{"id":38722,"date":"2020-11-27T19:43:46","date_gmt":"2020-11-27T23:43:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=38722"},"modified":"2020-11-27T19:45:17","modified_gmt":"2020-11-27T23:45:17","slug":"covid-fraud-the-reclassification-of-expected-deaths-from-all-causes-into-covid-deaths","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=38722","title":{"rendered":"COVID FRAUD: “the reclassification of expected deaths from all causes into Covid deaths”"},"content":{"rendered":"

New Study Highlights Alleged Accounting Error Regarding Covid Deaths<\/h1>\n

Ethan Yang
\nAIER<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

[Editor\u2019s note: the article and video discussed below have been pulled by Johns Hopkins Newsletter. You can read the announcement\u00a0here<\/a>. An additional explanation is\u00a0here<\/a>. The claims made by the economics professor will clearly require more investigation, as the announcement says. That said, AIER is publishing this in the interest of objective science and open discussion.]<\/p>\n

At the time of this writing, the United States currently maintains the\u00a0highest number of Covid-19 deaths and ranks 11th<\/a>\u00a0for the highest deaths per capita. There have been approximately 262,000 recorded Covid-19 deaths in the United States, which is certainly a concerning number.<\/p>\n

However, a new\u00a0study<\/a>\u00a0(link removed or site crashed but now\u00a0available at Archive.org)<\/a>\u00a0published by Dr.\u00a0Genevieve Briand<\/a>\u00a0at Johns Hopkins University notes some critical accounting errors done at the national level. The study \u2013 which is still being vetted \u2013 simply examines the raw data that should have been questioned months ago. The overall conclusion is that Covid-19, at least according to collected data, is not the killer disease that it is currently hyped up to be.\u00a0AIER is not endorsing the study as is without further study, but we are interested in the argument being examined and discussed.<\/p>\n

Viewing Covid-19 Deaths in Context<\/h3>\n

It is already well established that Covid-19 is a disease that is most dangerous to those over the age of 65 and who have preexisting conditions. In the United States, there has been an observed\u00a02.1% mortality rate<\/a>, with elderly individuals making up over half that number.<\/p>\n

Young and healthy people are not by any significant capacity threatened by Covid-19.<\/p>\n

One of the most important factors when it comes to Covid-19 is preventing excess death. According to the\u00a0CDC<\/a>,<\/p>\n

\u201cEstimates of excess deaths can provide information about the burden of mortality potentially related to the COVID-19 pandemic, including deaths that are directly or indirectly attributed to COVID-19. Excess deaths are typically defined as the difference between the observed numbers of deaths in specific time periods and expected numbers of deaths in the same time periods.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Essentially, there is an average number of deaths every year due to a variety of causes that for the most part have remained constant through the years. This includes morbidities such as heart disease, which has long been the leading cause of death, and cancer, which has long plagued our existence. For Covid-19 to be a serious cause of alarm, it would need to significantly increase the number of average deaths.<\/p>\n

However, according to the study,<\/p>\n

\u201cThese data analyses suggest that in contrast to most people\u2019s assumptions, the number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming. In fact, it has relatively\u00a0no effect on deaths in the United States<\/strong>.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Total deaths in the United States show no significant change and even mirror past trends of seasonal illness.<\/p>\n

\n
\"\"
Source: CDC Data, Methodology Included in this\u00a0Video<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

According to this graph constructed using data provided by the CDC from the last 6 years, total deaths have remained relatively constant and increases can be explained by various factors such as a larger population. The spikes in deaths in 2020 are consistent with historical trends, only topping 2018 by 11,292 deaths. There have been over 262,000 deaths attributed to Covid-19 in the United States, yet total deaths have not increased in any alarming capacity; they have only mirrored existing trends. In short, according to 6 years of data collected by the CDC, Covid-19 has not led to any significant increase in deaths.<\/p>\n

Diving Deeper<\/h3>\n

What is even more interesting if not more alarming is that the spike in recorded Covid-19 deaths seen in 2020 has coincided with a proportional decrease in death from other diseases.<\/p>\n

