Whistleblower<\/em>: “We were told to collect any ballots that we find<\/strong>\u00a0in mailboxes, collection boxes, et cetera, for outgoing mail, at the end of the day, we are supposed to separate them from the standard letter mail,\u00a0so they can hand-stamp them with yesterday\u2019s date<\/u><\/strong>\u2014and put them through the Express Mail system\u2014to get wherever they need to go,” said the whistleblower, adding “For clarification, today is the fourth of November.”<\/p>\n James O’Keefe<\/em>: “Hand-stamp them with Nov. 3\u2019s date?”<\/p>\n Whistleblower:\u00a0<\/em>“Yes<\/p>\n James O’Keefe:\u00a0<\/em>“That seems wrong–”<\/p>\n Whistleblower:\u00a0<\/em>“Yeah, that\u2019s why I am coming forward with this information.\u00a0That is a very shady<\/strong>\u2014in addition to, as far as I am aware,\u00a0we\u2019re not supposed to be counting ballots that are postmarked after the third of November here in the state of Michigan.<\/strong>”<\/p>\n The Insider said he was shocked when\u00a0Barlow Branch morning supervisor Jonathan Clarke<\/strong>\u00a0told a group of mail carriers how late ballots would be handled.<\/p>\n …<\/p>\n The Insider said there was a process set up for the post office workers involved in the bogus postmark scheme. –Project Veritas<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Listen<\/strong>:<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.zerohedge.com\/s3\/files\/inline-images\/michigan.jpg?itok=PHjSGCDQ\")