{"id":123612,"date":"2022-07-10T09:32:21","date_gmt":"2022-07-10T13:32:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=123612"},"modified":"2022-07-10T09:36:01","modified_gmt":"2022-07-10T13:36:01","slug":"how-vaccine-trials-routinely-rig-the-results-video","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=123612","title":{"rendered":"<h2><b>How Vaccine Trials Routinely Rig the Results<\/b> (Video)<\/h2>"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><!--more-->Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola<\/p>\n<p><script>!function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src=\"https:\/\/rumble.com\/embedJS\/u4\"+(arguments[1].video?'.'+arguments[1].video:'')+\"\/?url=\"+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+\"&args=\"+encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify([].slice.apply(arguments))),e.parentNode.insertBefore(l,e)}})}(window, document, \"script\", \"Rumble\");<\/script><\/p>\n<div id=\"rumble_v17qyar\"><\/div>\n<p><script>\nRumble(\"play\", {\"video\":\"v17qyar\",\"div\":\"rumble_v17qyar\"});<\/script><\/p>\n<div id=\"bcr_UpdPnlStory\">\n<div id=\"bcr_pnlStoryAtAGlance\" class=\"story-glance\" data-swiftype-name=\"saag\" data-swiftype-type=\"text\">\n<div class=\"story-highlights\">\n<h3 id=\"expanderHead\" data-jsid=\"expanderHead\">STORY AT-A-GLANCE<\/h3>\n<div id=\"expanderContent\" data-jsid=\"expanderContent\">\n<ul>\n<li><span id=\"bcr_rptStory_cslStory_0\">The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has adopted a \u201cFuture Framework\u201d scheme that will allow Pfizer and Moderna to reformulate and release updated COVID shots without conducting any additional clinical trials<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span id=\"bcr_rptStory_cslStory_1\">This Framework will allow completely untested, reformulated COVID injections to be churned out; the elimination of clinical trial requirements may also, over time, be expanded to other vaccines and drugs<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span id=\"bcr_rptStory_cslStory_2\">The \u201cFuture Framework\u201d will almost certainly guarantee that future COVID shots be less effective and\/or more dangerous, because adding more mRNA (to cover more variants) will result in higher adverse event rates, and less mRNA per variant will lower the effectiveness<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span id=\"bcr_rptStory_cslStory_3\">Over the years, we\u2019ve seen plenty of examples of how vaccine trials are being rigged, and that the \u201cFuture Framework\u201d is an extreme expansion and formalization of that rigging<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span id=\"bcr_rptStory_cslStory_4\">Not recording injuries, or recording them improperly, are a common tactic used to fudge results and make a vaccine appear safer than it is. Another common strategy is to exclude any parameter that turns out to be problematic, and that includes participants who are injured. Because this is such a common trick, the fact that 3,000 of the 4,526 children (aged 6 months through 4 years) enrolled in Pfizer\u2019s pediatric COVID trial were excluded is a huge red flag<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"bodytext\" class=\"bodytextdiv\" data-swiftype-name=\"postbody\" data-swiftype-type=\"text\">\n<p>In a rather shocking turn of events, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration sneaked in a \u201cFuture Framework\u201d<sup><span id=\"edn1\" data-hash=\"#ednref1\">1<\/span><\/sup>\u00a0scheme that will allow Pfizer and Moderna to reformulate and release updated COVID shots without conducting any additional human clinical trials, other than what\u2019s already been done.<sup><span id=\"edn2\" data-hash=\"#ednref2\">2<\/span>,<span id=\"edn3\" data-hash=\"#ednref3\">3<\/span>,<span id=\"edn4\" data-hash=\"#ednref4\">4<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n<h2>FDA Rewrites the Rules on the Fly<\/h2>\n<p>A vote on the Framework was scheduled to be taken June 28, 2022, by the FDA\u2019s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC), but while the VRBPAC approved (19-2) a bivalent COVID shot for fall 2022,<sup><span id=\"edn5\" data-hash=\"#ednref5\">5<\/span><\/sup>\u00a0the expected voting on the Framework, specifically, didn\u2019t seem to take place \u2014 only it DID.<\/p>\n<p>As it turns out, we\u2019ve been bamboozled yet again by an agency that keeps rewriting the rules on the fly. Toby Rogers, Ph.D. \u2014 a political economist whose research focus is on regulatory capture and Big Pharma corruption<sup><span id=\"edn6\" data-hash=\"#ednref6\">6<\/span><\/sup>\u00a0\u2014 explains how they sneaked this one by us:<sup><span id=\"edn7\" data-hash=\"#ednref7\">7<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>\u201cYesterday [June 28], the FDA\u2019s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee approved a bivalent COVID-19 shot with the Wuhan strain and the Omicron variant &#8230;<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><em>At the meeting, the manufacturers (Moderna, Pfizer, and Novavax) were asked what their production timelines are\u2026 and they said\u00a0<strong>out loud<\/strong>, \u2018So long as we don\u2019t have to provide any clinical data, we\u2019ll have them ready by fall.