{"id":39879,"date":"2020-12-04T17:10:41","date_gmt":"2020-12-04T21:10:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=39879"},"modified":"2020-12-04T17:14:35","modified_gmt":"2020-12-04T21:14:35","slug":"covid-vaccine-is-female-sterilization","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=39879","title":{"rendered":"Covid Vaccine is Female Sterilization"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Head of Pfizer Research: Covid Vaccine is Female Sterilization<\/h1>\n<\/div>\n

Health and Money News<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

The vaccine contains a\u00a0\u00a0spike protein (see image) called\u00a0 syncytin-1<\/strong>, vital for the formation of human placenta in women. If the vaccine works so that we form an immune response AGAINST the spike protein, we are also\u00a0training the female body to attack syncytin-1,<\/strong>\u00a0which could lead to infertility in women of an unspecified duration.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

On December 1, 2020, the ex-Pfizer head of respiratory research\u00a0Dr. Michael Yeadon<\/strong>\u00a0and the lung specialist and former head of the public health department\u00a0Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg<\/strong>\u00a0filed an application with the EMA<\/a>, the European Medicine Agency responsible for EU-wide drug approval, for the\u00a0immediate suspension of all SARS CoV 2 vaccine studies, in particular the BioNtech\/Pfizer study on BNT162b (EudraCT number 2020-002641-42).<\/strong><\/p>\n

Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon demand that the studies \u2013 for the protection of the life and health of the volunteers \u2013 should not be continued until a study design is available that is suitable to address the\u00a0significant safety concerns<\/strong>\u00a0expressed by an increasing number of renowned scientists against the vaccine and the study design.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

On the one hand, the petitioners demand that, due to the known lack of accuracy of the PCR test in a serious study, a so-called\u00a0Sanger sequencing<\/strong>\u00a0must be used. This is the only way to make reliable statements on the effectiveness of a vaccine against Covid-19. On the basis of the many different PCR tests of highly varying quality,\u00a0neither the risk of disease nor a possible vaccine benefit can be determined with the necessary certaint<\/strong>y, which is why testing the vaccine on humans is unethical per se.<\/p>\n

Furthermore, they demand that it must be excluded, e.g. by means of animal experiments,\u00a0that risks already known from previous studies<\/strong>, which partly originate from the nature of the corona viruses,\u00a0can be realized<\/strong>. The concerns are directed in particular to the following points:<\/p>\n