{"id":96178,"date":"2021-11-15T11:52:22","date_gmt":"2021-11-15T15:52:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=96178"},"modified":"2021-11-15T11:53:37","modified_gmt":"2021-11-15T15:53:37","slug":"news-vaers-analysis-proves-covid-vaccines-are-extremely-dangerous-and-deadly-not-safe-and-effective","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=96178","title":{"rendered":"

News VAERS Analysis Proves Covid ‘Vaccines’ Are Extremely “Dangerous and Deadly”, NOT “Safe and Effective”!!!<\/b><\/h2>"},"content":{"rendered":"

New VAERS analysis reveals hundreds of serious adverse events that the CDC and FDA never told us about<\/h1>\n

They missed hundreds of serious adverse events that are more elevated than myocarditis. A new VAERS analysis done by Albert Benavides blows the doors off the “safe and effective” narrative.<\/h3>\n

Steve Kirsch
\nSubstack<\/p>\n

The CDC and FDA have said the vaccines are \u201csafe and effective.\u201d They haven’t found any serious issues with the COVID vaccines. Zero. Zip. Nada. It was the DoD that found myocarditis.<\/p>\n

The evidence in plain sight shows that they are either lying or incompetent. Or both. But of course, the medical community is never going to call them on this.<\/p>\n

So that\u2019s where\u00a0our team of vaccine safety experts<\/a>\u00a0comes in; to reveal the truth about what is really going on.<\/p>\n

In a brand new VAERS data analysis performed by our friend Albert Benavides (aka\u00a0WelcomeTheEagle88<\/a>),\u00a0we found hundreds of serious adverse events that were completely missed by the CDC\u00a0<\/strong>that should have been mentioned in the informed consent document that are given to patients. And we found over 200 symptoms\u00a0that occur at a higher relative rate than myocarditis (relative to all previous vaccines over the last 5 years).\u00a0<\/strong>All together, there were\u00a0over 4,000 VAERS adverse event codes<\/strong>\u00a0that were elevated by these vaccines\u00a0by a factor of 10 or more over baseline<\/strong>\u00a0that the CDC should have warned people about.<\/p>\n

As of November 1, 2021, there have\u00a0been more adverse events reported for the COVID vaccines than for all 70+ vaccines combined since they started tracking adverse events 30 years ago<\/strong>. That\u2019s a stunning statistic, nobody can deny it, but nobody in the mainstream medical community (or mainstream media) seems to care much. It\u2019s not even worth noting in passing. Wow.<\/p>\n

