By Brandon Smith \/\u00a0Alt-Market<\/a><\/p>\n The most frequently asked question I get these days is what is going to happen in November, 2020. The election seems to be on the majority of people\u2019s minds even more so that the coronavirus pandemic. In the\u00a0summer of 2016<\/a>\u00a0I accurately predicted that\u00a0Donald Trump would enter the White House<\/a>\u00a0and meet endless opposition to the idea. At the time, an overwhelming number of analysts in the liberty movement assumed Trump would lose, and that Clinton, by hook or by crook, would become president. Obviously this was not the case.<\/p>\n I made the call on a Trump presidency for a number of reasons.\u00a0 Set aside the fact that the majority of major elections are rigged from within because the elites choose candidates on BOTH sides to run, and lets just look at the simple campaign dynamic at the time.<\/p>\n For one, Clinton was the worst possible candidate that could have been chosen to run against Trump if they had actually intended on \u201cwinning\u201d. The DNC had rigged the primary process against Bernie Sanders in order to push Clinton through, yet she was universally hated not just by conservatives but also by moderate liberals. Democrats tend to draw a larger voter base by running \u201cvibrant\u201d candidates that appeal to younger Americans, yet they ran one of the most twisted and decrepit creatures they had on their roster. Though all the polling said Clinton would win in a landslide, the crowds at her campaign events were tiny and devoid of energy. It was clear that she had zero momentum.<\/p>\n It was almost as if she was being set up to lose. But why? Trump\u2019s rhetoric was anti-globalist and his calls to \u201cdrain the swamp\u201d were resonating with voters. Would this not greatly damage or expose the establishment agenda?<\/p>\n Here\u2019s what people need to understand\u2026<\/p>\n Sometimes giving an enemy a false sense of security by allowing them a minor victory is the best strategy. The globalists strategize for the long term; not just for the next 4 years, but for the next 40 years. As Richard N. Gardner, former deputy assistant Secretary of State for International Organizations under Kennedy and Johnson, and a member of the Trilateral Commission, wrote in the April, 1974 issue of the Council on Foreign Relation\u2019s (CFR) journal Foreign Affairs (pg. 558) in an article titled \u2018The Hard Road To World Order\u2019:<\/p>\n \u201c<\/em>In short, the \u2018house of world order\u2019 will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great \u2018booming, buzzing confusion,\u2019 to use William James\u2019 famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n My prediction on Trump becoming president was not only based on Clinton\u2019s inadequacy as a candidate, but also on Trump\u2019s usefulness as a scapegoat for collapse. Keep in mind that the US economy had been struggling to maintain support since the crash of 2008. With all major fundamentals either stagnant or in decline, and with corporate debt, consumer debt and national debt skyrocketing, an enormous bubble was being created in the US economy. This bubble was being inflated by the Federal Reserve through endless stimulus policies to the point that the economy had become addicted to easy money. The system was dependent on it.<\/p>\n Eventually, this bubble was going to pop regardless of how much money was printed by the Fed. The banking elites needed a cover event and a scapegoat for the inevitable collapse they had engineered. With Clinton in office, the globalists would get the blame for the crash. With Trump in office, conservatives and all of our ideals and principles get the blame for the crash.<\/p>\n Trump\u2019s entry into the White House brought hope for many conservatives, but I never put much faith in the eventual outcome once I realized the same elites that had infested previous administrations were now packed into Trump\u2019s cabinet. The fact of the matter is, Trump is surrounded by them.<\/p>\n Dozens of members of the Council on Foreign Relations (a globalist think tank) reside in Trump\u2019s cabinet, along with elites like Pompeo, Mnuchin, Ross, Kudlow, Lighthizer, Fauci, etc. Mike Pompeo is a hardcore neo-con with longtime support for numerous unconstitutional policies\u00a0including mass surveillance of Americans<\/a>. Steve Mnuchin is former Goldman Sachs. Wilber Ross is an agent for the\u00a0Rothschild banking syndicate<\/a>. Larry Kudlow is former New York Federal Reserve. Robert Lighthizer is a member of the\u00a0Council on Foreign Relations<\/a>. And, Fauci is the guy that gave\u00a0MILLIONS of dollars to the Level 4 lab in Wuhan, China<\/a>\u00a0to research none other than coronavirus transmission from bats to other mammals; the same lab that is probably responsible for the initial pandemic outbreak.