{"id":92838,"date":"2021-10-28T14:55:05","date_gmt":"2021-10-28T18:55:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=92838"},"modified":"2021-10-28T14:55:59","modified_gmt":"2021-10-28T18:55:59","slug":"nearly-two-million-americans-dead-from-covid-vaccines-and-other-causes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=92838","title":{"rendered":"Nearly Two Million Americans Dead from COVID Vaccines and Other Causes"},"content":{"rendered":"

Nearly Two Million Americans Dead
\nfrom COVID Vaccines, Infections, and Collateral Impacts<\/strong><\/h1>\n

by Dr. Joel S. Hirschhorn
\nNOQ Report<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

During the pandemic many deaths have occurred, approaching 2 million Americans.\u00a0 Ponder this: Have large numbers of excess deaths over pre-pandemic years resulted from something other than COVID infections?<\/p>\n

\n
\n

There have been increasing articles and studies about excess deaths during the pandemic.\u00a0 Too many of these seem aimed at getting attention rather than being accurate and balanced.\u00a0 The concept of excess deaths is simple: deaths above what was normally observed before the pandemic<\/strong>.\u00a0 But why are more people dying even after accounting for COVID infection deaths?\u00a0 Getting to the correct answer is the goal of this article.<\/p>\n

The core issue in seeking truth is how to evaluate excess deaths during the pandemic and then explain them if they are not caused by COVID infections.\u00a0 If there really are non-infection excess deaths, then the goal is to rise above often bad and uncertain data from government agencies to correctly figure out whether something especially concerning is happening.\u00a0 Perhaps something that governments do not want to acknowledge and deal with, as we shall see.<\/p>\n

Classification of deaths<\/h3>\n

To get to the truth about excess deaths it is important to make a critical distinction by defining two classes of deaths.<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

Class 1:\u00a0 First, direct<\/strong> pandemic effects are twofold.<\/h4>\n

Most attention is needed to assess the magnitude of deaths from COVID infection.\u00a0 These include breakthrough cases that are COVID infections despite full vaccination.<\/p>\n

The other direct impact is deaths from COVID vaccines.<\/p>\n

Class 2:\u00a0 The second class is very different.\u00a0 They are indirect<\/strong> health impacts resulting from actions other than from direct medical actions aimed at addressing COVID.<\/h4>\n

These are the many collateral deaths<\/strong> resulting from severe contagion controls used by federal and state governments, especially lockdowns, stay at home mandates, limited hospital and physician access, school closings, job losses, travel restrictions and widespread impacts on personal and medical freedom.<\/p>\n

These many indirect impacts cause large numbers of deaths across the entire population.\u00a0 They are the collateral damage caused by pandemic government authoritarian actions, but not infections nor COVID vaccines.\u00a0 They are done, supposedly, in the name of public health.<\/p>\n

The government does not collect comprehensive data on these indirect deaths.\u00a0 Be clear about this category of deaths.\u00a0 They are caused by all the public health systems to address the pandemic.<\/p>\n

To be clear, deaths directly associated with COVID infections cover a range of situations.\u00a0 Government agencies report COVID related deaths.\u00a0 That word \u201crelated\u201d is very important, because proving causality has proven contentious.\u00a0 Most physicians see causality when deaths occur soon after COVID symptoms or a positive test result.<\/p>\n

There are reasons why there are legitimate concerns and criticisms of official COVID death data.\u00a0 It comes down to what criteria are used to declare a death as either caused by COVID or just, in some way, related to the infection.<\/p>\n

US federal and state agencies have, for the most part, been very liberal in declaring deaths as COVID ones.\u00a0 This has resulted from financial incentives, political motivations (maintaining public fear and acceptance of authoritarian government actions) and procedural government guidance.<\/p>\n

In the latter category are guidelines from CDC for death certificates issued in March 2020 that replaced a practice used for the previous 17 years.\u00a0 This change allowed physicians, medical examiners and coroners to place less importance on all kinds of health problems contributing to a death and, if there was any evidence of COVID virus infection from testing (before or after death) or symptoms, to declare a death as a COVID one.<\/p>\n

In other words, many people, especially the elderly, could have died with COVID but NOT from<\/strong> COVID.\u00a0 They may have died from their underlying medical problems and weakened immune system more than effects directly associated with COVID infection.\u00a0 Some die because they have been given the very expensive approved drug remdesivir that causes acute liver and kidney problems, and has a death rate of over 25%.\u00a0 Yet their deaths go into the COVID death column.<\/p>\n

