{"id":72036,"date":"2021-07-03T13:11:09","date_gmt":"2021-07-03T17:11:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=72036"},"modified":"2021-07-03T13:15:11","modified_gmt":"2021-07-03T17:15:11","slug":"theres-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification-anywhere-ever","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=72036","title":{"rendered":"

There’s No Record of SARS-COV-2 Isolation\/Purification, Anywhere, Ever<\/b><\/h3>"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

FOIs reveal that health\/science institutions around the world have no record of SARS-COV-2 isolation\/purification, anywhere, ever<\/h1>\n

Fluoride Free Peel<\/p>\n

\"\"
\n<\/header>\n

\n

Would a sane person mix a patient sample (containing various sources of genetic material and never proven to contain any particular virus) with transfected monkey kidney cells, fetal bovine serum and toxic drugs, then claim that the resulting concoction is \u201cSARS-COV-2 isolate\u201d and ship it off internationally for use in critical research (including vaccine and test development)?<\/p>\n

Because that\u2019s the sort of fraudulent monkey business that\u2019s being passed off as \u201cvirus isolation\u201d by research teams around the world.<\/p>\n

Just 1 of many examples is shown below \u2013 this is from a study\u00a0cited by the Australian Department of Health<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0as a paper \u201cwhich led to the isolation of SARS-CoV-2 in culture<\/strong><\/em>\u201c. (Can you spot the oxymoron in that quote?)<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n

If you are new to the topic of \u201cvirus isolation\/purification\u201d, I strongly recommend that you begin by reading the Statement On Virus Isolation by Dr. Andrew Kaufman, Dr. Thomas Cowan and<\/strong><\/span>
\nSally Fallon Morell, MA<\/strong><\/span>:\u00a0https:\/\/andrewkaufmanmd.com\/sovi\/<\/a><\/strong>
\nor watch this<\/span>\u00a05 minute video<\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/strong>from Dr. Cowan.<\/span><\/p>\n

A colleague in New Zealand (Michael S.<\/a><\/strong>) and I (CM) have been submitting Freedom of Information requests to institutions in various countries seeking records that describe the isolation of a SARS-COV-2 virus from any unadulterated sample taken from a diseased patient.<\/p>\n

Our requests have\u00a0not<\/strong>\u00a0been limited to records of isolation performed by the respective institution, or limited to records authored by the respective institution, rather they were open to any records describing \u201cCOVID-19 virus\u201d (aka \u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d) isolation\/purification performed by anyone, ever, anywhere on the planet.<\/p>\n

Thus far (June 18, 2021) 26 Canadian institutions have provided their responses:\u00a0Public Health Agency of Canada<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0(and another from\u00a0Public Health Agency of Canada<\/a><\/strong>, this one re the \u201cthe UK variant\u201d aka \u201cB.1.1.7\u201d aka \u201cAlpha\u201d),\u00a0<\/strong>Health Canada<\/strong><\/a>, the\u00a0National Research Council of Canada<\/a><\/strong>,\u00a0Vaccine and Infectious Disease Organization-International Vaccine Centre\u00a0<\/a><\/strong>(VIDO-InterVac)<\/a>,\u00a0Canadian Institutes of Health Research<\/a>,<\/strong>\u00a0Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada<\/a>,\u00a0<\/strong>Ontario Ministry of Health<\/strong><\/a>,<\/strong>\u00a0Institut National de Sante Publique du Quebec<\/strong><\/a>,\u00a0British Columbia\u2019s Ministry of Health<\/strong><\/a>\u00a0(re \u201cthe UK variant\u201d),\u00a0British Columbia\u2019s Centre for Disease Control<\/strong><\/a>,\u00a0British Columbia\u2019s Provincial Health Services Authority<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0(2 responses, 1 re \u201cSARS-COV-2, 1 re \u201cthe UK variant\u201d aka \u201cB.1.1.7\u201d aka \u201cAlpha\u201d),\u00a0Vancouver Coastal Health Authority<\/strong><\/a>\u00a0(re \u201cthe UK variant\u201d aka \u201cB.1.1.7\u201d aka \u201cAlpha\u201d),\u00a0Newfoundland Labrador Department of Health & Community Services<\/a><\/strong>,\u00a0McGill University<\/strong><\/a>, the\u00a0City of Toronto<\/a><\/strong>,\u00a0Toronto Police<\/strong><\/a>, the\u00a0Region of Peel<\/strong><\/a>\u00a0(Ontario),\u00a0KFL&A Public Health<\/strong><\/a>\u00a0(Kingston, Frontenac, Lennox and Addington, Ontario, re \u201cany variant\u201d),\u00a0Grey Bruce Health Services<\/strong><\/a>,\u00a0Peterborough Public Health (Ontario)<\/strong><\/a>,\u00a0Peterborough Police Service<\/strong><\/a>\u00a0(Ontario),\u00a0Aylmer Police Service<\/strong><\/a>\u00a0(Ontario), the\u00a0University of Toronto<\/strong><\/a>,\u00a0Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre<\/strong><\/a>,\u00a0McMaster University<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0and\u00a0Mount Sinai Hospital<\/strong><\/a>\u00a0(Toronto) (note that researchers from the last 4 institutions had publicly claimed to have \u201cisolated the virus\u201d, as had VIDO-Intervac).<\/p>\n

Every institution has failed to provide even 1 record describing the isolation aka purification of any \u201cCOVID-19 virus\u201d directly from a patient sample that was not first adulterated with other sources of genetic material. (Those other sources are typically monkey kidney aka \u201cVero\u201d cells and fetal bovine serum).<\/p>\n

The response from 1 additional Canadian institution is long overdue:
\nPublic Health Ontario<\/strong>\u00a0(request submitted July 16, 2020<\/strong><\/a>). On June 3, 2021 PHO provided their excuse for failing to respond: \u201cwe\u2019re too busy with COVID-19\u201d:
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/PHO-response-re-isolation-Access-Request-2020-08.pdf<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Click on the above links to access the responses from Canadian institutions.\u00a0Scroll further down this page for responses from institutions outside of Canada<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

Here are 4 compilation pdfs containing responses from 69 institutions in 20 countries\/jurisdictions re the isolation\/purification\/existence of \u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d\u00a0<\/strong>last updated June 3, 2021 (note: some of these responses were obtained by FOI-submitters other than Michael S. and myself, as indicated further down this page):
\nPart 1:<\/strong>\u00a0https:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/FOI-replies-SARS-COV-2-isolation-existence-causation-47-institutions-Feb-12-2021-chrono-part-1.pdf<\/a><\/strong>
\nPart 2:\u00a0https:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/FOI-replies-SARS-COV-2-isolation-existence-causation-47-institutions-Feb-12-2021-chrono-part-2.pdf<\/a><\/strong>
\nPart 3:\u00a0https:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/FOI-replies-SARS-COV-2-isolation-purification-existence-part-3-April-3.pdf<\/a><\/strong>
\nPart 4:<\/strong>\u00a0https:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/FOI-replies-re-SARS-COV-2-purification-existence-June-3-2021-part-4.pdf<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Check back here (the page you are currently on) for regular updates.<\/strong>\u00a0As of July 2, 2021:<\/strong>\u00a075 institutions and offices in 20 countries\/jurisdictions<\/strong><\/span>\u00a0have responded thus far, and none have provided or cited any record describing \u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d isolation\/purification\u00a0<\/strong>(click\u00a0here<\/strong><\/a>\u00a0to see a list; scroll down this page to see the responses).<\/p>\n

Note that some institutions failed to fully co-operate. Tsk tsk University of Auckland, Public Health Wales, Imperial College London.<\/p>\n

