{"id":222400,"date":"2024-04-10T07:07:02","date_gmt":"2024-04-10T11:07:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=222400"},"modified":"2024-04-10T07:07:02","modified_gmt":"2024-04-10T11:07:02","slug":"maryland-sheriff-says-it-will-be-civil-war-before-gun-confiscation-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=222400","title":{"rendered":"Maryland Sheriff Says It Will Be CIVIL WAR Before Gun Confiscation"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><!--more--><div id=\"attachment_61695\" style=\"width: 1034px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/themillenniumreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/163140215.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-61695\" class=\"size-full wp-image-61695\" src=\"https:\/\/themillenniumreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/163140215.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1024\" height=\"682\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-61695\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Wicomico County Sheriff Michael A. Lewis and other Maryland sheriffs speak<\/p><\/div><\/p>\n<h2>Some sheriffs protest gun restrictions; others refuse to enforce the laws<\/h2>\n<p>By Marlena Chertock, Emilie Eaton, Jacy Marmaduke and Sydney Stavinoha<br \/>\nNEWS 21<\/p>\n<p>Sheriff Mike Lewis considers himself the last man standing for the people of Wicomico County.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cState police and highway patrol get their\u00a0<span class=\"soundcite\" data-url=\"\/soundcite\/Sheriff-Lewis.mp3\" data-start=\"0\" data-end=\"21000\">orders from the governor<\/span>,\u201d the Maryland sheriff said. \u201cI get my orders from the citizens in this county.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>With more states passing stronger gun control laws, rural sheriffs across the country are taking the meaning of their age-old role as defenders of the Constitution to a new level by protesting such restrictions, News21 found.<\/p>\n<p>Some are refusing to enforce the laws altogether.<\/p>\n<p>Sheriffs in states like New York, Colorado and Maryland argue that some gun control laws defy the Second Amendment and threaten rural culture, for which gun ownership is often an integral component.<\/p>\n<p>They\u2019re joined by groups like Oath Keepers and the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association, both of which encourage law enforcement officers to take a stand against gun control laws.<span style=\"color: #000000; font-size: 1.4em;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"col-sm-4 col-sm-offset-1\">\n<div class=\"panel panel-default animated story_side fadeIn\">\n<div class=\"panel-body\">\n<p>\u201cIt&#8217;s not (the judge&#8217;s) job to tell me what I can and can&#8217;t enforce,\u201d &#8211; Weld County, Colo. Sheriff John Cooke<span style=\"color: #000000; font-size: 1.4em;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"container story-body\" role=\"main\">\n<div class=\"row\">\n<div class=\"col-sm-6\">\n<p>Lewis and some other sheriffs across the nation, most of them elected by residents of their counties, say their role puts them in the foremost position to stand up to gun laws they consider unconstitutional.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe role of a sheriff is to be the interposer between the law and the citizen,\u201d said Maryland Delegate Don Dwyer, an Anne Arundel County Republican. \u201cHe should stand between the government and citizen in every issue pertaining to the law.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>While the position of sheriff is not found in the U.S. Constitution, it is listed in state constitutions:\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/tornado.state.co.us\/gov_dir\/leg_dir\/olls\/constitution.htm#ARTICLE_XIV_Section_8.5\">Article XIV<\/a>\u00a0of Colorado\u2019s,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/delcode.delaware.gov\/constitution\/constitution-16.shtml#TopOfPage\">Article XV<\/a>\u00a0of Delaware\u2019s,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/mgaleg.maryland.gov\/Pubs-current\/current-constitution-maryland-us.pdf\">Part VII<\/a>\u00a0of Maryland\u2019s and\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.dos.ny.gov\/info\/constitution.htm\">Article XIII<\/a>\u00a0of New York\u2019s. Nearly all of America\u2019s 3,080 sheriffs are elected to their positions, whereas most state and city police top commanders are appointed.