On the other side, is the view that some people have died from COVID infection but their death has not been officially declared as a COVID death.\u00a0 Most likely these have been people who have died at home without medical attention.\u00a0 It is difficult to believe that the numbers of deaths in this class could account for a large excess death figure.\u00a0 Why?\u00a0 Because people who die from COVID infection almost always experience severe symptoms as they move from stage one viral replication to stages two and three when vital organs are attacked, especially breathing problems.\u00a0 These typically cause them to seek medical attention, usually hospitalization where so many COVID deaths occur.<\/p>\n

Not to be dismissed, is the reality that many COVID deaths have preempted a number of normally occurring deaths, such as from the seasonal flu and many types of accidents in a more mobile population.\u00a0 The latter are subsumed in the COVID death data.\u00a0 They do not explain excess deaths.\u00a0 If anything, they reduce non-infection excess deaths.<\/p>\n

Taking all this into consideration means that COVID death totals are most likely to overstate the lethality of COVID.\u00a0 In fact, as I have discussed elsewhere<\/a>, COVID lethality for the whole population was initially overstated by Fauci to justify extreme government actions and mass vaccination.\u00a0 He started the pandemic by wrongly saying that the China virus was so much more deadly than the seasonal flu.\u00a0 Only the elderly had a high risk of death (and younger people with serious underlying medical problems) that warranted focused<\/strong> government attention, initially by using safe and effective generics, namely ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, and later vaccines.<\/p>\n

In seeking truth about excess deaths, it is most important to recognize the countless and not quantitatively reported indirect<\/strong> impacts of the pandemic on health and deaths of very large numbers of people who were not actually at significant risk from COVID infection.<\/p>\n

Deaths have resulted, for example, from people not getting normal pre-pandemic health care from treatment to prevention and suffering from extreme mental stress (often pushing addiction and suicide) caused by abnormal living and negative economic conditions.\u00a0 Unlike direct pandemic deaths there is hardly any useful tabulation of indirect pandemic death impacts by government agencies.\u00a0 In the name of public health government agencies have harmfully impacted the lives of nearly all Americans.<\/p>\n

There is need for caution when seeing numerical excess deaths beyond official COVID deaths, in coming up with explanations that involve controversial causes.\u00a0 The big example is blaming what seems as major excess deaths on COVID vaccines<\/strong>.\u00a0 Especially if the many indirect pandemic causes of death are not addressed, mainly because data are not readily available.<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

Also note that breakthrough COVID infections<\/strong> in fully vaccinated people that sometimes cause death are appropriately categorized as direct COVID deaths.<\/p>\n

As I have discussed<\/a>, declining vaccine ineffectiveness (especially for variants) make the fully vaccinated vulnerable to dying from COVID infection.\u00a0 But it would be wrong to say that these deaths are different than COVID ones.\u00a0 And wrong to place these deaths in a category of vaccine deaths.\u00a0 Moreover, as I have analyzed, breakthrough deaths in the US most likely account for tens of thousands of deaths, much smaller than true excess deaths.\u00a0 Though their numbers are likely to increase in coming months and years as mass vaccination continues.\u00a0 For example, recently this was reported<\/a>: \u201cFormer Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Robert Redfield said that more than 40 percent of people who have died from Wuhan coronavirus in the state of Maryland over the last 6-8 weeks were fully vaccinated.\u201d<\/p>\n

To recap, it is important to focus on the many causes of vaccine induced<\/strong> deaths and collateral <\/strong>deaths that do not result from the viral infection<\/strong>.\u00a0 Make no mistake, there are now widely recognized medical explanations of vaccine induced deaths, including a broad array of serious blood problems that this author has reviewed<\/a>.\u00a0 Data on vaccine deaths will be examined below.<\/p>\n

Indirect health impacts<\/h3>\n

A March 2021 study<\/a> examined how the pandemic caused non-infection health impacts and made it clear that they cannot be ignored.<\/p>\n

