fabrications made on the sole basis of symptoms.<\/p>\n The computer model predicting the expected \u201cdisease curve\u201d\u00a0used by CDC\u2019s Dr. Birx<\/a>\u00a0is a\u00a0Bill Gates\u2013funded model<\/a>\u00a0known as the IHME (Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation) and is done at the University of Washington School of Medicine. This model, along with\u00a0the Imperial College model<\/a>\u00a0used in the UK, has been shown to be\u00a0wildly high off the mark<\/a>\u00a0in its US and UK projections. The IHME model used the data from New York and New Jersey and applied it to the rest of the country, yielding a predicted death rate four times (121,000) greater than the \u201cactual rate\u201d (31,142) as of April 1. The model has been significantly revised several times since the beginning of the alleged pandemic in America, from 2 million to 200,000, to 121,00 and now 61,545 by August 4.<\/p>\n The US government\u2013used Gates IHME model also seems to have\u00a0dramatically overestimated<\/a>\u00a0the number of total US hospitalizations, ICU beds and ventilators needed, by 8, 6 and 40 times, respectively, according to scientist\u00a0Ned Nikolov<\/a>. It appears to have since been\u00a0revised downward<\/a>\u00a0equally dramatically. The Gates model also overestimated the number of\u00a0ICU beds needed in New York<\/a>\u00a0at least twice, by factors of three and four.<\/p>\n The model also has a 95% \u201cuncertainty interval\u201d said to be the result of limited or conflicting data.\u00a0Covidtracking.com<\/a>\u00a0has stated that the CDC is \u00a0actually not reporting full data, and neither are the states: \u201cAcross the country, this reporting is also sparse. In short: it is impossible to assemble anything resembling the real statistics for hospitalizations, ICU admissions, or ventilator usage across the United States.\u201d States are reporting different types of data, as noted.<\/p>\n Strikingly, in the case of Colorado, Covidtracking.com reports: \u201cCases include people who test positive for COVID-19 AND\u00a0people who have symptoms of COVID-19 and are a close contact to someone who tested positive<\/em>.\u201d (Our emphasis) Similar to what Minnesota State Senator\u00a0Dr. Scott Jensen has revealed<\/a>\u00a0to local media and FOX News, it appears a mere association with someone said to be \u201cCOVID-positive\u201d is being counted as COVID cases in at least two states.<\/p>\n The Gates IHME model also does not appear to represent a curve at all but a jagged leap. This \u201cspikeyness\u201d as well as the daily spikes in cases seen in China,\u00a0Italy<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0Spain<\/a>\u00a0do not suggest a natural infection rate predicted by a smooth curve \u2013 but rather changes in accounting and reporting. Gates\u2019s IHME claims their model\u2019s performance and data notwithstanding,\u00a0and<\/em>\u00a0the lack of evidence for this statement notwithstanding, that the lowering of the \u201ccurve\u201d is confirmation that \u201csocial distancing works\u201d. They continue to warn the public: \u201c\u201cPandemic\u2019s\u00a0trajectory\u00a0would\u00a0change \u2013 and dramatically for the worse \u2013\u00a0if people ease up on social distancing.\u201d\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n As of April 7,\u00a0Politico<\/em><\/a>\u00a0<\/em>reports that \u201cThe military-run hospitals at the Javits Center and onboard the USNS Comfort remain mostly empty \u2014 so far treating only 110 patients between them, Pentagon officials said Tuesday.\u201d While the USNS Comfort\u2019s capacity was\u00a0previously reported<\/a>\u00a0at 1000 beds,\u00a0Politico\u00a0<\/em>and\u00a0US Naval Institute News<\/a>\u00a0say now that the ship has a capacity of 500 beds but only 44 civilian patients, five of which are \u201cCOVID-positive\u201d. A mere 66 patients were being treated at the \u201cfield hospital\u201d set up at Javitz Center. Nonetheless there are nearly 2,000 medical personnel at those locations.<\/p>\n As of April 2, the USNS Mercy docked off of Los Angeles has treated 15 patients out of a capacity of 1,000 beds. No COVID patients have been reported to have been on or treated on the Mercy. Both the Mercy and Comfort were supposed to treat non-corona patients to help with an overflow of patients, but the Comfort began accepting COVID patients. It is unclear how many if any were COVID-positive. The Mercy however has only had non-COVID patients, so one wonders how, as of April 14,\u00a0seven crew members<\/a>\u00a0are reported to have tested positive for it.<\/p>\n It\u2019s also been reported today that a Washington state \u201cemergency field hospital\u201d has been\u00a0dismantled<\/a>\u00a0after treating no patients.