by Jon Rappoport<\/p>\n
(Episode 2 of Rappoport Podcasts \u2014 \u201cHIV, The White House, and The Montana Prophet; When The HIV Debate Went Public, Almost\u201d \u2014 is now posted on my substack. To listen, click here. To learn more about Rappoport Podcasts, click here.)<\/p>\n
With the release of COVID vaccines, and then the mandates, we\u2019ve seen a new resurgence of people attempting to gain religious exemptions.<\/p>\n
Many of these attempts focus on fetal tissue obtained through abortion.<\/p>\n
On January 19, 2021, AnnaMaria Cardinalli published an explosive article in Crisis Magazine, headlined, \u201cCatholic Conscience and the COVID-19 Vaccine.\u201d<\/p>\n
Cardinalli details the collection of fetal tissue for the cell line named HEK 293.<\/p>\n
The tissue was taken from an aborted infant in the Netherlands in 1972-3.<\/p>\n
This cell line was used for \u201ctesting\u201d the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines.<\/p>\n
Cardinalli writes: \u201cWe know that the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines do not use any cells derived from abortion in the production process. That is, we know that we are not being directly injected with fetal cells or their engineered descendants (though this fact differs with other manufacturers). We hear that the abortion-derived cell lines were only used in testing, which should somehow comfort us, though it still means that the vaccines from which we seek to benefit depend on the involvement of abortion. We are told that the cell line used in testing came from one abortion, which took place decades ago. These things are all true, but they do not serve to inform us fully.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat we may not know follows. The most prominent cell line, called HEK 293, comes from an abortion performed in the 1970\u2019s\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHEK stands for human embryonic kidney. To harvest a viable embryonic kidney for this purpose, sufficiently healthy children old enough to have adequately-developed kidneys must be removed from the womb, alive, typically by cesarean section, and have their kidneys cut out. This must take place without anesthesia for the child, which [anesthesia] would lessen the viability of the organs. Instead of being held, rocked, and comforted in the time intervening between their birth and their death, they have organs cut out of them alive.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThere is no way that a spontaneous abortion could result in the cell line (as the kidneys cannot remain viable past the brief window in which they must be harvested) or that some brilliant researcher found a way for great good to come out of a rare tragedy by making use of a child\u2019s body donated to science after it was aborted. The deliberate killing of an unwanted child (a little girl, in the case of HEK 293) took place in the tortuous manner it did precisely to obtain her organs for research. The harvest of her organs was the direct cause of her death, prior to which, she was a living child, outside the womb.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI fear that Pope Francis and Pope Emeritus Benedict may not have had this information when they received the vaccines. If we re-examine the Vatican statement that \u2018it is morally acceptable to receive COVID-19 vaccines that have used cell lines from aborted fetuses in their research and productions process,\u2019 we see that it does not apply here. It does not imagine this scenario. To approve of the currently-available vaccines, it would have to read \u2018it is morally acceptable to receive COVID-19 vaccines that have used cell lines from living persons, killed by the harvest of their organs for use in medical research and productions processes,\u2019 but the Church\u2019s moral teachings could never truly bend so far.<\/p>\n
Similar to the human rights abuses exposed by international tribunal in today\u2019s China, where unwanted individuals such as religious and political dissidents are executed by the harvest of their organs for profit, the little girl whose cells gave rise to the COVID-19 vaccines was brutally sacrificed for the purpose, as were all the children whose cell lines failed before her.\u201d<\/p>\n
After reading Cardinalli\u2019s analysis\u2014not only should the granting of religious exemptions from vaccination be a foregone conclusion; the whole field of fetal tissue research, going back many years and involving many pharmaceutical products, should be put on trial.<\/p>\n