\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\u201cThe COVID-19 pandemic and global efforts to contain its spread, such as stay-at-home orders and transportation shutdowns, have created new barriers to accessing healthcare, resulting in changes in service delivery and utilization globally.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201cOne hundred and seventy studies were included in the final analysis. Nearly half (46.5%) of included studies focused on cardiovascular health outcomes. \u00a0The main methodologies used were observational analytic and surveys. \u00a0Data were drawn from individual health facilities, multicentre networks, regional registries, and national health information systems. \u00a0Most studies were conducted in high-income countries with only 35.4% of studies representing low- and middle-income countries.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201cHealthcare utilization for non-COVID-19 conditions has decreased almost universally, across both high- and lower-income countries. \u00a0The pandemic\u2019s impact on non-COVID-19 health outcomes, particularly for chronic diseases, may take years to fully manifest and should be a topic of ongoing study.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

A November 2020 article<\/a> Death by Lockdown \u201cforecasted more than 100,000 excess deaths due to drug overdoses, suicide, alcoholism, homicide, and untreated depression \u2013 all a result not of the virus but of policies of mandatory human separation, economic downturn, business and school closures, closed medical services, and general depression that comes with a loss of freedom and choice.\u201d\u00a0 What was recognized is \u201cthat as bad as a virus is, policies that wreck normal social functioning will cause massive and completely unnecessary suffering and death. \u201c<\/p>\n

A new article<\/a> from the New York Post made these wise observations:<\/p>\n

\u201cInstead of keeping calm and carrying on, the American elite flouted the norms of governance, journalism, academic freedom \u2014 and, worst of all, science. \u00a0They misled the public about the origins of the virus and the true risk it posed. Ignoring their own carefully prepared plans for a pandemic, they claimed unprecedented powers to impose untested strategies, with terrible collateral damage. \u00a0We still have no convincing evidence that the lockdowns saved lives, but lots of evidence that they have already cost lives and will prove deadlier in the long run than the virus itself.\u00a0 A few scientists and public-health experts objected, noting that an extended lockdown was a novel strategy of unknown effectiveness. \u00a0In April 2020, John Ioannidis, Jay Bhattacharya and other colleagues reported that the fatality rate among the \u00adinfected was considerably lower than the assumptions used to justify lockdowns.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

The TB case has been one of worst collateral health impacts of the pandemic.\u00a0 This was documented in a detailed story<\/a>.\u00a0 \u201cTuberculosis killed roughly 1.5 million people in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, up from 1.4 million in 2019. \u00a0And researchers say COVID is to blame.\u201d\u00a0 And there is every indication that it has gotten much worse worldwide.\u00a0 \u201cThe COVID-19 pandemic has reversed years of progress and efforts in the fight against tuberculosis,\u201d said Dr. Tereza Kasaeva, head of WHO\u2019s global TB program.\u00a0 Kasaeva said that COVID lockdowns, limited access to health care and patients\u2019 concerns about visiting medical clinics made TB far more deadly during the pandemic.\u201d<\/p>\n

Justin Hart of Rational Ground said in October 2021 that \u201cIt\u2019s estimated that 50% of regular child immunizations were missed in the spring of 2020. \u00a0You can do some actual math and I feel confident in saying that more children will die from missed vaccines in a year\u2019s time than died of COVID-19.\u201d\u00a0 This is just another example of a collateral impact of the pandemic.<\/p>\n

\n

Buy your Gold and Silver from true America-First<\/strong> patriots. Contact Our Gold Guy<\/strong> and protect yourself through the coming (and current) economic turmoil.<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n

Another study<\/a> \u201cfound that COVID-19 was cited in only 65% of excess deaths in the first weeks of the pandemic (March-April 2020); deaths from non\u2013COVID-19 causes (eg, Alzheimer disease, diabetes, heart disease) increased sharply in 5 states with the most COVID-19 deaths.\u201d<\/p>\n

The conclusion is that when examining excess deaths, it is important to recognize indirect deaths resulting from pandemic control actions by governments.<\/p>\n

The Economist article<\/h3>\n

Here are highlights from a discussion<\/a> of this widely addressed article titled \u201cThe pandemic\u2019s true death toll.\u201d<\/p>\n

This conclusion was the attention grabber: \u201cFifteen million more people have died during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to historical norms, according to a recent October report by the Economist<\/a>. \u00a0This figure is more than three times the reported COVID-19 deaths, which stands at 4.6 million people.\u201d\u00a0 In other words, about 10 million excess deaths over direct COVID infection deaths.<\/p>\n

\u201cAnd what about people who died of preventable causes during the pandemic because hospitals full of COVID-19 patients could not treat them? \u00a0If such cases count, they must be offset by deaths that did not occur but would have in normal times, such as those caused by flu or air pollution.\u201d\u00a0 These ideas fall into the class of indirect COVID impacts.<\/p>\n

