![\"shiva](\"https:\/\/patriots4truth.files.wordpress.com\/2020\/04\/shiva-patent.jpg?w=845\")
<\/p>\n
Shiva Ayyadurai. (Awarded Dec. 23, 2003)<\/a>. U.S. Pat. No. 6,668,281, Relationship Management System and Method Using Asychronous Electronic Messaging. U.S. Patent Office.<\/p>\n In his 1999 patent,\u00a0https:\/\/www.vashiva.com\/pdf\/vashiva_pat11.pdf,<\/a>\u00a0Shiva only cites IBM Notes, and IBM Domino as prior art that was reviewed. Note:\u00a0This was THE groupware system\u00a0<\/strong>that the Highlands Group, DoD Office of Net Assessment and their Pilgrims Society handlers were counting on to implement the \u201cIBM Internet of Things.\u201d Notably, hindsight shows us that at this time, IBM had already founded the IBM Eclipse Foundation (Nov. 29, 2001) with Leader Technologies Ne\u2019er-do-well patent attorney, James P. Chandler, III, and IBM Eclipse was already\u00a0giving away<\/em>\u00a0Leader inventions (including its Leader Mail inventions for use with its social backbone), that they had stolen, to everyone in Silicon Valley, government, education, commerce and military.<\/p>\n This disclosure alone shows the Examiner, or Shiva, or both, were brain dead in their examination of \u201cprior art\u201d to meet the \u201cnovel and nonobvious\u201d standards for patentability<\/strong>. Curiously, the \u201cpatent wrapper\u201d for this patent does not provide the customary the file drawer for this filing, as it should do.<\/p>\n The patent attorney handling this patent is Khaled Shami (former patent Examiner)\u00a0https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/khaled-shami-0a27a17\/<\/a>\u00a0who says he is in the firm of\u00a0BUCHANAN, INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC<\/a>\u00a0that does not list him as an attorney. His LinkedIn never mentions BUCHAN either\u00a0https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/khaled-shami-0a27a17\/<\/a><\/p>\n At minimum, this record raises numerous red flags. It is certainly ambiguous. The lack of a \u201cpatent wrapper\u201d showing the examiner\u2019s review of the Prior Art begs the question of who is running interference for Shiva? The patent is evidently invalid due to the utter lack of disclosure of significant prior art that the examiner should have used to reject the application as obvious and therefore non-patentable. Certainly Shiva is not justified in saying that he is the \u201cinventor of email.\u201d<\/p>\n This\u00a0Wikipedia entry<\/a>\u00a0is a more accurate reflection of the origins of email.<\/p>\n One serious problem with this Shiva patent is that he does not cite his own prior work, touted on his current website, as prior art. Therefore, his own documents prove this patent bogus.<\/p>\n Here\u2019s Shiva\u2019s history from his site:<\/p>\n V. A. Shiva Ayyadurai. (Apr. 29, 2020)<\/a>. Inventor history, The Inventor o \u00a0Email \u2013 History. Vashiva.com.<\/p>\n (Note: We have backups of these documents if they disappear from Shiva\u2019s website now that we are bringing attention to them.)<\/p>\n For example, he shows an\u00a0UNDATED 1981 alleged Westinghouse entry<\/a>\u00a0describing his alleged email design in esquisite detail. This document appears to be fake. Notably, Westinghouse is a Pilgrims Society company that is organically tied to NBC, RCA, Marconi and the Pilgrims Society. At minimum, he should have cited this document as prior art on all of his email filings, which would render them all as obvious\u2026 if this document really existed, which we now doubt seriously.<\/p>\n He cites an irrelevant\u00a01978 NYU document<\/a>.