Celia Farber
\nThe Truth Barrier<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
https:\/\/youtu.be\/1bqUCReQTtU<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
I was on the Stew Peters show yesterday, discussing the end of Fauci\u2019s reign.<\/p>\n
Before the show, and after, I got to chat with Stew, and was left with a great impression of him as a human being and journalist. One thing I like is the way he allows himself full expression of the\u00a0rage<\/strong>\u00a0we all feel over what they have done. He doesn\u2019t play the \u201cI-don\u2019t-get-emotional\u201d journalist role.<\/p>\n The full podcast is\u00a0here.<\/a><\/p>\n I\u2019m getting clarity on thoughts I\u2019ve had for a long time but could not bring to fruition. For example: What is (what I am now calling) \u201cFauci-ism?\u201d Does it perish when Fauci resigns thank Christ at the end of this year?<\/p>\n What AIDS showed us all, with infinite and determined brutality, was that Fauci\u2019s empire held power by refusing allegiance to factual reality. Epidemiology, \u201cvirology,\u201d anything whatsoever.\u00a0We are right even when wrong<\/em>, and we have done away with \u201cwrong.\u201d That\u2019s \u201cFauci-ism.\u201d<\/p>\n It\u2019s all documented in\u00a0this piece,<\/a>\u00a0which I re-post now and again, because I think it holds a documentation of the battle that took place between \u201cclassical\u201d science and \u201cFauci-ism.\u201d<\/p>\n The one thing to truly understand about \u201cFauci-ism\u201d is this: Fauci is never wrong.<\/p>\n Who is his forebear? Ah yes! Of course\u2014<\/p>\n Trofim Lysenko.<\/p>\n Fauci is a modern, postwar, American version of Trofim Lysenko, without the Stalin apparatus itself, using other tools and weapons of war. But the same spirit: War against biology in the name of progress and himself. From Lysenko\u2019s Wikipedia page:<\/p>\n \u201cOutside the Soviet Union, scientists spoke critically: British biologist\u00a0S. C. Harland<\/a>\u00a0lamented that Lysenko was “completely ignorant of the elementary principles of genetics and plant physiology” (Bertram Wolfe<\/a>, 2017). Criticism from foreigners did not sit well with Lysenko, who loathed Western “bourgeois” scientists and denounced them as tools of imperialist oppressors. He especially detested the American-born practice of studying\u00a0fruit flies<\/a>, the workhorse of modern genetics. He called such geneticists “fly lovers and people haters”.[26]<\/a><\/p>\n \u201cScientists who refused to renounce genetics found themselves at the mercy of the\u00a0NKVD<\/a>. The lucky ones simply got dismissed from their posts and were left destitute. Hundreds if not thousands of others were rounded up and dumped into prisons or psychiatric hospitals. Several were sentenced to death as enemies of the state or starved in their jail cells (most notably the botanist\u00a0Nikolai Vavilov<\/a>).[4]<\/a>\u00a0Before the 1930s, the Soviet Union had arguably the best genetics community. According to\u00a0The Atlantic<\/a><\/em>\u00a0writer\u00a0Sam Kean<\/a>, “Lysenko gutted it, and by some accounts, set Russian\u00a0biology<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0agronomy<\/a>\u00a0back a half-century”.[4]<\/a>\u00a0Lysenko’s work was eventually recognized as fraudulent by some, “but not before he had wrecked the lives of many and destroyed the reputation of Russian biology” according to scientist\u00a0Peter Gluckman<\/a>.[27]<\/a>\u201d<\/p>\n ___ Fauci-ism means \u201cI don\u2019t owe you any proof.\u201d No Duty To Be Correct, Ever, No Duty To Predict, No Remorse, No Accountability (But isn’t that the definition of a sociopath? I argue: Yes, BUT, it was an entire culture. It … Continue reading
\n<\/em><\/p>\n
\nhttps:\/\/celiafarber.substack.com\/p\/a-discussion-with-stew-peters-what<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"