{"id":47544,"date":"2021-01-13T19:03:27","date_gmt":"2021-01-13T23:03:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=47544"},"modified":"2021-01-13T19:03:01","modified_gmt":"2021-01-13T23:03:01","slug":"47544","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=47544","title":{"rendered":"The crazy Joint Chiefs drama is much more complicated than anyone knows.<\/b>"},"content":{"rendered":"

Joint Chiefs of Staff – Or Yellow-Bellied, Political Cowards?<\/strong><\/h1>\n

Hal Turner Radio Show<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

The Joint Chiefs of Staff for the United States Armed Forces seem to have shown themselves to be Yellow-Bellied Political Cowards today, in a memo sent to all members of the U.S. Armed Forces.<\/p>\n

The memo, shown below, informs the military that Joe Biden will be sworn in as their 46th Commander-in-Chief on January 20, and that the Protests at the US Capitol last week were, among other things, sedition and insurrection.<\/p>\n

First, the memo:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Hal Turner Opinion<\/strong><\/p>\n

This letter is almost complete balderdash; Double-talk.\u00a0 In my view, it is, in and of itself, “conduct unbecoming.”<\/p>\n

Lets take this piece by piece . . .<\/p>\n

The Generals write:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

“Direct Assault???”\u00a0 It was no such thing.\u00a0 \u00a0No member of Congress got the crap beaten out of them, and that’s really too bad.\u00a0 It would have been a refreshing thing to watch, but those brave members of Congress were too busy hiding in closets, under tables, and using couches to barricade office doors to keep out . . . who?\u00a0 The American People, that’s who.<\/p>\n

Look at these girly-men barricading their office doors:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

They were utterly terrified of the very Americans who paid to build that building, pay to maintain that building, pay for the lights, heat, air conditioning, desks, chairs, computers, and everything else in that building.\u00a0 Put simply, they DARED to run and hide from not only the OWNERS of the building, but the very same people who actually pay their salaries!<\/p>\n

NOT ONE member of congress even came face to face with the Americans who entered their Capitol that day; so there was no “direct assault.”\u00a0 For you to say otherwise is propaganda.<\/p>\n

Is that what our troops should expect from superior officers? Propaganda?\u00a0 If I were a subordinate under the command of these Joint Chiefs, I would realize from this letter, that I cannot trust another word that comes out of their mouths!<\/p>\n

Direct assault? It was a protest that got a little pushy is all.\u00a0 \u00a0Yes, some glass got broken.\u00a0 Yes, some furniture got roughed up.\u00a0 Big deal.\u00a0 The American people own that stuff, if they want to break it, they darn well can.<\/p>\n

Now, why did the protest get a little physical?\u00a0 Because the public servant employees who are supposed to serve the American people, had the unmitigated gall to try to keep them out of their own building!\u00a0 We the People own that building.\u00a0 Maybe if our public servants knew their place, they wouldn’t have interfered with the property owners coming into their own building!<\/p>\n

Instead, the public servants defied the landlord, defied the people who pay their salaries, and got uppity with them.\u00a0 Big mistake.\u00a0 So they got pushed around a bit. Big deal. Hopefully, some of them got some sense knocked into their dense skulls: Don’t mess with the American people.<\/p>\n

At least one of those public servants got so out of control, he SHOT and KILLED an unarmed American woman.\u00a0 A real hero, that guy; shooting an unarmed woman.<\/p>\n

Next, the Joint Chiefs write:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

When I read that first sentence, I thought to myself, OK, now we’re talking.\u00a0 “. . . actions . . .\u00a0 inconsistent with law.”\u00a0 You’re darn right we did, in fact, witness actions inconsistent with law. Then I read the second sentence and realized what I was reading was written by some sniveling idiot.<\/p>\n

The letter was referring to the actions of the Americans and not of the Congress.\u00a0 It was CONGRESS that acted inconsistent with law, by accepting Electors from a clearly fraudulent election!<\/p>\n

Congress assembled in Joint session, and did NOTHING to stop the disenfranchisement of 74 Million Americans whose votes were negated by rampant ballot stuffing, voter fraud, and computer algorithms that stole votes from Trump and gave them to Biden!\u00a0 THAT was the action inconsistent with law.<\/p>\n

Let’s keep this simple: Prior to the November 3 election, there were about 140 Million registered voters in the entire United States.\u00a0 The mass-media admits Donald Trump won 74 Million votes.\u00a0 That leaves only 66 Million for Biden.\u00a0 \u00a0Where did the other fourteen Million Biden votes come from?<\/strong><\/p>\n

See the problem?<\/p>\n

In Pennsylvania alone, it is already documented there were 205,000 more Ballots than voters who voted.\u00a0 One state!\u00a0 And this does not even take into consideration the dead who voted, the illegal aliens who voted, the non-citizens who voted, and people who moved out of state who voted TWICE; once from their new State and again in their old.<\/p>\n

On televisions throughout this nation on election night, we all got to WATCH as thousands of votes were shifted by computers from Trump to Biden.\u00a0 Here’s just some very few examples:<\/p>\n

FLORIDA<\/strong><\/p>\n

This is the simplest to follow.\u00a0 Watch the Florida vote totals for Trump and Biden in the white bars along the bottom of the TV screen.\u00a0 Trump is at 4.702 million.\u00a0 \u00a0Minutes later, Trump\u00a0DROPS 1,364 votes.\u00a0 On live TV!!!\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong>How can you LOSE votes when counting\u00a0up\u00a0from zero?\u00a0 \u00a0Fraud, that’s how!<\/strong><\/p>\n