by Jon Rappoport<\/p>\n
NEW VIRUS IN CHINA. WATCH OUT. SPREADING. ANIMALS TO HUMANS? PANDEMIC COMING UP? OBEY MEDICAL AUTHORITIES. ALL HANDS ON DECK. CENTERED IN WUHAN. CITY OF 11 MILLION. WILL THEY QUARANTINE AND SHUT DOWN HONG KONG? TRAVELERS WITH THE VIRUS GETTING THROUGH TO EUROPE AND AMERICA? WHAT\u2019S THE NAME OF THE VIRUS? 2019-nCOV or nCoV2019. WHAT? THANK GOD THE CHINESE ARE UNDER A TIGHT DICTATORSHIP, THEY CAN CRACK DOWN AND QUARANTINE ANYBODY ON A WHIM. IF YOUR BODY TEMPERATURE IS ELEVATED ON A TEST, THEY STOP YOU? WOW. WE MAY NEED THAT IN THE USA, AS LONG AS THEY DON\u2019T STOP ME. IMPEACHMENT? FORGET THAT, IT\u2019S THE VIRUS.<\/p>\n
In the 19 years of this website, the one story I\u2019ve researched and covered more than any other is the DEADLY VIRUS hustle. SARS, Swine Flu, Ebola, etc.<\/p>\n
Now, we have a new one. The possible maybe CORONAVIRUS from China.<\/p>\n
In each case of these could-be killers, we have an official warning. \u201cThis could be the big one.\u201d Millions of people could fall ill and die. In each case, there are travelers. \u201cPeople returning from X have the virus and they are spreading it.\u201d In the case of SARS and Swine Flu, the patients\u2019 symptoms were typical \u201cflu\u201d symptoms: fever, fatigue, cough, weakness. In other words, there was no reason to think the \u201cnew disease\u201d was any different from ordinary traditional illness.<\/p>\n
The big and only difference is the claim that researchers have found a new virus as the cause of illness.<\/p>\n
But in each case, there are serious problems with that claim.<\/p>\n
First, only \u201cofficial researchers\u201d are involved with the \u201cdiscovery\u201d of the new virus. There is no confirmation from independent researchers. For example, in the case of SARS (2003), ten labs belonging to the World Health Organization (WHO) performed the \u201cdiscovery\u201d of that coronavirus. They were connected through closed circuit\u2014no outsiders allowed.<\/p>\n
Eventually, a Canadian biologist working for WHO, Frank Plummer, told the press he was quite puzzled by what he was seeing: more and more SARS patients didn\u2019t have the SARS virus at all. In fact, almost no new SARS patients had the virus. Well, when you stop and think about that ridiculous state of affairs, you realize you can\u2019t say a person, with ordinary flu-like symptoms, is suffering from a new disease if he doesn\u2019t have the cause of that disease. But the mainstream press took no notice of this and moved on.<\/p>\n
In the case of the Swine Flu \u201cepidemic\u201d (2009), the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) was reporting thousands of cases in America\u2014but CBS star reporter Sharyl Attkisson found out that the CDC had, mysteriously, stopped counting cases. How could this be? She came up with the devastating answer. The overwhelming percentage of blood tests on Swine Flu patients were coming back from labs with no sign of the Swine Flu virus or any other flu virus. That story ran on the CBS News site, but as Attkisson told me in an interview, the bosses at CBS wouldn\u2019t allow it on the national television news broadcast. Censored. And that was the end of the CBS exposure of the Swine Flu hoax. Yet, as I reported: about three weeks after CBS shut down the story, WebMD ran a piece in which the CDC estimated there were 22 MILLION cases of Swine Flu in the US. If your head is spinning, it should be.<\/p>\n
The second major problem with the announcement of a \u201cnew disease\u201d or an epidemic is the absence of research on what we could call the \u201cinfection factor.\u201d Let me explain. To even begin to say a particular germ is causing a particular disease, you have to prove the germ is present in a patient\u2019s body IN GREAT NUMBERS. A few little viral particles floating around here and there are irrelevant. You need millions. So if an ignorant doctor or a researcher states, \u201cWell, this patient has the coronavirus so he has the disease,\u201d he\u2019s falling far short of proving anything useful. Where are the tests proving the patient has millions of the virus in his body? Nowhere.<\/p>\n
The third major problem with the announcement of a \u201cnew disease\u201d or an epidemic is the \u201ctest factor.\u201d What test is being run on a patient to prove he has the \u201cnew virus\u201d in his body? Most of the time, it is an antibody test. Stay with me here, this is important. Prior to 1984, it was generally recognized that a positive antibody test was a good outcome. In short, it indicated that the patient\u2019s immune system had come in contact with a germ and successfully defeated it. But then, for several reasons, this science was turned on its head. A positive antibody test, from that time on, was evidence that the patient currently had the disease in question. Boom. Now, disease numbers could easily be inflated. And they were. And they are.<\/p>\n
Automatically assuming that the announcement of a possible epidemic is accurate\u2014well, it\u2019s a major mistake, to say the least.<\/p>\n
The CDC and WHO are operated by virus hunters. Running a new virus up the flagpole is their stock in trade. They rush to an area where an \u201coutbreak\u201d has been announced, and they roll up their sleeves and look for the virus. They pay no attention to environmental factors, such as contaminated water supplies or toxic chemicals or malnutrition or lack of basic sanitation.<\/p>\n
Epidemics are good for business. Pharmaceutical business, inducing fear business, shutting down travel business, diverting the public from key events business, surveillance and quarantine business, and so on.<\/p>\n
I\u2019m sure, at some point, there will be THANK YOU, CHINA, BUSINESS, too. Thank you, China, for your rule by iron fist over the population. Your ability to stop anyone for any reason and test for \u201cthe virus\u201d may have saved the planet from an extinction event. Freedom? Forget it. Public safety is the ace in the deck. It wins every time. Hell, we may need a good epidemic in the US, so we can exert more control over the unruly citizenry. The doctor is king. Do what he says. Always. How many vaccines are there now? Take all of them. Everyone must.<\/p>\n
Nineteen years ago, when I started this website, I told you that, of all the cartels in this world, the most important and powerful one, long-term, was the medical cartel. Nothing since that time has changed my mind.<\/p>\n