Written by: Tim Brown
\nSonsOfLibertyMedia<\/p>\n
It\u2019s amazing what the mainstream media will ignore or absolutely fail to report.\u00a0 In the midst of the plandemic hoax known at COVID, which we affectionately refer to as CONvid-1984, a ruling regarding the PCR test that has been used to bump up the numbers of COVID cases was utterly ignored.<\/p>\n
First, I\u2019ll remind you once again that the man that developed the PCR test, Dr. Karry Mullis, explained the PCR test was never designed to do what they are doing with it today.<\/p>\n
Now, former CBS Healthwatch reporter and author of The Matrix Revealed<\/a> Jon Rappoport expounds on a historic Portuguese appeals court ruling on the PCR test that you never heard in the mainstream media.<\/p>\n Trending: <\/strong>Wisconsin: 28-Year-Old Healthcare Worker Has Aneurysm \u2013 Brain Dead 5 Days After Taking Second Experimental Pfizer Jab<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n Rappoport writes:<\/p>\n On November 11, 2020\u2014and ignored completely by major media in the US and other countries\u2014the Lisbon, Portugal, Court of Appeal ruled against lockdowns, because they were based on unreliable PCR tests. [2]<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n The ruling was historic.<\/em><\/p>\n The off-guardian covered the story [2]<\/a>:\u00a0\u201cPortuguese Court Rules PCR Tests \u2018Unreliable\u2019 & Quarantines \u2018Unlawful\u2019; Important legal decision faces total media blackout in Western world\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n \u201cMost importantly, the judges ruled that a single positive PCR test cannot be used as an effective diagnosis of infection.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n \u201cIn their ruling, judges Margarida Ramos de Almeida and Ana Param\u00e9s referred to several scientific studies. Most notably [a study by Jaafar et al], which found that \u2013 when running PCR tests with 35 cycles or more \u2013 the accuracy dropped to 3%, meaning up to 97% of positive results could be false positives.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n \u201cThe ruling goes on to conclude that, based on the science they read, any PCR test using over 25 cycles is totally unreliable. Governments and private labs have been very tight-lipped about the exact number of cycles they run when PCR testing, but it is known to sometimes be as high as 45. Even fearmonger-in-chief Anthony Fauci has publicly stated anything over 35 is totally unusable.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n The Court was declaring the PCR test alone could not be sufficient for a diagnosis of disease, and it was outrageous to believe it could.<\/em><\/p>\n A \u201ccase of COVID disease\u201d without a medical assessment of clinical symptoms in the patient is no case at all. It is a misnomer, and, the Court stated, represents a serious breach of the law.<\/em><\/p>\n I have explained the issue of \u201ccycles\u201d before. Each cycle is a quantum leap in magnification of the test sample swabbed from the patient. When 35 or more cycles are deployed (some reports say 25), the result of the test is meaningless.<\/em><\/p>\n However, many, many labs use 40 or even 45 cycles.<\/em><\/p>\n At more than 35 cycles, the test yields an overwhelming percentage of false-positives.<\/em><\/p>\n This Portuguese Court of Appeal is surely the best \u201cCOVID-educated\u201d judicial body in the world.<\/em><\/p>\n In prior articles on the PCR, I\u2019ve exposed a triangle of factors that surrounds COVID testing in the US.<\/em><\/p>\n One: Anthony Fauci readily asserts that running the test at 35 cycles or higher yields useless and meaningless results. [3]<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n\n