![\"\"](\"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/Screen-Shot-2020-01-18-at-6.23.54-PM.png\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Baxter Dmitry
\nNewsPunch.com<\/p>\n
Canada\u2019s largest newspaper has blasted Prince Harry and Meghan Markle\u2019s plans to live in the famously friendly country, declaring the royals\u2019 plans as \u201cunconstitutional\u201d and \u201ctaboo.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n In a strongly worded editorial<\/a>,\u00a0The Globe and Mail<\/em>\u00a0says the royal couple\u2019s plan to flee Britain and move to Canada violates laws that keep the once-British-ruled country at arm\u2019s length from their mother monarchy across the pond.<\/p>\n \u201cIn response to the sudden announcement of\u00a0a vague and evolving plan\u00a0for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex \u2013 Prince Harry and Meghan \u2013 to move to Canada while remaining part of the Royal Family, the Trudeau government\u2019s response should be simple and succinct: No<\/em>,\u201d the editorial blasts.<\/p>\n \u201cYou are welcome to visit, but so long as you are senior royals, Canada cannot allow you to come to stay \u2026 It breaks an unspoken constitutional taboo,<\/em>\u201d it says.<\/p>\n NYPost\u00a0report<\/a>: Harry and Meghan\u2019s Canada planned migration mucks up the country\u2019s long history of breaking away from the British political system, according to the article.<\/p>\n \u201c[Canada\u2019s] unique monarchy, and its delicate yet essential place in our constitutional system, means that a royal resident \u2014 the Prince is sixth in the line of succession \u2014 is not something that Canada can allow,<\/em>\u201d it says.<\/p>\n \u201cA royal living in this country does not accord with the long-standing nature of the relationship between Canada and Britain, and Canada and the Crown.<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n