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"row padd\">\n<div class=\"col-sm-10\">\n<div class=\"embed-responsive embed-responsive-16by9 embed-glow\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" class=\"embed-responsive-item\" src=\"http:\/\/player.vimeo.com\/video\/102542248?title=0&amp;byline=0&amp;portrait=0&amp;color=a0181d\" width=\"300\" height=\"150\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\" data-mce-fragment=\"1\"><\/iframe><\/div>\n<div class=\"row\">\n<div class=\"col-sm-7\">\n<h4 class=\"text-left sans text-muted noindent photo-caption\"><small>Upstate New York sheriffs don\u2019t understand why the state passed the<br \/>\nSAFE Act when, as they see it, the only place with a gun problem is<br \/>\nNew York City. The governor signed the act last year in response to<br \/>\nthe 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting.<\/small><\/h4>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"row padd\">\n<div class=\"col-sm-6\">\n<p>When Lewis was president of the Maryland Sheriffs\u2019 Association, he testified with other sheriffs against the state\u2019s\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/mgaleg.maryland.gov\/webmga\/frmMain.aspx?pid=billpage&amp;stab=01&amp;id=sb0281&amp;tab=subject3&amp;ys=2013rs\">Firearms Safety Act<\/a>(FSA) before it was enacted in 2013. One of the strictest gun laws in the nation, the act requires gun applicants to supply fingerprints and complete training to obtain a handgun license online. It bans 45 types of firearms, limits magazines to 10 rounds and outlaws gun ownership for people who have been involuntarily committed to a mental health facility.<\/p>\n<p>After Lewis opposed the FSA, he said he was inundated with emails, handwritten letters, phone calls and visits from people thanking him for standing up for gun rights. He keeps a stuffed binder in his office with the laminated notes.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI knew this was a local issue, but I also knew it had serious ramifications on the U.S. Constitution, specifically for our Second Amendment right,\u201d said Lewis, one of 24 sheriffs in the state. \u201c<span class=\"soundcite\" data-url=\"\/soundcite\/Sheriff-Lewis-2.mp3\" data-start=\"0\" data-end=\"7000\">It ignited fire<\/span>\u00a0among sheriffs throughout the state. Those in the rural areas all felt the way I did.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In New York, the state sheriff\u2019s association has publicly decried portions of the SAFE Act, legislation that broadened the definition of a banned assault weapon, outlawed magazines holding more than 10 rounds and created harsher punishments for anyone who kills a first-responder in the line of duty. The act was intended to establish background checks for ammunition sales, although that provision hasn\u2019t taken effect.<\/p>\n<p>A handful of the state\u2019s 62 sheriffs have vowed not to enforce the high-capacity magazine and assault-weapon bans. One of the most vocal is Sheriff Tony Desmond of Schoharie County, population 32,000. He believes his refusal to enforce the SAFE Act won him re-election in 2013.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf you have an (assault) weapon, which under the SAFE Act is considered illegal, I don\u2019t look at it as being illegal just because someone said it was,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>Desmond\u2019s deputies haven\u2019t made a single arrest related to the SAFE Act. Neither has the office of Sheriff Paul Van Blarcum of Ulster County. Van Blarcum said it\u2019s not his job to interpret the Constitution, so he\u2019ll enforce the law. But he said police should use discretion when enforcing the SAFE Act and determining whether to make arrests, as they do when administering tickets.<\/p>\n<p>In Otsego County, New York, population 62,000, Sheriff Richard Devlin takes a similar approach. He enforces the SAFE Act but doesn\u2019t make it a priority.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"row padd\">\n<div class=\"col-sm-10\">\n<div class=\"embed-responsive embed-responsive-16by9 embed-glow\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" class=\"embed-responsive-item\" src=\"http:\/\/player.vimeo.com\/video\/102416104?title=0&amp;byline=0&amp;portrait=0&amp;color=a0181d\" width=\"300\" height=\"150\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\" data-mce-fragment=\"1\"><\/iframe><\/div>\n<div class=\"row\">\n<div class=\"col-sm-7\">\n<h4 class=\"text-left sans text-muted noindent photo-caption\"><small>Wicomico County Sheriff Mike Lewis is taking a strong stance against<br \/>\npotential limits to Maryland citizens\u2019 Second Amendment rights.<\/small><\/h4>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"row padd\">\n<div class=\"col-sm-6\">\n<p>\u201cI feel as an elected official and a chief law enforcement officer of the county it would be irresponsible for me to say, \u2018I\u2019m not going to enforce a law I personally disagree with,\u2019\u201d he said. \u201cIf someone uses a firearm in commission of a crime, I\u2019m going to charge you with everything I have, including the SAFE Act. I won\u2019t do anything as far as confiscating weapons. We\u2019re not checking out registrations. People that are lawfully using a firearm for target shooting, we\u2019re not bothering those people.