Chuck Baldwin<\/p>\n
By sitting down and having a prolonged, meaningful, televised, face-to-face discussion with Russia\u2019s President Vladimir Putin, Tucker Carlson likely delayed global nuclear war.<\/p>\n
Of course, the War Party in Washington, D.C., and its lackeys in the mainstream media are crucifying Tucker to no end. You see, Tucker Carlson did the unthinkable (and unpardonable): He conducted a televised interview with the second most powerful leader in the world without the controls and restraints of the Deep State. He went off the reservation. He allowed Mr. Putin to talk freely and directly to the American people. And the War Party guardians of discourse were helpless to stop it.<\/p>\n
It has been decades since a majority of the American people have been able to hear or see unfettered, unrestrained, uncontrolled, unscripted, truthful news reporting. Decades! Tucker Carlson tore down the media\u2019s Iron Curtain<\/i>.<\/p>\n
VIVA, Tucker!<\/p>\n
Dr. Ron Paul:<\/a><\/p>\n There has been much written and said about Tucker Carlson\u2019s interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin last week. As of this writing the video on Twitter alone has been viewed nearly 200 million times, making it likely the most-viewed news event in history.<\/p>\n Many millions of viewers who may not have had access to the other side of the story were informed that the Russia\/Ukraine military conflict did not begin in 2022, as the mainstream media continuously reports, but in fact began eight years earlier with a US-backed coup in Ukraine. The US media does not report this because they don\u2019t want Americans to begin questioning our interventionist foreign policy. They don\u2019t want Americans to see that our government meddling in the affairs of other countries \u2013 whether by \u201ccolor revolution,\u201d sanctions, or bombs \u2013 has real and deadly consequences to those on the receiving end of our foreign policy.<\/p>\n To me, however, perhaps the most interesting aspect of the Tucker Carlson interview with Putin was the US mainstream media reaction. As Putin himself said during the interview, \u201cin the world of propaganda, it\u2019s very difficult to defeat the United States.\u201d Even a casual look at the US mainstream media\u2019s reporting before and after the interview would show how correct he is about that. In the days and weeks before the interview, the US media was filled with stories about how horrible it was that Tucker Carlson was interviewing the Russian president. There was the danger, they all said, that Putin might spread \u201cdisinformation.\u201d<\/p>\n That Putin might say something to put his country in a better light was, they were saying, reason enough to not interview him. With that logic, why have journalism at all? Everyone interviewed by journalists \u2013 certainly every world leader \u2013 will attempt to paint a rosy picture. The job of a journalist in a free society should be to do the reporting and let the people decide. But somehow that has been lost. These days the mainstream media tells you what to think and you better not dispute it or you will be cancelled!<\/p>\n What the US mainstream media was really worried about was that the \u201cother side of the story\u201d might start to ring true with the public. So they attacked the messenger.<\/p>\n The CNN reporting on Tucker\u2019s interview pretty much sums up the reaction across the board of the US mainstream media. Their headline read, \u201cTucker Carlson is in Russia to interview Putin. He\u2019s already doing the bidding of the Kremlin.\u201d<\/p>\n By merely doing what used to be called \u201cjournalism\u201d \u2013 interviewing and reporting on people and events, whether good or bad \u2013 one is \u201cdoing the bidding\u201d of the subject of the interview or report?<\/p>\n No wonder fellow journalist Julian Assange has been locked away in a gulag for so many years. He dared to assume that in a free society, being a journalist means reporting the good, the bad, and the ugly even if it puts those in power in a bad light.<\/p>\n In the end, the massive success of the Tucker Carlson interview with Vladimir Putin demonstrates once and for all that the American people are sick to death of their mainstream media propagandists and liars. They are looking not for government narratives, but for truth. That\u2019s the really good news about this interview.<\/p>\n VIVA, Tucker!<\/p>\n CitizenWatchReport.com<\/a>:<\/p>\n This week, the biggest news story in the entire world is Tucker Carlson\u2019s interview with Vladimir Putin.\u00a0 Honestly, it was kind of a bizarre interview, and you can watch it for yourself below.\u00a0 But I give Tucker Carlson a ton of credit for going to Russia and sitting down with Putin.\u00a0 I think that the real reason he did this is because he wanted to see for himself if there is any hope of avoiding a cataclysmic conflict between our two nations.\u00a0 Every day we get even closer to the unthinkable<\/a>, and so it would make sense for both sides to pursue a peaceful way out of this mess.\u00a0 But at this point the western elite are not interested in peace, and they don\u2019t want any talk of peace in the media.\u00a0 So they are going to great lengths to discredit Tucker Carlson\u2019s interview with Putin, because they don\u2019t want their carefully crafted narratives to be disrupted.<\/p>\n Michael is right: \u201cThe western elite are not interested in peace, and they don\u2019t want any talk of peace in the media.\u201d That\u2019s why I said at the beginning of this column:<\/p>\n By sitting down and having a prolonged, meaningful, televised, face-to-face discussion with Russia\u2019s President Vladimir Putin, Tucker Carlson likely delayed global nuclear war.<\/p>\n VIVA, Tucker!<\/p>\n