What\u2019s more, Noorchashm quotes one of his previous medical school professors, who said, \u201cthe eyes do not see what the mind does not know.\u201d In the case of a vaccine-induced antigen specific immune response, which may trigger thromboembolic complications 10 to 20 days after vaccination, including in those who may already be elderly and frail, the reaction isn\u2019t likely to be registered as a vaccine-related adverse event.<\/p>\n
<\/div>\n
Immediately Delay Vaccination for These Key Groups<\/h2>\n
In his repeated letters to the FDA, Noorchashm suggests that the FDA \u201cimmediately and at the very minimum\u201d delay COVID-19 vaccination for people with symptomatic or asymptomatic COVID-19 infections, as well as those who have recently recovered from the virus.<\/p>\n
Because so many cases are asymptomatic, he recommends clinicians \u201cactively screen as many patients with high cardiovascular risk as is reasonably possible, in order to detect the presence of SARS-CoV-2, prior to vaccinating them.\u201d11<\/span><\/sup>\u00a0As it stands, Noorchashm points out that by ignoring what he believes to be an imminent risk for a sizable minority of people, the FDA\u2019s credibility, and that of the mass vaccination campaign in general, is at grave risk:12<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n\u201cCan you imagine if the public, without having received any real warning from FDA, becomes aware of an increasing number of such vascular\/thromboembolic complications? What do you suppose will happen to the level of \u2018vaccine hesitancy\u2019 then?<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\nAnd, what kind of accountability do you think the public will demand from our experts and federal regulators \u2014 especially if they knew, or should have known, that this immunological danger might exist?<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\nThe aim of benefiting the majority of our public and saving the nation from this pandemic by quick and aggressive vaccination is an ethically sound one \u2014 but where we know of real or likely risks of harm and mortality, we ought to mitigate the risks to those in potential harm\u2019s way.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\nSo doing is the only reasonable, ethical, and likely legal option you can pursue as public health regulators \u2014 for in America, we no longer sacrifice the lives of minority subsets of people for the benefit of the majority.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\nAt least 62 cases of myocarditis, or heart inflammation, in people who received the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine are being investigated by the Israel Health Ministry. Most of the cases occurred in men under the age of 30 who were in good health, and two deaths have been reported as a result.13<\/span>,<\/sup>14<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\nNo Proof of Efficacy in People Who\u2019ve Had COVID-19<\/h2>\n
In a high-profile report issued by the CDC\u2019s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, 15 scientists stated that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine had \u201cconsistent high efficacy\u201d of 92% or more among people with evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection.15<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\nBut according to Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky, \u201cThat sentence is wrong. There is no efficacy demonstrated in the Pfizer trial among participants with evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infections and actually there’s no proof in the Moderna trial either.\u201d16<\/span><\/sup>\u00a0In France, the health body la Haute Autorit\u00e9 de Sant\u00e9 (HAS) does not recommend routinely vaccinating those who have already recovered from COVID-19, stating:17<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n\u201cAt this stage, there is no need to systematically vaccinate people who have already developed a symptomatic form of Covid-19 unless they wish to do so following a decision shared with the doctor and within a minimum period of time. 3 months from the onset of symptoms.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\nWhen Massie realized that vaccination didn\u2019t change the risk of infection among people who\u2019ve had COVID-19, he was alarmed and contacted the CDC directly, recording his calls.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt [the CDC report] says the exact opposite of what the data says. They’re giving people the impression that this vaccine will save your life, or save you from suffering, even if you’ve already had the virus and recovered, which has not been demonstrated in either the Pfizer or the Moderna trial,\u201d Massey says in a \u201cFull Measure\u201d report.18<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\nCDC Allows Misinformation to Continue<\/h2>\n
