Humans are not meant to make spike proteins.\u00a0They are not part of the human genome.<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.frontnieuws.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/image-1-810x500-1.jpg?fit=800%2C545&ssl=1\" "\\"image-1-810x500\\"")
<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n3. Why are mRNA interventions called \u201cgene therapy\u201d?<\/strong><\/p>\n Therapy is a word reserved for treating a condition, disorder, or disease.\u00a0The arrogance to administer therapy to healthy individuals is unwarranted interference at best, assault at worst.<\/p>\n 4. Why do professions ending in “ologist” suddenly need studies to explain the obvious, namely that naturally acquired immunity is much better than anything artificially stimulated?<\/strong><\/p>\n The immune system is a versatile, powerful, complex system that has evolved over millennia and is far from being fully understood.\u00a0What is known is that when the body suffers from a disease, it mobilizes a battery of defense mechanisms that work in harmony, producing antibodies as the first line of defense to kill pathogens circulating in body fluid or on tissue surfaces, and a T-cell response to interact with pathogens if they succeed in entering cells where they can multiply, because antibodies cannot reach those cells.\u00a0Once they have recovered from a particular infection, the body’s T cells retain a broad spectrum and long memory,<\/p>\n In contrast, vaccines that elicit high antibody levels cause a concomitant reduction in the T cell response.\u00a0When the T-cell response is suppressed, and the pathogen escapes the antibodies, invades the cells and begins to multiply, unlike in an unaffected immune system, the means to fight the microbe are not available, leaving it with a persistent infection. , or cause an infection of a longer duration.\u00a0In addition, the antibodies elicited by vaccination are specific, not broad spectrum, making them easier to evade by a related pathogen.<\/p>\n 5. What is meant by \u201cdecreasing vaccines\u201d?<\/strong><\/p>\n Vaccines by themselves do not confer immunity.\u00a0They aim to provoke a response from the individual’s own immune system.\u00a0How sustainable and effective that is is a whole area of research.\u00a0But if the initially observed immune response disappears within a short time, it means that the intervention has failed in its purpose.\u00a0Continued overstimulation of the body’s immune responses by more failed treatments only weakens the body’s innate defenses, making it more vulnerable to attack by toxic substances.<\/p>\n 6. Why was the mRNA cargo said to remain in the deltoid muscle, at the site of the injection, or near it?\u00a0On what basis was this assumption made?<\/strong><\/p>\n Professor Michael Palmer gave a video presentation on the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of mRNA injections, in the context of the symposium \u201cDoctors for Covid Ethics\u201d on July 30, 2021, with a biodistribution study of the spike proteins and how they are used in particular. high concentrations migrated to the liver, spleen and ovaries.\u00a0The mRNA “packets” containing the gene sequence are suspended in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), which are essentially tiny fat bubbles used to deliver genetic material into cells.\u00a0But our immune system has all kinds of ways to protect our cells from invasion, so polyethylene glycol (PEG) is added to promote wide distribution throughout the body;\u00a0to deliver a toxin-creating gene sequence into the cells of all our body systems.\u00a0Then why the claim that most of the load remains in the arm muscle?\u00a0The above information is provided by Dr.\u00a0Byram W. Bridle in his article A Moratorium on mRNA \u201cVaccines\u201d is Needed.\u00a0Re-Visiting the Biodistribution of Lipid Nanoparticles, published on Substack on April 22, 2022 under Covid Chronicles.\u00a0He also informs us that PEG is the compound most associated with causing anaphylactic shock (severe hyper-acute allergic reaction).<\/p>\n 7. Why do academics and doctors recommend giving it to the elderly and people with compromised immune systems?<\/strong><\/p>\n Does it make sense to give people with weakened or weak immune systems an intervention that will further impair their ability to fight off everyday infections?\u00a0Project Veritas recently released a leaked recording of a December 2020 Zoom call from AstraZeneca in which its CEO, Pascal Soriot, stated that the millions of people with weakened immune systems should not receive a covid vaccine.\u00a0Jon Rappoport points out that he himself explained the simple reason for this as early as early 2020, which was that a vaccine is supposed to trigger an immune system response, but if the system is weak and unable to respond, the vaccine functions as a “super high toxic invader that overwhelms the body.\u201d<\/p>\n This has not stopped the European Medicines Agency from stating: \u201cThere is limited data on immunocompromised people.\u00a0But while they may not respond as well to the vaccine, there are no particular safety concerns.\u00a0Immunocompromised people can still be vaccinated as they may be at higher risk from Covid-19.\u00a0And, of course, from our own Via\u00a0Thelightpaper.co.uk<\/a> Darren Smith (p. 10)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" 1. Why is a gene-editing technology called a vaccine?\u00a0The term vaccination comes from the 18th-century practice of cowpox;\u00a0vacca is the Latin word for cow, and then became the term for the practice of introducing a minute amount of a pathogen … Continue reading <\/a><\/div>\n<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\nStrategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization (SAGE) came the recommendation that \u201cseverely or moderately immunocompromised individuals should be offered an additional dose of vaccine\u201d.<\/p>\n