![\"\"](\"https:\/\/theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com\/2017\/09\/mattis-and-dunford.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n[\u2026] \u201cMattis quietly went to Washington National Cathedral to pray about his concern for the nation\u2019s fate under Trump\u2019s command and, according to Woodward, told Coats, \u201cThere may come a time when we have to take collective action\u201d since Trump is \u201cdangerous. He\u2019s unfit.\u201d (read more<\/a>)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
What do you call a conversation between the Defense Secretary and the head of the U.S. intelligence apparatus where they are talking about taking \u201ccollective action\u201d to remove an elected President?\u00a0 That\u2019s called sedition\u2026. A seditious conspiracy.<\/p>\n
As alarming as that sounds on its face, this actually aligns with our own previous research into key military leadership, the joint chiefs, and their corrupt intent to overthrow the\u00a0elected<\/em>\u00a0government.\u00a0 Readers will remember when we noted this very issue after Lt. Col\u00a0 Alexander Vindman compromised his position yet was not removed by his command structure within the Pentagon.<\/p>\n
NOVEMBER 2019<\/em><\/a>\u00a0\u2013 [\u2026] For emphasis let me repeat a current fact that is being entirely overlooked.\u00a0 Despite his admitted usurpation of President Trump policy, Vindman was sent back to his post in the NSC with the full support of the United States Department of Defense.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
The onus of action to remove Vindman from the NSC does not just lay simply at the feet of the White House and National Security advisor Robert O\u2019Brien; and upon whose action the removal of Vindman\u00a0could be positioned as political<\/a>; the necessary, albeit difficult or perhaps challenging, obligation to remove Lt. Col Vindman also resides purposefully with the Dept. of Defense.<\/p>\n
The Pentagon could easily withdraw Vindman from his position at the National Security Council; yet, it does not\u2026. and it has not. \u00a0\u00a0WHY?<\/strong><\/p>\n
There is a code within the military whereby you never put your leadership into a position of compromise; ie. \u201cnever compromise your leadership\u201d.\u00a0 In this example, President Trump cannot remove Vindman from the White House NSC advisory group due to political ramifications and appearances\u2026<\/p>\n
The Joint Chiefs certainly recognize this issue; it is the very type of compromise they are trained to remove.\u00a0 Yet they do nothing to remove the compromise.\u00a0 They do nothing to assist.<\/p>\n
Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman was the majority (#1) source for the material CIA operative Eric Ciaramella used in a collaborative effort to remove President Trump from office.\u00a0 Let me make this implication\u00a0crystal clear<\/strong>:<\/p>\n
The United States Military is collaborating with the CIA to remove a U.S. President from office.<\/h3>\n
Do you see the issue now?<\/p>\n
The Pentagon has done nothing, absolutely nothing, to countermand this implication\/reality.<\/p>\n
The Joint Chiefs of Staff have done nothing, absolutely nothing, to diminish the appearance of, nor deconstruct the agenda toward, the removal of President Trump.<\/p>\n
Mr. President, do I have your attention?<\/p>\n