(And yes, we are aware of the many publications wherein authors claim to have \u201cisolated the virus\u201d. We\u2019ve looked at numerous such studies and have yet to see one where they actually did so. Claiming to have done something and actually doing it are sometimes 2 different things, even in peer-reviewed science. And yes we are aware of the many published alleged \u201cSARS-COV-2 genomes\u201d \u2013 these were in fact manufactured, not discovered. And yes we are aware that EM photos have been published, allegedly of \u201cthe virus\u201d, however a photo of something does not tell you what the thing is, where it came from or what it does. One has to scrutinize the Methods used to \u201cisolate the virus\u201d \/ obtain said photos \/ obtain alleged genomes, and that is when absolutely\u00a0everything<\/strong>\u00a0falls apart with \u201cCOVID-19\u201d.)<\/p>\n

FOI responses from institutions in the U.S., India, New Zealand, Australia, U.K., England, Scotland, Wales, Ireland, Denmark, Norway, the Netherlands, Spain, European CDC, Slovenia, Czech Republic, Columbia, Uruguay, etc<\/h2>\n

A big\u00a0Thank You\u00a0<\/strong>to all the individuals who have now kindly shared additional FOI responses that they obtained re isolation\/purification\/existence of \u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d. Some prefer to remain anonymous, others are named below.<\/p>\n

Also note that we have included below responses from the U.S. CDC and a couple of New Zealand institutions in regards to isolation\/purification of a number of other alleged \u201cviruses\u201d, i.e. \u201cHIV\u201d, \u201cmeasles virus\u201d, \u201cpolio virus\u201d, \u201cHPV\u201d, \u201cEbola virus\u201d, \u201cZika virus\u201d, \u201cXMRV\u201d, \u201cHTLV1\u201d, \u201cHTLV-III\/LAV\u201d, 2003 \u201cSARS-COV\u201d, \u201cMERS virus\u201d, any common cold \u201ccoronavirus\u201d, any \u201cvirus\u201d on their \u201cimmunization\u201d schedules. Again,\u00a0none<\/strong>\u00a0have yielded any records or citations of records describing the isolation\/purification of any \u201cvirus\u201d from a patient sample.<\/p>\n

As this next link you will see a \u201cno records of SARS-COV-2 isolation\/purification\u201d FOI response from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (CDC\/ATSDR), dated November 2, 2020:
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/USA-CDC-Virus-Isolation-Response-Scrubbed.pdf<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

\"Image\"<\/figure>\n

On March 1, 2021 once again the CDC made clear that they still have no records of \u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d isolation performed by anyone, anywhere on the planet, ever\u2026 just not in so many words. Instead, the CDC absurdly implied that isolation of \u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d would require the replication of a \u201cvirus\u201d without host cells and thus is impossible.
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/CDC-March-1-2021-SARS-COV-2-Isolation-Response-Redacted.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

\"Image\"<\/figure>\n

March 3, 2021:<\/strong>\u00a0CDC again fails to provide\/cite any records describing \u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d isolation\/purification by anyone anywhere ever\u2026 BUT will no longer simply say so (as they did back on November 2nd); instead they give song and dance and cite their own fraudulent study (by Harcourt et al.):
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/CDC-March-3-2021-<\/strong>SARS-COV-2-purification-FOI-response.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

\"Image\"<\/figure>\n

[Note that someone kindly forwarded another FOI response from the CDC dated December 30, 2020 re the alleged\u00a02003 \u201cSARS-COV-1\u201d and all \u201ccommon cold coronaviruses\u201d \u2013 the CDC has no record of any having been isolated.\u00a0<\/strong>\u00a0Here is a temporary pdf of the redacted letter\u2026. a better pdf one will follow:
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/CDC-isolation-FOI-reply-any-coronavirus.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

And\u2026\u00a0March 15, 2021 CDC\u00a0<\/strong>FOIA response: no records of any\u00a0\u201cEbolavirus<\/strong>\u201d isolation\/purification by anyone, anywhere, ever:
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/CDC-Ebola-FOIA-request-response-No-Records.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

And\u2026\u00a0March 19, 2021,<\/strong>\u00a0U.S. CDC\u00a0<\/strong>(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) and the\u00a0Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry<\/strong>\u00a0(ATSDR) admit they have no record of any\u00a0\u201cZika virus\u201d\u00a0<\/strong>isolated\/purified from a patient sample, by anyone, anywhere on the planet, ever:
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/FOIA-request-response-CDC-re-Zika-isolation.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

And\u2026\u00a0March 23, 2021 CDC<\/strong>\u00a0admitted in a FOIA response that they have no record of any\u00a0\u201cHIV\u201d<\/strong>\u00a0purified\/isolated from a patient sample, by anyone, anywhere, ever.<\/p>\n

[Please note: you might notice a strange reference to \u201cinfluenza\u201d in my FOIA request, however this detail did not effect the request in any way because the reference was in the context of me giving any example of the sort of record I was looking for. The reference was the result of sloppy editing on my part \u2026 I had recycled my earlier FOI request to the CDC re purification of any \u201cinfluenza virus\u201d, and neglected to edit that part when adapting the text for my HIV request.]
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/FOIA-request-reply-CDC-HIV-purification-March-2021.pdf<\/a>]<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n

CDC<\/strong>\u00a0has no record of\u00a0\u201cXMRV\u201d<\/strong>\u00a0purification\/isolation:
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/XMRV-request-response.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

CDC<\/strong>\u00a0has no record of\u00a0\u201cHTLV-1\u201d<\/strong>\u00a0purification\/isolation:
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/HTLV1-request-response.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

CDC<\/strong>\u00a0has no record of\u00a0\u201cHTLV-III\/LAV\u201d<\/strong>\u00a0purification\/isolation:
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/HTLV-IIILAV-request-response.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

April 12, 2021:\u00a0CDC<\/strong>\u00a0admits they have no record of any\u00a0\u201cinfluenza virus\u201d\u00a0<\/strong>isolated\/purified from a patient sample, by anyone, anywhere on the planet, ever:
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/CDC-FOIA-request-response-influenza-purification.pdf<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

June 7, 2021: CDC<\/strong>\u00a0provided responses to 4 separate requests, admitting they have no record of \u201cvirus\u201d purification from a patient sample via maceration, filtration and use of an ultracentrifuge, by anyone, anywhere, EVER, for the following \u201cviruses\u201d:<\/p>\n

\u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d:<\/span>
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/CDC-FOIA-request-response-no-records-SARS-COV-2-purification.pdf<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cHPV\u201d<\/strong>:
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/CDC-FOIA-request-response-no-records-HPV-purification.pdf<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

\u201cMeasles virus\u201d:<\/strong>
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/CDC-FOIA-request-response-no-records-re-measles-virus-purification.pdf<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

Any \u201cvirus\u201d targeted by the CDC\u2019s childhood or adult \u201cvaccine\u201d schedules:\u00a0<\/strong>[Note: there was a reference to \u201cinfluenza\u201d in this request, but it doesn\u2019t affect the request in any way because it was in the context of an example of the sort of record I was looking for\u2026 sloppy editing on my part when recycling my earlier \u201cinfluenza virus\u201d FOIA request.]
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/CDC-admits-no-records-re-purification-of-any-virus-on-vax-schedules.pdf<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\"Image\"<\/figure>\n

June 10, 2021: CDC<\/strong>\u00a0admits they have no record of any\u00a0\u201cMERS virus\u201d<\/strong>\u00a0purified from any patient sample via maceration, filtration and use of an ultracentrifuge, by anyone, anywhere, ever:
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/CDC-MERS-request-response-no-records.pdf<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\"Image\"<\/figure>\n