\u2019 No one had a problem with that &#8230;<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><em>Wait, hold up, I thought the FDA was voting on the Future Framework yesterday? The policy question was whether reformulated COVID-19 shots would be treated as new molecular entities (which they are) in which case they should be subject to formal review or whether reformulated shots would be treated as \u2018biologically similar\u2019 to existing Covid-19 shots and be allowed to skip clinical trials altogether.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n<div class=\"MidProductAd\"><\/div>\n<p><em>Apparently the FDA did not have the votes to just pass this as a policy question. If you ask anyone whether reformulated mRNA represents a new molecular entity, well of course it is, so that would require formal regulatory review.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><em><strong>What the FDA did instead<\/strong>\u00a0was to smuggle the policy question in disguised as a vote about reformulated \u2018boosters\u2019 for the fall.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><em>In essence, the FDA just started doing the Future Framework (picking variants willy nilly, skipping clinical trials) and essentially dared the committee members to turn down a booster dose \u2014 knowing that all of the VRBPAC members are hand-picked because they\u2019ve never met a vaccine they did not like.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><em>So of course only two people on the committee had the courage to turn down a booster dose \u2014 even though it was based on this preposterous process (that was never formally adopted) where there was literally no data at all &#8230; By stealth, the FDA replaced a system based on evidence with a system based entirely on belief.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<h2>Worst Idea in the History of Public Health<\/h2>\n<p>A decision to release reformulated mRNA shots without additional clinical trials is the worst development yet, by far, and has the power to radically change medical science moving forward.<\/p>\n<p>Not only will completely untested COVID injections be churned out, but this \u201cframework\u201d may also, over time, be widened to include other vaccines and drugs that drug makers may want to tinker with. Heck, it could even lower standards for drug trials in general, which historically have required at least 10 years of multi-phase testing.<sup><span id=\"edn8\" data-hash=\"#ednref8\">8<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n<p>In a May 31, 2022, Substack article, Rogers explained the origin and purpose of this incredibly dangerous proposal:<sup><span id=\"edn9\" data-hash=\"#ednref9\">9<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>\u201cPfizer and Moderna have a problem \u2014 their mRNA COVID-19 shots do not stop infection, transmission, hospitalization, nor death from the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Everyone knows this &#8230; Pfizer and Moderna are making about $50 billion a year on these shots and they want that to continue.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><em>So they need to reformulate the shots. Maybe target a new variant, maybe change some of the ingredients \u2014 who knows, these shots don\u2019t work so it\u2019s not clear what it will take to get them to work. This is a problem because reformulated shots mean new clinical trials and new regulatory review by the FDA.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><em>There is a decent chance that any reformulated shot might fail a new clinical trial and the public is deeply skeptical of these shots so the scrutiny would be intense.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><em>So Pfizer and Moderna have figured out a way to use regulatory capture to get their reformulated COVID-19 shots approved WITHOUT further clinical trials. Their scheme is called the \u2018Future Framework\u2019 &#8230; The purpose of the \u2018Future Framework\u2019 is to rig the COVID-19 vaccine regulatory process in perpetuity in favor of the pharmaceutical industry.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><em>If this \u2018Future Framework\u2019 is approved all future COVID-19 shots, regardless of the formulation, will automatically be deemed \u2018safe and effective\u2019 without additional clinical trials because they are considered \u2018biologically similar\u2019 to existing shots.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><em>This is literally the worst idea in the history of public health. If you change a single molecule of mRNA in these shots it will change health outcomes in ways that no one can anticipate. That necessarily requires new clinical trials \u2014 which is what the FDA is proposing to skip &#8230;<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><em>The FDA authorized COVID-19 shots for kids on June 14 and 15. So if the FDA approves the \u2018Future Framework\u2019 on June 28th, the shots that will be given to kids (and Americans of all ages) in the fall will be the reformulated shots that skipped clinical trials.