The Economist had to invoke indirect pandemic impacts in addition to vaccine induced deaths.\u00a0 When speaking of many millions of excess deaths globally, the only rational explanation are the widespread indirect pandemic impacts that have devastated the entire global population.\u00a0 This means that it has not been the virus that has killed most people, but rather government actions.\u00a0 It is quite plausible that for every COVID death two more people have died from the indirect impacts of pandemic management.<\/p>\n

Here are the data reported for North America: 675,000 COVID deaths and 843,000 excess deaths (middle uncertainty).\u00a0 That is a very large number of excess deaths that could only be explained by health impacts of government actions.\u00a0 For the US it was reported that the cumulative COVID-19 infection deaths have reached close to 650,000, and excess deaths are 820,000, presumably indirect deaths.\u00a0 Updating, for the current US 730,000 infection deaths that implies 921,000 indirect collateral deaths.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Important NIH and other results<\/h3>\n

Here is an important observation from a recent report<\/a> from the NIH.\u00a0 \u201cRoughly 2.9 million people died in the United States between March 1, 2020, and December 31, 2020. \u00a0Compared with the same period in 2019, there were 477,200 excess deaths<\/strong>, with 74% of them due to COVID-19.\u201d\u00a0 That amounts to 343,584 COVID deaths during the first year<\/strong> of the pandemic; it is consistent with the over 730,000 COVID deaths reported since 2020.<\/p>\n

\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

For 2020 when COVID began ravaging the country, compared to pre-pandemic 2019, that leaves 133,616 deaths to be explained<\/strong>.\u00a0 The answer cannot be deaths associated with COVID vaccines for this pre-vaccination period.\u00a0 That is the key point \u2013 pre-vaccination, which means that the plausible explanation for the significant excess deaths of 133,616 are the many negative health impacts causing deaths from the expanding government pandemic control actions in 2020.\u00a0 These included many lockdowns, stay at home mandates, disruptions in health care and loss of jobs.\u00a0 In other words, collateral deaths<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

In agreement with this statement was the finding in a medical journal article<\/a> titled \u201cExcess Deaths From COVID-19 and Other Causes in the US, March 1, 2020, to January 2, 2021.\u201d\u00a0 It said deaths attributed to COVID-19 accounted for 72.4% of US excess deaths, leaving 27.6% explained most likely from collateral deaths.<\/p>\n

A June 2021 Scientific American article<\/a> said 18 percent of excess deaths across the U.S. last year (2020) were not assigned to COVID.\u00a0 Thus, 78% was related to COVID infections.\u00a0 Reported was that Andrew Stokes, Boston University, and his colleagues calculated excess deaths for each of more than 3,100 U.S. counties. \u00a0To do so, they compared provisional 2020 mortality data from the National Center for Health Statistics with predicted death rates based on previous years. \u00a0The researchers then compared the proportion of excess deaths attributed to COVID on death certificates with those assigned to other causes. \u00a0Their data showed that 18 percent of excess deaths across the U.S. in 2020 were not assigned to COVID.\u00a0 That infers about 77,000 indirect deaths, reasonably explained by collateral deaths.<\/p>\n

A journal article<\/a> published in April 2021 said this: \u201cBetween March 1, 2020, and January 2, 2021, the US experienced 2,801,439 deaths, 22.9% more than expected, representing 522\u202f368 excess deaths\u2026 Deaths attributed to COVID-19 accounted for 72.4% of US excess deaths.\u201d That leaves 27.6% or a little over 144,000 non-COVID infection deaths. \u00a0Detailed data were given on specific non-COVID deaths, including: heart disease, Alzheimer disease\/dementia and diabetes.<\/p>\n

A September 2021 article<\/a> titled \u201cImpact of COVID-19 on excess mortality, life expectancy, and years of life lost in the United States\u201d found that for 2020: There were 375,235 excess deaths<\/strong>, with 83% attributable to direct, and 17% attributable to indirect effects of COVID-19.\u00a0 So, about 64,000 deaths were collateral deaths.<\/p>\n

Data focused Our World Data website<\/a> said the following:<\/p>\n

\u201cThe raw death count gives us a sense of scale: for example, the US suffered roughly 472,000 excess deaths<\/strong> in 2020, compared to 352,000 confirmed COVID-19 deaths (75%) during that year.\u201d\u00a0 That leaves 25% or 120,000 collateral deaths.<\/p>\n