June 10, 2021: CDC<\/strong>\u00a0admits they have no record of any\u00a0\u201cpolio virus\u201d<\/strong>\u00a0purified from any patient sample via maceration, filtration and use of an ultracentrifuge, by anyone, anywhere, ever:
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/CDC-FOIA-request-response-no-records-polio-virus-purification.pdf<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\"Image\"<\/figure>\n

Now back to \u201cSARS-COV-2\u2033\u2026.<\/strong><\/p>\n

June 24, 2021 FOIA response:
\nAnthony Fauci\u2019s\u00a0National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases\u00a0<\/strong>(NIAID) failed to provide\/cite any record of \u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d purification from a patient sample by anyone, anywhere.
\nNIAID referred me to the anti-science CDC study by Harcourt et al., even after I\u2019d advised them of CDC\u2019s\u00a0June 7, 2021<\/a>\u00a0\u2018no records\u2019 response.\u00a0 I have appealed to NIAID\u2019s FOIA Public Liaison.
\nThe communications between myself and NIAID are provided here:
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/NIAID-FOIA-package-redacted.pdf<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n

The CDC study cited by NIAID did not purify anything from a patient sample. It is the same study that Dr. Thomas Cowan wrote about in 2020 (\u201cOnly Poisoned Monkey Kidney Cells \u2018Grew\u2019 the \u2018Virus\u2019<\/strong><\/a>\u201c) where he also addressed the fraudulent nature of the authors\u2019 fabricated \u201cSARS-COV-2 genome\u201d (as shown in the screenshot below).<\/p>\n

\"Image\"<\/figure>\n

Previously, in 2020, Ron Bublitz had already asked the\u00a0U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH)<\/strong>\u00a0the question shown below. His correspondence is posted at the following link, along with the evasive response provided by the NIH\/NIAID Section Chief for Controlled Correspondence and Public Inquiries, Legislative Affairs and Correspondence Management Branch.\u00a0https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/pulse\/has-causation-been-proven-ron-bublitz\/<\/strong><\/a>\u00a0Here is a pdf showing the text and a photo of the actual emails:\u00a0https:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/NIAID-reply-to-Ron-Bublitz-re-SARS-COV-2-isolation.pdf<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

\"Image\"<\/figure>\n

Ron kindly provided a screenshot of his communications with NIAID, shown below.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n

Note that\u00a0NIH\/NIAID failed to answer any of Ron Bublitz\u2019s questions<\/strong>\u00a0and merely cited\u00a0the same CDC study<\/strong><\/a>\u00a0mentioned above that indulged in the typical fraudulent \u201cmonkey business\u201d approach to so-called \u201cisolation\u201d \u2013 as shown in the screenshot below).<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n

 <\/p>\n

After a series of Freedom of Information requests beginning in April 2020 failed to yield any satisfactory response, Ricardo Maarman (working alongside\u00a0Dr. Faiez Kirsten<\/strong><\/a>) challenged the\u00a0South African government<\/strong>\u00a0in the Western Cape High Court in May 2021 to provide proof of \u201cthe virus\u201d that allegedly justifies that government\u2019s devastating lockdown measures.<\/p>\n

The government failed to provide proof or even compelling evidence, and on pages 29+ of their\u00a0responding affidavit<\/strong><\/a>\u00a0(starting on page 31 of the pdf) revealed that they have relied on a \u201cwell established\u201d but unscientific approach to \u201cvirus isolation\u201d.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n

The SA government\u2019s affidavit artfully implies that Koch\u2019s Postulates (or a variation therefore) have been fulfilled for the alleged \u201cvirus\u201d when in fact none of them have been. It contains no mention of\u00a0purification<\/strong>\u00a0of the particles that have been shown in EM images (within cell cultures, never purified or in patient samples!) alleged to be \u201cthe virus\u201d, or the characterization or sequencing of purified particles, or any controlled experiment involving purified particles.<\/p>\n

And the SA government\u2019s discussion of the Bradford-Hill criteria glosses over the fact that these criteria\u00a0presuppose<\/strong>\u00a0the existence and valid measurement of the potentially causative factor under investigation, when the reality is that no test ever has been or could have been validated for the never-purified, never-characterized, never-sequenced particles alleged to be \u201cthe virus\u201d.<\/p>\n

The judge ruled that the matter is\u00a0not urgent<\/strong>\u00a0and struck the matter from her roll. Ricardo will be pursuing this further. The notice of motion,\u00a0hearing transcript<\/a><\/strong>,\u00a0court ruling<\/strong><\/a>, other documentation and interviews about this case are posted on a dedicated website:
\nhttps:\/\/www.showusthevirus.info<\/strong><\/a>.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n

A\u00a0Lisbon court document<\/strong>\u00a0dated May 19, 2021 is posted on the website of\u00a0Andre Dias, PhD<\/strong><\/a>\u00a0(as reported by Celia Farber at \u201cThe Truth Barrier,\u201d\u00a0celiafarber.substack.com<\/strong><\/a>).<\/p>\n

The court document\u2019s URL is\u00a0https:\/\/andre-dias.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fwd-Sentenca.pdf<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0(and we have backed it up at\u00a0https:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Portuguese-court-ruling.pdf<\/a>).<\/p>\n

According to Ms. Farber\u2019s published June 28, 2021 email interview with Dias, who is an expert in lung disease modeling, the court ruling is in regards to a citizen\u2019s petition to the Ministry of Health, \u201cequivalent to a Freedom of Information Request\u2026that ended up in court \u2013 with epidemiological and statistical queries<\/em>\u201c, and \u201cthe court also formalized that the ministry has no data or references about the existence of the virus<\/em><\/strong>\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n

Ms. Farber advises that an English translation of the court ruling is in the works and will be shared on her website once it\u2019s prepared. Below is a screenshot from the original document showing some of the questions that had been posed to Portugal\u2019s Ministry of Health, for which they apparently had no answers.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n

At the next link (from the\u00a0website<\/strong><\/a>\u00a0of award-winning investigate journalist Torsten Engelbrecht and co-author of the book\u00a0Virus Mania<\/a><\/strong>) is an email from\u00a0Dr. Michael Laue<\/a><\/strong>, Head of the Consultant Laboratory for Diagnostic Electron Microscopy of Infectious Pathogens at\u00a0Germany\u2019s Robert Koch Institut (RKI)<\/strong>, an institute \u201cwithin the portfolio of the\u00a0Federal Ministry of Health<\/strong><\/em>\u201d and responsible for disease control and prevention:
\nhttps:\/\/www.torstenengelbrecht.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/RKI_noSARSCoV2purification-1.pdf<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n

The link for the Turonova et al. abstract, provided by Dr. Laue in the email above, is\u00a0here<\/strong><\/a>; the full text of the paper is here:\u00a0In situ structural analysis of SARS-CoV-2 spike reveals flexibility mediated by three hinges<\/strong>)<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

The\u00a0starting point\u00a0<\/strong>for this paper is a so-called SARS-COV-2 isolate named \u201cMUC-IMB1\u201d (referred to simply as \u201cMUC-1\u201d in the paper\u2019s\u00a0supporting materials<\/strong><\/a>). Turonova et al. credit G. Dobler of the Bundeswehr Institute for Microbiology for providing them this \u201cisolate\u201d.<\/p>\n

I contacted Dr. Gerhard Dobler to confirm details about \u201cMUC-1\u201d (which goes by several different names including Germany\/BavPat1\/2020), and it turns out that MUC-1 is another result of the monkey-business methodology cited at the top of this page. (The emails and more details are posted here:\u00a0MUC-1 aka MUC-IMB1: just more Corman\/Drosten monkey business fraud<\/strong><\/a>.) MUC-1 is not isolated\/purified \u201cvirus\u201d nor was it ever shown to contain any \u201cvirus\u201d.<\/p>\n

