![\"\"](\"http:\/\/tapnewswire.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/canary_spot_art-246x300.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
Yet other media reports of\u00a0the same cluster of COVID\u201319 deaths<\/a>\u00a0in the same care home\u00a0made\u00a0no mention<\/em>\u00a0of the vaccinations. They reported full lockdowns, emergency situations and alarming COVID\u201319 death tolls. They spoke to NHS teams and local public health officials \u2014 but omitted to report that all of the deceased had almost certainly been vaccinated.<\/p>\n How did they know the correlation was irrelevant? Why didn\u2019t they think it was in the public interest to report this?<\/p>\n On both sides of the Atlantic, the mainstream media are extremely reticent about even hinting at any criticism of vaccines. In order to encourage black and minority ethnic communities in the U.S. to take the vaccination, ABC News reported Baseball legend\u00a0Hank Aaron\u2019s vaccination<\/a>. When he sadly passed away two weeks later, the mainstream media eulogies\u00a0forgot to mention<\/a>\u00a0his much-publicised promotion of COVID\u201319 vaccination. The original story from ABC News was then\u00a0removed from their archives<\/a>.<\/p>\n Consequently, we would be foolish if we didn\u2019t consider what other crucial facts may have been omitted from reports of sudden fatal outbreaks in UK care homes. Are the claims that these occurred\u00a0before vaccination programmes were underway<\/em>\u00a0credible?<\/p>\n On 19 January 2021, the\u00a0Guardian<\/em>\u00a0reported a\u00a0significant cluster of deaths<\/a>\u00a0in a Lincolnshire care home. They stated that 18 of 27 residents at The Old Hall Care\u00a0Home died\u00a0in the run-up to Christmas.<\/em>\u00a0They noted that\u00a0\u201cthe deaths were so sudden [that] staff did not have the chance to administer end-of-life treatment or arrange for loved ones to say goodbye.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n Four days earlier, on 15 January, a BBC\u00a0report of the same deaths<\/a>\u00a0stated that the Old Hall residents were anticipating receiving the\u00a0life-saving<\/em>\u00a0vaccine. The\u00a0Guardian<\/em>\u00a0made no mention of vaccination and the BBC were keen to stress that none of the decedents had been vaccinated. It seems there was no correlation in this case. However, the mainstream media\u2019s frequent expediency with the truth, especially when it comes to vaccines, prompts doubt.<\/p>\n The NHS reported that Lincolnshire was\u00a0one of the first counties in the UK<\/a>\u00a0to commence the vaccine rollout. It was an early adopter, with its programme starting on 8 December 2020, the same day that Margaret Keenan received her vaccine. If the Old Hall residents had\u00a0not<\/em>\u00a0been vaccinated, it seems they were among the unlucky few.<\/p>\n The British overseas territory of Gibraltar provides a study in microcosm. Government of Gibraltar\u00a0COVID\u201319 statistics<\/a>\u00a0show that their first case was recorded on 18 March 2020, with the first death occurring on 1 November. Total deaths had risen to six\u00a0by 22 December, when\u00a0the new B.1.1.7 variant<\/a>\u00a0was first identified. Between 22 December and 10 January, the\u00a0new variant<\/em>\u00a0accounted for a further\u00a0six\u00a0deaths, bringing the total to 12.<\/p>\n Gibraltar started its vaccine rollout on\u00a010 January 2021<\/a>. By 30 January 2021, COVID\u201319 mortality on the Rock had risen to 75. This constituted a\u00a0525%<\/strong>\u00a0increase in the death rate over a twenty-day period, following nearly ten months of\u00a0prior infections carrying off a handful. This order-of-magnitude increase corresponded precisely with the vaccine rollout.<\/p>\n Speaking on 29 January, with the death count standing at 73, the Chief Minister of Gibraltar gave a press conference. Having expressed his sorrow, and mourning\u00a0\u201cthe highest toll in lives arising from one cause\u201d<\/em>\u00a0in Gibraltar\u2019s history, the Chief Minister encouraged the press to see this catastrophe in context. He then informed the press:<\/p>\n In Gibraltar we have now finalised the first dose inoculation of the four most at risk cohorts and the frontline \u2026 We are now starting to provide the second dose to our four priority categories \u2026 We will tomorrow receive a further delivery of the Pfizer vaccine for this purpose, once again on the wings of the RAF angels.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n The Fact-Checkers were quick to\u00a0deny any link to the vaccines<\/a>. They cited a statement from the\u00a0Government of Gibraltar<\/a>, which claimed only six\u00a0vaccinated individuals died. This claim was not a fact.<\/p>\n The Chief Minister said their vaccination programme followed the JCVI priority. In just nineteen days, they had\u00a0finalised the first dose inoculation of the four most at risk cohorts.<\/em>\u00a0That means every Gibraltarian over the age of 70 and those at high clinical risk were vaccinated.<\/p>\n Report after report<\/a>\u00a0in the local media described how the Elderly Residential Service was destroyed by the deaths that began mounting rapidly on 10 January. As just one example, on 17 January, with 13 dying in two days, the\u00a0Gibraltar Chronicle reported<\/a>:<\/p>\n All but three of those who died this weekend were in the care of the Elderly Residential Services. The youngest in their early 70s, the eldest in their late 90s. All were recorded as being deaths from Covid<\/em>\u201319.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Speaking on 26 January, Chief Minister Fabian Picardo said:<\/p>\n These Gibraltarians who are sadly losing their lives to this virus are the same people who have survived the evacuation.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n The evacuation of Gibraltar took place in the summer of 1940.<\/p>\n The next day, Fabien Picardo claimed that just\u00a0six\u00a0of the 61 people who died\u00a0in the 19-day period between the start of the vaccine rollout and his wholly unbelievable statement\u00a0had been\u00a0vaccinated. This despite the fact that a total of\u00a0twelve<\/em>\u00a0Gibraltarians\u00a0had died of COVID\u201319 in the previous\u00a0ten\u00a0months.<\/p>\n The Fact-Checkers checked nothing, researched nothing, and simply used Picardo\u2019s spurious assertions to defend the vaccine rollout. In doing so, like the MHRA, they genuinely exhibited a callous disregard both for the truth and the lives lost. They weren\u2019t in the least bit interested.<\/p>\n It is possible, if unlikely, that the marked and rapid increase in mortality seen in COVID\u201319 affected communities around the world\u00a0may<\/em>\u00a0be explained by new variants. But it appears, wherever you look, that a dramatic mortality increase correlates with COVID\u201319 vaccination programmes.<\/p>\n The numerous anomalies and contradictions suggest we aren\u2019t being given the full story. If vaccine adverse reactions were expected, where are they?<\/p>\n Correlation does not prove causation \u2014 but ignoring correlation signifies denial. We should not be afraid to ask a perfectly legitimate question:<\/p>\n Why is there a correlation between the vaccine rollout and increased COVID\u201319 mortality?<\/p>\n from\u00a0www.ukcolumn.org<\/a><\/p>\nDeath on the Rock<\/h3>\n
![\"Gibraltar](\"https:\/\/www.ukcolumn.org\/sites\/default\/files\/article-images\/Gibralter.png\" "\\"Gibraltar")
Gibraltar Mortality Statistics from virusncov.com<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n