here<\/a>.)<\/p>\nHe said that \u2018somebody knew something in 2015 and 2016 which gave rise to my favourite quote of this entire pandemic\u2019. This was a statement made by Peter Daszak in 2015, and reported in the National Academies Press on February 12, 2016, in which he declared: \u2018We need to increase public understanding of the need for medical counter-measures such as a pan-coronavirus vaccine.\u00a0A key driver is the media, and the economics will follow the hype.\u00a0We need to use that hype to our advantage, to get to the real issues.\u00a0Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process.\u2019<\/p>\n
Of his own company, Martin said: \u2018We have since 1998 been the world\u2019s largest underwriter of intangible assets used in finance in 168 countries.\u00a0Our underwriting systems include the entire corpus of all patents, patent applications, federal grants, procurement records, e-government records, etc.\u00a0We have the ability to track not only what is happening, and who is involved in what\u2019s happening, but we monitor a series of thematic interests for a variety of organisations and individuals as well as for our own commercial use.<\/p>\n
\u2018We have reviewed over 4,000 patents issued around SARS-coronavirus and done a very comprehensive review of the financing of all the manipulation of coronavirus which gave rise to SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome).<\/p>\n
\u2018We took the actual genetic sequences that were reportedly novel, and reviewed those against the patent records available as of the spring of 2020.\u00a0What we found, as you\u2019ll see in this report, are over 120 patented pieces of evidence to suggest that the declaration of a novel coronavirus was entirely a fallacy.\u00a0There was no novel coronavirus.\u00a0There are countless, very subtle modifications of coronavirus sequences that have been uploaded.\u00a0But there was no single identifiable novel coronavirus at all.<\/p>\n
\u2018As a matter of fact, we found patent records of sequences attributed to novelty going to patents sought as early as 1999.\u00a0So not only was this not a novel anything, it\u2019s actually not been novel for over two decades.\u2019<\/p>\n
Martin took the inquiry team on what he called a \u2018short journey through the patent landscape, to make sure people understand what happened\u2019.<\/p>\n
Until 1999, he said, patenting activity around coronavirus applied only within veterinary science.\u00a0As early as January 2000, the Pfizer drug company filed for a patent on a genetic sequence giving rise to a coronavirus spike protein, \u2018the exact same thing we have allegedly rushed into invention\u2019, to be used in a vaccine against a canine disease.<\/p>\n
So, based on patent filings more than two decades old, neither the coronavirus concept of a vaccine, nor the principle of the coronavirus itself as a pathogen of interest with regard to the spike protein\u2019s behaviour, were \u2018anything novel at all\u2019.<\/p>\n
Even more problematic, the patent record showed that in 1999 Anthony Fauci, head of the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID), found the \u2018malleability\u2019 of the coronavirus made it a potential candidate for vaccines against HIV (the purported cause of AIDS, for which US taxpayers have contributed more than $300billion in research and treatment over the past 35 years).<\/p>\n
\u2018Anthony Fauci funded research at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, specifically to create \u2013 and you cannot help but lament what I am about to read, because this comes directly from a patent application filed on April 19, 2002 \u2013 \u201can infectious replication defective coronavirus\u201d.\u2019<\/p>\n
This virus was specifically targeted to invade human lung epithelia, the protective cells lining the lungs, Martin said.<\/p>\n
\u2018In other words, we made SARS.\u00a0Before there was ever any alleged outbreak in Asia, which as you know followed that by several months.<\/p>\n
\u2018That patent, issued as US patent 7279327, clearly lays out in very specific gene sequencing the fact that we know that the . . . ACE-2 binding domain [a protein on the surface of many cell types, through which both SARS-CoV-2 and the original SARS coronavirus enter host cells], the S1 spike protein, and other elements of what we have come to know as this scourge pathogen, was not only engineered but could be synthetically modified in the laboratory, using nothing more than gene sequencing technologies taking computer code, and turning it into a pathogen.<\/p>\n
\u2018And the technology was funded exclusively in the early days as a means by which we could harness coronavirus as a vector to distribute HIV vaccine.\u2019<\/p>\n
Martin went on: \u2018It gets worse.\u2019 His organisation was asked to monitor biological and chemical weapons treaty violations, and was part of an investigation into events in October 2001, in which letters containing anthrax spores were sent to several news media offices and two senators.<\/p>\n
\u2018Throughout the fall of 2001 we began monitoring an enormous number of bacterial and viral pathogens that were being patented through the National Institutes of Health, NIAID,\u00a0USAMRIID [the\u00a0US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases],\u00a0and a number of other agencies internationally that collaborated with them.<\/p>\n
\u2018Our concern was that coronavirus was being seen not only as a potential manipulable agent for potential use as a vaccine vector, but it was also very clearly being considered as a biological weapon candidate.<\/p>\n
\u2018Our first public reporting on this took place prior to the SARS outbreak in the latter part of 2001.\u00a0So you can imagine how disappointed I am to be sitting here 20 years later, having 20 years earlier pointed that there was a problem looming on the horizon with respect to coronavirus.\u2019<\/p>\n
That first SARS event gave rise to a \u2018very problematic\u2019 April 2003 patent filing by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).\u00a0It was for the entire SARS gene sequence, and for a series of derivative patents covering means of detection, including the PCR test [widely used today purportedly to diagnose cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection].<\/p>\n
\u2018The reason why that is a problem is that if you both own the patent on the gene itself, and on its detection, you have a cunning advantage to being able to control 100 per cent of the provenance of not only the virus itself, but also its detection.\u00a0Meaning, you have the entire scientific and message control.\u2019<\/p>\n
The CDC\u2019s public relations team sought to justify the application on the grounds that it would enable everyone to be free to research coronavirus.<\/p>\n
That was a lie, Martin said.\u00a0The US Patent Office twice rejected the application for the entire SARS sequence, on the grounds that it was already recorded in the public domain, but the CDC started a process to override this rejection.\u00a0After repeated applications, and paying an appeal fine, they got the patent approved in 2007.\u00a0They also paid an additional fee to keep the application private.\u00a0\u2018So every public statement the CDC has made that said this was in the public interest is falsifiable by their own, paid bribe to the Patent Office.\u2019<\/p>\n
Furthermore, three days after the CDC\u2019s April 2003 attempt to patent the SARS sequence, Sequoia Pharmaceuticals, a private venture-capital funded company founded in 2002, filed a patent application on antiviral agents, treatment and control of infections by coronavirus. This was approved, and published, before the CDC patent was allowed.<\/p>\n
\u2018So the degree to which the information could have been known by any means other than insider information between those parties is zero.\u00a0It is not physically possible for you to patent a thing that treats a thing that had not been published, because CDC had paid to keep it secret.<\/p>\n
\u2018This is the definition of criminal conspiracy, racketeering and collusion.\u00a0This is not theory. This is evidence.\u2019<\/p>\n
Tomorrow: How SARS-CoV-2 was also patented for commercial exploitation\u00a0<\/em>before\u00a0Covid-19 emerged.<\/em><\/div>\n\n
\n
Twenty-year genetic trail behind Covid’s creation | The Conservative Woman<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n| <\/td>\n | \n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n\n\n\n\n| <\/td>\n | \nTwenty-year genetic trail behind Covid’s creation | The Conservative Woman<\/h2>\nTwenty-year genetic trail behind Covid’s creation<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n <\/div>\n ___<\/div>\n https:\/\/www.conservativewoman.co.uk\/twenty-year-genetic-trail-behind-covids-creation\/<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-73938","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73938","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=73938"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73938\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=73938"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=73938"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=73938"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}} | | | | | |