(Dr. Andrew Kaufman recently commented on this same paper by Turonova et al.; to see his video summary go to \u201cBonus Video\u201d:
\nhttps:\/\/andrewkaufmanmd.com\/covid-19-myths-public-release\/<\/a><\/strong>.)<\/p>\n

Also on Torsten Engelbrecht\u2019s website are links to email responses from authors of \u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d studies, starting with the Zhu et al paper cited above by Dr. Michael Laue.\u00a0None<\/strong>\u00a0provided any evidence or assurance re purification of \u201cthe virus\u201d. The following is copied and pasted from Torsten\u2019s homepage:<\/p>\n

\u201cNa Zhu et al.<\/strong>\u00a0(NEJM<\/em>): \u201c[We show] an image of sedimented virus particles, not purified ones\u201d (see Email<\/a>).<\/p>\n

Leo L. M. Poon; Malik Peiris<\/strong>\u00a0(Nature Medicine<\/em>): \u201cThe image is the virus budding from an infected cell. It is not purified virus\u201d (see Email<\/a>).<\/p>\n

Sharon R. Lewin et al.<\/strong>\u00a0(The Medical Journal of Australia<\/em>): \u201c\u201cThe nucleic acid extraction was performed on isolate material recovered from infected cells. This material was not centrifuged, so was not purified through sucrose gradient to have a density band as such. The EM images were obtained directly from cell culture material\u201d (see Email<\/a>).<\/p>\n

Myung-Guk Han et al.<\/strong>\u00a0(Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives<\/em>): \u201cWe could not estimate the degree of purification because we do not purify and concentrate the virus cultured in cells\u201d (see Email<\/a>).<\/p>\n

Wan Beom Park et al.<\/strong>\u00a0(Journal of Korean Medical Science<\/em>): \u201cWe did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification\u201d (see Email<\/a>).\u201d<\/p>\n

January 13, 2021:\u00a0Norway\u2019s Ministry of Health and Care Services<\/strong>\u00a0failed to provide or cite any record of \u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d isolation from a sample from a symptomatic patient, where the sample was not adulterated with additional genetic material, by anyone anywhere, for the requester Martiens Bekker. Request and response with English translation:
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Norway-Ministry-of-Health-cites-no-records.pdf<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\"Image\"<\/figure>\n

April 25, 2021: the\u00a0Norwegian Directorate of Health<\/strong>\u00a0(which is under the Ministry of Health and Care Services) failed to provide or cite even 1 record of \u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d purification from a patient sample, by anyone, anywhere, and provided a silly excuse instead:
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Norwegian-Directorate-of-Health.pdf<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

\"Image\"<\/figure>\n

May, 2021\u00a0Uruguay\u2019s Clemente Stable Biological Research Institute\u00a0<\/strong>(under the Ministry of Education and Culture) and the\u00a0Faculty of Chemistry, University of the Republic<\/strong>\u00a0provided\/cited no records of \u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d purification, by anyone anywhere, for requester Mar\u00eda Bettina Galo. Both responses:
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/Uruguay-Clemente-Stable-Biol-Research-Inst-Min-Edu-and-Culture-Faculty-of-Chem-U-of-Repub-no-records.pdf<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

June 7 2021:\u00a0Uruguay Ministry of Public Health\u00a0<\/strong>failed to provide or cite for requester Mar\u00eda Bettina Galo any record of \u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d purified from a patient sample, by anyone, anywhere, ever and claimed they can\u2019t understand the request:
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Uruguay-Ministry-of-Public-Health-of-Res-377-2021.pdf<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\"Image\"<\/figure>\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n

March 30, 2021:\u00a0Oregon Health Authority<\/strong>\u00a0confirmed they have no record re purification of any \u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d from any patient sample in the world: See the full wording of the request, and response:
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/Oregon-HA-March-2021-request-response.pdf<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

\"Image\"<\/figure>\n

May 22, 2021:\u00a0Ministry of Health and Social Protection, Republic of Colombia<\/strong>\u00a0admits they have no record re purification of \u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d from a patient sample, by anyone anywhere. Full letter:
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/FOI-Colombia-no-records-package.pdf<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

\"Image\"<\/figure>\n

May 3, 2021:\u00a0Indian Council of Medical Research<\/strong>\u00a0(ICRM, \u201cthe apex body in India for formulation, coordination & promotion of biomedical research\u201d) has failed to provide\/cite any record of \u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d purification for the requester (who asked to keep both their name and file # private); instead they cited a typical example of \u201cmonkey-business\u201d fraud. Note that ICRM had fraudulently claimed to have been tracking \u201cthe virus\u201d across India, to have isolated the imaginary UK variant, has developed a COVID-19 quackcine, shares ownership rights on the quackcine and is a member of guess WHO\u2019s\u00a0Global Health Workforce Network<\/strong><\/a>. Full response:
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/India-Council-Medical-Research-request-reply-redacted.pdf<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\"Image\"<\/figure>\n

I personally cannot read these Czech documents, but was told:
\nUniverzita Karlova:<\/strong>\u00a0\u201cThis from the No.1 university in Czech R. As answer, they inform us, that \u201cthere is broad\u00a0consensus<\/strong>\u00a0in the international scientific community\u201d about precise RNA sequence of SARS-Cov2, about its chemical and protein structure and it causing COVID19.\u201d<\/em>
\nThus Univerzita Karlova failed to provide any record proving the purification or existence of \u201cthe virus\u201d:
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/Czech-university.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

\"Image\"<\/figure>\n

Czech Ministry of Health:<\/strong>\u00a0\u201cThis is the response of Czech ministry of health. When a proof of existence of the SARS-Cov2 virus was requested\u2026\u201d<\/em>
\nThe references cited by the Ministry are in English and do not describe purification of an alleged virus, let alone scientific study of such. Full letter:
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/Czech-ministry-of-health.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n

The Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport<\/strong>\u00a0provided\/cited for the requester no records of actual purification and control experiments to show \u201cSARS-CoV-2\u201d exists:
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/FOI-RIVM2.pdf<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

New Zealand\u2019s Ministry of Health and NZ\u2019s crown research institute<\/strong>,\u00a0the<\/strong>\u00a0Institute of Environmental Science and Research<\/strong>\u00a0admitted they have no records of \u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d isolation:\u00a0https:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/new-zealand-no-record-of-covid-19-virus-isolation-at-the-ministry-of-health-or-the-institute-of-environmental-science-and-research\/<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

Here are 5 pages of pure gold, evidencing masterful evasion plus stunning incompetence and\/or fraud from\u00a0New Zealand\u2019s Ministry of Health<\/strong>. Instead of providing the requests records of \u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d isolation\/purification and proof of accurate diagnostic tests, they blathered about genomes and cultures of the never-isolated imaginary virus; stated that PCR tests have been validated around the world and are the gold standard; and cited a February 2020 preliminary report (\u201cThe Pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 in hACE2 Transgenic Mice\u201d) that used the so-called \u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d strain that had been concocted by Zhu et al. and claimed that Koch\u2019s Postulates had been fulfilled.
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/NZ-Min-Health-2nd-FOI-no-records.pdf<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\"Image\"<\/figure>\n

No records describing isolation of SARS-COV-2 from a sample not already adulterated with other genetic material, admits\u00a0New Zealand\u2019s<\/strong>\u00a0Department of the Prime Minister & Cabinet<\/strong>:\u00a0https:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/NZ-Prime-Minister-And-Cabinet-Response-scrubbed.pdf<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