A new report<\/a> \u201cCollateral Damage from COVID\u201dsaid this:\u00a0 \u201cIn the first year of the U.S. COVID pandemic (the 52 weeks ended February 27, 2021) there were 665,000 excess deaths<\/strong> (deaths above the normal seasonal death rate) reported by the CDC. \u00a0The official COVID death toll for that span was 514,000 (77%). \u00a0Shockingly, this means that non-COVID deaths caused by the pandemic and possibly by our policy choices, are likely to total at least this 151,000 difference.\u201d\u00a0 The latter would logically be collateral deaths.<\/p>\n

And this is how that 151,000 difference was explained: \u201cExcess deaths due to unnatural causes surged by an estimated 82,000 above the normal levels, from March 2020 through August 2021. \u00a0Unnatural causes are dominated by homicides, suicides, overdoses, and accidents. \u00a0And, excess deaths due to the Big Four natural causes (heart and lung disease, cancer, and stroke) soared by over 86,000 over those same 18 months, mostly during 2020. \u00a0These two categories alone total 168,000 excess deaths.\u201d\u00a0 Clearly, many deaths were caused by government pandemic controls that made lives extremely difficult and stressful.<\/p>\n

On this point, the report noted: \u201cThe death toll from unnatural causes has risen sharply and is not likely to fall as quickly. \u00a0Research shows that collateral effects on health, direct and indirect, following unemployment and other economic disruption remain elevated for several years. \u00a0The same seems likely to be true for overdoses and homicides, due to lingering mental health effects, though perhaps not for accidental deaths.\u201d<\/p>\n

In contrast to the above, it was reported<\/a> in October 2020 that a report by CDC said that overall, an estimated 299,028 excess deaths occurred from late January through October 3, 2020, with 198,081 of them (66 percent) caused by Covid-19.\u00a0 But that left nearly three months in later 2020 unaccounted for, when COVID infections probably mounted.\u00a0 So, some 100,947 (or 134,596 for 12 months) excess deaths not related to COVID infection is mostly in agreement with the above figures.\u00a0 These CDC numbers are the least credible.<\/p>\n

Thus, despite data variations, most of these reports were fairly consistent in attributing 72 to 83% of US excess deaths over pre-pandemic years to COVID infection deaths, leaving a fairly broad range of about 64,000 to 151,000 excess deaths to non-infection causes.\u00a0 These would be the collateral impacts of pandemic control actions by federal and state governments, but are much lower than what The Economist estimated; but these are not systematically measured by the government.<\/p>\n

The average of the above reports is 25.3% for non-infection deaths and for these an average of 117,745 such collateral deaths annually, and before vaccine deaths would be a significant fact.<\/p>\n

Dr. Joseph Mercola views<\/h3>\n

Receiving major attention on alternative news sites<\/a> in October 2021 are the views of Dr. Mercola that will now be summarized.\u00a0 He has been a strong proponent for explaining non-infection deaths on the basis of COVID vaccines.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe number of Americans who have died between January 2021 and August 2021 is 16% higher than 2018, the pre-COVID year with the highest all-cause mortality, and 18% higher than the average death rate between 2015 and 2019. \u00a0Adjusted for population growth of about 0.6% annually, the mortality rate in 2021 is 16% above the average and 14% above the 2018 rate.\u201d<\/p>\n

Mercola asked the key question: \u201cDid COVID-19 raise the death toll despite mass vaccination, or are people dying at increased rates because of it?\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cThe death toll from the jabs is estimated to be between 200 and 500 deaths per million doses administered. \u00a0With 4 billion doses having been administered around the world, that means 800,000 to 2 million so-called \u2018COVID-19 deaths\u2019 may in fact be vaccine-induced deaths.\u201d\u00a0 This range is a high fraction of about 5 million total global COVID infection deaths.\u00a0 In the US 414 million doses have been given; using the above range that yields a range of 82,800 to 207,000 vaccine deaths on top of the 730,000 infection deaths given by CDC<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

[To be clear, vaccine induced deaths are definitely real and significant.\u00a0 The issue is their magnitude.\u00a0 Nor is it fair to argue that vaccine induced deaths are to some degree hidden within COVID death data.\u00a0 And clearly it is unreasonable to argue that high COVID deaths after mass vaccination, which has been widely observed, should be counted as vaccine deaths.]<\/p>\n

The key question is whether the high level of US vaccine deaths is compatible with what the public is seeing.<\/p>\n

