Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola<\/p>\n
VIDEO:<\/strong> \u00a0Might COVID Injections Reduce Lifespan?<\/a><\/p>\n Dr. Mercola Interviews the Experts<\/p>\n This article is part of a weekly series in which Dr. Mercola interviews various experts on a variety of health issues. To see more expert interviews, click here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n In this interview, return guest Dr. Vladimir Zelenko discusses an incredibly serious concern, one shared with at least two other highly credible experts \u2014 Michael Yeadon, Ph.D., a life science researcher and former vice-president and chief scientist of allergy and respiratory research at Pfizer<\/a>, and professor Luc Montagnier, a world-renowned virologist who won the Nobel prize for his discovery of HIV.<\/p>\n Yeadon, Montagnier and Zelenko all believe the COVID-19 shots could reduce life expectancy by several decades, depending on several factors, including whether you\u2019re required to get booster shots. In fact, there may be reason to suspect that many who get the jabs and subsequent boosters could lose their lives within two to three years, as a result of pathogenic priming.1<\/span>,<\/sup>2<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n Many may not realize that when I was a youngster I was a Boy Scout, but you might know their motto is \u201cBe Prepared.\u201d It is an approach that has served me well over the years. I am not stating unequivocally that dire outcome will materialize, as my interview next week with Dr. Peter McCullough goes into. However, it would seem prudent to have a good protocol in your hands in anticipation of a worst-case scenario.<\/p>\n So, on that note, Zelenko and I take a deep dive into what can be done to prevent such a fate. Zelenko categorizes the risks of COVID-19 \u201cvaccines\u201d into three categories: acute, subacute and long-term, so let\u2019s begin by reviewing the primary risks found in each of these categories.<\/p>\n The acute phase of harm begins at the moment of injection and likely lasts for about three months or so. Based on reports filed with the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), it\u2019s clear that many cannot survive past the acute phase.<\/p>\n About 6,000 deaths have been reported so far, and death commonly occurs within 48 hours of injection. Many serious disabling events also occur rather rapidly, typically within a few days or weeks. However, Zelenko has a very dismal perspective on the accuracy of the VAERS database. He explains:<\/p>\n \u201cAccording to a paper published by the Salk Institute in San Diego, they’ve discovered that the spike protein that’s generated through the vaccination itself has negative health effects. It’s toxic \u2026 on its own …<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n There’s plenty of evidence that shows that it spreads from the injection site and goes to the bloodstream, and basically comes into every single cell in the body.<\/em>3<\/span>,<\/sup>4<\/span><\/sup><\/p><\/blockquote>\n mRNA has a half-life of around one to two weeks, depending on the mRNA, and during that interim, each mRNA molecule makes around 2,000 to 5,000 spike proteins. So, we’re talking about trillions and trillions of spike proteins.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Your entire body becomes a spike protein factory. Several orders of magnitude more than if you were to get COVID, because COVID infects the upper and lower airways primarily. Those are the cells that get infected and begin to produce spike proteins. But here we’re injecting the vaccine and it actually travels to every single cell in your body and converts every single cell in your body into a factory for spike proteins.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n As the mRNA<\/a> disseminates through your vascular system, the cells lining your blood vessels begin producing spike protein<\/a>. This is why we\u2019re seeing such a staggering number of reports of people experiencing blood clots<\/a> from these injections.<\/p>\n According to Zelenko, 40% of these events occur within the first two days after injection. The risk then diminishes, but vascular events such as heart attacks, strokes, renal infarcts and pulmonary infarcts don\u2019t completely peter out until about three months after the last injection.<\/p>\n But these events of the past three months are not being reported to VAERS. It is, of course, possible that people simply aren\u2019t connecting them to the COVID shot they got several months earlier.<\/p>\n As noted by Zelenko, underreporting is part of the problem we\u2019re facing. The real number of side effects is impossible to determine, given the fact that the Food and Drug Administration didn\u2019t insist on a robust post-vaccination data collection system, but it\u2019s most certainly higher than what VAERS is listing.<\/p>\n \u201cIf you look at the VAERS [vaccine adverse event reporting system], which in my opinion is a piece of garbage \u2026 as of today, let’s say says there’s 6,000 deaths associated with taking the vaccine. Well, we need to understand what that actually means,\u201d<\/em> Zelenko says.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n \u201cIf you look at the 2009 Harvard study on the VAERS system, they said only 1% of events are actually reported. So, OK \u2026 whatever the number is, it’s not 6,000. Maybe only 10% are being reported. I don’t know. But definitely it’s being underreported.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n And then there’s two [additional] big problems. There’s evidence coming out that VAERS reports that have been filed are being erased off the server, No. 1. No. 2, I personally know of two dozen cases of deaths associated with the vaccine, and the doctor and\/or family members that tried to file a VAERS report, their reports were rejected due to some technicality.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n The fact that they all couldn’t make a report, that raises my eyebrows. What percentage of the information are we actually seeing? The answer is, I estimate, there are already around 200,000 dead Americans, directly related to the vaccinations.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n To get to that number, Zelenko assumes only 10%5<\/span><\/sup> of adverse effects are reported. Studies have indicated it could be as low as 1%.6<\/span>,<\/sup>7<\/span><\/sup> That gives us a death toll of about 60,000, to which he adds another 140,000 given the fact that reports are being scrubbed and refused.<\/p>\n \u201cThe point is that it should definitely raise eyebrows and have the public start screaming and saying, \u2018We want to know the truth. We want to know the accurate numbers. Stop suppressing the truth \u2026 I want to be able to make an informed choice whether or not I want to take this injection.\u2019 And that’s not being given to the people.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n My problem is not with the vaccine. My problem is with the government, governing bodies and certain people that are obstructing the flow of life saving information and suppressing the truth from people, and then using coercion to force people to take this vaccine. That’s the nefarious part.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n The suppression is so blatant and so overt that doctors with impeccable credentials are being deplatformed for just voicing an opinion. And then you couple that together with proven prehospital treatment approaches and protocols that have been proven to reduce hospitalization and death by 85%, and that information is being suppressed.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n So here you have a dual censorship where the positive, hopeful, life-saving information is being suppressed and the dangerous outcomes of the vaccination approach is being suppressed. It’s a perfect setup for genocide.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\nStory at-a-glance<\/h3>\n
\n
Risk Category No. 1 \u2014 Acute Risks<\/h2>\n
How Many Have Actually Died From the COVID Shots?<\/h2>\n