March 22, 2021, New Zealand\u2019s Ministry of Heath, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and the NZ Cabinet<\/strong>\u00a0confirm they still have no record describing purification of \u201cthe virus\u201d and hence zero proof of its existence, and they choose to cite fraudulent studies instead (the infamous Harcourt et al. study mentioned above and the Australian paper cited at the top of this page). Full pdf response:
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/2021-03-22-NZ-MOH-Purification-SARS-COV-2-redacted.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

\"Image\"<\/figure>\n

April 19, 2021, responding to a request that had been forwarded to them by\u00a0Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern\u2018s Office, the New Zealand Ministry of Heath\u00a0<\/strong>confirms that no record describing purification of \u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d is held by the Ministry or by any \u201cagency subject to the Act\u201d. Full pdf response:\u00a0https:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/2021-04-19-NZ-MOH-Purification-SARS-COV-2-Final-Request-Redacted.pdf<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

April 23, 2021\u00a0Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern\u2018s Office, New Zealand<\/strong>, again confirms they have no record describing purification of \u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d by anyone, anywhere, ever. Full pdf response:
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/NZ-PMO-23.04.2021-2021-068-Redacted.pdf<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

\"Image\"<\/figure>\n

New Zealand\u2019s University of Auckland<\/strong>\u00a0was disappointingly non-cooperative, the only institution as of October 8th failing to simply admit that they have no such records, opting instead for a sketchy \u201crefusal\u201d of my colleague\u2019s request. Let\u2019s face it, if the University actually had any such records (that no one else on the planet appears have) and they are publicly available, the University of Auckland would have proudly provided links\/citations. But they didn\u2019t.\u00a0https:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/Auckland-redacted-FOI-emails.pdf<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

New Zealand\u2019s University of Otago<\/strong>, where Professor Miguel Qui\u00f1ones-Mateu, Ph.D.\u00a0claimed months ago<\/strong><\/a>\u00a0to have \u201cisolated the virus\u201d, responded that they too have \u201cno records\u201d describing isolation of SARS-COV-2 from a sample not already adulterated with other genetic material:\u00a0https:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/new-zealands-university-of-otago-claimed-to-have-isolated-covid-19-virus-but-has-no-record-of-it-isolated-from-an-unadulterated-sample-anywhere-on-earth-by-anyone-ever\/<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

March 30, 2021 New Zealand\u2019s University of Otago<\/strong>\u00a0confirm they still have no record of \u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d isolation\/purification, by anyone anywhere. Full response pdf here:
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/2021-03-30-University-of-Otago-Purification-of-SARS-COV-2-redacted.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

\"Image\"<\/figure>\n

[BONUSES:<\/strong>
\nNew Zealand\u2018s\u00a0Ministry of Health<\/strong>\u00a0admits to having no records describing isolation of\u00a0ANY virus listed on NZ\u2019s Immunisation Schedule<\/strong>:\u00a0https:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/Ministry-of-Health-Immunisation-Schedule-Virus-Isolation-Request_Response-2-scrubbed.pdf<\/strong><\/a>;<\/p>\n

NZ\u2019s crown research institute, the Institute of Environmental Science and Research also admits to having no records describing isolation of\u00a0ANY virus listed on NZ\u2019s Immunisation Schedule<\/strong>, and equates \u201cisolation\u201d with culturing:
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/NZ-ESR-Isolation-of-ANY-VIRUS-OIA-Request-Response.pdf<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\"Image\"<\/figure>\n

New Zealand\u2018s\u00a0Ministry of Health<\/strong>\u00a0obviously has no record describing the isolation of the alleged 2003 \u201cSARS-COV\u201d or any \u201ccommon cold coronavirus\u201d by anyone, anywhere, ever<\/strong>, but wasn\u2019t willing to admit such. Instead they falsely implied that Michael S. had asked for things he had\u00a0not<\/strong>\u00a0asked for.
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/NZ-MOH-SARS-COV-1-Isolation-Response-redacted.pdf<\/a><\/strong>]<\/p>\n

\"Image\"<\/figure>\n

New Zealand\u2019s crown research institute, the Institute of Environmental Science and Research\u00a0<\/strong>once again equates \u201cisolation\u201d with culturing and this time admits to having\u00a0no record re isolation of \u201cSARS-COV-1\u201d or any \u201cvirus\u201d on NZ\u2019s Immunisation Schedule<\/strong>\u00a0and simply\u00a0\u201cignored\u201d a query re isolation of any \u201ccommon cold coronaviruses\u201d<\/strong>. I think we know the answer though, don\u2019t we?
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/ESR-FOI-reply-schedule-SARS-common-cold.pdf<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

\"Image\"<\/figure>\n

 <\/p>\n

March 9, 2021:\u00a0New Zealand\u2019s Institute of Environmental Science and Research<\/strong>\u00a0admits that they still have no record of\u00a0\u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d<\/strong>\u00a0isolation\/purification (performed by anyone on the planet, anywhere, ever):
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/ESR-SARS-COV-2-Purification-Redacted.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

\"Image\"<\/figure>\n

One of\u00a0New Zealand\u2019s Associate Ministers of Health Jenny Salesa<\/strong>\u00a0has \u201cno records\u201d:
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/NZ-Ass-Min-Health-Hon-Jenny-Salesa-Response-scrubbed.pdf<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n

Another of\u00a0New Zealand\u2019s Associate Ministers of Health Julie Anne Genter<\/strong>\u00a0has \u201cno records\u201d:
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/Hon-Julie-Anne-Genter-Response-scrubbed.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

And another of\u00a0New Zealand\u2019s Associate Ministers of Health Peeni Henare<\/strong>\u00a0has \u201cno records\u201d:
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/Hon-Peeni-Henare-Response-scrubbed.pdf<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

Same, \u201cno records\u201d says\u00a0Bay of Plenty District Health Board, Tauranga Hospital, New Zealand<\/strong>:
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/Bay-Of-Plenty-District-Health-Board-response-scrubbed.pdf<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

June 16, 2021:\u00a0University of Western Australia<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 home of Gates-funded researcher\u00a0Christine Carson<\/strong><\/a>, who has spent countless hours on social media this past year insisting \u201cyes the COVID-19 virus has been isolated\u201d<\/em>\u00a0\u2013 provided\/cited zero records of \u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d isolation\/purification from a patient sample, by anyone anywhere ever:
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/UWA-Carson-no-records-redacted.pdf<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\"Image\"<\/figure>\n

At this next link you will find an interesting \u201cno records\u201d FOI response from\u00a0Australia\u2019s Department of Health<\/strong>:
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/australian-dept-of-health-has-no-record-of-covid-19-virus-isolatio<\/strong>n\/<\/a><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n

Same admission from\u00a0Australia\u2019s<\/strong>\u00a0Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0(which had publicly claimed to have \u201cisolated the virus\u201d).<\/p>\n

Same admission from\u00a0Australia\u2019s Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation\u00a0<\/strong>\u2013 CSIRO (\u201cAustralia\u2019s national science research agency\u201d), which is\u00a0involved in \u201cCOVID-19\u201d vaccine trials<\/a>\u00a0using the so-called \u201cSARS-COV-2 isolate\u201d from Doherty Institute:
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/CSIRO-Isolation-Response-scrubbed.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n

 <\/p>\n

March 22, 2021<\/strong>,\u00a0Australia\u2019s Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation\u00a0<\/strong>still has no record of any \u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d purified from a patient, by anyone, anywhere:
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/no-records-CSIRO-SARS-COV-2-Purification-Redacted.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