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<div class=\"productad\"><\/div>\n<h2>SARS-CoV-2 Is a Horrible Vaccine Candidate, and They Know It<\/h2>\n<p>Before we continue, let\u2019s review one important factor that tends to get lost. As explained by Rogers,<sup><span id=\"edn10\" data-hash=\"#ednref10\">10<\/span><\/sup>\u00a0\u201cViruses that evolve rapidly are bad candidates for a vaccine,\u201d for the simple reason that they mutate faster than vaccine development can keep up with.<\/p>\n<p>This is why we don\u2019t have a vaccine against the common cold. It\u2019s\u2019 also why all previous attempts to develop a coronavirus vaccine failed. Those studies never made it past animal trials. The vaccines caused antibody-dependent enhancement, making the animals sicker than normal when exposed to the virus.<\/p>\n<p>Most people are unaware that SARS-CoV-2 mutates at a rate that is two to 10 times faster than the influenza virus,<sup><span id=\"edn11\" data-hash=\"#ednref11\">11<\/span>,<span id=\"edn12\" data-hash=\"#ednref12\">12<\/span><\/sup>\u00a0and these mutations can considerably reduce vaccine effectiveness. Indeed, we\u2019ve seen this both with the seasonal flu vaccine and the COVID shots. When you vaccinate against a rapidly mutating virus you also run the risk of pressuring it into a more virulent and\/or vaccine-resistant form. As noted by Rogers:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>\u201cThe FDA\u2019s \u2018expert advisory committee\u2019 (VRBPAC) met on April 6, 2022 to discuss the \u2018Future Framework\u2019 for the first time. All of the committee members agreed that COVID-19 shots are not working, that boosting multiple times a year was not feasible, and that the shots need to be reformulated.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><em>They also unanimously agreed that there are no \u2018correlates of protection\u2019 that one can use to predict what antibody levels would be sufficient to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>By now, the VRBPAC must know that the only way forward, really, is to withdraw the COVID shots and focus on therapeutics. But they\u2019re not doing that. Instead, they\u2019re doubling down on a failed strategy. On top of that, they\u2019re making the situation even worse by foregoing clinical trials. There\u2019s no doubt in my mind that this will pose grave risks to public health. I agree with Rogers, who said:<sup><span id=\"edn13\" data-hash=\"#ednref13\">13<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>\u201cThink about it. The more mRNA you put into a shot, the higher the adverse event rate (as the genetically modified mRNA hijacks the cell and starts cranking out spike proteins). So if Pfizer and Moderna put more mRNA into these shots (in order to cover multiple variants) adverse event rates will skyrocket.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><em>But if Pfizer and Moderna put<\/em>\u00a0less\u00a0<em>mRNA per variant into a shot (in order to keep the total amount of mRNA at 100 mcg for Moderna and 30 mcg for Pfizer) then the effectiveness against any one particular variant will be reduced. The Future Framework is 100% guaranteed to fail.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<h2>They\u2019re Fudging Effectiveness Too<\/h2>\n<p>The FDA also insists that, due to time constraints, evaluation of effectiveness must rely on \u201cmeasures other than actual health outcomes.\u201d<sup><span id=\"edn14\" data-hash=\"#ednref14\">14<\/span><\/sup>\u00a0In other words, whether the shots actually lower your risk of severe illness, hospitalization and death will have no bearing.<\/p>\n<p>The only measure that will be taken into account is whether or not the jab triggers a rise in antibody levels, which has never been proven to offer significant protection. This also means that as long as antibody levels are through the roof, the death rate could be through the roof too, and the jabs will still be used, because that\u2019s not part of the equation.<\/p>\n<p>The focus on antibody levels to the exclusion of everything else may actually be backfiring. Data from Moderna\u2019s trial suggest the shot actually makes you more prone to repeat infections due to the inhibition of antibodies against a particular portion of the virus.<\/p>\n<p>A preprint study<sup><span id=\"edn15\" data-hash=\"#ednref15\">15<\/span>,<span id=\"edn16\" data-hash=\"#ednref16\">16<\/span><\/sup>\u00a0posted on medRxiv April 19, 2022, found adult participants in Moderna\u2019s trial who got the real injection, and later got a breakthrough infection, did not generate antibodies against the nucleocapsid \u2014 a key component of the virus \u2014 as frequently as did those in the placebo arm.<\/p>\n<p>Placebo recipients produced anti-nucleocapsid antibodies twice as often as those who got the Moderna shot, and their anti-nucleocapsid response was larger regardless of the viral load. As a result of their inhibited antibody response, those who got the jab may be more prone to repeated COVID infections.