Authored by Oliver May for The Daily Expose<\/em><\/p>\n Dr Yeadon, a former vice-president and chief scientific officer of the Allergy and Respiratory department at Pfizer, who has also provided a simple explanation of why lockdowns could never have worked, went on to explain that there is \u201czero\u201d chance of incessantly reported new variants escaping immunity.<\/p>\n The 60-year-old, convinced the UK reached herd immunity last May, is now looking to move to Florida, where he hopes to work alongside Governor Ron DeSantis. He has expressed his severe concern over vaccine passports, saying that not only do healthy people under 60 not need a Covid 19 vaccine, but that the introduction of certification could lead to a society whereby, without such a pass, you may not even be permitted to leave your house.<\/p>\n In a passionate exclusive interview with The Daily Expose, he also criticised former Conservative MP Edwina Currie for her \u201cuninformed\u201d scattergun comments on Good Morning Britain in which she said she would not want anyone unvaccinated anywhere near her.<\/p>\n Dr Yeadon said: \u201cI know enough about biotechnology to know that you can easily create, shall we say, pathogens, which don\u2019t look like they\u2019re related to what you\u2019ve done. And what\u2019s even more horrifying is you can separate them in time, so an injection which will later make you ill or kill you can be separated by design in time from that event. So you might die a year later of liver cancer or something and you wouldn\u2019t connect that. And if you can imagine making a smorgasbord of different pathogens so not everybody is going to die of the same thing, you literally could do away with big slices of the population if you want. And we could all be running around like headless chickens. This is an attempt on global depopulation.<\/p>\n \u201cI think vaccine passports are a gateway to numerous things and it is my belief that it will be a gateway to mass killing, in the billions. And the reason I say that is many of the key players, including Bill Gates and his father and Boris Johnson and his father, have all been maniacal \u2013 and possibly correct \u2013 about earth being overpopulated. Even if we said to people can you stop having children, the population would only start to fall in about 100 years. If you got birth rates down below replacement, it would still take a century given each new birth will probably live out 100 years.<\/p>\n \u201cI accept the argument that, if we are on the verge of destroying the planet, the ecosystem and its non-renewables and biodiversity, if these things are true then, I\u2019m not saying I endorse it, I can see the argument of \u2018do you know what, the only possible way to save the earth is to get rid of 90 per cent of the people and then it will be a nice place to live\u2019.<\/p>\n \u201cI think a group of people over decades have said to each other, \u2018this is an awful task that has fallen to us, which is to rescue the human species and its planet and there is no other way of doing it except for mass extermination. And it\u2019s not something that anybody would want to do but we have to do it and it\u2019s got to happen in this generation and these are the technological advances required\u2019.<\/p>\n \u201cThere are some clever people who have taken it upon themselves to basically do God\u2019s work and to do a violent readjustment of the population of the world to put it into a position where, once it sorts itself out from this utter bloody disaster, will be a place where 500million people maybe will be living on the planet and they can have comfortable sustainable lives with plenty of space, plenty of room for the animals. I will not support what they\u2019re doing but that would provide a justification for those who are doing it.\u201d<\/p>\n Dr Yeadon believes the proof lies in the correlation between deaths and the rollout of vaccines which have been rushed through via an Emergency Use Authorisation. He said: \u201cIf you look at every regional health authority, they tick up on the same day, they peak at the same day and drop back in the same way and that\u2019s because they\u2019re sycned to vaccination. If it was the spreading of an epidemic, it could not possibly occur in Auchtermuchty on the same day as Aldershot. It can\u2019t, it has to move.<\/p>\n \u201cBut the thing that moved was the vaccination squads. They started on December 8 everywhere in the NHS and then in the care homes, so that was the strong clue for me that what was correlating with the time and cause of deaths was not a geographical history and neither were the differences in timing, it was just the date of vaccination.<\/p>\n \u201cCan it be stopped? I am not optimistic about the UK because as time has gone on there are fewer of me and most people have just put their heads down. I am fortunate in a number of ways, I have the breadth of a full career behind me and I love science and biology. There is nothing I can be fired from and I\u2019m not doing it for money, so I can only be stopped if they arrest me or kill me.