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Colorado made national headlines when 55 of the state\u2019s 62 sheriffs attempted to sign on as plaintiffs in a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of several 2013 gun control bills in the state. The most-controversial measures banned magazines of more than 15 rounds and established background checks for private gun sales.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"col-sm-5\">\n<h4><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone\" src=\"http:\/\/gunwars.news21.com\/images\/CO_JohnCooke.jpg\" \/><br \/>\n<small><br \/>\nWeld County Sheriff John Cooke sits in his office in Greeley, Colo., on June 6, 2014. Cooke was the lead plaintiff in a lawsuit against the governor when the state legislature passed gun control laws in 2013. Cooke says the new laws are unenforceable and unconstitutional. (Photo by Morgan Spiehs\/News 21)<\/small><\/h4>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"row\">\n<div class=\"col-sm-6\">\n<p>A federal judge said the sheriffs couldn\u2019t sue as elected officials, so Weld County Sheriff John Cooke and eight other sheriffs sued as private citizens. Cooke was the lead plaintiff in the lawsuit, which a federal district judge threw out in June. He and the other plaintiffs are preparing an appeal.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s not (the judge\u2019s) job to tell me what I can and can\u2019t enforce,\u201d Cooke said. \u201cI\u2019m still the one that has to say where do I put my priorities and resources? And it\u2019s not going to be there.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Cooke has won fans with his opposition. He, like Maryland\u2019s Sheriff Lewis, keeps a novel-thick stack of praise and thank-you notes in his office. He\u2019ll run for a Colorado Senate seat in November and is endorsed by the state\u2019s major gun lobby, Rocky Mountain Gun Owners.<\/p>\n<p>Lewis, who is running for re-election this year, said sheriffs have a responsibility to push against what he sees as the federal government\u2019s continual encroachment on citizens\u2019 lives and rights.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhere do we draw a line?\u201d he asked. \u201cI made a vow and a commitment that as long as I\u2019m the sheriff of this county I will not allow the federal government to come in here and strip my law-abiding citizens of the right to bear arms. If they attempt to do that it will be an all-out civil war. Because I will stand toe-to-toe with my people.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>But Brian Frosh, a Maryland state senator and an FSA sponsor and gun-control advocate of Montgomery County, said Lewis\u2019 understanding of a sheriff\u2019s role is flawed.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf you are a sheriff in Maryland you must take an oath to uphold the law and the Constitution,\u201d said Frosh, now the Democratic nominee for Maryland attorney general. \u201cYou can\u2019t be selective. It\u2019s not up to a sheriff to decide what\u2019s constitutional and what isn\u2019t. That\u2019s what our courts are for.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Bronx County, New York, Sen. Jeffrey Klein, who co-sponsored the SAFE Act, agreed that sheriffs who refuse to enforce laws they disagree with are acting out of turn. Constitutional sheriffs are not lawyers or judges, Frosh said, which means they are\u00a0<span class=\"soundcite\" data-url=\"\/soundcite\/Brian-Frosh.mp3\" data-start=\"0\" data-end=\"19000\">following their convictions<\/span>\u00a0instead of the Constitution.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe had lots of people come in (to testify against the bill) and without any basis say, \u2018This violates the Second Amendment,\u2019\u201d Frosh said. \u201cThey can cite the Second Amendment, but they couldn\u2019t explain why this violates it. And the simple fact is it does not. There is a provision of our Constitution that gives people rights with respect to firearms, but it\u2019s not as expansive as many of these people think.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>But sheriffs have the power to nullify, or ignore, a law if it is unconstitutional, Maryland Delegate Dwyer said. He said James Madison referred to nullification as the rightful remedy for the Constitution.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe sheriffs coming to testify on the bill understood the issue enough and were brave enough to come to Annapolis and make the bold stand that on their watch, in their county, they would not enforce these laws even if they passed,\u201d said Dwyer, who has recognized the sheriffs for their courage. \u201cThat is the true role and responsibility of what the sheriff is.