Massie spoke with multiple officials on numerous occasions, who acknowledged the misinformation and implied that it would be fixed.19<\/span>,<\/sup>20<\/span><\/sup>\u00a0It wasn\u2019t until Massie\u2019s final call with the CDC, to deputy director Dr. Anne Schuchat, that it was acknowledged that a correction was necessary.<\/p>\n\u201cAs you note correctly, there is not sufficient analysis to show that in the subset of only the people with prior infection, there’s efficacy. So, you’re correct that that sentence is wrong and that we need to make a correction of it. I apologize for the delay,\u201d Schuchat said. January 29, 2021, the CDC did finally issue a correction, which reads:21<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n\u201cConsistent high efficacy (\u226592%) was observed across age, sex, race, and ethnicity categories and among persons with underlying medical conditions. Efficacy was similarly high in a secondary analysis including participants both with or without evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\nInstead of fixing the error, Massie believes the wording just phrases the mistake in a different way and still misleadingly suggests vaccination is effective for those previously infected.22<\/span><\/sup>\u00a0Meanwhile, increasing numbers of breakthrough COVID-19 cases among the fully vaccinated are being reported, which the CDC has been reporting.<\/p>\nAs of April 26, 2021, there have been 9,245 reported cases of COVID-19 in fully vaccinated individuals, including 132 deaths.23<\/span><\/sup>\u00a0Note this is not total deaths from the vaccine, which is rapidly approaching 4,000.<\/p>\nHowever, May 14, 2021, the CDC announced it will no longer report breakthrough cases unless they involve hospitalization or death,24<\/span><\/sup>\u00a0which will obscure the actual number of breakthrough cases occurring, artificially driving down rates and making the vaccines appear to be more effective.<\/p>\nThe CDC also changed recommendations on PCR tests for the fully vaccinated, which will further drive down the appearance of breakthrough cases by making them less likely to \u201ctest positive.\u201d<\/p>\n
PCR tests recommended by the WHO used to be set to 45 cycle thresholds (CTs),25<\/span><\/sup>\u00a0yet the scientific consensus has long been that anything over 35 CTs renders the test useless,26<\/span><\/sup>\u00a0as the accuracy will be extremely low, with false positives artificially driving up case numbers.<\/p>\nIn April 2021, the CDC recommended the CT be lowered to 28, but only for people who are fully vaccinated.27<\/span><\/sup>\u00a0Under this guidance, someone with a CT of 30 would not be considered to have COVID-19 if they were fully vaccinated, but if they were not, then their test would be \u201cpositive.\u201d<\/p>\nThis is beyond obvious that they are rigging the system to create data that fit their fake narrative, which is pushing the entire population to get a vaccine they don\u2019t need, will harm or kill them and which will generate tens of billions of dollars in annual recurring revenue for the drug companies.<\/p>\n
In return, the drug companies have no legal risk for any complications, adverse effects or deaths and are given billions of dollars in free advertising from the U.S. taxpayers to get this\u00a0dangerous gene therapy<\/a>.<\/p>\nThe Big Lie \u2014 Natural Infection Isn\u2019t Adequate<\/h2>\n
Why is it that the media continue to promote the fake narrative that natural immunity \u2014 the type acquired by getting infected by and recovering from a virus \u2014 isn\u2019t as powerful or long-lasting as vaccine-acquired immunity?28<\/span>,<\/sup>29<\/span><\/sup>\u00a0Do you think it might be to support vaccine sales?<\/p>\nDid they forget that COVID-19 vaccines aren\u2019t intended to be a long-term solution, and have NEVER been shown to provide immunity benefits? The original warp speed test only showed reduced symptoms.<\/p>\n
Pfizer\u2019s CEO Albert Bourla exacerbated this charade by stating that not only will people need a third booster dose of COVID-19 vaccine within 12 months of being fully vaccinated, but annual vaccination will probably be necessary.30<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\nRobust natural immunity has been demonstrated, however, for at least eight months after infection in more than 95% of people who have recovered from COVID-19.31<\/span>,<\/sup>32<\/span><\/sup>\u00a0A Nature study also demonstrated robust natural immunity in people who recovered from SARS and SARS-CoV-2.33<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\nThere continue to be many unanswered questions surrounding COVID-19 vaccines, many of which most of the public has never heard of, such as\u00a0imprinting<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0Th2 immunopathology<\/a>. If you choose to get a COVID-19 vaccine, you\u2019re participating in a giant experiment, acting as a guinea pig to see what will ultimately bear out.<\/p>\nThat being said, if you or someone you love have received a COVID-19 vaccine and are experiencing side effects, be sure to report it. Children’s Health Defense (CHD) is calling on all who have suffered a side effect from a COVID-19 vaccine to do three things:34<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n\n- If you live in the U.S.,\u00a0file a report on VAERS<\/a><\/li>\n
- Report the injury on\u00a0VaxxTracker.com<\/a>, which is a nongovernmental adverse event tracker (you can file anonymously if you like)<\/li>\n
- Report the injury on the CHD website<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n