<\/p>\n \u201cBut I don\u2019t fear for my life. It\u2019s over anyway. This is not going to return to normal. It would be pointless. There is no way, with the amount of damage that has been done deliberately, would it then just be left. It would just be dumb. It would make no sense at all to have marched people up to the top of the hill and then say, \u2018you can go back now\u2019. And remember the drum beats for vaccine passports are very strong. And once that\u2019s in then if they can transition an absolute majority that they already have who will be so delighted with their privileges, beeping their phones when they go in and out of shops, they are not going to pay any attention to someone like me who says, \u2018excuse me what about the unvaccinated\u2019?<\/p>\n \u201cThey will say, \u2018well don\u2019t you know, you\u2019re the unclean people, you\u2019re the ones brewing the variants, you\u2019re going to kill us. Can you just go away or I might feel that I have to kill you\u2019. I expect vaccine passport will come in and those who have already been vaccinated will whoop for joy, a large number of people yet to be vaccinated will rush to get vaccinated because they will see their horizons will be shrunk and they simply won\u2019t realise they are being herded like cattle into a pen.<\/p>\n \u201cI would fear next winter being an unvaccinated person in this country, there will be additional orchestrated events. They will need that in order to drive people to top-up vaccines. I\u2019ve decided I\u2019m not going to stop the fight, I\u2019m going to leave the country. I\u2019ll go wherever I have to because it\u2019s not going to be safe for unvaccinated people indefinitely.\u201d<\/p>\n Top-up vaccines is another thing that frightens Dr Yeadon, who highlighted the fact that these too will forego any further safety checks. He added that the driver for these will come in the form of new variants, which he says are barely any different from the original sequence.<\/p>\n \u201cAs soon as they started talking about it [new variants] I went to look at the source material and found that the variants most different from the Wuhan sequence are still 99.7 per cent identical,\u201d said Dr Yeadon. \u201cAnd I can assure you that there is zero \u2013 not just implausible, but zero \u2013 chance something that would escape the immunity of someone who was immune from natural infection or vaccinated. It\u2019s absolutely impossible, no matter what they tell you.<\/p>\n \u201cWe know for example that Sars 2003 is 20 per cent different \u2013 not 0.3, 180 times different \u2013 and the immune system has absolutely no trouble in recognising the two as brothers. I have empirical evidence, theoretical evidence and yet, countering that, we are being told by Sage, politicians, people around the world that you need these variant vaccines. We\u2019ve closed our borders, we\u2019re smashing our economy and depriving people of their liberty over the theoretical concern about variants, which is a lie. And now we are making variant vaccines. I became terrified when I knew they were actually making them and not just talking about it \u2013 and when all the large medicine regulators of the world put out a joint statement saying that, because vaccine variants are so similar to the parents from which they\u2019re derived, we will not require the manufacturers to conduct any clinical safety studies.<\/p>\n \u201cI have spoken to eight professors in the UK whose discipline includes immunology and they all agree with my analysis in terms of the technical side of it. Three months ago my fear levels went into the red and I begged them, \u2018people like you have go to start writing letters to editors and getting pieces into the papers that this b******t about variants is fake because people are going to believe it\u2019. Carl Heneghan [director of evidence based medicine at Oxford University] said that the world is in such a sort of panic at the moment, anything he could say would not have any breakthrough power at all.<\/p>\n \u201cWe\u2019ve been trained to think that if anyone raises any question at all about vaccines, you automatically think \u2018anti-vaxxer\u2019. I\u2019ve spent my entire professional career in the industry that produces these things. I would say I\u2019m extremely pro innovative medicines. I don\u2019t have an anti bloody anything in my body except I\u2019m anti unsafe medicines. Why have we got vaccines that clearly are much more dangerous than other public health prophylactic vaccines, because they are if you just compare the number of people that have died within a month with the number of reported deaths after all other vaccines \u2013 it\u2019s like 10 times worse.<\/p>\n \u201cThere have been 10 times more deaths from within a couple of months of any covid vaccination than in the entire year for all other vaccines combined. Most vaccines are very safe but there are rare idiosyncratic responses including fatal ones and I\u2019m afraid that does happen. You might just drop dead tomorrow going out to your car. But as long as the numbers are very, very small it\u2019s tolerable, because there is a benefit to it. But what we have here is that, even if the people being given the vaccines were at risk \u2013 and a lot of them are not \u2013 anyone 60 or younger who is in good physcial shape and does not have serious prior chronic conditions is not going to be killed by this virus, they\u2019re just not. It\u2019s unethical even to bloody offer it to them. There is no logic to the statement that we need to vaccinate everybody in order to stop this, it\u2019s just nonsense.