Roundup hinders biosynthesis in plants by poisoning the shikimate<\/em> pathway. For decades it was only used prior<\/em> to seeding a crop, and since humans and animals don\u2019t rely on the same biology and chemistry as plants do, we were assured we could safely ingest small dosages while applying it. But we were never supposed to actually eat it, much less have it injected into our bloodstream<\/em>. We now know our bodies rely on trillions of microorganisms integral to our immune systems that do<\/em> employ on the shikimate<\/em> pathway, leading to the grave conclusion that, more so than other pesticides, Roundup contributes directly to the suppression of our immune systems.<\/p>\n Ignoring this, Bayer execs seek to dominate the fast-growing desiccation market with their recent purchase of Monsanto. There\u2019s a minor hitch though. Bayer is being sued by thousands of people who claim to have contracted cancer while applying<\/em> Roundup.<\/p>\n Strangely, none of these 40,000+ Roundup lawsuits are from consumers who have inadvertently\u00a0consumed\u00a0Roundup in their food, or had it injected into them in the form of a trace ingredient in a vaccine. Why? Because it\u2019s next to impossible to clinically prove that one\u2019s God-given immune system may have been impacted so long as conventional medicine fails to help us boost overall health, pushing patented, pharmaceutical vaccinations instead which supposedly maintain \u201cherd immunity\u201d on a disease-by-disease basis.<\/p>\n To repeat, the government has never required any long-term research into the possible immunological impact of Roundup, and shows no interest in doing so.<\/p>\n As such, Food Giants like General Mills, which make use of massive volumes of desiccated grains, have dodged the few lawsuits thrown at them. Alas, plaintiffs suffer from a paucity of admissible evidence to prove their claims. \u201cDon\u2019t bother looking,\u201d and \u201cyou won\u2019t find any bad news,\u201d is the maxim being applied. And it\u2019s working marvelously.<\/p>\n Bayer has not been as fortunate as General Mills. And yet, and again strangely, none of the judgments against Bayer have been for farmers. Wouldn\u2019t farmers be the first to succumb to illness if Roundup (glyphosate) was a carcinogen and applying<\/em> it was the problem? Yes, there are apparently some<\/em> farmers involved, but it\u2019s impossible to say how many for the simple reason that it does not suit lawyers on either side to reveal this important statistic. As explained in my article here in Culture Wars<\/em> last year. Both sides in this battle already agree that farmers will NEVER stop using glyphosate, not here in America, nor over in enviro-conscious Europe. Never. Modern farming is literally addicted to it, and both sides are banking on that fact. Why, it\u2019s enough to make you think both sides in this titanic struggle for justice might even be in cahoots.[4]<\/a><\/p>\n So, are the Roundup lawsuits just a diversionary tactic in a much larger battle? It sure looks that way. Shareholders are worried, as evidenced by Bayer\u2019s falling stock price. But Bayer executives have everything to gain from a protracted court battle, replete with dire headlines warning that Roundup is DANGEROUS, so long as no one figures out that the real problem with Roundup isn\u2019t with people applying it; it\u2019s with people absorbing it after eating it or having it injected into their bloodstream.<\/p>\n
![\"Culture](\"https:\/\/static1.squarespace.com\/static\/5cec0ec284d3ad0001c28a32\/5d0a60b32c88210001f6cd31\/5ed53b0602fba55bd5f643dd\/1591040733768\/CW-39-7-Final.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n