{"id":80488,"date":"2021-08-25T13:32:45","date_gmt":"2021-08-25T17:32:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=80488"},"modified":"2021-08-25T13:33:30","modified_gmt":"2021-08-25T17:33:30","slug":"why-didnt-the-mainstream-media-report-these-2-crucial-points-about-the-fdas-approval-of-the-pfizer-vaccine","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=80488","title":{"rendered":"Why didn’t the Mainstream Media report these 2 crucial points about the FDA\u2019s approval of the Pfizer ‘vaccine’?!"},"content":{"rendered":"

2 Things Mainstream Media Didn\u2019t Tell You About FDA\u2019s Approval of Pfizer Vaccine<\/strong><\/h1>\n

Buried in the fine print of Monday\u2019s approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration of the Pfizer Comirnaty COVID vaccine are two critical facts that affect whether the vaccine can be mandated, and whether Pfizer can be held liable for injuries.<\/em><\/h3>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

By Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. & Meryl Nass, M.D.<\/p>\n

Monday, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved<\/a> a biologics license application<\/a> for the Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine.<\/p>\n

The press reported<\/a> that vaccine mandates<\/a> are now legal for military, healthcare workers, college students and employees in many industries. New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio has now required<\/a> the vaccine for all teachers and school staff. The Pentagon<\/a> is proceeding with its mandate<\/a> for all military service members.<\/p>\n

But there are several bizarre aspects to the FDA approval that will prove confusing to those not familiar with the pervasiveness of the FDA\u2019s regulatory capture, or the depths of the agency\u2019s cynicism.<\/p>\n

First, the FDA acknowledges that while Pfizer<\/a> has \u201cinsufficient stocks\u201d of the newly licensed Comirnaty vaccine available, there is \u201ca significant amount\u201d of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID vaccine \u2014 produced under Emergency Use Authorization<\/a> (EUA) \u2014 still available for use.<\/p>\n

The FDA decrees<\/a> that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine under the EUA should remain unlicensed but can be used \u201cinterchangeably\u201d (page 2, footnote 8<\/a>) with the newly licensed Comirnaty product.<\/p>\n

ORDER TODAY:<\/span> Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.’s New Book \u2014 ‘The Real Anthony Fauci’<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

Second, the FDA pointed out that the licensed Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine and the existing, EUA Pfizer vaccine are \u201clegally distinct,\u201d but proclaims that their differences do not \u201cimpact safety or effectiveness.\u201d<\/p>\n

There is a huge real-world difference between products approved under EUA compared with those the FDA has fully licensed.<\/p>\n

EUA products are experimental<\/a> under U.S. law. Both the Nuremberg Code<\/a> and federal regulations provide that no one can force a human being to participate in this experiment. Under 21 U.S. Code Sec.360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III)<\/a>, \u201cauthorization for medical products for use in emergencies,\u201d it is unlawful to deny someone a job or an education because they refuse to be an experimental subject. Instead, potential recipients have an absolute right to refuse EUA vaccines.<\/p>\n

U.S. laws, however, permit employers and schools to require students and workers to take licensed vaccines.<\/p>\n

EUA-approved COVID vaccines have an extraordinary liability shield under the 2005 Public Readiness and Preparedness Act<\/a>. Vaccine manufacturers, distributors, providers and government planners are immune from liability. The only way an injured party can sue is if he or she can prove willful misconduct, and if the U.S. government has also brought an enforcement action against the party for willful misconduct. No such lawsuit has ever succeeded.<\/p>\n

The government has created an extremely stingy compensation program, the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program<\/a>, to redress injuries from all EUA products. The program\u2019s parsimonious administrators have compensated under 4% of petitioners<\/a> to date \u2014 and not a single COVID vaccine injury \u2014 despite the fact that physicians, families and injured vaccine recipients have reported more than 600,000 COVID vaccine injuries<\/a>.<\/p>\n

At least for the moment, the Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine has no liability shield. Vials of the branded product, which say \u201cComirnaty\u201d on the label, are subject to the same product liability laws as other U.S. products.<\/p>\n

When the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention\u2019s (CDC) Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices places a vaccine on the mandatory schedule, a childhood vaccine benefits from a generous retinue of liability protections.<\/p>\n

But licensed adult vaccines, including the new Comirnaty, do not enjoy any liability shield. Just as with Ford\u2019s exploding Pinto, or Monsanto\u2019s herbicide Roundup<\/a>, people injured by the Comirnaty vaccine could potentially sue for damages.<\/p>\n

And because adults injured by the vaccine will be able to show that the manufacturer knew of the problems with the product, jury awards could be astronomical.<\/p>\n

Pfizer is therefore unlikely to allow any American to take a Comirnaty vaccine until it can somehow arrange immunity for this product.<\/p>\n

Given this background, the FDA\u2019s acknowledgement in its approval letter that there are insufficient stocks of the licensed Comirnaty, but an abundant supply of the EUA Pfizer BioNTech jab, exposes the \u201capproval\u201d as a cynical scheme to encourage businesses and schools to impose illegal jab mandates.<\/p>\n

The FDA\u2019s clear motivation is to enable Pfizer to quickly unload inventories of a vaccine that science and the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System<\/a> have exposed as unreasonably dangerous, and that the Delta variant<\/a> has rendered obsolete.<\/p>\n