{"id":207696,"date":"2024-01-28T15:15:22","date_gmt":"2024-01-28T19:15:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=207696"},"modified":"2024-01-28T15:15:14","modified_gmt":"2024-01-28T19:15:14","slug":"the-demolition-of-justice-in-the-usa","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=207696","title":{"rendered":"

The Demolition of Justice in the USA<\/h1>"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/p>\n

Jim Fetzer, Ph.D.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
The latest affront to the administration of justice has come from the decision in the E. Jean Carroll\u00a0\u201cfantasy\u201d trial,<\/a>\u00a0where a woman who appears to be obsessed with sex has won\u00a0a staggering $83.3 million verdict against Donald Trump for an alleged defamation for denying her claim that he had raped her at a Bergdorf Goodman store, where she cannot even remember the year of its occurrence<\/a>. A woman who has been raped (absent roofies) will not ony remember the year but the month, the week, the day and even the minute the transgression took place.<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

And in Georgia, the sanctimonious DA Fani Willia, who threatened\u00a0to fire anyone working for her who slept with a coworker, turns out to have been\u00a0indulging a lavish\u00a0affair with her married lover, whom she has selected to prosecute Donald Trump in a complex RICO case with 19 defendants, when he was inexperienced at litigation and had not expertise with this type of law<\/a>. These cases appear to manifest TDS (\u201cTrump Derangement Syndrome\u201d) by zealous Democrats eager to tarnish or destroy the reputation of the one-man wrecking ball they despise to the core.<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

Far more serious, however, are acts by the Supreme Court of the United States, which have been manifest most seriously in\u00a0the current decision regarding the right of the Biden administration to curtail the Governor of Texas in his efforts to staunch the flood of millions of illegal migrants across our Southern Border,<\/a>\u00a0where the President of the United States has abdicated his role to insure that the laws are faithfully executed and that the federal government will protect the states from invasions. Abbott is doing what Biden refuses to do in defending the state\u2013yet SCOTUS rules against him!<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

While the Carroll and Willis\u2019 cases may be viewed as laughing matters (demonstrating the extent to which one party will go after their most influential political opponent), the border matter represents a threat to the integrity of the nation, where\u00a0at least 25 other governors have now sided with Governor Abbott and we appear to be on the verge of a Constitutional crisis<\/a>. While there\u2019s talk of a civil war between the states, this development has to do with the legitimacy of the federal government and has more of the character of a revolution of the kind envisioned by the Declaration of Independence.<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

And this is not the first time that SCOTUS has failed the nation. In the wake of the (obviously fraudulent) election of 2020 (where by my best estimate, Trump earned over 100,000,000 votes and Biden around 37,000,000), the rejection of the (once again) Texas lawsuit against the swing stages of Arizona, Wisconsin, Michigan, Georgia, and Pennsylvania)\u00a0for violating their own state protocols for the selection of electors on the specious grounds of \u201clack of standing\u201d was not only a massive insult to the nation but placed our future by permitting an illegitimate regime<\/a>.<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

Unlike the New York and Georgia offenses, these two are enormous cases fraught with consequences\u00a0for the nation. They concern the integrity of the federal election process and the security of our nation\u2019s borders. Another case\u00a0No. 21-7916\u00a0<\/b>(far less familiar\u00a0but which I brought to the Supreme Court)<\/a>\u00a0underscores the complete irresponsibility\u00a0and abdication of\u00a0commitment\u00a0of SCOTUS\u2013at least, if you believe as I believe that our 7th Amendment right to trial by jury may be our most important (by safeguarding the people from loss of life, liberty, or property without due process).<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n