\u201d<\/p>\n<h3>Rural versus Urban Divide<\/h3>\n<p>Some rural sheriffs argue that gun control laws are more than just unconstitutional \u2014 they\u2019re unnecessary and irrelevant. In towns and villages where passers-by stop to greet deputies and call local law enforcement to ask for help complying with gun laws, they say, firearms are less associated with crime than they are with a hunting and shooting culture that dates back to when the communities were founded.<\/p>\n<p>Edward Amelio, a deputy in Lewis County, New York, shares that sentiment. There\u2019s no normal day for Amelio, who has patrolled the 27,000-person county for eight years. But he usually responds to domestic disputes, burglaries and car accidents. That\u2019s why he considers the SAFE Act unnecessary.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe issue orders of protection and some contain a clause the judge puts in there saying a person\u2019s guns are to be confiscated,\u201d Amelio said. \u201cThat\u2019s mostly when we deal with guns.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Zachary Reinhart, a deputy sheriff in Schoharie County, New York, said he responds to a wide variety of calls, too.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cOur calls range from accidental 911 dials to domestic disputes to bar fights,\u201d he said. \u201cYou can\u2019t really typify a day at the Schoharie County Sheriff\u2019s Office. It\u2019s all pretty helter-skelter.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Violent crime also isn\u2019t common in Wicomico County, Maryland, where Lewis is sheriff. He receives daily shooting reports from the\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.mcac.maryland.gov\/\">Maryland Coordination and Analysis Center<\/a>, which are not available for public disclosure.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"row padd\">\n<div class=\"col-sm-6\">\n<p>\u201cYou always see \u2018nothing to report\u2019 in the eastern region, in the southern region, in the northern region, in the western region,\u201d Lewis said. \u201cBut the Baltimore central region? Homicide after homicide after homicide.\u201d<span style=\"font-size: 12px;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Even though there are few gun crimes in rural areas, Sheriff Michael Carpinelli in Lewis County argues that people need guns for self-defense.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"row\">\n<div class=\"col-sm-6\">\n<p>\u201cPeople rely on the police in an urban environment to come and protect you all the time,\u201d he said. \u201cPeople who live in a rural area also rely upon the police, but they realize that they live further out from those resources and that they may have to take action themselves.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Duke law professor Joseph Blocher said gun culture has varied in urban and rural areas for centuries.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt has long been the case that gun use and ownership and gun culture are concentrated in rural areas, whereas support for gun control and efforts to curb gun violence are concentrated in urban areas,\u201d he said. \u201cIn the last couple decades we\u2019ve moved away from that towards a more-centralized gun control.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"col-sm-5\">\n<h4><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/gunwars.news21.com\/images\/Carpinelli.jpg\" \/><\/h4>\n<p><small>\u201cWhen I was five years old, my grandmother was raped, and I was with her when it happened. I remember getting on the telephone and dialing the operator and saying, \u2018I need the police.\u2019 And I couldn\u2019t tell her where, and I couldn\u2019t tell her for who, and I was told to hang up and don\u2019t play pranks. At five years old, what do you do? You don\u2019t know. A neighbor had heard my grandmother screaming and took up his shotgun and ran to the woods and held the person at bay that was raping my grandmother. I think that\u2019s probably what made me want to become a police officer. I didn\u2019t want to see that happen to anybody else.\u201d \u2014Sheriff Michael Carpinelli, Lewis County, N.Y.\u00a0 (Photo by Emilie Eaton\/News21)<\/small><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"row\">\n<div class=\"col-sm-6\">\n<p>Lewis bemoaned lawmakers who craft gun-control legislation but are ignorant about guns. \u201cThey have no idea between a long gun and a handgun,\u201d he said. \u201cMany of them admittedly have never fired a weapon in their lives.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>But Klein, the Bronx County senator, said he does understand the gun and hunting culture in upstate New York.