<\/p>\n Despite the phantom quality of the statistical picture of the \u201cCOVID\u201d crisis, and the arguable over-reporting, overcounting or misreporting seen in these data, many reports have surfaced arguing that death counts have actually been underreported.<\/p>\n The US intelligence establishment just released a \u201cclassified\u201d report charging China with a\u00a0deliberate undercount<\/a>. In Italy, it has been reported that COVID deaths in Bergamo province were\u00a0understated<\/a>\u00a0because so many were dying at home. The same rationale has been argued to have occurred in the US, with the\u00a0New York Times<\/a>\u00a0citing (but not attributing) New York City paramedics speculating that many New Yorkers may have died at home. Across the US, the\u00a0Times<\/em>\u00a0says:<\/p>\n \u201cThe undercount is a result of inconsistent protocols, limited resources and a patchwork of decision making from one state or county to the next.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n In many rural areas, coroners say they don\u2019t have the tests they need to detect the disease. Doctors now believe that some deaths in February and early March, before the coronavirus reached epidemic levels in the United States, were likely misidentified as influenza or only described as pneumonia.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Due to a lack of testing and awareness, the\u00a0Times<\/em>\u00a0argues that many cases were missed:<\/p>\n \u201c<\/strong>Early in the U.S. outbreak, virus-linked deaths may have been overlooked, hospital officials said. A late start to coronavirus testing hampered hospitals\u2019 ability to detect the infection among patients with flulike symptoms in February and early March. Doctors at several hospitals reported treating pneumonia patients who eventually died before testing was available.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n As all of this weren\u2019t enough to plague the least of skeptics, official talk has persisted in exaggerating reality in favor of the worst. White House Coronavirus Task Force lead Anthony Fauci said\u00a0on April 13<\/a>\u00a0that the situation had been \u201cworse than we could have imagined\u201d.<\/p>\n That\u2019s an interesting statement, considering Fauci\u2019s 2017 warning to incoming US President Donald Trump about the \u201cinevitability of a \u2018surprise outbreak\u2019 of an \u201cunknown infectious disease\u201d. As reported by\u00a0Business Insider<\/a><\/em>:<\/p>\n \u201cThere is no question that there will be a challenge to the coming administration in the arena of infectious diseases,\u201d Fauci said during a\u00a0speech at Georgetown University<\/a>, adding, \u201cthe thing we\u2019re extraordinarily confident about is that we\u2019re going to see this in the next few years.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Fauci among others has also spoken of \u201csecond waves\u201d and \u201crebounds\u201d despite all evidence to the contrary, and despite an earlier March statement by Fauci to Congress that the disease did not \u201creinfect\u201d.<\/p>\n At the April 7 Task Force press conference, Fauci warned: \u201c[But] it\u2019s gonna be different. Remember now, because this is not gonna disappear, so we\u2019re going to have in place the capability of doing the things we talk about all the time on this stage: to identify, to isolate, to contact trace.\u201d Fauci has also talked about using antibody tests for this.<\/p>\n And ultimately, tracking people appears to be the goal, despite the fact that no virus has been identified, isolated, or proven to cause a disease known as COVID-19. Nor is COVID conjecture confirmed by the reporting and statistics as outlined here.<\/p>\n Inside the hospitals, some doctors and nurses have come forward to expose that the normal guidance for classification of deaths, \u201ccause of death reporting\u201d is now superseded by guidance that broadly links COVID to nearly anyone who comes into a hospital.<\/p>\n Dr. Annie Bukacek, a longtime Montana board-certified internal medicine physician has also\u00a0come forward\u00a0<\/a>to blow the whistle on death rate exaggeration.<\/p>\n In a public statement, she said:<\/p>\n In other words, \u201cDying with COVID-19 is not the same as dying from COVID-19\u201d but both are reported as COVID-19 deaths.<\/p>\n How many people have actually died from COVID 19 is anyone\u2019s guess\u2026 but based on how death certificates are being filled out, you can be certain the number is substantially lower than what we are being told. Based on inaccurate, incomplete data people are being terrorized by fearmongers into relinquishing cherished freedoms.