Here\u2019s what the evidence shows:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. The COVID vaccines are\u00a0the most dangerous vaccines in human history<\/a>. They are 800 times more deadly than the smallpox vaccine which was the previous record holder. The vaccines have\u00a0killed over 150,000 Americans<\/a>\u00a0and permanently disabled even more. They\u00a0don\u2019t make sense for anyone of any age<\/a>. The younger you are, the worse it gets. For kids, it is estimated that\u00a0we kill 117 kids for every COVID death we prevent<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  2. The\u00a0Pfizer 6 month trial<\/a>\u00a0showed the drug can save 1 life for every 22,000 people vaccinated. It also appeared from the trial that the drug killed more people than it saved (there were 20 deaths in the treatment group vs. 14 in placebo after unblinding). So we are \u201csaving\u201d fewer than 10,000 lives at the expense of over 150,000 deaths. In short, we kill 15 people to save 1. That\u2019s incredibly stupid. But\u00a0nobody in the Biden administration wants to meet with our team<\/strong>. They basically don\u2019t want to hear the truth. Instead, they focus on deplatforming and censoring us which are techniques that are effective when the data doesn\u2019t work out for you.<\/li>\n
  3. Both the FDA and CDC have proven inept in spotting safety signals. They can\u2019t\u00a0even compute the VAERS URF<\/a>\u00a0which is a number that is required for any serious risk-benefit analysis. So the FDA and CDC outside committee members\u00a0are all flying blind in approving the vaccines<\/strong>. Even after this deficiency is pointed out in the public comments by yours truly (and direct emails to the committee members), it makes no difference. We are ignored. The CDC safety monitoring is so bad that they even admitted at the last ACIP meeting that it was the DoD that spotted the myocarditis signal. So the FDA and CDC have basically been batting .000 in terms of spotting safety signals that have been sitting in plain sight the entire time.<\/li>\n
  4. They can\u2019t admit that they missed the signals now because that would be an admission they missed them before. So they will try to discredit this article with ad hominem attacks (this is a technique used to win an argument when you cannot win on the evidence).<\/li>\n
  5. The serious events we highlight below are all consistent with the mechanism of action that Robert Malone and I first described in the Darkhorse podcast. Namely, that the spike protein that is produced in response to the delivery of the mRNA is cytotoxic and results in blood clots, inflammation and scarring throughout your body which then\u00a0creates a wider range of severe adverse events than any vaccine in human history<\/strong>.<\/li>\n
  6. The medical community is trained by the CDC to believe the vaccines are safe, so they interpret all the adverse events as not vaccine related. But if it wasn\u2019t the vaccine that caused all these events, what was it? What\u2019s worse is they tell their patients, \u201cthis is all in your head\u201d or that \u201cyour baby died because you had a genetic defect.\u201d<\/li>\n
  7. In general, patients believe their doctors and never figure out where to get a cytokine panel to discover that they are vaccine injured (go to\u00a0www.covidlonghaulers.com<\/a>\u00a0to get the cytokine panel and\u00a0IncellDx\u00a0<\/a>to get the spike protein assay). So people never learn how to rid their body of the spike protein either (see my\u00a0article on vaccine treatment<\/a>\u00a0for the drugs they use to do this) which is the first step in the road to recovery.<\/li>\n
  8. The high adverse event rates aren\u2019t \u201cexcess reporting.\u201d It is due to excess events. For example, one neurologist had 0 cases of vaccine adverse events in her entire career, but this year, she has 2,000. Another physician I know has had 0 events in 29 years in his 700 patients. This year he needs to report 25 events. Physicians themselves have experienced stunningly higher incidence rates of reproductive, neurological, and cardiac events since the vaccines rolled in 2021. We couldn\u2019t find a single cardiologist who actually had fewer cases of myocarditis after the vaccines rolled out as the members of the FDA and CDC claim.<\/li>\n
  9. The serious events are primarily centered around menstruation, blood clots, inflammation and scarring, cardiovascular damage, and neurological damage, just as we predicted in the podcast in June of 2021.<\/li>\n
  10. There are hundreds of serious adverse events that are caused by these vaccines. This of course is shocking to people since the CDC has repeatedly said you can\u2019t ascribe causality to data in VAERS. Not true. The VAERS data analysis (temporal data, the dose dependency, and the elevated reporting rates compared to baseline) provide ample signal to enable us to show causality on all of these events using the\u00a0five Bradford-Hill criteria applicable to vaccines<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  11. Nicki Minaj was right to complain about elevated rates of testicular swelling, impotence (erectile dysfunction), and orchitis<\/a>. Every world authority who opined on the matter belittled her and said she was wrong, but all the symptoms she talked about are strongly elevated as you\u2019ll see from the data below. None of these so-called experts of course ever looks at the data; it\u2019s all based on arguing from their belief system rather than the scientific evidence. And even if those authorities disagreed with the VAERS data, it was irresponsible not to have pointed out the raw data to people and then explain why they totally ignored the elevated signal in the VAERS data. Today, we do science based on our belief system rather than the old-fashioned way of looking at what the data actually says. Our team is old-fashioned.<\/li>\n
  12. There is a pretty good chance that the vaccines don\u2019t really work at all and never did. We know the Pfizer Phase 3 trials were gamed in many ways. There is no doubt that the vaccines elevate antibodies, but it seems that it is quite possible that the immunity they confer is actually the result of killing off (or excluding as in the case of the trials) people with weaker immune systems. The people who are left are thus more resistant to the virus. Mathew Crawford will be coming out shortly with an analysis that makes a compelling case for this novel hypothesis.\u00a0Subscribe to his substack here<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  13. It is unlikely that anyone in the world will want to debate us publicly on any of the claims above (or on any of my articles or on any of Mathew\u2019s articles), but if you are a prominent supporter of the false narrative and want a public debate, we are here for you.\u00a0Our team<\/a>\u00a0would be thrilled to accept the challenge as we have no desire to spread misinformation. If we got it wrong, we are happy to correct our mistakes if you can explain to us clearly the mistake we made and the correction you suggest (e.g., the \u201cright\u201d answer). Yet even with multiple million dollar incentives (listed in this article<\/a>), nobody seems to be interested in showing how we got it wrong. Everyone talks about how bad the vaccine misinformation problem is, but nobody is willing to do anything to show that we got it wrong. For example, I\u2019ve asked any prominent scientist in America who disagrees with my analysis (showing eight different ways to validate that over 150,000 Americans have been killed by the vaccines<\/a>) to let me see their \u201ccorrect\u201d analysis showing the \u201ccorrect\u201d number, but nobody will. They won\u2019t even come on a recorded call to show us how we got it wrong. It\u2019s baffling. They all want to do it in slow motion via documents because that way it\u2019s easier to obfuscate the truth and they can avoid answering questions. The latter is key.<\/li>\n
  14. It\u2019s really easy to tell who is telling you the truth here.<\/strong>\u00a0John Su is the CDC expert on VAERS. If he\u2019s wrong, the entire narrative falls apart. I\u00a0personally attacked Dr. Su in a widely read article accusing him of being corrupt<\/a>. I offered to publish his response in the article. He said nothing. I offered to debate him. No dice. TrialSiteNews tried to interview him. He refused to reply. Seriously? If the CDC gave us 2 hours to ask John Su questions, we would destroy his credibility and the credibility of the CDC. That\u2019s why he\u2019s not talking and that\u2019s why the CDC will never let him talk to anyone on our team. Because we don\u2019t ask softball questions like what John gets at the ACIP meetings. We play hardball.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    What we found in the VAERS analysis below can be verified by anyone because it is all publicly accessible. Albert spent only a few hours to produce the tables. So the CDC should have been able to do the same work Albert did.<\/p>\n

