Our Greater Destiny<\/p>\n
There is\u00a0no proof<\/strong>\u00a0anywhere that SARS-COV 2 was ever isolated using the gold standard of medical testing to prove it causes an infectious disease called COVID19.\u00a0https:\/\/off-guardian.org\/2020\/06\/09\/scientists-have-utterly-failed-to-prove-that-the-coronavirus-fulfills-kochs-postulates<\/a><\/p>\n Page 5 Virus Existence: <\/strong>Scientists are detecting novel RNA in multiple patients with influenza or pneumonia-like conditions, and assuming the detection of RNA (believed to be wrapped in proteins to form an RNA virus, as coronaviruses are believed to be) is equivalent to isolation of the virus. It is not, and one of the groups of scientists was honest enough to admit this: \u201cwe did not perform tests for detecting infectious virus in blood<\/em>\u201d [2]. https:\/\/theinfectiousmyth.com\/book\/CoronavirusPanic.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n 2] CDC Admits no quantified virus <\/strong><\/p>\n Page 39 Performance Characteristics states, \u201cSince no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays [diagnostic tests] designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA\u201d The use of the term \u201cquantified\u201d in that phrase means: the CDC has no measurable amount of the virus, because it is unavailable. THE CDC HAS NO VIRUS. https:\/\/www.fda.gov\/media\/134922\/download<\/a><\/p>\n 3] ATTACHMENT: <\/strong>Christine Massey\u2019s speech Nov 28\/20 Dundas Square, Toronto, Ontario CANADA.<\/p>\n Excerpts:<\/strong><\/p>\n To date, no institution has been able to provide or cite even 1 paper showing that “SARS-COV-2” has actually been isolated from even 1 patient anywhere on the planet.<\/p>\n As a result of everyone\u2019s efforts we now have “no records” responses from well over 30 institutions around the world, some of them are:<\/p>\n \u2022 U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COPIES OF \u2018NO RECORD\u2019 RESPONSES [as at Dec 07.20]<\/strong><\/p>\n1] Detection of coronavirus in plasma \u2013 scientist admission
\n<\/strong>\u201cSince we did not perform tests for detecting infectious virus in blood.\u201d<\/em> https:\/\/www.thelancet.com\/journals\/lancet\/article\/PIIS0140-6736(20)30183-5\/fulltext<\/a><\/h3>\n
\n\u2022 U.S. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
\n\u2022 New Zealand \u2022 Ministry of Health
\n\u2022 University of Otago \u2013 claimed to have isolated
\n\u2022 Australia\u2019s Department of Health
\n\u2022 Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation \u2013 involved in \u201cCOVID-19\u201d vaccine trials using the so-called \u201cSARS-COV-2 isolate\u201d from the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity
\n\u2022 Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity (which had publicly claimed to have \u201cisolated the virus\u201d) Do you see any problem there?
\n\u2022 UK\u2019s Government Office for Science
\n\u2022 U.K. Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency
\n\u2022 Public Health Scotland
\n\u2022 Public Health Wales
\n\u2022 Public Health England
\n\u2022 European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control has admitted to having no documentation, even for their own methodology to prove that a virus exists, let alone proof of SARS-COV-2\u201d<\/p>\n
\n