<\/p>\n<p>These findings are further corroborated by data from the U.K. Health Security Agency. It publishes weekly COVID-19 vaccine surveillance data, including anti-nucleocapsid antibody levels. The report<sup><span id=\"edn17\" data-hash=\"#ednref17\">17<\/span>,<span id=\"edn18\" data-hash=\"#ednref18\">18<\/span><\/sup>\u00a0for Week 13, issued March 31, 2022, shows that COVID-jabbed individuals with breakthrough infections indeed have lower levels of these antibodies.<\/p>\n<aside class=\"takeaway tamiddle\">There is a whole lot we do not know about this virus, these shots, and the interaction between them. So, allowing the vaccine makers to reformulate the shots without clinical trials is a recipe for disaster.<\/aside>\n<p>For clarity, antibodies thought to offer protection against COVID are the antibodies against the spike protein and the receptor binding domain (RBD).<sup><span id=\"edn19\" data-hash=\"#ednref19\">19<\/span><\/sup>\u00a0But this study suggests antibodies against other parts of the virus may play an equally important role, and at least one of them is being inhibited rather than boosted, resulting in a situation where you can get reinfected time and again.<\/p>\n<p>The moral of the story here is that there is a whole lot we do not know about this virus, these shots, and the interaction between them. So, allowing the vaccine makers to reformulate the shots without clinical trials is a recipe for disaster.<\/p>\n<h2>Vaccine Trials Are Routinely Rigged<\/h2>\n<p>Over the years, we\u2019ve seen plenty of examples of how vaccine trials are being rigged, and what the FDA is now proposing is really just an extreme expansion and formalization of that rigging. For example, in 2017, an eight-month investigation by Slate magazine<sup><span id=\"edn20\" data-hash=\"#ednref20\">20<\/span><\/sup>\u00a0revealed that HPV vaccine trials \u201cweren\u2019t designed to properly assess safety.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In an internal report about Gardasil 9, obtained through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) had actually called attention to some of these problems, saying Merck\u2019s approach was \u201cunconventional and suboptimal\u201d and that it left \u201cuncertainty\u201d about Gardasil\u2019s safety. Yet nothing was done about it.<\/p>\n<p>Then, in 2020, Dr. Peter G\u00f8tzsche \u2014 a Danish physician-researcher, professor and cofounder of the Cochrane Collaboration and the Nordic Cochrane Centre \u2014 and two colleagues published a review and meta-analysis<sup><span id=\"edn21\" data-hash=\"#ednref21\">21<\/span><\/sup>\u00a0of the data from 24 HPV vaccine trials. Slate magazine reported those findings as well.<sup><span id=\"edn22\" data-hash=\"#ednref22\">22<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n<p>Again, the conclusion was that HPV trials had put safety on the back burner by failing to conduct proper safety testing. Still, to quote Slate magazine, \u201cThe findings don\u2019t affect official recommendations to get vaccinated.\u201d According to G\u00f8tzsche and his coauthors:<sup><span id=\"edn23\" data-hash=\"#ednref23\">23<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>\u201cWe judged all 24 studies to be at high risk of bias. Serious harms were incompletely reported for 72% of participants (68,610\/95,670). Nearly all control participants received active comparators (48,289\/48,595, 99%). No clinical study report included complete case report forms &#8230;<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><em>At 4 years follow-up, the HPV vaccines decreased HPV-related cancer precursors and treatment procedures but increased serious nervous system disorders (exploratory analysis) and general harms.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><em>As the included trials were primarily designed to assess benefits and were not adequately designed to assess harms, the extent to which the HPV vaccines\u2019 benefits outweigh their harms is unclear.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Not recording injuries, or recording them improperly (such as listing an injury as a preexisting condition, for example), is a common tactic used to fudge results and make a vaccine appear safer than it is. Another common strategy is to exclude any parameter that turns out to be problematic, and that includes participants who are injured.<\/p>\n<p>Because this is such a common trick, the fact that 3,000 of the 4,526 children (aged 6 months through 4 years) enrolled in Pfizer\u2019s pediatric COVID trial were excluded is a huge red flag.<sup><span id=\"edn24\" data-hash=\"#ednref24\">24<\/span><\/sup>\u00a0Even more suspicious is the fact that Pfizer doesn\u2019t explain why two-thirds of the children were dropped.