{"id":39551,"date":"2020-12-02T18:08:10","date_gmt":"2020-12-02T22:08:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=39551"},"modified":"2020-12-02T18:10:54","modified_gmt":"2020-12-02T22:10:54","slug":"election-fraud-of-nearly-575000-pa-votes-biden-allegedly-received-99-4-trump-got-0-6","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=39551","title":{"rendered":"ELECTION FRAUD: Of a batch of 575,000 PA votes, Biden allegedly received 99.4%, Trump got 0.6%"},"content":{"rendered":"

Pennsylvania Bombshell: Biden 99.4% v. Trump 0.6%<\/strong><\/h1>\n

<\/p>\n

Stunning testimony that the media has dutifully ignored.<\/em><\/h3>\n

by Paul Kengor
\nThe American Spectator<\/p>\n

\"\"

Ret. Col. Phil Waldren testifying at hearings on Nov. 25 (YouTube screenshot)<\/p><\/div>\n

T<\/span>here are landslides and then there are landslides. There are lopsided votes and then there are lopsided votes. There are egregious examples of vote manipulation and then there are really<\/em> egregious examples of vote manipulation. What surfaced during hearings in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, on November 25, 2020, may set the standard for electoral outrageousness. An expert testifying to the Pennsylvania Senate flagged a batch of ballots that recorded some 570,000 votes for Joe Biden and only 3,200 for Donald Trump.<\/p>\n

Yes, you read that correctly. That would equate to Joe Biden bagging 99.4 percent of that enormous chunk of votes. That one batch alone would have flipped the state to Biden.<\/p>\n

This bombshell was dropped last Wednesday at the Wyndham Hotel in Gettysburg. The November 25 hearings, which began at 12:30 p.m. and ran for nearly four hours, were convened at the request of Sen. Doug Mastriano (R-Adams, Cumberland, Franklin, and York counties). It was sponsored by the Senate Majority Policy Committee, chaired by Sen. David Argall (R-Berks\/Schuylkill). Mastriano has called what happened \u201cunacceptable,\u201d and has called for the resignation of Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar.<\/p>\n

This particular gem was provided by Ret. Col. Phil Waldren, a former combat officer with a background in Army information and electronic warfare. Waldren, who testified along with Rudy Giuliani\u2019s team, brought to the hearing his considerable expertise in analysis of election-data fraud. After Waldren presented his material, the chair opened the floor for questions. Rudy Giuliani went first, asking Waldren to clarify what his analytics team means when they talk about \u201cspike anomalies\u201d in voting patterns. These, as Waldren defines them, are \u201cevents where a numerical amount of votes are processed in a time period that is not feasible or mechanically possible under normal circumstances.\u201d Waldren showed a chart with a shocking example of an apparent massive dump of votes for Joe Biden. Giuliani pressed Waldren for clarification regarding this unbelievable \u201cBiden injection of votes.\u201d Here\u2019s the exchange:<\/p>\n

Waldren: At the very beginning of the chart, where there\u2019s a circle that says \u201cOn Election Day,\u201d what that indicates is there\u2019s a spike in loaded votes. 337,000-plus-or-minus-some votes that were added in there in one big batch. So that was an anomaly in the reporting. Normally you would expect to see a smooth curve going up, not any big spikes, that\u2019s kind of what Greg was talking about, the anomalies of loading and uploading those votes. So that big spike that occurs there is a prime indicator of fraudulent voting.<\/p>\n

Giuliani: And that\u2019s [a total of] 604,000 votes in 90 minutes, is that right?<\/p>\n

Waldren: Correct, this is [shows chart] 337,000 votes in that period of time.<\/p>\n

Giuliani: And when you look at this entire curve, with all these spikes, can you calculate how much of a vote that accounted for for Biden, and how much for Trump?<\/p>\n

Waldren: Close to 600,000. I think our figures were about 570-some-odd-thousand that all those spikes represent overtime.<\/p>\n

Giuliani: For Biden?<\/p>\n

Waldren: Correct.<\/p>\n

Giuliani: And how much for Trump?<\/p>\n

Waldren: I think it was a little over 3,200.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