<\/p>\n \u201cNow if Edwina Currie is vaccinated then she is fine. She might sincerely believe what she\u2019s saying in which case she\u2019s just uninformed and nuts. I\u2019m sure lots of MPs have just been given the brief and they\u2019re not very clever. I\u2019ve personally spoken to about 60. Several get it reasonably well but some of them are just embarrassing.\u201d<\/p>\n Reports have surfaced in the past week that trials mean venues might be able to open to capacity audiences on June 21, in keeping with the Government\u2019s roadmap \u2013 but only if people agree to Covid passports. Dr Yeadon believes that introducing such a system will create a two-tier society and one which can be tweaked at a moment\u2019s notice depending on the Government\u2019s wishes.<\/p>\n Dr Yeadon said: \u201cThere is absolutely no chance whatsoever that Westminster will save the people. They are the tools of our destruction. They will vote vaccine passports through, even those who know these are horrible things. They\u2019ll be told it\u2019s temporary and get their pat on the shoulder. But of course they won\u2019t be temporary.<\/p>\n \u201cFor example, you might even be told as from next month it will be illegal to leave your house without a valid vaccine passport. That\u2019s how easy it would be. We are following \u201cthe science\u201d, capital T, capital S. I\u2019m not saying they will do that but they can exclude non-vaccinated people from civil society wholly and that is what is happening in Israel. Once this system comes in I cannot see a way in which it can be undone. They might say initially you can\u2019t enter a sports ground or a large shopping complex, but then in a couple of weeks they might say, \u2018as of Tuesday all large supermarkets will use vaccine passports on the door\u2019, so that\u2019s them out. And eventually they can say, \u2018as from Wednesday week, all cashless transactions must be preceded by demonstration of a vaccine pass\u2019 \u2013 so you can\u2019t even fill your car with petrol. It could happen.<\/p>\n \u201cThe idea would be for me to be in America, educating and essentially immunising populations and politicians against what is happening, so that when they\u2019re told next time that you need to lock down your businesses and your state, they won\u2019t. That\u2019s the goal. My preferred one would be to go and work for either Governor DeSantis or his scientific advisory team.\u201d<\/p>\n Dr Yeadon has criticised his peers for failing to speak out against the problems he sees with following only one line of enquiry. He explains that the UK\u2019s official figures of 4,395,703 positive cases and 127,000 simply cannot be believed due to the countless levels of contamination in testing and the unprecedented change in how deaths are certified.<\/p>\n He said: \u201cI am disappointed that almost no one in the scientific community has said anything. What about recently retired professors, people who are not being paid by universities, why aren\u2019t you saying something? Is it cowardice? Death certification has been radically changed in a way that has never been done anywhere for any disease. And we have never used PCR on an industrial scale and it is my opinion \u2013 confirmed by people who do this professionally \u2013 that it could never be done reliably. So whatever they tell you it\u2019s a lie. You cannot run three quarters of a million PCR tests and not have cross contamination all over the place.<\/p>\n \u201cWhy were the doctors not complaining about the death certification? If you have a positive in this ropey test at any time 28 days up to your death then that is on your death certificate. It\u2019s just not even logical. It\u2019s like saying if you had biro on your finger at any point 28 days prior to your death, we\u2019ll say you died of biro ink poisoning. It\u2019s absurd. But they went along with it.\u201d<\/p>\n And he has a message for those who no doubt once would have agreed that you cannot trust a politician but who know hang on their every word.<\/p>\n \u201cIf you spot an inconsistency, something you think, \u2018that doesn\u2019t sound right\u2019, pursue it, because if you pursue it to a point where you think, \u2018I\u2019m not being told the truth\u2019 \u2013 which you\u2019re not \u2013 once you spot that, then the question would be, \u2018if your Government has lied to you about one thing, don\u2019t you think it\u2019s quite likely it has lied to you about other things?\u2019 I believe they are lying to you about everything.