<\/p>\n<h2>World Health Organization Is Behind Idea to Toss Safety<\/h2>\n<p>The FDA did not invent the \u201cFuture Framework\u201d idea all by itself, however. According to Rogers, the World Health Organization and other predictable names are the real masterminds:<sup><span id=\"edn25\" data-hash=\"#ednref25\">25<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>\u201cI did not understand until &#8230; I started to write this article, that this entire \u2018Future Framework\u2019 is actually coming from the WHO. The Bill &amp; Melinda Gates Foundation is the biggest voluntary contributor to the WHO. So Gates is likely directing the play.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><em>Gates requires that WHO use the McKinsey consulting firm so this is probably a McKinsey operation (and McKinsey also works for Pharma so this is a huge conflict of interest). As Naomi Wolf points out, the involvement of the WHO also raises troubling questions about the influence of the Chinese Communist Party over this process.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><em>As far back as January, the WHO\/Gates\/McKinsey junta realized that these shots were terrible and so they decided to use that as an opportunity to seize even more power and control.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><em>The WHO set up a Technical Advisory Group on COVID-19 Vaccine Composition (TAG-CO-VAC) to implement these Orwellian \u2018Future Frameworks\u2019 across the developed world to lower manufacturing costs for Pharma and avoid bothersome health data that might hurt profits. All the messaging we have seen from the FDA and leaked to the press was initially developed and released by TAG-CO-VAC.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<h2>We Must Reject All Future mRNA Shots<\/h2>\n<p>This COVID debacle \u2014 from its fraudulent PCR test beginnings, to these devastatingly dangerous COVID shots and the intentional negligence by vaccine makers and health authorities \u2014 is the most shocking example of a criminal enterprise I\u2019ve ever seen. Nothing else even comes close.<\/p>\n<p>And the proverbial cherry on top that proves none of it is accidental or caused by ignorance is this sneaky and underhanded erasure of the requirement of clinical trials for all future COVID shots in the name of expedience. COVID-19 is not a death sentence \u2014 far from it. So, there\u2019s no need for expedience. And since there\u2019s no need for expedience, there\u2019s also no need to accept collateral damage in the form of COVID jab-related injuries and deaths.<\/p>\n<p>So, why are they doing this? That\u2019s the million-dollar question, and the most obvious answers are all disturbing in the extreme. At best, they don\u2019t care how many people, including children, suffer and die. At worst, the intention is to dramatically reduce the population through adverse effects on fertility, reduction of life span and near-term death.<\/p>\n<p>To save ourselves, indeed, to save mankind, we must reject all mRNA shots, present and future. And not just the COVID shots but also any others that are in the pipeline, because if they\u2019re willing to skip the most basic of safety protocols once, you can be sure they\u2019ll do it again.<\/p>\n<p>Skimping on safety assessment has been the secret norm for decades, and now they\u2019re attempting to formalize that process using stealth and subversion. The initial COVID shots haven\u2019t even completed their trials yet, and they want you to believe those incomplete trials are sufficient to \u201cprove\u201d all future reformulations are \u201csafe and effective\u201d too!<\/p>\n<p>We\u2019ve also seen how the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention came out saying they\u2019ve seen no safety signals in the data, only to later discover that the reason they didn\u2019t find any was because they never actually looked.<sup><span id=\"edn26\" data-hash=\"#ednref26\">26<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s nothing short of insanity, and over the past two years, government agencies have proven they are not going to put a stop to the madness. No, they\u2019re going to take this experiment as far as it\u2019ll go, and that means, until people everywhere say \u201cNo more,\u201d and leave all their stockpiles to rot.<\/p>\n<h2>There\u2019s Help if You\u2019ve Taken the Jab<\/h2>\n<p>In closing, if you\u2019ve already taken one or more COVID jabs and now regret it, first, the most important step you can take is to not take any more shots, and that includes conventional vaccines and any other mRNA or gene-based injections as well.<\/p>\n<p>Next, if you suspect your health may have been impacted, check out the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance\u2019s (FLCCC) post-vaccine treatment protocol, I-RECOVER,<sup><span id=\"edn27\" data-hash=\"#ednref27\">27<\/span><\/sup>\u00a0which you can\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/covid19criticalcare.com\/covid-19-protocols\/i-recover-post-vaccine-treatment\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">download from covid19criticalcare.com<\/a> in several different languages.