![\"\"](\"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/kidsatpride.png\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
By\u00a0Eric Striker<\/a><\/p>\n Leading \u201cLGBT\u201d intellectuals are responding to public demands that they stop performing public\u00a0sex acts in front of small children at \u201cPride\u201d parades\u00a0by doubling down.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n Joseph J. Fischel, a Jewish queer theorist at Yale, recently published a piece in\u00a0Boston Review<\/em>\u00a0arguing that performing perverted homosexual acts in front of children is important because it\u00a0teaches them to reject racism, sexism and homophobia, as well\u00a0introducing them to visual stimuli he hopes will arose them.<\/p>\n In the\u00a0essay<\/a>, he dismisses concerns that performing sex acts in front of children brought to \u201cPride\u201d by their homosexual\u00a0parents is wrong because they can\u2019t \u201cconsent.\u201d According to Fischel, this perspective is \u201cracist\u201d and \u201cbad for children.\u201d\u00a0He\u00a0refers to writings<\/a>\u00a0by\u00a0transsexual blue check Julia Serrano, who states\u00a0that people wearing wedding rings and publicly expressing right-wing political beliefs violate\u00a0its<\/em>\u00a0consent, and so nobody has a right to demand\u00a0that \u201ckink\u201d and public sodomy be banned from gay parades.<\/p>\n To build his argument from a legal standpoint, Fischel relies on Brenda Cossman, Stuart Green, Richard Posner and Joel Feinberg \u2014 all of them\u00a0Jewish academic legal theorists\u00a0\u2014 who argue that public sex acts in front of unsuspecting people\u00a0are no more offensive than racist or \u201coffensive\u201d political speech, and that the distinction between private and public behavior is arbitrary, heteronormative, and should be done away with.<\/p>\n By shielding their children from displays of gay sex acts, parents are merely projecting their own puritanical impulses onto their children, argues Fischel:<\/p>\n According to the author, shocking children at any age by deliberately showing them grotesque sex acts functions to challenge their \u201cheteronormative\u201d default, as well as potentially make them \u201ccurious\u201d and get them to \u201clike it.\u201d<\/p>\n Fischel expresses confusion over white liberals attending \u201cpride\u201d parades with their families because it is fashionable wanting to sanitize the deviant acts performed. He draws parallels to research conducted by recently deceased\u00a0Jewish \u201cgender studies\u201d author Lauren Berlant\u00a0on homosexual behavior, including an anecdote about a performance at a gay bar where a man force feeds a much younger man until he repeatedly vomits. According to Fischel, obscene displays of non-reproductive sex in public are radical acts that\u00a0should be expected and encouraged at gay events.<\/p>\n Last September,\u00a0National Justice<\/em>\u00a0wrote a piece warning that the\u00a0Jewish community was preparing a push<\/a>\u00a0to normalize pedophilia. According to numerous gay and Jewish intellectuals, exposing young children to sex and engaging them in it is the pinnacle of\u00a0anti-fascist activism and the ultimate blow to the \u201cauthoritarian\u201d personality that Jews believe led to the populist movements that gave\u00a0rise to\u00a0figures like Hitler and Mussolini.<\/p>\n According to research conducted by\u00a0Western Journal,\u00a0<\/em>multiple members of the San Francisco Gay Chorus\u00a0behind the recent controversial video \u201cWe\u2019re coming for your children\u201d\u00a0are convicted child molesters<\/a>.<\/p>\n The\u00a0mainstream media<\/a>\u00a0has responded to outrage over pedophiles singing songs about coming for people\u2019s children by referring to critics as bigots and claiming to be victims of threats.<\/p>\n There does not appear to be a credible opponent to the \u201cqueer\u201d power structure, which is backed by Wall Street and heavily infiltrated the government, media and academia.\u00a0Both parties now celebrate\u00a0homosexual and deviant behavior, even though racial minority blocs\u00a0in the Democratic Party and the GOP\u2019s rural white Christian base do not generally approve. Recently, the transsexual activist\u00a0Caitlyn Jenner<\/a>, who has launched a doomed\u00a0bid to become Governor of\u00a0California, was a headliner at the\u00a0Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC).<\/p>\n That high profile homosexuals no longer feel the need to hide their true aspirations reveals that normal people in\u00a0America will be expected to pull\u00a0the front line back yet again in the fight to resist extreme forms of sexual depravity.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n
When parents or people ventriloquizing parents oppose public indecency at Pride on the grounds that it may upset children, the opposite is more likely the case: their children might like it, and that upsets the parents, not the children. What is the presumptive harm if a child happens upon a guy sporting a chest harness, or sees an adult\u2019s butt cheeks, or even an adult\u2019s genitals or breasts? Would such children necessarily feel violated, or might adults be feeling violated on their behalf? Might the child be as likely to respond with curiosity?<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n
\n