    You can easily verify any entry yourself via manual queries to any VAERS interface (my favorite is\u00a0MedAlerts<\/a>, but others such as\u00a0openvaers\u00a0<\/a>and the\u00a0HHS site<\/a>\u00a0give the same results).<\/p>\n

    Before we get to Albert\u2019s analysis of the VAERS data, let\u2019s do a little background.<\/p>\n

    The Darkhorse Podcast<\/h3>\n

    On June 10, 2021, my friend Robert Malone and I appeared on\u00a0Bret Weinstein\u2019s Darkhorse Podcast<\/a>\u00a0to tell the world what we had learned about the COVID vaccines. You can watch the\u00a03 hour version here<\/a>\u00a0or the\u00a0condensed 1 hour version here<\/a>\u00a0if you haven\u2019t already seen it. I highly recommend the whole thing; I know a lot of people who watched it multiple times and raved about it.<\/p>\n

    Basically, we said the COVID vaccines were super dangerous, they had killed a lot of people at the time, the Pfizer bio-distribution data that Dr. Byram Bridle obtained from the Japanese government using a FOIA request showed the lipid nanoparticles delivered a very substantial dose of mRNA to female ovaries, and that the spike protein that is subsequently produced causes blood clots, inflammation, and scarring leading to a large number of cardiovascular and neurological symptoms, a number of which would be irreversible. Robert in particular noted that we had no clue about the amount, dose, and duration of the spike protein that is produced (we still don\u2019t) because this testing was never done in animals (they looked only at the distribution of the nanoparticles which is not the same thing). Bret referenced a very\u00a0long article I had written on May 25, 2021 for TrialSiteNews entitled \u201cShould you get vaccinated?\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n

    For reference, here is the bio-distribution graph that Bret showed in that podcast:<\/p>\n

    \n
    \"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

    See anything wrong? Note that we deliberately omitted areas of the body where the vaccine was expected to accumulate\u00a0in order to highlight areas of the body where it wasn\u2019t supposed to go<\/strong>. Naturally, those supporting the mainstream narrative that the vaccines are safe and effective went into overdrive to suppress the episode and discredit what we said. They said we were dishonest not to include everything in the chart. YouTube censored the video after nearly 1M views. Wikipedia accused both of us of spreading misinformation and then blocked me when I tried to point out that the scientific evidence supported what I said. Wikipedia relies on fact checks for science.<\/p>\n

    We were right about everything we said in the podcast, and now, thanks to the work Albert did, it\u2019s now easier to see we were telling the truth: the top elevated events were neurological, cardiovascular, and related to the female reproductive system, just like we said. I was stunned at the sheer number of menstrual events that made it to the very top of the list. That was a surprise to me.<\/p>\n

    Openvaers has been highlighting the damaging effects on both male and female reproductive systems for months with a\u00a0page dedicated to reproductive health<\/a>, but the medical community, Congress, and mainstream press wasn\u2019t paying any attention at all. These event counts are not normal, but nobody really seems to care. President Biden not only doesn\u2019t care;\u00a0he wants to force all our kids to be vaccinated with the most dangerous vaccine in human history<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

