{"id":230336,"date":"2024-05-21T06:46:30","date_gmt":"2024-05-21T10:46:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=230336"},"modified":"2024-05-21T06:46:30","modified_gmt":"2024-05-21T10:46:30","slug":"covid-plandemic-roundup-huge-lawsuit-tsunami-incoming","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=230336","title":{"rendered":"

COVID PLANDEMIC ROUNDUP: Huge Lawsuit Tsunami Incoming<\/h1>"},"content":{"rendered":"

BEN BARTEE
\nArmageddon Prose<\/p>\n

COVID Propaganda Roundup: The latest updates on the \u201cnew normal\u201d \u2013 chronicling the lies, distortions, and abuses by the ruling class.<\/em><\/p>\n

Back in 2020, the multinational pharmaceutical industry successfully persuaded the government prostitutes who theoretically regulate it to grant it carte-blanche, pre-emptive, blanket immunity from all injuries associated with the shots \u2014 a carve-out literally granted to no other industry, and an affront to decency on its face.<\/p>\n

But the exemption, as ludicrous as it was, didn\u2019t grant either industry or government immunity for fraud; it didn\u2019t grant immunity for human rights abuses; it didn\u2019t grant immunity for public servants engaged in public malfeasance. These were before 2020 and are now prosecutable crimes.<\/p>\n

Fauci lackey bragged about making \u2018smoking gun\u2019 emails \u2018disappear\u2019<\/h2>\n

The lesson from the Hillary Clinton email server saga of 2016, sent loud and clear to her fellow criminals in government, is that skirting public recordkeeping of official business will go unpunished by the state \u2014 provided the perpetrator is sufficiently well-connected.<\/p>\n

Via\u00a0The Defender<\/a>\u00a0(emphasis added):<\/p>\n

\u201cA longtime aide to<\/strong>\u00a0former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) director Dr.\u00a0Anthony Fauci allegedly boasted<\/strong>\u00a0in emails\u00a0about his ability to evade public records requests<\/strong>\u00a0and his intention to delete any potential \u2018smoking guns,\u2019<\/strong>\u00a0a congressional hearing revealed Thursday.<\/em><\/p>\n

Former National Institutes of Health (NIH) acting director Lawrence Tabak testified before the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, which has been investigating an American research organization at the center of suspicions that the COVID-19 pandemic may have resulted from a lab accident in Wuhan.<\/em><\/p>\n

The hearing follows an announcement Wednesday that this organization \u2014 EcoHealth Alliance, helmed by President Peter Daszak \u2014 has had its federal funding suspended and could be on track to be debarred from federal funding for years.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Deleting public records to protect government criminals is a crime itself, part and parcel of a much larger criminal conspiracy to cover up larger crimes.<\/p>\n

They\u2019re all begging for the RICO treatment.<\/p>\n

AstraZeneca trial participant sues Pfizer for breach of contract<\/h2>\n

Via\u00a0New York Post<\/a>\u00a0(emphasis added):<\/p>\n

\u201cA Utah mother who says she was \u2018permanently disabled\u2019 after taking part in the US clinical trial of AstraZeneca\u2019s COVID-19 vaccine is suing the drug manufacturer because it failed to cough up enough cash to cover her medical expenses\u2026<\/em><\/p>\n

\u2018I walked into the clinic fine, and walked out the beginning of a nightmare I wouldn\u2019t wish on my worst enemy,\u2019 Dressen said, per the court papers…<\/em><\/p>\n

The mom of two has accused AstraZeneca of breaching its contract by failing to provide adequate compensation to cover the costs of the medical bills<\/strong>\u00a0associated with her side effects, which she says have \u2018skyrocketed\u2019 in the years since taking the vaccine.<\/em><\/p>\n

She claims she had signed a consent form with the manufacturer at the beginning of the trial\u00a0that said AstraZeneca would \u2018pay the costs of medical treatment for research injuries, provided that the costs are reasonable, and you did not cause the injury yourself,\u2019<\/strong>\u00a0the suit says.<\/em><\/p>\n

Dressen, however, said\u00a0AstraZeneca only offered her a one-time payment of $1,243.30<\/strong>.<\/em><\/p>\n

That is a \u2018minuscule fraction of the medical bills and lost wages, among other financial costs, that Bri had incurred and will continue to incur,\u2019 the suit says.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\n