{"id":83706,"date":"2021-09-10T06:59:34","date_gmt":"2021-09-10T10:59:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=83706"},"modified":"2021-09-10T06:59:34","modified_gmt":"2021-09-10T10:59:34","slug":"hard-statistical-evidence-proves-covid-cases-are-really-flu-cases","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=83706","title":{"rendered":"Hard Statistical Evidence Proves Covid Cases Are Really Flu Cases<\/b>"},"content":{"rendered":"

Proof that COVID-19 Statistics are Being Padded With Influenza Cases<\/strong><\/h1>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

By Edward Hendrie<\/p>\n

[Editor\u2019s note:<\/strong>\u00a0While Edward Hendrie\u00a0published this earlier in the year<\/a>, it remains relevant to demonstrate the enormity of the hoax to which we are being subjected and as proof of the complicity of the WHO.]<\/em><\/h4>\n
\n

Below are a series of three short videos of an interview by software engineer and statistician John Cullen of Dr. (and State Senator) Scott Jensen. While Cullen calls Dr. Jensen a hero, and he is, Cullen is every bit worthy of that accolade. I cannot do justice with the treasure of information coming from these two patriots, and so I will set forth below my simple explanation of the\u00a0World Health Organization (WHO) influenza data<\/a>\u00a0discussed by Cullen. The charts reveal that the COVID-19 statistics are being padded by falsely reporting influenza cases as COVID-19 cases.<\/p>\n

To suggest that influenza cases are being misrepresented as COVID-19 cases is simply not allowed to be mentioned in the mainstream media. Peter Andrews, writing for\u00a0Russia Today<\/em>, reveals that there has been a 98% plummet in flu infections. He then reveals it is impolite within the scientific community to suggest that doctors are misclassifying influenza cases as COVID-19 cases. Andrews explains that\u00a0\u201cit only seems like the flu has disappeared because doctors and scientists have been wrongly classing other respiratory diseases as Covid. Please note that the boffins are already treating this suggestion as something akin to flat-Earth theory.\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n

Andrews reveals that \u201cAustralia essentially \u2018skipped\u2019 their flu season this year, with not a single case reported since July (their peak). In fact, flu has more or less\u00a0vanished throughout the Southern Hemisphere.\u201d\u00a0 Andrews was writing on October 29, 2020. The Southern Hemisphere had emerged from what should have been their fall and winter flu season. But they had none. And the Northern Hemisphere since followed suit with a collapse in reported flu cases. Jo MacFarlane reporting for\u00a0The Daily Mail\u00a0<\/em>concluded from the WHO data that\u00a0\u201cflu, it seems, has all but vanished.\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n

MacFarlane published his article on October 24, 2020, which was the beginning of what is supposed to be the fall and winter flu season in the Northern Hemisphere. MacFarlane could already see from the data that the expected seasonal flu epidemic was not making its appearance. The reported flu cases in the UK were down approximately 90%. He saw the disappearance of the flu revealed by \u201cthe figures provide a startling insight into what has become a creeping trend across the world.\u201d<\/p>\n

Of course, MacFarlane states the obvious. \u201cThere are those who claim flu cases haven\u2019t vanished at all, but are instead being recorded as Covid-19.\u201d But after making that common-sense statement, MacFarlane quickly dismisses the thought. So, what is the explanation he announces for the disappearance of the flu in the midst of the alleged COVID-19 pandemic? It is the theory of \u2026 wait for it \u2026 \u201cviral interference.\u201d<\/p>\n

MacFarlane explains that \u201c[w]hen an individual is infected with one virus, they are less likely to be infected by another during that time due to something called \u2018viral interference\u2019.\u201d MacFarlane quotes Dr. Elisabetta Groppelli who claims that \u201c[v]iruses are parasites. Once they enter a cell, they don\u2019t want other viruses to compete with. So the virus already in the body will effectively kick the other parasite out.\u201d It sounds good, but it is not true. Indeed, when one\u2019s immune system is focused on fighting off one particular pathogen, the body\u2019s immune resources are focused on that pathogen. With all of the body\u2019s immune resources focused on that one pathogen, the person does not have the reserves to fight an unrelated pathogen and is thus is more susceptible to an unrelated pathogen.<\/p>\n

That is why the flu vaccine only works for the particular strain of the flu virus that is in the vaccine and no others. Often, persons who receive the flu vaccine end up getting the flu, but it is a different strain of the flu for which they have no protection. Under the theory of \u2018viral interference\u2019 the patient getting a flu shot should be protected from all strains of flu and not just the strain in the vaccine.<\/p>\n

The phenomenon of a vaccinated person being more susceptible to an unrelate pathogen is known as pathogenic priming. Vaccines cause pathogenic priming, which injures a person\u2019s immune system such that the person is 4.4 times more likely to become ill from some other pathogen. For example, at least six major studies have shown that a person who gets the flu shot has had their immune system pathogenically primed to be more likely to become infected from coronavirus.<\/p>\n

The charts below reveal a complete collapse in worldwide cases of influenza after COVID-19 made its appearance in the spring of 2020. Notice the complete disappearance of the flu during the 2020-2021 fall and winter seasonal flu period. That disappearance of flu correlates directly with the reported second-wave of COVID-19 cases and suggests that flu cases are being misreported as COVID-19 second-wave cases.<\/p>\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n
\n