![\"\"](\"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/The-Truth-vs.-Ales-Jones-featured-image-1024x659-1.jpg\")
Screenshot<\/p><\/div>\n
Jim Fetzer, Ph.D.
\nJamesHFetzer.org<\/a><\/h3>\nRobert Barnes, the celebrated attorney, said (of his visit to the Alex Jones trial in Austin) that it was unlike any courtroom he had ever seen, with three cameras (one of which was pointed at the jury) and that \u201cit looked like a made-for-TV-movie\u201d!<\/strong><\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\nNo doubt, Robert Barnes got it right! And the outcome was the film,\u00a0\u201cThe Truth vs. Alex Jones\u201d<\/a>, which contains very little truth (as I shall explain) and distorts the law regarding freedom of speech by grossly misrepresenting the First Amendment to present a contrived and fabricated case against him for (allegedly) lying about Sandy Hook. But\u00a0for a person x to like about an event E<\/em>\u00a0requires that (a) x makes assertions about E that are false, (b) that x made those assertions knowing they were false, and (c) with the intent to deceive a target audience about E. From the clips of Alex talking about Sandy Hook that are included in this film, it should be obvious he believed what he was reporting and was attempting to inform his audience of the truth about Sandy Hook. That means that,\u00a0even if what Alex was reporting had been false,<\/em>\u00a0he cannot have been lying because he believed that what he was saying was true.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/jameshfetzer.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Three-Sandy-Hook-22victims22--300x268.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
As though this elementary point were not telling enough, Alex Jones\u2019 early reporting was not even false. I know because I am one of the \u201cprofessors\u201d and \u201cschool safety experts\u201d Alex said had \u201cmisled\u201d him about Sandy Hook during his exchange with Elon Musk, which I reviewed (in some detail) during my interview with Sean on\u00a0SGT Report: Never Speak of This\u201d (28 December 2023)\u00a0<\/a>and at\u00a0the College of Complexes (10 February 2024)<\/a>, including how we know that three of the \u201cvictims\u201d\u2013Noah Pozner, Emilie Parker, and Vicki Soto (or the persons they were based upon)\u2013are alive and well. You can\u2019t do better to appreciate the enormity of the Sandy Hook hoax than by reviewing the evidence I provide there, where I co-edited the book, Nobody Died at Sandy Hook: It was a FEMA drill presented as mass murder to promote gun control\u201d<\/a> (2015, 2nd ed., 2016), which amazon.com banned less than a month after it had gone on sale and sold nearly 500 copies.<\/em><\/p>\n
Robert Barnes, the celebrated attorney, said (of his visit to the Alex Jones trial in Austin) that it was unlike any courtroom he had ever seen, with three cameras (one of which was pointed at the jury) and that \u201cit looked like a made-for-TV-movie\u201d!<\/strong><\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n No doubt, Robert Barnes got it right! And the outcome was the film,\u00a0\u201cThe Truth vs. Alex Jones\u201d<\/a>, which contains very little truth (as I shall explain) and distorts the law regarding freedom of speech by grossly misrepresenting the First Amendment to present a contrived and fabricated case against him for (allegedly) lying about Sandy Hook. But\u00a0for a person x to like about an event E<\/em>\u00a0requires that (a) x makes assertions about E that are false, (b) that x made those assertions knowing they were false, and (c) with the intent to deceive a target audience about E. From the clips of Alex talking about Sandy Hook that are included in this film, it should be obvious he believed what he was reporting and was attempting to inform his audience of the truth about Sandy Hook. That means that,\u00a0even if what Alex was reporting had been false,<\/em>\u00a0he cannot have been lying because he believed that what he was saying was true.<\/p>\n As though this elementary point were not telling enough, Alex Jones\u2019 early reporting was not even false. I know because I am one of the \u201cprofessors\u201d and \u201cschool safety experts\u201d Alex said had \u201cmisled\u201d him about Sandy Hook during his exchange with Elon Musk, which I reviewed (in some detail) during my interview with Sean on\u00a0SGT Report: Never Speak of This\u201d (28 December 2023)\u00a0<\/a>and at\u00a0the College of Complexes (10 February 2024)<\/a>, including how we know that three of the \u201cvictims\u201d\u2013Noah Pozner, Emilie Parker, and Vicki Soto (or the persons they were based upon)\u2013are alive and well. You can\u2019t do better to appreciate the enormity of the Sandy Hook hoax than by reviewing the evidence I provide there, where I co-edited the book, Nobody Died at Sandy Hook: It was a FEMA drill presented as mass murder to promote gun control\u201d<\/a> (2015, 2nd ed., 2016), which amazon.com banned less than a month after it had gone on sale and sold nearly 500 copies.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n