Mercola also references the following:<\/p>\n

\u201cAccording to this whistleblower, the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) under-reports deaths caused by the COVID shots by a conservative factor of five or more. \u00a0She claims the number of Americans killed by the shots was at least 45,000 as of July 9, 2021.\u00a0 At that time, VAERS reported 9,048 deaths following COVID injection. That number is now 16,310 (as of October 1, 20218). \u00a0Using an under-reporting factor of five, that gives us an estimated vaccine death toll of 81,550.\u201d\u00a0 That is at the low end of the range calculated above.<\/em><\/p>\n

Another source is also used by Mercola:<\/p>\n

\u201cSteve Kirsch, executive director of the COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund, has come up with even more drastic numbers. \u00a0In the video \u2018Vaccine Secrets: COVID Crisis,\u2019 he argues that VAERS can be used to determine causality, and shows how the VAERS data indicate more than 212,000 Americans have already been killed by the COVID shots.\u201d\u00a0 That is at the high end of the range calculated above.<\/em><\/p>\n

To recap, Mercola\u2019s reporting provided different sources to support the range of 82,800 to 207,000 for vaccine deaths to date.<\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

Rose and Crawford study<\/h3>\n

The September 2021 study<\/a> \u201cGovernment\u2019s Own Data Reveals that at Least 150,000 Probably DEAD in U.S. Following COVID-19 Vaccines.\u201d by Jessica Rose and Mathew Crawford is the most detailed and impressive effort to determine vaccine deaths.\u00a0 It has been criticized<\/a> by FDA: \u201cAlthough under reporting is a limitation in VAERS, with regard to COVID-19 vaccine safety monitoring, there currently is not evidence to suggest it would underestimate the amount of COVID-19 vaccine-related deaths to such a large degree.\u201d..This author disagrees with FDA.\u00a0 Here is the official view<\/a> of CDC: \u201c\u2019Underreporting\u2019 is one of the main limitations of passive surveillance systems, including VAERS. \u00a0The term, underreporting refers to the fact that VAERS receives reports for only a small fraction of actual adverse events.\u201d\u00a0 As you will see below, the 150,000 figure for vaccine deaths is a low, conservative estimate.<\/p>\n

This is the summary of its findings: \u201cAnalysis of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database can be used to estimate the number of excess deaths caused by the COVID vaccines. \u00a0A simple analysis shows that it is likely that over 150,000 Americans have been killed by the current COVID vaccines as of Aug 28, 2021.\u201d\u00a0 This is close to the high end of the range given above.<\/p>\n

The study is both long and complex.\u00a0 Here are some highlights.<\/p>\n

On the problem of underreporting of vaccine deaths: \u201cIn our informal physician surveys we saw a bias to under-report serious adverse events in order to make the vaccines look as safe as possible to the American public since most physicians believe they are hurting society if they do anything to create vaccine hesitancy.\u00a0 Secondly, we\u2019d estimate that at least 95% of physicians have completely bought into the \u201csafe and effective\u201d narrative and thus any event that they observe they deem as simply anecdotal and don\u2019t bother to report it since it couldn\u2019t have been caused by such a safe vaccine that appeared to do so well in the Phase 3 trials.\u201d<\/p>\n

On the search for quantifying underreporting in the CDC VEARS system: \u201cThe point of this paper is not to find the exact number of deaths, but merely to find the most credible estimate for deaths. We think that anaphylaxis is an excellent proxy for a serious adverse event that, like a death, should always be reported so we think 41X is the most accurate number.\u201d\u00a0 That means multiplying CDC numbers by 41.<\/p>\n

To get estimates of vaccine deaths: \u201cThere are three ways to estimate the number of excess deaths caused by the vaccine. \u00a0Using these three methods we can estimate the low and high likely bounds for the number of excess deaths caused by the vaccine:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Subtract the average number of background deaths in previous years: estimate is 252,109<\/li>\n
  2. Use 86% based on the analysis in the Mclachlan study<\/a>; estimate is 252,073<\/li>\n
  3. Use 40% based on the estimate of Dr. Peter Schirmacher one of the world\u2019s top pathologists<\/a> ; <\/sup>estimate is 175,865\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    This was the explanation for looking at other studies: \u201cIn order to validate that our estimates are reasonable (or simply that the evidence was more likely consistent with the hypothesis that the vaccine does more harm than good), we looked at four different quantitative methods from very small to very large and summarized their estimates:\u201d<\/p>\n