Yanni Gu\u00a0writes<\/a><\/p>\n

\u201cThis suggests, according to Briand, that the COVID-19 death toll is misleading. Briand believes that deaths due to heart diseases, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia may instead be\u00a0recategorized<\/strong>\u00a0as being due to COVID-19.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Deaths have remained relatively constant, yet reported deaths due to deadly conditions such as heart disease have fallen while reported Covid deaths have risen. This suggests that the current Covid death count is in some capacity relabeled deaths due to other ailments. According to the graph, reported Covid deaths even overtook heart disease as the main cause of death at one point, which should raise suspicion.<\/p>\n

This aligns with many other well-established facts about the virus, such as those with comorbidities are the most at risk. According to the CDC,\u00a0about 94% of Covid deaths\u00a0<\/a>occur with comorbidities. This suggests that it could be possible that a large number of deaths could have been mainly due to more serious ailments such as heart disease but categorized as a Covid-19 death, a far less lethal disease.<\/p>\n

\n
\"\"
Source:\u00a0John Hopkins News-Lette<\/a>r, provided by Genevieve Briand<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

According to this graph provided by the study, deaths labeled under Covid-19 increased while deaths labeled under others decreased. It is important to note that this sample only applies to the month of April as the author notes these were the weeks with the highest reported deaths. Gu writes<\/p>\n

\u201cThe CDC classified all deaths that are related to COVID-19 simply as COVID-19 deaths. Even patients dying from other underlying diseases but are infected with COVID-19 count as COVID-19 deaths. This is likely the main explanation as to why COVID-19 deaths drastically increased while deaths by all other diseases experienced a significant decrease\u2026<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\u201cIf [the COVID-19 death toll] was not misleading at all, what we\u00a0should have observed is an increased number of heart attacks and increased COVID-19 numbers<\/strong>. But a decreased number of heart attacks and all the other death causes doesn\u2019t give us a choice but to point to some misclassification,\u201d Briand replied.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Furthermore, Briand\u2019s research notes that the percentage of death has remained relatively constant through all age groups. Covid death statistics seem to mirror the normal distribution of death amongst age groups, further lending credence to the argument that many Covid deaths are recategorized deaths.<\/p>\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

Briand provides this graph constructed from CDC data that shows that deaths amongst various age groups have remained relatively constant.<\/p>\n

By simply looking at the raw data presented by the CDC Gu writes that<\/p>\n

\u201cAll of this points to no evidence that COVID-19 created any excess deaths. Total death numbers are not above normal death numbers. We found no evidence to the contrary,\u201d Briand concluded.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

What Do We Do With This Information?<\/h3>\n

Briand and likely many others suppose that the extreme emphasis on Covid-19 has led to the unintended classification of the disease as the cause of death. She further stresses that although this data challenges the idea that Covid is an unprecedented and lethal disease, we should still be concerned with mitigating death in general.<\/p>\n

However, it is clear that this significant accounting error regarding Covid deaths, if true, is not productive. It has caused mass hysteria and misinformed public policy. Closing down communities to fight a virus that according to the data, has had no significant contribution to total deaths, reduces our overall capacity to build a healthy society.<\/p>\n

Lockdowns have resulted in severe damage to our capacity to improve the general health of society. From the catastrophic economic damage that lowers the standard of living for everyone to surgeries being deemed \u201cunessential,\u201d our current policies are not helping in preventing deaths in general; they are likely leading to more. Suicides and substance abuse are up, mental and physical health are down, all due to lockdowns.<\/p>\n

The late Dr. Donald Henderson, who led the eradication of smallpox, noted in\u00a02006\u00a0<\/a>that<\/p>\n

\u201cExperience has shown that communities faced with epidemics or other adverse events respond best and with the least anxiety when the normal social functioning of the community is least disrupted.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The hysteria over Covid-19 has likely led to the alleged accounting error noted in Briand\u2019s study, the reclassification of expected deaths from all causes into Covid deaths. That accounting error has likely led to a number of policy decisions that have drastically crippled our ability to support the general welfare of society, economically, socially, and spiritually. Going forward these findings should give us pause and reconsideration over the threat Covid-19 actually poses and realize how much avoidable damage we have done to ourselves as a result.<\/p>\n

\n