The people who have been carrying out the murders, the people who have been using the harvested tissue, the companies\u2014all of them\u2014on trial.<\/p>\n
I hope many medical professionals will take Cardinalli\u2019s article as a springboard, and weigh in on what she is very clearly stating.<\/p>\n
And not just doctors. All people who are shocked by her conclusions.<\/p>\n
So far, I see one counter-claim to Cardinalli\u2019s assertions:<\/p>\n
The notion that the kidneys of the aborted baby must be harvested very quickly is false. The kidneys can survive for a longer period.<\/p>\n
On that score, I refer you to a devastating video interview conducted by Robert Kennedy Jr. His guest was SOUND CHOICE PHARMACEUTICAL INSTITUTE \u201cPresident and Founder, Dr. Theresa Deisher Ph.D., [with] over 30 years of pharmaceutical research and leadership experience. She discovered adult cardiac derived stem cells, has worked on their therapeutic uses as an alternative to human fetal DNA, and leads a team of scientists at AVM Biotechnology dedicated to changing what a diagnosis of cancer, autoimmunity, or chronic infectious disease means to patients and their loved ones. As a result of this work, Dr. Deisher is named as an inventor on over 47 patents.\u201d<\/p>\n
In the first 15 minutes of the interview, Deisher makes it quite clear that infants in the womb are taken out alive, with their blood supply functioning (essential) and then killed by cutting out their hearts or their brains. This is what is done in order to obtain tissue that will be turned into fetal cell lines.<\/p>\n
Since this act of murder is standard practice, it would appear it was committed against the live baby whose kidney cells became cell line HEK 293, used in testing the COVID vaccines.<\/p>\n
At the top of the interview, Kennedy said he didn\u2019t want to get into the moral aspect of fetal cell lines. But after listening to Deisher, he was quite shaken. He said so. He said they would have to cover the moral aspect.<\/p>\n
The whole world has to.<\/p>\n
Here is the basic ramification: THERE IS A RELIGIOUS EXEMPTION FOR THE WHOLE WORLD.<\/p>\n
For all people of faith. Every faith.<\/p>\n
\u201cAccording to my religious belief, the murder of an undeniably live infant for any reason is unconscionable and evil, and I refuse the vaccine.\u201d<\/p>\n
Here is a Force against which no government, no establishment, no secret society, no wealth can stand.<\/p>\n
I fully understand all sorts of professionals will spout language that purports to show \u201cthe aborted infant was not alive, the lab followed all the legal guidelines, this is an old argument that has been debunked\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n
But this is not just an old argument. This is the equivalent of an opening statement in a murder trial. Nothing less.<\/p>\n
If religious leaders will read AnnaMaria Cardinalli\u2019s article, they will see how important her charge is.<\/p>\n
The question isn\u2019t \u201cwill people of faith wake up and do what they should\u201d; the question is \u201chow can any person of faith NOT do what they should\u201d.<\/p>\n
If they will make a stand; if all people of faith will; the entire dire situation we are facing changes in the blink of an eye.<\/p>\n
Solomon to God: \u201cYou have made Your servant king instead of my father David, but I am a little child; I do not know how to go out or come in\u2026Therefore give to Your servant an understanding heart to judge Your people, that I may discern between good and evil.\u201d<\/p>\n
Gautama Buddha: \u201cTo cease from evil, to do good, and to purify the mind yourself, this is the teaching of all the Buddhas.\u201d<\/p>\n
John 10:10: \u201cThe thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy. I came that they may have life and have it abundantly.\u201d<\/p>\n
Would any church, any religion in the world say that God wants the killing of live infants for the purpose of medical research?<\/p>\n
In the midst of this COVID tyranny, haven\u2019t we all been looking for a truth that will galvanize huge numbers of people?<\/p>\n
And not as some kind of stunt. But rather as an inevitable outcome of deep faith.<\/p>\n
Faith and justice come from the same everlasting tree.<\/p>\n
SOURCES:<\/p>\n
https:\/\/www.crisismagazine.com\/2021\/catholic-conscience-and-the-covid-19-vaccine<\/a><\/p>\n