<\/p>\n He cites and irrelevant\u00a01978 FORTRAN<\/a>\u00a0output that merely mentions email, but there is\u00a0no association<\/em>\u00a0with him.<\/p>\n He shows a newspaper article from Oct. 30, 1980 (p. 8, Sec. 2) of the West Essex Tribune. The article says this project was under \u201ctutelage of Blair Krimmel, head of the math department and the Independent Study program.\u201d Since Shiva does not credit Blair Krimmel as a co-inventor, any subsequent claims are fraudulent (\u201cinequitable conduct\u201d).<\/p>\n His 1981 Westinghouse award discloses:<\/p>\n Such prior art disclosure renders his own work as must-cite prior art in subsequent patent applications\u2014thus invalidating his patent claims as\u00a0not novel and obvious<\/em>.<\/p>\n His 1981 MIT article is more evidence that his ideas for email were already widely known, and therefore not patentable.<\/p>\n His 1982 Copyright application only serves to show that he disclosed his work to the public in 1982, thus rendering subsequent patent claims impossible to make (since the public already knew about it). Copyrights and patents are very different intellectual property animals.<\/p>\n His 1982 Dr. Leslie Michelson, Ph.D. article is irrelevant to the subject to email.<\/p>\n His subsequent patents 6668281,\u00a06718367, 6718368<\/strong>\u00a0(note the last two were issued on the same day, by the same patent examiners). Very odd, unless a fake portfolio is being created as a buffer against patent enemies of the patent office and Shiva\u2019s handlers.<\/p>\n Conclusion:<\/strong>\u00a0Shiva\u2019s claim to be \u201cthe inventor of email\u201d suffers a definite sulfurous odor.<\/p>\n https:\/\/www.inventorofemail.com\/<\/a><\/p>\n https:\/\/vashiva.com\/innovation\/email\/vashiva-inventor-history.asp<\/a><\/p>\n http:\/\/generalinteractive.com\/<\/a><\/p>\n Whoa\u2026.all this on Dr. Shiva just on the first trip down the mines! The miners report seeing all kinds of nuggets regarding Dr. Shiva and his connection to Hillary Clinton, the vaccine world, Microsoft, and Bill Gates lying all over the place.<\/p>\n While you are waiting for our mining reports, get a glimpse of what we saw down there.<\/p>\n Don\u2019t think for one minute that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is a good guy in this. These are two globalist puppets creating kabuki theater for the vaccine wars. We are going to put both of these vaccine proponents into the bright light of truth.<\/p>\n![\"Shiva](\"https:\/\/patriots4truth.files.wordpress.com\/2020\/04\/shiva-ayyadurai-1.jpg?w=845\")
<\/p>\nBy the late 1990\u2019s,\u00a0numerous<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0email systems with the exact features of Inbox, Outbox, etc. Groups, sorting, filters, etc. were in wide use. Those systems included: Leader Mail, Microsoft Outlook, Microsoft Exchange, Novel Groupwise, Novel Groupwise Email, Hotmail, YahooMail, Lotus Notes, Lotus cc:Mail, AT&T Mail, AT&T Access (DOS version), AT&T AccessPlus 3.0 (Windows version), CompuServe (csmail), GEIS (mark400), MCI Mail, SPRINT Mail, X-400, BITNET, AOL Mail (\u201cYou\u2019ve got mail.\u201d)<\/h3>\n
\n![\"email](\"https:\/\/patriots4truth.files.wordpress.com\/2020\/04\/email-shiva.jpg?w=845\")
<\/p>\nOne of Shiva\u2019s current companies \u2013 General Interactive<\/h3>\n
![\"shiva](\"https:\/\/patriots4truth.files.wordpress.com\/2020\/04\/shiva-companies.jpg?w=845\")
<\/p>\n
\n![\"Coal](\"https:\/\/patriots4truth.files.wordpress.com\/2018\/04\/coal-miners-2.jpg?w=845\")
<\/p>\nRFK Jr. Asks if Dr. Shiva Owning a Vaccine Company & Partnering with Microsoft is Why He\u2019s Splintering the Movement<\/a><\/h3>\n