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cGrowing up, my father was in the military,\u201d Klein said. \u201cWhen I was younger, I had a .22-caliber gun. In the past, I\u2019ve gone pheasant hunting, quail hunting. It\u2019s great,\u201d he said. \u201cI mean, there\u2019s nothing that we do in Albany, especially with the SAFE Act, that in any way takes away someone\u2019s right to own a gun for hunting purposes.\u201d<\/p>\n<h3>Oath Keepers and CSPOA<\/h3>\n<p>If former Arizona sheriff Richard Mack had it his way, there wouldn\u2019t be a single gun control law in the U.S.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI studied what the Founding Fathers meant about the Second Amendment, the right to keep and bear arms, and the conclusion is inescapable,\u201d said Mack, the founder of the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association (CSPOA). \u201cThere\u2019s no way around it. Gun control in America is\u00a0<span class=\"soundcite\" data-url=\"\/soundcite\/Richard-Mack.mp3\" data-start=\"0\" data-end=\"15000\">against the law<\/span>.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"col-sm-5\">\n<h4><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/gunwars.news21.com\/images\/Desmond.jpg\" \/><\/h4>\n<p><small>\u201cThe people here they are like the original rebels that rebelled against England. They\u2019re strong in their thoughts. They will protect themselves, protect their families and they cherish and respect their freedoms. One of the biggest freedoms that they have is the right to keep and bear arms.\u201d \u2014Sheriff Tony Desmond, Schoharie County, N.Y.\u00a0 (Photo by Emilie Eaton\/News21)<\/small><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"row\">\n<div class=\"col-sm-6\">\n<p>He knows his no-compromise stance has cost him and the CSPOA the support of some sheriffs and law enforcement organizations around the country. And it\u2019s resulted in civil rights agencies labeling CSPOA an anti-government \u201cpatriot group.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>But Mack, the former sheriff in eastern Arizona\u2019s rural Graham County, is not letting up. His conviction is central to the ideology of CSPOA, which he founded in 2011 to \u201cunite all public servants and sheriffs, to keep their word to uphold, defend, protect, preserve and obey\u201d the Constitution, according to his introduction letter on the association\u2019s website.<\/p>\n<p>CSPOA also has ties to Oath Keepers, an organization founded in 2009 with a similar goal to unite veterans, law enforcement officers and first-responders who pledge to keep their oath to \u201cdefend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.\u201d Mack serves on the Oath Keepers Board of Directors.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"col-sm-5\">\n<h4><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/gunwars.news21.com\/images\/Devlin.jpg\" \/><\/h4>\n<p><small>\u201cI\u2019m very proud that the people have put me into this office. As I said, I ran unopposed four years ago and I\u2019m unopposed again this year. I guess I must be doing a good job. It\u2019s an honor to serve the residents. There\u2019s difficult things at times. The SAFE Act is one of those difficult things that you have to deal with and you do the best that you can and you try to be fair to everybody.\u201d \u2014Sheriff Richard Devlin, Ostego County, N.Y.\u00a0 (Photo by Emilie Eaton\/News21)<\/small><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"row\">\n<div class=\"col-sm-6\">\n<p>Oath Keepers is larger and farther-reaching than CSPOA, with active chapters in 48 states and the District of Columbia, and an estimated national membership of 40,000. Its website features a declaration of \u201corders we will not obey,\u201d including those to disarm Americans, impose martial law on a state and blockade cities.<\/p>\n<p>CSPOA grabbed media attention in February with a growing list of sheriffs \u2014 484 as of late July \u2014 professing opposition to federal gun control. Detailed with links beside each name, the sheriffs\u2019 stances run the gamut from refusals to impose a litany of federal and state gun-control laws, to vague vows to protect their constituents\u2019 Second Amendment rights, to law critiques that stop short of promising noncompliance.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"col-sm-5\">\n<h4><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/gunwars.news21.com\/images\/Lewis.jpg\" \/><\/h4>\n<p><small>\u201cWhy are we being penalized? Why are we being crucified because we\u2019re standing up for our Second Amendment right? Why does everybody look at us like we\u2019re right-wing nuts because we\u2019re standing up for our constitutional rights?\u201d \u2014Sheriff Mike Lewis, Wicomico County, Md.\u00a0 (Photo by Sydney Stavinoha\/News21)<\/small><span style=\"font-size: 12px;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"row\">\n<div class=\"col-sm-6\">\n<p>Only 16 of those 484 are listed as CSPOA members.