<\/p>\n One could debate whether or not Trump is aware that he is being swarmed by globalist parasites, but it is a FACT that these people still have considerable influence over White House policy either way.<\/p>\n This brings us to 2020. We are now in the middle of a viral pandemic; government officials and establishment elites are calling for extensive economic lockdowns in order to \u201cflatten the curve\u201d and slow the infection rate. These lockdowns are accelerating the decline of the already weakened US economy and setting the country up for collapse in the near term. Civil unrest is constantly on the verge of breaking out on both sides of the political divide.<\/p>\n The social justice cultists want chaos in the name of bringing down the system and replacing it with some kind of Marxist Utopia. Conservatives are ready to protest and perhaps even go to war in order to stop the lockdowns and prevent medical tyranny (and I agree with them). This is the background for election 2020, and it\u2019s an epic mess.<\/p>\n For the past few month my suspicion is that there might not be an election at all. But let\u2019s look at the factors that are in place:<\/p>\n 1)<\/strong>\u00a0Joe Biden, the Dem candidate, appears to have stage four dementia. Either that, or he is a very good actor. This is another situation where I am questioning WHY? Why would the establishment run Biden (like they ran Clinton), perhaps the worst possible choice if they hope to rally people against Trump and conservatives?<\/p>\n Maybe Trump is meant to stay in office for another four years, because Biden appears to have no capacity to hold the attention of an audience (again, unless his Alzheimer\u2019s is an act).\u00a0 That said, if the economic decline is severe enough into November, the election numbers could still be very close because of the backlash against Trump.\u00a0 Close elections are the easiest for the establishment to manipulate one way or the other.<\/p>\n 2)<\/strong>\u00a0Leftists hate Trump so thoroughly that they would vote for anyone at this point just to get rid of him; but will this fervor be enough to sway moderate Dems to participate if Biden continues his displays of mental frailty?<\/p>\n 3)<\/strong>\u00a0The pandemic lockdowns and viral spread are likely to hit hard by November. Meaning, there is a chance that people will find it difficult to vote at all, unless the votes are handled by mail-in or by electronic means.<\/p>\n 4)<\/strong>\u00a0Electronic or mail-in voting will not be trusted by the public on either side. Whoever wins will be accused of cheating.<\/p>\n 5)<\/strong>\u00a0Civil unrest and violence is almost guaranteed in the lead up to the elections, which could frighten people away from voting booths if they are even in operation.<\/p>\n These factors and more lead me to predict that Election 2020 will be a contested election which ends with Trump staying in office but accused of usurping the democratic process. This outcome is the worst possible outcome and also the most advantageous for the globalist establishment.<\/p>\n The elites are even hinting publicly that this is about to happen. For those of you that have been reading my work for many years, the name \u201cMax Boot\u201d might sound familiar. In my article\u00a0\u2018How Globalists Will Attempt To Control Populations Post Collapse\u2019<\/a>, published in 2016, I outlined writings by Council on Foreign Relations member Max Boot on the Malaysian Model, a method he describes as the perfect strategy for taking control of a population and destroying an insurgency.<\/p>\n The model calls for the institution of city-sized concentration camps which are used to isolate a rebellion away from the general population. The population in these cities is then subjected to extreme tracking and control measures, while the military is sent out to rural areas to eliminate potential insurgent threats.<\/p>\n Well, Boot is back again, this time writing about how he thinks Donald Trump will try to \u201chijack\u201d the presidency in 2020.<\/p>\n