    \n
    \"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

    With the new analysis, the counts are much easier to interpret because instead of being just raw counts, they are no numbers relative to a baseline rate so we can instantly see what symptoms are \u201cabnormal\u201d meaning 10X or more higher than \u201cexpected.\u201d The answer: over 4,000 adverse events.<\/p>\n

    The X factor analysis (November 7, 2021)<\/h3>\n

    Before I give you the link to the spreadsheet of VAERS symptoms sorted by X factor, you need to know a few things to properly interpret the data.<\/p>\n

    First, let\u2019s address the myth that is promoted by the FDA that the VAERS database is \u201cover reported.\u201d As we said above, there are more events this year than any previous year, so that\u2019s why the events are up. But there still could be a component of overreporting as well, i.e., that people this year are more likely to make a report on an event compared to last year since everyone is so \u201chighly aware\u201d of the vaccines. Nice theory. No data to back it up. Nobody making that argument has ever included any data to back up their assertion. We call that a hand-waving argument. Doctor surveys we\u2019ve done show that, if anything, they are less likely to report an adverse event this year for a variety of reasons (hospital frowns on it, no time, still too frustrating, too many events to report). The other way we can tell is to look at the rates of events that are not comorbidities or causal. We find that events like Musculoskeletal pain, Screaming, Head banging, Local reaction, Diet refusal, Croup infectious, Hepatitis A, Eyelid oedema, and more occur at pretty much the same rate this year as in previous years.<\/p>\n

    Now let\u2019s tackle the columns:<\/p>\n

    Symptom<\/strong>
    \nThis is the VAERS symptom name. These are coded by HHS upon receipt of the report based on the contents of the report. Some of these symptoms are tests that are ordered. An elevation of a test is a good signal something is amiss. Other symptoms are not causal, but are comorbidities. For example, it might be that diabetes is there more often not because it makes diabetes worse, but because diabetic people are more likely to report symptoms. So for these symptoms, we have to be careful about the analysis. But for many of these symptoms such as cancer, herpes zoster (shingles), diabetes and more, these are all exacerbated by the vaccine as we know from talking directly to doctors. Finally, some symptoms like \u201crib fracture\u201d or \u201csuicide\u201d are elevated because they are caused by the vaccine. For example, the vaccine can make you lose consciousness and fall and fracture your hip. The vaccine can give you tinnitus which is so bad that you want to kill yourself. So we have to be extremely careful to examine each one of these symptoms carefully because in most cases, we\u2019ll find that they are indeed caused by the vaccine. I\u2019ve coded a bunch of symptoms red that I thought were serious\/interesting. I\u2019m not done yet, so the redness coding was only methodically done on the first 100 symptoms and sporadically after that. When I get more time, I\u2019ll go through them and update the file. Note that myocarditis is located on row 274, i.e., way way down.<\/p>\n

    Also, when looking at deaths, we never look at a \u201csymptom\u201d of death since death is coded in a separate field. So the event count for the \u201cdeath\u201d symptom (6,487) is lower than the over 8,000 domestic deaths.<\/p>\n

    Guillain-Barre syndrome is only elevated by a factor of 6 from baseline, likely because other vaccines also elevate GBS; this vaccine elevates it even more.<\/p>\n

    C19 count
    \n<\/strong>This is the raw number of VAERS events in 2020 and 2021 due to the COVID vaccines for that symptom. The key here is that this count should be multiplied by 41 (known as the underreporting factor or URF to estimate the absolute number of events that occurred). See\u00a0    this article for how that is computed<\/a>.<\/p>\n

    Baseline count<\/strong>
    \nThe baseline rate is the # of incidents occurring in a 5 year period from 2015-2019 for all vaccines given in that time period.<\/p>\n

    X-factor<\/strong>
    \nThe X-factor is the (C19 count*5\/Baseline count). This is because the baseline is 5 years so we compare the COVID counts in a year vs. the average count in a typical year. So an X-factor of 10 or more would mean that the symptom is very likely to be caused by the vaccine since it is highly elevated from the \u201cnormal\u201d rate.<\/p>\n

    Now let\u2019s tackle the tabs. There are two tabs:<\/p>\n

    match tab
    \n<\/strong>On the match tab are symptoms where the baseline count !=0<\/p>\n

    no match tab
    \n<\/strong>On the \u201cno match\u201d tab are symptoms where the baseline count=0. So these are quite extraordinary since these symptoms are not typically seen even once in 5 years. So here, even a small value in the \u201ccount\u201d field is very significant, e.g., 2 or more would be comparable to a 10X or more on the \u201cmatch tab.\u201d<\/p>\n