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Minnesota State Senator Dr. Scott Jensen\u00a0made headlines on Fox News<\/a>, calling the\u00a0April 202<\/a>0<\/a>\u00a0guidance<\/a>\u00a0for determining cause of death \u201cridiculous\u201d. He also noted that hospitals will receive on average $13,000 in Medicare payments per COVID patient and $39,000 per patient requiring a ventilator. The practice of exorbitant Medicare billing per ventilator has already been noted as a concern by the US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). In a 2016 document, it stated that Medicare paid 85 times more claims for noninvasive pressure support ventilators in 2015 than in 2009.<\/p>\n And due to a decision by DHHS to allocate the first $30 billion of CARES funds by historical share of Medicare billings, not on current need, some states, such as Minnesota, Nebraska and Montana, are reportedly receiving more than $300,000 per COVID case from Medicare,\u00a0Keiser Health News reports<\/a>. New York is receiving $12,000 per case while Florida is getting $132,000 per case.<\/p>\n So there is a clearly established financial incentive for hospitals to declare COVID cases. And it may also be a legitimate threat to patients who are told they have COVID.\u00a0STAT News<\/a>\u00a0reports: \u201csome critical care physicians are questioning the widespread use of the breathing machines for Covid-19 patients, saying that large numbers of patients could instead be treated with less intensive respiratory support.\u201d<\/p>\n A\u00a02010 HealthDay report<\/a>\u00a0cited a University of Pittsburgh study of seven years of Medicare data showing that\u00a0all<\/em>\u00a0elders on mechanical ventilators either die within the year or are very disabled by the invasive treatment:<\/p>\n \u201cUnfortunately, 70 percent of elders who receive mechanical ventilation will not survive the year. And the 30 percent who are strong enough to survive will be very disabled,\u201d study author Dr. Amber Barnato, an associate professor of medicine at the University of Pittsburgh, said in an American Thoracic Society news release.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n A Utah ICU nurse with 30 years of experience also has\u00a0anon<\/a>ymously come forward to reveal pro-COVID bias in diagnosing cases: \u201cYou basically treat the patient as if they have it, until you find out they don\u2019t\u2026\u00a0<\/a>If a patient dies, if they are COVID positive, you put COVID as the cause of death.\u201d<\/p>\n She further notes the case of a terminally ill patient who was given a COVID test:<\/p>\n \u201cThat\u2019s bizarre that you would do that on a hospice patient, but they would get a COVID test positive. That person wouldn\u2019t die of their terminal disease. They died of COVID. This is what is happening \u2013 that\u2019s the issue, that our hands are tied\u2026. We can\u2019t disclose this technically to anyone, or you are breaking federal law.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n The nurse further noted the sacrifice of preventative care, and care of patients in need from other causes:<\/p>\n \u201cAll preventative care at this moment is shut down. No one is getting preventative care. I did hear a conversation of two cardiologists basically saying there are probably a lot of people who are just staying home and having silent heart attacks in their home.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n \u201cAnd the other issue is organic donation\u2026 donor services have been nearly completely shut down at this point in placing organs\u2026 I can\u2019t tolerate the dishonesty and lack of integrity and the giving into the emotional side of it.\u00a0We are acting as if everyone has end-stage AIDS.<\/em>\u00a0(Our emphasis)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n To make matters worse for the general public who might have a health emergency, amidst the manufactured \u201ccrisis\u201d, thousands of US hospital workers are reported to have been\u00a0\u201cfurloughed\u201d<\/a>, laid off or had hours reduced as \u201croutine patients have dropped off\u201d. (Disingenuous language attributing these developments to basic supply and demand is rife in media right now: \u201cdemand has dropped\u201d.) In fact, the public has been told by authorities, specifically, the Surgeon General Jerome Adams to postpone or not seek medical care and to stay at home. The\u00a0Daily Mail<\/a>\u00a0reports that doctors have been asked to accept pay cuts of up to 70%, and cites a statistical model produced in association with the American Academy of Family Physicians suggesting that by the end of April, \u201calmost 20,000 family physicians could be underemployed, reassigned or out of a job altogether.