<\/p>\n \u201cLet\u2019s look at pubs; you can only take a drink outside and you can only pay for it outside. Hold on, have the supermarkets not been open continuously through this process? Sometimes it\u2019s really busy and you might be in the shop an hour. Isn\u2019t that an inconsistency? And why are we OK with that? I don\u2019t believe that any outbreaks have ever been linked to a supermarket. And that is another odd one. That\u2019s about the only place you meet. Surely all the outbreaks that aren\u2019t linked to hospitals and care homes must be linked to common places of commerce and they are supermarkets and essential shops \u2013 there aren\u2019t any others, none.\u201d<\/p>\n And he uses supermarkets in his insight as to why lockdowns are pointless; in a nutshell, if you are full of virus, you feel very ill, so you would be at home, curled up on the sofa, in bed or in hospital. If not, you do not have enough virus in your body to be a threat of transmission. Indeed, a global study, cited by Jay Bhattacharya, Professor of Medicine at Stanford University and co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration, to a court in Manitoba, found that asymptomatic transmission is close to zero in an outside setting, given it is about 0.7 per cent inside.<\/p>\n Dr Yeadon says: \u201cWe will lock down again. They will want to do it as early as possible, so October.<\/p>\n But the reason why lockdowns could never have worked is combined with one of the other lies, asymptomatic transmission. The reason it\u2019s a lie is that, in order to be a good source of infection, you need to have lots of virus in your body. If you\u2019ve only got a little bit, the chances that you would infect another person is very low, even if you were close to them \u2013 maybe even if you kissed them \u2013 you just don\u2019t have that much virus in and around your body.<\/p>\n \u201cBut if you had a thousand times more virus, maybe you could put a droplet on a person and they might inhale it or whatever. But if you have lots of virus you must have symptoms. You cannot have a situation where your body is growing huge amounts of virus in the airwaves and producing no symptoms and this is because the virus will attack you, it\u2019s damaging your tissues, every cell it multiplies in and then escapes from is destroyed. It\u2019s not just a theory, it\u2019s inevitable you will have symptoms. And furthermore you need symptoms like coughing in order to propel infected droplets out of your body. They don\u2019t come out when you\u2019re just passively breathing. If you have lots of virus and it\u2019s attacking you and making you ill and your immune system is fighting it back, which is also making you feel ill, those symptoms are called \u2018I don\u2019t feel well\u2019.<\/p>\n \u201cSo if you\u2019re a good source of infection, you\u2019re symptomatic, you don\u2019t feel well, you probably feel very ill, possibly bad enough to be in your bed and we\u2019re giving you chicken soup and cups of tea every few hours. And if you\u2019re a bit older you might be in hospital. But what you\u2019re not going to be doing is dashing up and down the aisles in Sainsbury\u2019s. Or sitting in the pub. You\u2019re ill. So that\u2019s the whole point. In the general community, almost no one who met the conditions to be pretty sure of infection was out there. It\u2019s just simply not possible. You need to be full of virus, you need to get the symptoms to get the stuff out of your body but you need to be completely unwell despite those two things.<\/p>\n \u201cAnd those things do not overlap, you can\u2019t have \u2018feeling fine out and about, looking normal but full of virus\u2019. And we are trained to notice if someone has a cold or they look ill. We have known this stuff for tens of thousands of years. You can spot someone who is a respiratory threat to you. It\u2019s very uncommon for people with good sources of infection to be walking about in the community and, even if they were there, you would usually avoid them. And as a result hardly any transmission occurred in the general population. And as a result shutting down the general population made f**k all difference to transmission. And that is why lockdowns don\u2019t work and they never did. They never worked anywhere because lockdown isn\u2019t really lockdown, it just smashes the economy.\u201d<\/p>\n ___ An exclusive interview with Dr Mike Yeadon DR MIKE YEADON has described how creating lethal pathogens that can kill at different points in time is \u201ceasy\u201d and says this is being used for \u201cmass global extermination\u201d. He fears vaccine passports … Continue reading ![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/dailyexpose.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/image-182.png?resize=595%2C472&ssl=1\")
<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/dailyexpose.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/image-183.png?resize=615%2C330&ssl=1\")
<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/dailyexpose.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/image-184.png?resize=639%2C290&ssl=1\")
<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/dailyexpose.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/image-185.png?resize=639%2C426&ssl=1\")
<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n
\nhttps:\/\/dailyexpose.co.uk\/2021\/04\/25\/an-exclusive-interview-with-dr-mike-yeadon\/<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"