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"bcr_divfootnote\" class=\"sources-references narrow-width\">\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"heading\" class=\"title link16\" data-jsid=\"sourcesReferencesBtn\">&#8211;\u00a0Sources and References<\/h3>\n<div id=\"contentrefsources\" class=\"contentrefsources\" data-jsid=\"sourcesReferences\">\n<div class=\"sources sourcesfoot\"><\/div>\n<div id=\"bcr_divReferences\" class=\"references\">\n<ul id=\"footnote-references2\">\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref1\" data-hash=\"#edn1\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">1<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"https:\/\/www.fda.gov\/media\/159452\/download\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">FDA Briefing Document\u00a0June 28, 2022<\/a><\/li>\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref2\" data-hash=\"#edn2\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">2,<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<sup><span id=\"ednref14\" data-hash=\"#edn14\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">14<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"https:\/\/childrenshealthdefense.org\/defender\/who-fda-gates-future-framework-covid-vaccines\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The Defender June 27, 2022<\/a><\/li>\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref3\" data-hash=\"#edn3\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">3<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"https:\/\/archive.ph\/LGInf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The Epoch Times June 28, 2022 (Archived)<\/a><\/li>\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref4\" data-hash=\"#edn4\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">4<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"https:\/\/archive.ph\/BwpbF\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">New York Times June 27, 2022 (Archived)<\/a><\/li>\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref5\" data-hash=\"#edn5\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">5<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"https:\/\/childrenshealthdefense.org\/defender\/fda-future-framework-covid-vaccines\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The Defender June 29, 2022<\/a><\/li>\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref6\" data-hash=\"#edn6\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">6<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"https:\/\/brownstone.org\/articles\/the-fdas-future-framework-for-covid-vaccines-is-reckless-plan\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Brownstone Institute June 22, 2022, Author\u2019s Bio<\/a><\/li>\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref7\" data-hash=\"#edn7\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">7<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"https:\/\/tobyrogers.substack.com\/p\/the-end-of-covid-19-vaccine-safety\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">uTobian June 29, 2022<\/a><\/li>\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref8\" data-hash=\"#edn8\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">8<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"http:\/\/phrma-docs.phrma.org\/sites\/default\/files\/pdf\/rd_brochure_022307.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Phrma.org Biopharmaceutical research and Development<\/a><\/li>\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref9\" data-hash=\"#edn9\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">9,<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<sup><span id=\"ednref10\" data-hash=\"#edn10\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">10,<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<sup><span id=\"ednref12\" data-hash=\"#edn12\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">12,<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<sup><span id=\"ednref13\" data-hash=\"#edn13\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">13<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"https:\/\/tobyrogers.substack.com\/p\/the-fdas-proposed-future-framework\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">uTobian Substack May 31, 2022<\/a><\/li>\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref11\" data-hash=\"#edn11\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">11<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"https:\/\/www.fda.gov\/media\/157471\/download\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">VRBPAC Meeting Comments by Trevor Bedford, April 6, 2022<\/a><\/li>\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref15\" data-hash=\"#edn15\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">15<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"https:\/\/www.medrxiv.org\/content\/10.1101\/2022.04.18.22271936v1.full\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">medRxiv April 19, 2022 DOI: 10.1101\/2022.04.18.22271936<\/a><\/li>\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref16\" data-hash=\"#edn16\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">16,<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<sup><span id=\"ednref18\" data-hash=\"#edn18\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">18<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"https:\/\/childrenshealthdefense.org\/defender\/moderna-trial-data-pandemic-vaccinated\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The Defender May 4, 2022<\/a><\/li>\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref17\" data-hash=\"#edn17\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">17<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"https:\/\/assets.publishing.service.gov.uk\/government\/uploads\/system\/uploads\/attachment_data\/file\/1066759\/Vaccine-surveillance-report-week-13.