The next FOI letter shown in the screenshot below is in response to a request that was submitted\u00a0on the advice of Australia\u2019s Department of Health<\/strong>, and has come to us via\u00a0John Blaid<\/a>. Addressed to Mary-Jane Liddicoat, the formal but undated letter was authored sometime after March 9, 2021 by\u00a0Dr. Nick Coatsworth<\/strong>, Executive Director of Medical Services,\u00a0Canberra Health Services<\/a>\u00a0(CHS),\u00a0ACT Government (Government of the Australian Capital Territory)<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

[When reviewing Coatsworth\u2019s response, bear in mind the following facts provided us by Darren Christison, a journalist in Sydney, Australia: \u201cThis is the same Dr Nick Coatsworth who is the \u2018poster boy\u2019 for the Australian government\u2019s push to vaccinate everyone until they urinate the poison, and has been a permanent fixture on TV and online in recent months (https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=Aep_RKawTWc<\/a>).\u00a0 He\u2019s also the same Dr Nick Coatsworth who recently, according to The Sydney Morning Herald, \u2018admonished a \u201chardcore rump of activist doctors\u201d spreading misinformation and undermining vaccine confidence\u201d (https:\/\/www.smh.com.au\/national\/former-deputy-chief-doc-warns-australia-must-reopen-borders-prepare-for-the-return-of-covid-19-20210514-p57s1u.html<\/a>).<\/em>]<\/p>\n

Coatsworth\u00a0<\/strong>admitted that Canberra Health Services holds no records relevant to the topic of isolating (aka purifying) the alleged \u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d. His entire letter is here:
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Australian-Dept-of-Health-March-2021.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n

[BONUS:<\/strong>\u00a0Australia\u2019s Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation\u00a0<\/strong>\u2013 CSIRO (\u201cAustralia\u2019s national science research agency\u201d) also admits to having no record describing the isolation of ANY virus on Australia\u2019s national \u201cimmunization\u201d schedule, by anyone, anywhere, ever:
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/CSIRO-Immunisation-Schedule-Response-Redacted.pdf<\/a><\/strong>]<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n

No records of \u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d isolation, admits the\u00a0U.K. Department of Health and Social Care\u00a0<\/strong>(note: there are not 1, not 2, not 3, but 4 such responses from DHSC \u2013 the most recent dated November 23, 2020):\u00a0<\/strong>https:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/u-k-dept-of-health-and-social-care-has-no-record-of-covid-19-virus-isolation\/<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n

[Note\u00a0The<\/strong>\u00a0U.K. Department of Health and Social Care<\/strong>\u00a0has kept us waiting for 2 months already on an FOI request for (at most) 3 days worth of analysis on their alleged \u201cnew variant\u201d announced by Matt Hancock on December 14 2020:\u00a0https:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/UK-DHSC-handling-of-Dec14-FOI-re-socalled-variant.pdf<\/a><\/strong>]<\/p>\n

UK\u2019s Government Office for Science has no record of \u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d isolation\/purification:\u00a0<\/strong>https:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/uks-government-office-for-science-has-no-record-of-a-covid-19-virus-isolated-from-an-unadulterated-sample-anywhere-on-earth-by-anyone-ever\/<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n

Same, from the\u00a0UK\u2019s Cabinet Office<\/strong>\u00a0and the\u00a0UK Prime Minister\u2019s Office<\/strong>, in response to a query from Marc Horn. See here:\u00a0https:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/Cabinet-Office-isolation-FOI2020-10121-Reply.pdf<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0and here:\u00a0https:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/Prime-Ministers-Office-FOI-reply-isolation-SARS-COV-2.pdf<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Here is a sketchy FOI reply from the\u00a0U.K. Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency\u00a0<\/strong>(obtained by Mr. Athanasios Kandias). The agency provided\/cited no records re \u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d isolation.\u00a0 Their response includes an (apparently fraudulent) claim that such records are available in the public domain, but they provided zero links\/citations despite having been asked for the location of any such records. Excerpts are shown below. Full response:\u00a0https:\/\/www.whatdotheyknow.com\/request\/documents_held_showing_sars_cov2_2#incoming-1670059<\/strong><\/a>
\nPdf:\u00a0https:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/UK-Medicines-and-Healthcare-products-Regulatory-Agency-no-isolation-records.pdf<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

\"Image\"<\/figure>\n

May 4, 2021:\u00a0University of Warwick<\/strong>\u00a0(UK) admits that they hold no record describing \u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d purification from a patient sample, by anyone, anywhere, ever:
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/University-of-Warwick-F352.20-21-May-4-2021.pdf<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Regarding\u00a0\u201cBNT162b2\u201d, the mRNA ingredient in the Pfizer-BioNTech \u201cCovid-19 vaccine\u201d<\/strong>, that is allegedly transcribed from the the alleged corresponding genetic template that allegedly encodes the alleged viral spike (S) protein of the alleged \u201cSARS-COV-2 virus\u201d,\u00a0U.K. Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency<\/strong>\u00a0admitted to investigative journalist Frances Leader that: the genetic template on which it (\u201cBNT162b2\u201d) is based \u201cdoes not come directly from an isolated virus from an infected person<\/em>\u201c, rather it \u201cwas generated via a combination of gene synthesis and recombinant DNA technology<\/em>\u201c. The email exchange is available here:
\nhttps:\/\/hive.blog\/worldnews\/@francesleader\/email-exchange-with-uk-mhra-exposing-th<\/a>e-genomic-sequence-of-sarscov2<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0and in a pdf here:\u00a0https:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/UK-MHRA-emails-w-FL.pdf<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"MHRA
\"MHRA<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

No EM photos of purified \u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d, no peer reviewed paper with the genome of purified \u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d, no proof that \u201cthe virus\u201d causes \u201cCOVID-19\u201d, etc \u2014 says\u00a0UK\u2019s Cabinet Office<\/strong>\u00a0in response to the queries shown below from Bartholomeus Lakeman; full letter here:\u00a0https:\/\/www.whatdotheyknow.com\/request\/666330\/response\/1589609\/attach\/3\/FOI2020%2006375%20Draft%201.pdf?cookie_passthrough=1<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0and preserved here:\u00a0https:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/Bartholomeus-Lakeman-Cabinet-Office-isolation-FOI-reply.pdf<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n

No records re isolation of \u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d from an unadulterated sample, says the\u00a0UK\u2019s House of Commons<\/strong>, in response to a query from Marc Horn:\u00a0https:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/House-of-Commmons-FOI-reply-isolation-SARS-COV-2.pdf<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

Same, from the\u00a0UK\u2019s House of Lords<\/strong>, in response to a query from Marc Horn:\u00a0https:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/House-of-Lords-FOI-reply-isolation-SARS-COV-2.pdf<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

(Click here to see a series of \u201cCOVID-19\u201d FOI requests submitted by Marc Horn to various agencies:\u00a0https:\/\/www.whatdotheyknow.com\/user\/marc_horn<\/strong><\/a>)<\/p>\n

Same, from\u00a0Public Health Scotland\u00a0<\/strong>in response to Athanasios Kandias:\u00a0https:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/PH-Scotland-RESPONSE-2020-000133.pdf<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n

Same, for the 2nd time from\u00a0Public Health Scotland\u00a0<\/strong>in response to my colleague in NZ:\u00a0https:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/Public-Health-Scotland-Response-2020-000158.pdf<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Public Health Wales<\/strong>\u00a0provided Dr. Janet Menage a sketchy excuse for not properly assisting with her request (Dr. Menage has submitted a complaint to the PHW \u2018Corporate Complaints\u2019 team); see PHW\u2019s response here:\u00a0https:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/Puplic-Health-Wales-453-Isolation-of-Sars-COV-2.pdf<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n