    Now here are some screenshots of the first page of the two tabs:<\/p>\n

    \n
    \"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

    And the no match tab:<\/p>\n

    \n
    \"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

     <\/p>\n

    What the data tells us<\/h3>\n

    Here are a few quick observations from the complete data set (see next section for downloading):<\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Female reproductive issues top the list. These are strongly elevated by these vaccines. Many of the top symptoms are all related to the menstrual process.<\/li>\n
    2. There are an enormous number of cardiovascular and neurological events that are strongly elevated, many of them serious.<\/li>\n
    3. Fibrin D dimer increased is #53 on the list, elevated by a factor of over 400x above baseline.\u00a0Charles Hoffe discovered D-dimer was elevated in over 60%<\/a>\u00a0of the patients he measured. This is very serious as D-dimer is a lagging indicator of blood clots.<\/li>\n
    4. Troponin increased was #130, elevated by a factor of 205. Troponin indicates heart damage and it is elevated to extreme levels (10X heart attack levels or more) and can stay elevated for months at a time (with a heart attack, the levels start returning back to normal immediately after the incident)<\/li>\n
    5. Death as a symptom (which is pretty unusual coding since it isn\u2019t a symptom), is #433 and elevated by 96X. Hardly a \u201csafe\u201d vaccine.<\/li>\n
    6. Brain herniation at #405 is elevated by a factor of 100X over baseline. However, this is not considered a big deal at the CDC (perhaps because many people there don\u2019t use their brain).<\/li>\n
    7. Cardiac arrest at #450 is elevated by 93X. This is when your heart stops. This is a relatively serious condition since you don\u2019t last for too long after that. It\u2019s a bit surprising that the CDC missed that one. Perhaps because they don\u2019t have a heart?<\/li>\n
    8. Pulmonary embolism #24 is\u00a0elevated by 954 times normal<\/strong>. How the CDC can miss that one is simply astonishing! This was the cause of death of 2 of the 14 kids that the CDC looked at in their death analysis. Mainstream press will never ask them that question as to why the CDC would not find causality here.\u00a0They wrote<\/a>: \u201cCDC reviewed 14 reports of death after vaccination. Among the decedents, four were aged 12\u201315 years and 10 were aged 16\u201317 years. All death reports were reviewed by CDC physicians; impressions regarding cause of death were pulmonary embolism (two), \u2026\u201d 954 times normal is hard to explain, isn\u2019t it? So no causality? That\u2019s hard to explain, so they didn\u2019t. They just moved on as if there is nothing to see.<\/li>\n
    9. Intracranial haemorrhage (their spelling) is at #604 and is elevated by 79X.\u00a0Two of the 14 kids from the CDC analysis<\/a>\u00a0died from that. How could that not be causal? They never explained that.<\/li>\n
    10. Tinnitus at #362 is elevated by 105X. This can be so bad that people can kill themselves from this alone. One of the people who work at Vaccine Safety Research Foundation (VSRF) had to talk a friend out of suicide.<\/li>\n
    11. There are many many more issues to be concerned with, but I wanted to get the list out quickly so there can be more eyes on this.<\/li>\n
    12. For months, I\u2019ve offered to discuss our data and analyses to both the FDA and CDC outside committees as well as the CDC and FDA themselves, but nobody wanted to see it. Most hit delete on my emails. A few told me to wait for the public comment period and submit it then (which I\u2019ve done). Nobody followed up.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      The Excel file with the full results<\/h3>\n

      I\u2019m trying to increase the number of paying subscribers I have as this supports the substack community. All proceeds will go to paying the salaries of people working for the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation (vacsafety.org<\/a>) as well as buying ads so we can get the message out.<\/p>\n

      You can find the full Excel file and Albert\u2019s analysis in\u00a0this article<\/a>.<\/p>\n

      ___
      \n      https:\/\/stevekirsch.substack.com\/p\/new-vaers-analysis-reveals-hundreds<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

      New VAERS analysis reveals hundreds of serious adverse events that the CDC and FDA never told us about They missed hundreds of serious adverse events that are more elevated than myocarditis. A new VAERS analysis done by Albert Benavides blows … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-96178","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/96178","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=96178"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/96178\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=96178"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=96178"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=96178"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}