\u201d<\/p>\n Here\u2019s Jessica, a\u00a0laid-off nurse from Cleveland<\/a>. She says, \u201cI work at an outpatient clinic. But we have hardly any patients so I\u2019m not working. My friends in the ICU that I used to work in, they\u2019re hardly working. They\u2019re getting canceled shifts. And this is big hospitals in the Cleveland area. Numbers are down.\u201d Cleveland Clinic has one case, noted in the interview.<\/p>\n Private medical practices have been forced closed, and dental service has basically stopped. In the UK,\u00a0elderly individuals<\/a>\u00a0and the\u00a0parents of sick children<\/a>\u00a0have been asked to sign \u201cdo not resuscitate\u201d orders so as to make room for alleged COVID patients. In the US, an\u00a0eyebrow-raising March 25\u00a0Washington Post<\/em>\u00a0report<\/a>\u00a0revealed that hospitals as of late March were \u2018\u201dconsider[ing] universal do-not-resuscitate\u2019 orders for coronavirus patients\u201d:<\/p>\n Several large hospital systems \u2014 Atrium Health in the Carolinas, Geisinger in Pennsylvania and regional Kaiser Permanente networks \u2014 are looking at guidelines that would allow doctors to override the wishes of the coronavirus patient or family members on a case-by-case basis due to the risk to doctors and nurses, or a shortage of protective equipment, say ethicists and doctors involved in those conversations. But they would stop short of imposing a do-not-resuscitate order on every coronavirus patient.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n The report also noted that Northwestern Memorial Hospital in Chicago and George Washington University Hospital in Washington, DC were considering a similar policy policy, even though they are not sure if it is legal. The\u00a0Post<\/em>\u00a0also reported:<\/p>\n \u201cAs cases mount amid a national shortage of personal protective equipment, or PPE, hospitals are beginning to implement emergency measures that will either minimize, modify or completely stop the use of certain procedures on patients with covid-19.<\/p>\n Some of the most anxiety-provoking minutes in a health-care worker\u2019s day involve participating in procedures that send virus-laced droplets from a patient\u2019s airways all over the room.<\/p>\n These include endoscopies, bronchoscopies and other procedures in which tubes or cameras are sent down the throat and are routine in ICUs to look for bleeds or examine the inside of the lungs.<\/p>\n Changing or eliminating those protocols is likely to decrease some patients\u2019 chances for survival. But hospital administrators and doctors say the measures are necessary to save the most lives.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Both the denial of medical care and the euthanasia orders are shocking and violate natural, constitutional, human rights and international laws.<\/p>\n Conversations such as these raise the further questions of what is happening in nursing homes. From the beginning of the coronavirus event, people were told to avoid nursing homes, after which several mass COVID deaths from nursing homes were reported.<\/p>\n Finally, intrepid social media posters have exposed many media \u201canomalies\u201d in COVID death reporting, just a few of which we mention here:<\/p>\n A photo of the same boy was found to represent two different boy COVID victims in two different countries, Britain and Portugal, by two UK presses:<\/p>\n In a third UK publication, the boy is shown as a Belgian female coronavirus victim:<\/p>\n Further, the BBC has reportedly\u00a0misrepresented mass graves<\/a>\u00a0at New York City\u2019s Hart Island as coronavirus mass graves, despite the fact that New York Mayor Bill de Blasio stated that the graves are full of bodies from all deaths.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/therulingclassobserver.files.wordpress.com\/2020\/04\/other-disease-chart.jpg?w=910\")
<\/figure>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/therulingclassobserver.files.wordpress.com\/2020\/04\/plummeting-pneumonia-deaths.jpg?w=900\")
<\/figure>\nModeling questionable data<\/h3>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/therulingclassobserver.files.wordpress.com\/2020\/04\/ihme-overestimation.jpg?w=680\")
<\/figure>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/therulingclassobserver.files.wordpress.com\/2020\/04\/ihme-model.png?w=1024\")
<\/figure>\nNavy Hospital Ships Remain \u201cVacant\u201d<\/h3>\n
Overcounts as Undercounts<\/h3>\n
Doctors and nurse confirm COVID overstatements<\/h3>\n
Media fabrications<\/h3>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/therulingclassobserver.files.wordpress.com\/2020\/04\/one-boy-two-countries-fake.jpg?w=760\")
<\/figure>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/therulingclassobserver.files.wordpress.com\/2020\/04\/boy-called-a-girl-two-boys.jpg?w=696\")
<\/figure>\n