Here is a 2nd & more recent dodgy response from\u00a0Public Health Wales<\/strong>\u00a0yielding no record, or citation of any record, of \u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d isolation\/purification done by anyone, anywhere, ever.\u00a0https:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/PHWales.pdf<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

Below is a screenshot of a Freedom of Information response from the University College Dublin, explaining thatIreland\u2019s National Virus Reference Laboratory has no records describing \u201c<\/a><\/strong>how the Novel Coronavirus was purified<\/a><\/strong><\/em>\u201c<\/a><\/strong>. Click the link for more details.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n

Statens Serum Institut, Denmark<\/strong>\u00a0told Alex Holmsted that (translation): \u201cThe Statens Serum Institut can state that we have now carried out a journal search for documentation that has convinced the Statens Serum Institut about the real existence of SARS-CoV-2, the alleged cause of COVID19 and moreover, we have in some other way tried to locate relevant documents. Statens Serum Institut can note that we are not in possession of the requested documents..<\/em>.\u201dhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/Denmark-The-Statens-Serum-Instituttet-SARS-COV-2-FOI-reply-Afgoerelse_Alex_Holmstedt_SAG_20-08162__1_.pdf<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

April 2020:\u00a0Public Health England<\/strong>\u00a0admits using fake virus material to evaluate \u201cCOVID-19\u201d tests, the gold standard is not isolated virus, and more\u00a0https:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/public-health-englands-answers-to-covid-19-testing-questions\/<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n

No records re isolation of \u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d from an unadulterated sample,\u00a0Public Health England\u00a0<\/strong>told Andrew Johnson, a Technology Tutor at a UK University:\u00a0https:\/\/www.whatdotheyknow.com\/request\/679566\/response\/1625332\/attach\/html\/2\/872%20FOI%20All%20records%20describing%20isolation%20of%20SARS%20COV%202.pdf.html<\/strong><\/a>. This is Andrew\u2019s write-up on his FOI request:\u00a0https:\/\/cvpandemicinvestigation.com\/2020\/08\/phe-has-no-real-evidence-that-sars2-cov2-causes-covid-19-chromosome-8-blood-plasma-treatment-and-more\/<\/strong><\/a>.<\/p>\n

Months ago, the\u00a0StandUpX Science Committee<\/strong>\u00a0published an open letter dated June 22, 2020 to the British Prime Minister, Boris Johnson. Below is a screenshot from their letter, demanding scientific proof of the alleged \u201cCOVID-19 virus\u201d. (Their entire letter can be viewed and\/or downloaded here:\u00a0https:\/\/kevinpcorbett.com\/onewebmedia\/Signed%20StandUpX%20definitive.pdf<\/strong><\/a>)<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n

StandUpX Committee member\u00a0Piers Corbyn<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0also made the demand verbally outside the headquarters of the UK government; video footage of the demand is available at this url (not<\/strong>\u00a0the embedded video below \u2013 that is a different video featuring Peirs Corbyn; WordPress would not embed the footage of the demand for some reason, so please click on this url to see the demand, not on the image below):\u00a0https:\/\/youtu.be\/4FpuzGBa36c<\/a><\/p>\n

Below is footage of Piers Corbyn calling out the UK government for the non-isolation of their theoretical \u201cSARS-COV-2 virus\u201d. https:\/\/www.bitchute.com\/embed\/1eDDh3eqFPAJ\/?feature=oembed#?secret=fSiAIVe09M ERRATUM: In the description underneath the video (on the bitchute page) the authors of the publication on the Drosten PCR test are referred to has \u2018Drosten et al\u2019 when it should read \u2018Croman et al\u2019.<\/p>\n

StandUpX has a petition entitled\u00a0<\/strong>\u201cIf there\u2019s no proof the virus exists end all Lockdowns\/Masks\/Trax\/Vax actions<\/em><\/strong>\u201c. If you can tell the difference between isolation and fraudulent monkey business, please consider signing it, here:<\/strong>\u00a0https:\/\/www.gopetition.com\/petitions\/if-theres-no-proof-the-virus-exists-end-all-lockdownsmaskstraxvax-actions-2.html<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

In April StandUpX committee member Dr. Kevin Corbett MSc PhD (@KPCResearch<\/strong><\/a>\u00a0on Twitter) published a paper describing issues around the non-isolation of the theoretical SARS-COV-2 virus. Below is a screenshot from his paper entitled \u201cWHERE IS THE EVIDENCE FOR THE EXISTENCE OF THE \u2018NOVEL CORONAVIRUS\u2019, \u2018SARS-CoV-2\u2019, AND THE ACCURACY OF THE TESTS?\u201d<\/strong>, which you may access here:
\nhttps:\/\/kevinpcorbett.com\/onewebmedia\/WHERE%20IS%20THE%20EVIDENCE%20FOR%20THE%20EXISTENCE%20OF%20THE%20CORONAVIRUS%20FINAL2.pdf<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n

Guess\u00a0\u201cWHO\u201d advised Public Health England (and the rest of the world) not to isolate \u201cthe virus\u201d as a routine diagnostic procedure<\/strong>,\u00a0and \u201cWHO\u201d encourages the conflation of isolation with culturing?<\/strong>\u00a0See the screenshots below from page 4 of the Interim Guidance document dated March 2, 2020 \u201cLaboratory testing for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in suspected human cases<\/em>\u201d kindly provided by Dr. Corbett of StandUpX:\u00a0https:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/WHO-COVID-19-laboratory-2020.4-eng.pdf<\/a>\u00a0and page 8 of the\u00a0Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 Interim guidance 11 September 2020<\/em>\u00a0https:\/\/canucklaw.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/WHO-2019-nCoV-laboratory-September-11-2020-Guidelines.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n

Update, October 1, 2020:<\/strong>\u00a0My colleague in New Zealand recently received a \u201cno records\u201d response from\u00a0Public Health England<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 identical to the \u201cno records\u201d response above that was already provided to Andrew Johnson. You may access this 2nd response from PHE here:\u00a0https:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/Public-Health-England-scrubbed.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

Update November 1, 2020:\u00a0<\/strong>Marc Horn also queried\u00a0Public Health England<\/strong>\u00a0for records describing \u201cSARS-COV-2 isolation\u201d from a sample not unadulterated with additional genetic material. Response: no records.\u00a0https:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/PHE-FOI-reply-re-SARS-COV-2-isolation.pdf<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

Another \u201cno records\u201d FOI response from\u00a0Public Health England<\/strong>\u00a0dated November 3<\/strong>, 2020, in response to a request from Athanasios Kandias for records (re SARS-COV-2 isolation) held by the\u00a0National Biological Standards Board<\/strong>.
\nhttps:\/\/www.whatdotheyknow.com\/request\/701311\/response\/1669071\/attach\/2\/1740%20FOI%20NIBSC%20records%20on%20SARS%20COV%202.pdf?cookie_passthrough=1<\/strong><\/a>\u00a0(Preserved here:\u00a0https:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/PHE-1740-FOI-NIBSC-no-records-SARS-COV-2-isolation.pdf<\/a><\/strong>)<\/p>\n

No records supporting the claim that the alleged \u201cSARS-COV-2 virus\u201d causes \u201cCOVID-19\u201d symptoms says\u00a0Public Health England<\/strong>, in response to a query from Marc Horn. Note that PHE cited 3 publicly available studies, none involving isolation of \u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d from a sample not unadulterated with additional genetic material.\u00a0https:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/PHE-FOI-reply-re-SARS-COV-2-isolation-and-causation-of-COVID-19.pdf<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