<\/p>\n<p>Some sheriffs perceive Oath Keepers and CSPOA as too radical to associate with. Desmond, of Schoharie County, New York, is known around his state for openly not enforcing provisions of the SAFE Act that he considers unconstitutional. Still, he\u2019s not a member of either organization.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI understand where they are, I guess, but I just have to worry right here myself,\u201d Desmond said. \u201cI don\u2019t want to get involved with somebody that may be a bit more proactive when it comes to the SAFE Act. I want to have the image that I protect gun owners, but I\u2019m not fanatical about it.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Mack is familiar with that sentiment. He suspects it\u2019s hindered the growth of CSPOA.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis is such a new idea for so many sheriffs that it\u2019s hard for them to swallow it,\u201d Mack said. \u201cThey\u2019ve fallen into the brainwashing and the mainstream ideas that you just have to go after the drug dealers and the DUIs and serve court papers \u2014 and that the federal government is the supreme law of the land.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The Southern Poverty Law Center, a civil rights nonprofit that classifies and combats hate and extremist groups, included both CSPOA and Oath Keepers on its list of 1,096 anti-government \u201cpatriot\u201d groups active in 2013. Both groups have faced criticism for their alleged connections to people accused of crimes that range from possessing a live napalm bomb to shooting and killing two Las Vegas police officers and a bystander in June.<\/p>\n<p>Media representatives from the Southern Poverty Law Center did not return phone calls and emails requesting comment.<\/p>\n<p>Franklin Shook, an Oath Keepers board member who goes by the pseudonym \u201cElias Alias,\u201d said the organization doesn\u2019t promote violence, but rather a message of peaceful noncompliance.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhat Oath Keepers is saying is \u2026 when you get an order to go to somebody\u2019s house and collect one of these guns, just stand down,\u201d Shook said. \u201cSay peacefully, \u2018I refuse to carry out an unlawful order,\u2019 and we, the organization, will do everything in our power to keep public pressure on your side to keep you from getting in trouble for standing down. That makes Oath Keepers extremely dangerous to the system.\u201d<\/p>\n<h3>The Future of Gun Control Laws<\/h3>\n<p>Self-proclaimed constitutional sheriffs hope that courts will oust gun control measures in their states \u2014 but they recognize that may not happen. Lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of gun control legislation in Maryland, New York and Colorado have been, for the most part, unsuccessful.<\/p>\n<p>In New York, five SAFE Act-related lawsuits have yielded few results: One lawsuit resulted in an expansion of the magazine limit from seven rounds to 10, but the rest of the measures were thrown out and are awaiting appeal; a similar lawsuit was stayed; a third was thrown out and denied appeal; and two additional lawsuits have been combined but are stagnating in court.<\/p>\n<p>Plaintiffs in the Colorado sheriff lawsuit are preparing to appeal the decision of a federal district judge who in June upheld the constitutionality of the 2013 gun control laws.<\/p>\n<p>A lawsuit seeking to overturn Maryland\u2019s assault weapons and high-capacity magazine bans went to trial in July, but the judge has yet to issue a ruling.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cMy hope is that the governor will look at it now that it\u2019s been a year plus and say, \u2018We\u2019ve had some provisions that have failed. Let\u2019s sit down and look at this and have a meaningful conversation.\u2019\u201d New York\u2019s Devlin said. \u201cI personally don\u2019t see that happening, but I\u2019d like to see that happen.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>__<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/gunwars.news21.com\/2014\/some-sheriffs-protest-gun-restrictions-others-refuse-to-enforce-laws\/\">http:\/\/gunwars.news21.com\/2014\/some-sheriffs-protest-gun-restrictions-others-refuse-to-enforce-laws\/<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-222400","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222400","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=222400"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222400\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=222400"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=222400"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=222400"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}