![\"\"](\"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/fauciredfield-750x422-1.jpg\")
<\/p>\nWritten by Patrick Howley
\nNational File<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
CDC illegally inflated the COVID fatality number by at least 1,600 percent as the 2020 presidential election played out, according to a study published by the Public Health Initiative of the Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge. The study, \u201cCOVID-19 Data Collection, Comorbidity & Federal Law: A Historical Retrospective,\u201d was authored by Henry Ealy, Michael McEvoy, Daniel Chong, John Nowicki , Monica Sava, Sandeep Gupta, David White, James Jordan , Daniel Simon, and Paul Anderson. (READ THE LANDMARK RESEARCH HERE<\/a>)<\/strong><\/p>\n The CDC is now legally requiring red-blooded Americans to wear face masks on all public transportation as globalists try to push the concept of \u201cdouble-masking\u201d on the populace. Since the election, the World Health Organization admits<\/a> that PCR tests are not totally reliable on the first try and a second test might be needed. This corresponds with CDC\u2019s quiet admission<\/a> that it blended viral and antibody test results for its case numbers and that people can test positive on an antibody test if they have antibodies from a family of viruses that cause the common cold<\/a>. Hospitals in Florida had so many accuracy complications that Orlando Health had to admit<\/a> that its 9.4 percent positivity rate got recorded at 98 percent. (READ: The TRUTH About Fauci and Gates And NIH Owning A Stake in the Vaccine).<\/a><\/p>\n \u201cThe groundbreaking peer-reviewed research\u2026asserts that the CDC<\/span> willfully violated multiple federal laws including the Information Quality Act, Paperwork Reduction Act, and Administrative Procedures Act at minimum. (Publishing Journal \u2013 Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge \/ Public Health Policy Initiative) Most notably, the CDC<\/span> illegally enacted new rules for data collection and reporting exclusively for COVID-19 that resulted in a 1,600% inflation of current COVID-19 fatality totals,\u201d <\/b>the watchdog group All Concerned Citizens declared in a statement provided to NATIONAL FILE, referring to the Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge study.<\/p>\n \u201cThe research demonstrates that the CDC<\/span> failed to apply for mandatory federal oversight and failed to open a mandatory period for public scientific comment in both instances as is required by federal law before enacting new rules for data collection and reporting. The CDC<\/span> is required to be in full compliance with all federal laws even during emergency situations. The research asserts that CDC<\/span> willfully compromised the accuracy and integrity of all COVID-19 case and fatality data from the onset of this crisis in order to fraudulently inflate case and fatality data,\u201d stated All Concerned Citizens.<\/p>\n \u201cOn March 24th<\/sup> the CDC<\/span> published the NVSS COVID-19 Alert No. 2<\/b> document instructing medical examiners, coroners and physicians to deemphasize underlying causes of death, also referred to as pre-existing conditions or comorbidities, by recording them in Part II rather than Part I of death certificates as \u201c\u2026the underlying cause of death are expected to result in COVID-19 being the underlying cause of death more often than not.\u201d This was a major rule change for death certificate reporting from the CDC<\/span>\u2019s 2003 Coroners\u2019 Handbook on Death Registration and Fetal Death Reporting <\/b>and Physicians\u2019 Handbook on Medical Certification of Death<\/b>, which have instructed death reporting professionals nationwide to report underlying conditions in Part I for the previous 17 years. This single change resulted in a significant inflation of COVID-19 fatalities by instructing that COVID-19 be listed in Part I of death certificates as a definitive cause of death regardless of confirmatory evidence, rather than listed in Part II as a contributor to death in the presence of pre-existing conditions, as would have been done using the 2003 guidelines. The research draws attention to this key distinction as it has led to a significant inflation in COVID fatality totals. By the researcher\u2019s estimates, COVID-19 recorded fatalities are inflated nationwide by as much as 1600% above what they would be had the CDC<\/span> used the 2003 handbooks,\u201d stated All Concerned Citizens.<\/p>\n \u201cThen on April 14th<\/sup>, the CDC<\/span> adopted additional rules exclusive for COVID-19 in violation of federal law by outsourcing data collection rule development to the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE), a non-profit entity, again without applying for oversight and opening opportunity for public scientific review. On April 5th<\/sup> the CSTE published a position paper Standardized surveillance case definition and national notification for 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19)<\/b> listing 5 CDC<\/span> employees as subject matter experts. This key document created new rules for counting probable cases as actual cases without definitive proof of infection (section VII.A1 \u2013 pages 4 & 5), new rules for contact tracing allowing contact tracers to practice medicine without a license (section VII.A3 \u2013 page 5), and yet refused to define new rules for ensuring that the same person could not be counted multiple times as a new case (section VII.B \u2013 page 7),\u201d stated All Concerned Citizens.<\/p>\n \u201cBy enacting these new rules exclusively for COVID-19 in violation of federal law, the research alleges that the CDC<\/span> significantly inflated data that has been used by elected officials and public health officials, in conjunction with unproven projection models from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), to justify extended closures for schools, places of worship, entertainment, and small businesses leading to unprecedented emotional and economic hardships nationwide. A formal petition has been sent to the Department of Justice as well as all US Attorneys seeking an immediate grand jury investigation into these allegations,\u201d All Concerned Citizens stated.<\/p>\n So\u2026do you still trust the globalist oligarchs?<\/p>\n