No records supporting the claim that the alleged \u201cSARS-COV-2 virus\u201d causes \u201cCOVID-19\u201d symptoms, says the\u00a0UK\u2019s House of Commons<\/strong>, in response to a query from Marc Horn:\u00a0https:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/UK-House-of-Commons-FOI-reply-re-COVID19-causation.pdf<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

No records supporting the claim that the alleged \u201cSARS-COV-2 virus\u201d causes \u201cCOVID-19\u201d symptoms , says the\u00a0UK\u2019s House of Lords<\/strong>, in response to a query from Marc Horn:\u00a0https:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/UK-House-of-Lords-FOI-reply-re-COVID19-causation.pdf<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Britain\u2019s Health and Safety Executive<\/strong>\u00a0confirmed for Athanasios Kandias on November 3, 2020 that they hold no information relating to isolation of \u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d.
\nhttps:\/\/www.whatdotheyknow.com\/request\/documents_held_showing_sars_cov2_3<\/a>
\n(Preserved here:\u00a0https:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/Health-and-Safety-Executive.pdf<\/a>).<\/p>\n

Imperial College London<\/strong>\u00a0managed to provide\/cite zero records in their wildly un-informative Freedom of Information response dated March 12, 2021 re: isolation\/purification of the imaginary \u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d (by anyone, anywhere, ever):
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/Imperial-College-London-March-12-reply-re-isolation.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

Kepa Ormazabal submitted a Freedom of Information request to\u00a0Spain\u2019s Ministry of Health<\/strong>\u00a0for bibliographic records of studies describing \u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d isolation (\u201cthe term \u201cisolation\u201d is used in the sense given by the Real Academia Espanola Dictionary\u201d<\/em>); the Ministry\u2019s response yielded no records:
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/Spain-Ministry-of-Health-isolation-request-reply-w-translation.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

The Director of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Andrea Ammon<\/strong>, has admitted to having no documentation, even for the ECDC\u2019s methodology to prove that a virus exists, let alone proof of SARS-COV-2:\u00a0https:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/DOCUMENT-REQUEST-ECDC-AND-RESPONSE.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

\"Image\"<\/figure>\n

According to the website of\u00a0Slovenia\u2019s University of Ljubljana<\/strong>, their\u00a0Faculty of Medicine\u00a0<\/strong>has been\u00a0involved in<\/a>\u00a0\u201c\u2026implementation of the latest molecular diagnostic procedures; an attempt to isolate the virus\u00a0in cell cultures\u00a0<\/strong><\/em>[oxymoron], which is a precondition for testing anti-viral agents and vaccines\u2026<\/em>\u201c. The Faculty formally admitted on November 30, 2020 to having no record (even obtained from others) of \u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d isolation or proving a causal link to \u201cCOVID-19\u201d; also that 40 PCR cycles have been used across Slovenia since the beginning of testing. The Faculty\u2019s original response and an English translation are available here:
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/FOI-reply-Slovenia-University-of-Ljubljana-re-isolation.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

\"Image\"<\/figure>\n

More recently,\u00a0Slovenia\u2019s Ministry of Health<\/strong>\u00a0stated that they had no records re \u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d purification, PCR tests, etc. and transferred an FOI request to the\u00a0Institute of Microbiology and Immunology (IMI) at the Univerisy of Ljubljana<\/strong>. The IMI eventually admitted in February 2021 that they have no records re \u201cvirus\u201d purification and that PCR tests have been conducted using up to 40 cycles. Bother letters are here:\u00a0https:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/Slovenian-Dept-Health-transfers-to-IMI-at-U-of-Ljubljana-no-isolation-40-PCR-CT.pdf<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

And more recently still,\u00a0Slovenia\u2019s National Laboratory for Health, Environment & Food (Nacionalnega laboratorija za zdravje, okolje in hrano,\u00a0<\/strong>NLZOH<\/strong><\/a>\u00a0\u2013 \u201cthe central and largest Slovenian public health laboratory that handles environmental protection, diagnostic and public health microbiological activities, chemical and microbiological analyses of different types of samples, and also performs research activities<\/em>\u201c) failed to provide or cite any record of \u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d purification or proof of existence, despite an intervention by the Information Commissioner. NLZOH also cited a \u201cbusiness secret\u201d in responses re queries re PCR testing.
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Slovenia-Lab-package-w-translations.pdf<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

\"Image\"<\/figure>\n

Hall of Shame<\/strong><\/h2>\n

The FOI request shown below was submitted to\u00a0Germany\u2019s Federal Ministry of Health<\/strong>\u00a0by Michael S. on August 9, 2020 and has been completely ignored. I think we know the answer though, don\u2019t we?
\nPdf:\u00a0https:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/German-Federal-Ministry-of-Health-ignored-FOI-request-redacted.pdf<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\"Image\"<\/figure>\n

On February 15, 2021 Kepa Ormazabal submitted an FOI request re isolation\/purification of the phantom \u201cvirus\u201d to the\u00a0Basque Country (Spain) Office of the President and Department of Health<\/strong>\u00a0and all dependent institutions. Months later Kepa wrote:
\n\u201cAccording to the law, they have 30 days to respond; 60 if the question is especially complex. Today is May 2nd and I have not heard from them.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n

On March 30, 2021 Kepa Ormazabal submitted another FOI request re isolation\/purification of the phantom \u201cvirus\u201d to the\u00a0flagship of Spanish research, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cient\u00edficas \/Higher Council of Scientific Research<\/strong>\u00a0(the image below indicates the reception of the request by the institution). Months later Kepa writes:\u00a0\u201cAgain, they have not responded and, therefore, their silence is refusing access to the information they may hold in regards to my question.\u201c<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201cThe CSIC and the Basque government are public institutions and, therefore, must comply with the Ley de transparencia, buen gobierno y acceso a la informaci\u00f3n p\u00fablica\/Law of transparency, good governance and access to public information. Article 20.4 of this law states that, if after 30 days there has been no response from the public administration, this silence is to be understood as meaning that the request to access the public information solicited has been refused.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n

Here is an exasperating email exchange between myself and Imperial College London, home of the disgraced \u201cCOVID-19\u201d modeller Professor Neil Ferguson and Public Health England\u2019s Deputy Director of National Infection Service and Director of Reference Microbiology Services, British virologist, Professor\u00a0Maria Zambon<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0FMedSci FRCPath. The College clearly has no records describing \u201cSARS-COV-2\u201d isolation\/purification but is unwilling to admit such:
\nhttps:\/\/www.fluoridefreepeel.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/Imperial-College-London-FOI-exchange-SARS-COV-2-isolation.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n

 <\/p>\n

Back-Up FOI Repositories<\/strong><\/h2>\n

This collection of FOI responses is being kindly backed up by a friend, here:\u00a0https:\/\/jumpshare.com\/b\/05F75HqalwFSRBB8Axsw<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

and they have backed up the compilation pdfs here:<\/p>\n

Part 1<\/strong>
\nhttps:\/\/jmp.sh\/xB2sb9P<\/a>
\nPart 2<\/strong>
\nhttps:\/\/jmp.sh\/p8QFqDK<\/a>
\nPart 3<\/strong>
\nhttps:\/\/jmp.sh\/neIBywO<\/a>
\nPart 4<\/strong>
\nhttps:\/\/jmp.sh\/RMCCCjZ<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

So \u201cWhat The Hell Is Going<\/strong>?<\/h2>\n

At this point you might be scratching your head and wonder what on Earth is going on. If so, the collection of presentations, articles and facts (not theories) on the page linked below will reveal the fraud and trickery that\u2019s behind the fake pandemic known as \u201cCOVID-19\u201d.<\/p>\n

\n