That\u2019s roughly 570,000 votes for Biden and 3,200 for Trump. Biden scooped up this enormous batch by 99.4 percent. Incredible. Impossible. Scandalous.<\/p>\n

When Waldren said this, the audience in the room gasped in shock. (To watch the exchange, and the entire hearing, click here<\/a>. This exchange begins at 1:28:00.)<\/p>\n

If what Waldren alleges here is true, then this would constitute one of the most insidious examples of documented voter fraud in the history of American presidential politics. This one spike alone would have erased Donald Trump\u2019s 600,000-vote lead over Joe Biden late Tuesday night, November 3. Biden has reportedly won Pennsylvania by about 70,000 votes. This one swing would have done it. If this is true, then this episode alone might well constitute a smoking gun affirming a fraudulent election in Pennsylvania.<\/p>\n

And yet, this electoral bombshell has been completely ignored by the mainstream press. The only national sources that I could find reporting it were RealClearPolitics<\/a>, Breitbart<\/a>, and Greg Kelly of Newsmax TV. The video link that I\u2019ve provided is courtesy of Right Side Broadcasting Network, a conservative source, filling a gap vacated by shameless mainstream \u201cnews\u201d sources, which avoided the hearing like the plague.<\/p>\n

I ask: Is this accurate? What happened here? Who or what could have flipped votes like this? Who was responsible? How does this occur? Is this real? Does this not have the potential to remove Pennsylvania from Joe Biden\u2019s column? At the least, should it make the Pennsylvania vote uncertifiable for either Biden or Trump?<\/p>\n

Trump\u2019s critics will want to dismiss the hearings as a partisan spectacle hosted by Pennsylvania Republican legislators. You can\u2019t do that. A real journalist would see enough here to at least merit making some phone calls or sending a few emails. It\u2019s not rocket science, press boys and girls. Do your jobs!<\/p>\n

For the record, likewise egregious voter spikes have reportedly occurred in Michigan, Georgia, and Wisconsin. One analysis<\/a> has targeted these four incidents of \u201cvoter updates\u201d:<\/p>\n

1. An update in Michigan listed as of 6:31AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 141,258 votes for Joe Biden and 5,968 votes for Donald Trump<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

2. An update in Wisconsin listed as 3:42AM Central Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 143,379 votes for Joe Biden and 25,163 votes for Donald Trump<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

3. A vote update in Georgia listed at 1:34AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 136,155 votes for Joe Biden and 29,115 votes for Donald Trump<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

4. An update in Michigan listed as of 3:50AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 54,497 votes for Joe Biden and 4,718 votes for Donald Trump<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Likewise, these incidents could have flipped the respective state into Joe Biden\u2019s win column. I could go on and on. See the affidavit<\/a> of Russell Ramsland of Allied Security Systems detailing the numerous instances of \u201cphysical improbabilities\u201d in the voting tabulations (and election results) in Michigan. If your mind and heart is open, you can\u2019t but be shocked by this.<\/p>\n

But back to Pennsylvania, which is my focus here.<\/p>\n

Could some reporter at some mainstream media outlet \u2014 one with a modicum of journalistic integrity and decency \u2014 pause to take some time to try to determine if these claims are accurate? Could just one \u201cjournalist\u201d with access to Joe Biden ask for his reaction? How long would it take for Donald Trump to be grilled by a pack of ravenous reporters if Joe Biden had been potentially victimized like this?<\/p>\n

And given that the media will not give these claims a hearing, could the U.S. Senate give them a hearing? There\u2019s enough here that demands investigation.<\/p>\n

Whether you like Donald Trump or not, whether you voted for him or not, this should concern every American. If this were Joe Biden being victimized, I would likewise protest. The media sure as heck would. This is not right.<\/p>\n

UPDATE 12\/1\/2020:\u00a0<\/b>A paragraph has been removed that detailed Waldren\u2019s allegations of a 766,000-vote discrepancy in mail-in ballots. That data has since been corrected, and the apparent discrepancy explained.<\/i><\/p>\n

___
\nhttps:\/\/spectator.org\/pennsylvania-bombshell-biden-99-4-vs-trump-0-6\/<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Pennsylvania Bombshell: Biden 99.4% v. Trump 0.6%<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-39551","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39551","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=39551"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39551\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=39551"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=39551"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=39551"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}