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">UK Health Security Agency COVID-19 Vaccine Surveillance Report Week 13<\/a><\/li>\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref19\" data-hash=\"#edn19\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">19<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"https:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/mmwr\/volumes\/70\/wr\/mm7049a2.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CDC.gov MMWR December 10, 2021; 70(49): 1700-1705<\/a><\/li>\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref20\" data-hash=\"#edn20\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">20<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"https:\/\/slate.com\/health-and-science\/2017\/12\/flaws-in-the-clinical-trials-for-gardasil-made-it-harder-to-properly-assess-safety.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Slate December 17, 2017<\/a><\/li>\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref21\" data-hash=\"#edn21\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">21,<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<sup><span id=\"ednref23\" data-hash=\"#edn23\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">23<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"https:\/\/systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s13643-019-0983-y\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">BMC Systematic Reviews 2020; 9: article number 43<\/a><\/li>\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref22\" data-hash=\"#edn22\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">22<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"https:\/\/slate.com\/technology\/2020\/03\/hpv-vaccine-safety-gardasil-clinical-trials-flaws.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Slate March 11, 2020<\/a><\/li>\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref24\" data-hash=\"#edn24\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">24<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"https:\/\/rumble.com\/v18s66i-bombshell-dr.-clare-craig-exposes-how-pfizer-twisted-their-clinical-trial-d.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Rumble June 17, 2022<\/a><\/li>\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref25\" data-hash=\"#edn25\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">25<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"https:\/\/tobyrogers.substack.com\/p\/breaking-newly-released-documents?\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">uTobian June 26, 2022<\/a><\/li>\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref26\" data-hash=\"#edn26\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">26<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"https:\/\/jackanapes.substack.com\/p\/new-foia-release-shows-cdc-lied-about\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Jackanapes Substack June 16, 2022<\/a><\/li>\n<li><sup><span id=\"ednref27\" data-hash=\"#edn27\"><span id=\"lblReferenceNo\">27<\/span><\/span><\/sup>\u00a0<a id=\"lnkReference\" href=\"https:\/\/covid19criticalcare.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/FLCCC_Alliance-I-RECOVER-Protocol-PostVaccine-v3-English.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">FLCCC I-RECOVER Post-Vaccine Treatment Protocol (PDF)<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">___<br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/articles.mercola.com\/sites\/articles\/archive\/2022\/07\/08\/covid-19-vaccine-trials-results.aspx?ui=7d4f35cff736f077b2ae4301813d0195449985379d483f57b37156f601517996&amp;sd=20190616&amp;cid_source=dnl&amp;cid_medium=email&amp;cid_content=art1HL&amp;cid=20220708Z1&amp;mid=DM1206121&amp;rid=1542592574\">https:\/\/articles.mercola.com\/sites\/articles\/archive\/2022\/07\/08\/covid-19-vaccine-trials-results.aspx?ui=7d4f35cff736f077b2ae4301813d0195449985379d483f57b37156f601517996&amp;sd=20190616&amp;cid_source=dnl&amp;cid_medium=email&amp;cid_content=art1HL&amp;cid=20220708Z1&amp;mid=DM1206121&amp;rid=1542592574<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-123612","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/123612","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=123612"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/123612\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=123612"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=123612"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=123612"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}