By Andrea Widburg
\nAmerican Thimker<\/p>\n
Americans have common sense, so they can understand when they’re being played (for example, when politicians place Americans under house arrest and then ignore their own rules to party and travel).\u00a0\u00a0And they know there is no way on God’s green earth that decrepit, demented, corrupt, and terminally stupid Joe Biden fairly won this election.\u00a0\u00a0This post assembles various election anomalies that don’t pass the smell test.<\/p>\n
J.B. Shurk<\/a>, who frequently publishes at\u00a0American Thinker, wrote\u00a0a knock-out article<\/a>\u00a0for\u00a0The Federalist\u00a0about Joe Biden’s magical performance in the election.\u00a0\u00a0You should read the whole article, but here are four things that don’t pass the smell test:<\/p>\n 1. Biden allegedly got 80 million votes, which is more than Obama received at his peak, in 2008 \u2014 and Biden did this despite losing minority voters to Donald Trump and trailing Trump in voter enthusiasm.<\/p>\n 2. Biden broke 60 years of precedent by winning nationally despite losing prodigiously in bellwether states and counties.\u00a0\u00a0The last time this happened was when the mafia got out the vote for John F. Kennedy in 1960.<\/p>\n 3. Trump had extraordinary coattails, so much so that even the\u00a0New York Times\u00a0<\/a>admitted<\/a><\/em>\u00a0that the “Democrats Suffered Crushing Down-Ballot Losses Across America.”\u00a0\u00a0Think about that: Biden had\u00a0no<\/em>\u00a0coattails and no enthusiasm, yet he allegedly won a record number of votes.\u00a0\u00a0Smells fetid to me.<\/p>\n 4. Biden barely made it through the primaries, while Trump soared, with Trump’s performance being a historically sure sign of voter enthusiasm and probable victory \u2014 yet Biden, again, allegedly scored an equally historically strong victory.<\/p>\n At\u00a0The Spectator, Patrick Basham, a professional pollster, also felt\u00a0that Biden’s alleged win<\/a>\u00a0cannot pass the smell test.\u00a0\u00a0Again, this is a summary, so you should read the original article:<\/p>\n 5. Trump exceeded his original vote count by the largest margin for any incumbent in American history.\u00a0\u00a0He got 10 million more votes than before; by contrast, Obama, in 2012, got 3.5 million\u00a0fewer<\/em>\u00a0votes than in 2008.<\/p>\n 6. Trump’s support among blacks grew by 50%, while Biden’s fell below the important 90% mark that Democrat candidates need to secure victory.<\/p>\n 7. In the Rust Belt, Biden lost black support everywhere except in Detroit, Philadelphia, and Milwaukee.\u00a0\u00a0In those cities, every single black person apparently voted for Biden.<\/p>\n 8. While pollsters can and do\u00a0manipulate polling outcomes<\/a>, non-polling metrics (historical norms such as the economy, enthusiasm, etc.) have never been wrong \u2014 only we’re being told that this year was the exception.<\/p>\n Then there are the indicia of fraud that\u00a0Dr. Navid Kershavarz-Nia detailed<\/a>:<\/p>\n 9. The fact that Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Arizona, Nevada, and Georgia simultaneously pretended to halt ballot-counting while continuing to count is evidence of election fraud collusion.<\/p>\n 10. Optical scanners were set to accept unverified, un-validated ballots.<\/p>\n 11. The scanners were almost certainly programmed to fail to keep audit records.<\/p>\n 12. In the contested states, the voting machines were alleged to have processed hundreds of thousands of ballots within a short time, which is a physical impossibility.<\/p>\n And here are a few more indications of fraud:<\/p>\n 13. In Pennsylvania,\u00a0statistically impossible numbers<\/a>\u00a0of late-arriving mail-in votes went to Biden.<\/p>\n 14. Dominion and ES&S voting machines\u00a0were created<\/a>\u00a0to have back doors and specific functions to manipulate votes either at the machine or over the internet.<\/p>\n 15.\u00a0Fox News’s\u00a0behavior on election night (refusing to call pro-Trump outcomes while prematurely calling Arizona for Biden) was so abnormal that\u00a0Vegas oddsmakers<\/a>\u00a0instantly assumed that the fix was in.<\/p>\n 16. The allegedly late-arriving mailed in ballots increased Biden’s equally alleged lead with\u00a0statistically impossible perfection and stability<\/a>.<\/p>\n 17. There were\u00a0anomalies in Virginia<\/a>\u00a0that suggested that computers were subtracting votes from Trump and, sometimes, giving them to Biden.<\/p>\n 18.\u00a0One analysis shows<\/a>\u00a0that voting machines in Michigan systematically removed votes from Trump and handed them to Biden.\u00a0\u00a0I saw a rebuttal (which I cannot locate now) that purported to debunk this but did so by using a different scale on the X-axis, which I found inherently suspicious.<\/p>\n