{"id":164767,"date":"2023-04-23T15:24:16","date_gmt":"2023-04-23T19:24:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=164767"},"modified":"2023-04-23T15:24:32","modified_gmt":"2023-04-23T19:24:32","slug":"the-revelations-of-dr-richard-day-an-ever-unveiling-prophecy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=164767","title":{"rendered":"The Revelations Of Dr Richard Day: An Ever Unveiling Prophecy"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sebastian Smith
\nAlternative Column<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

I<\/span><\/span>n 1932, Aldus Huxley wrote the famed literature Brave New World, describing humanity\u2019s ignorant enslavement to an establishment primarily focused on exploiting labour. In the novel, the world is governed by 10 world controllers, who have successfully replaced the family unit with \u2018state hatcheries\u2019 and condemned everyone to hard labour relieved by sex and drugs.<\/p>\n

A little over a decade later, Eric Arthur Blair, better known as George Orwell, wrote 1984, a novel similarly warning that humanity would eventually fall under the arms of an establishment controlling all aspects of information, media and production.<\/p>\n

Huxley, who was once a teacher to Orwell at the elitist Eton College, wrote to Orwell praising his work, but criticising that his piece was the more accurate prediction:<\/p>\n

\u201dWithin the next generation, I believe that the world\u2019s rulers will discover that infant conditioning and narco-hypnosis are more efficient, as instruments of government, than clubs and prisons, and that the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging and kicking them into obedience.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u2026\u201cI feel that the nightmare of\u00a0Nineteen Eighty-Four<\/em>\u00a0is destined to modulate into the nightmare of a world having more resemblance to that which I imagined in\u00a0Brave New World<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n

However great, familiarity has already been achieved with Huxleys\u00a0Brave New World<\/em>\u00a0and Orwell\u2019s\u00a0Nineteen-Eighty-Four<\/em>, and it is time to put them to rest. A thew decades later, a greater prophecy arose, one of great detail and minuscule representation.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

”Off The Record” Remarks<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\"Dr
Dr L. Richard Day<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

Prophets and conspiracy groups have long believed in the prophecy of a one-world government. They claim progression in the past century has revealed and silenced those who claim to expose it. Although, plans for the end game seem to have slowly unveiled, with public documents such as the UN\u2019s Agenda 21 and the World Economic Forum\u2019s \u2018Great Reset\u2019 matching such profecies. Other rev<\/span>elations, however, have come out from whistleblowers aiming to warn the public.<\/p>\n

Perhaps one most accurate whistleblower would be that of Dr Richard L. Day.<\/p>\n

In 1988, Lawrence Dunagen, a paediatrician from Mt. Lebanon took to the tapes to explain a meeting he attended on the 20th of March 1969 lead by Dr Richard Day, a professor of paediatrics at Pittsburgh university, and a future director at Planned Parenthood.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

In the tapes, which were recorded by Randy Engel, Lawrence claimed that Dr Richard Day made \u201coff the record\u201d remarks of a plan for humanity.<\/p>\n

According to Dr Dunagen, before the meeting could begin, Day asked all members to switch off all tape recorders and put away any notes. Lawrence said:\u00a0\u201dSomething in his remarks suggested that there could be negative repercussions against him if it became widely known what was about to say to our group\u201d.<\/p>\n

The three tapes, which consisted of one hour-long segments, have since been groundbreaking prophecies, describing topics including population control, the internet, computers, promotion of homosexuality, legalisation of abortion, microchipping, cashless society, pornography, sex, individual security, education, religion, and much more.<\/p>\n

Dunegan began with: \u201dThe speaker was not looking from the outside in, thinking that he saw conspiracy, rather, he was on the inside, admitting that, indeed, there was an organized power, force, group of men, who wielded enough influence to determine major events involving countries around the world. And he predicted, or rather expounded on, changes that were planned for the remainder of this century.\u201d<\/p>\n

So far, many of Lawrence\u2019s claims have come true, bringing serious consideration to whether there truly is some global conspiracy.<\/p>\n

Today, the 3-hours worth of tape recordings \u2013 named the\u00a0New Order of Barbarians<\/em>, can be listened\u00a0to\u00a0here.<\/a><\/p>\n

Below are some of the key subjects Day mentioned:<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

State Surveillance Through Technology<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Claim by Dr Day according to Dr Dunagen:\u00a0<\/strong>\u201cYou\u2019ll be watching television and somebody will be watching you at the same time at a central monitoring station.\u201d Television sets would have a device to enable this. The TV set would not have to be on in order for this to be operative. Also, the television set can be used to monitor what you are watching . People can tell what you\u2019re watching on TV and how you\u2019re reacting to what you\u2019re watching.<\/p>\n

And you would not know that you were being watched while you were watching your television. How would we get people to accept these things into their homes? Well, people would buy them when they buy their own television. They won\u2019t know that they\u2019re on there at first.<\/p>\n

This was described by being what we now know as Cable TV to replace the antenna TV. When you buy a TV set this monitor would just be part of the set and most people would not have enough knowledge to know it was there in the beginning. And then the cable would be the means of carrying the surveillance message to the monitor.<\/p>\n

By the time people found out that this monitoring was going on, they would also be very dependent upon television for a number of things. Just the way people are dependent upon the telephone today. One thing the television would be used for would be purchases.<\/p>\n

You wouldn\u2019t have to leave your home to purchase. You just turn on your TV and there would be a way of interacting with your television channel to the store that you wanted to purchase. And you could flip the switch from place to place to choose a refrigerator or clothing.<\/p>\n

This would be both convenient, but it would also make you dependent on your television so the built-in monitor would be something you could not do without. There was some discussion of audio monitors , too, just in case the authorities wanted to hear what was going on in rooms other than where the television monitor was , and in regard to this the statement was made, \u201cAny wire that went into your house, for example your telephone wire, could be used this way.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

The next subject mentioned by Dr Richard Day was the advancement of televisions to include monitoring devices, such as the possibility of a camera and a microphone.<\/p>\n

Given this point was spoken in 1969, and the first laptop wasn\u2019t invented until 1981, and including a camera until 1996, I think it would be possible to say that perhaps the closest thing to a laptop or mobile phone at the time was a television. The latest iPhone models as of today include up to 4 cameras, 3 microphones, a 3d facial recognition camera and infrared sensors.<\/p>\n

It is arguable whether these technologies could be used as a means of monitoring individuals. However, with advancing technologies such as Amazon\u2019s Alexa and Apple\u2019s Siri making their way into the average home, the opportunity for tapping into certain devices could very easily be taken advantage of by both hackers and potential governments.<\/p>\n

However, Day\u2019s prediction did come true. Today, most newer smart TVs are made with a built-in microphone and camera. The ostensible reason behind this is for voice commands (such as switching the channel), video calls, facial recognition logins, and camera games. According to Samsung\u2019s smart TV policy, which can be\u00a0read here<\/a>:<\/p>\n

\u201dPlease be aware that if your spoken words include personal or other sensitive information, that information will be among the data captured and transmitted to a third party through your use of Voice Recognition.\u201d<\/p>\n

Samsung later added\u2026 \u201dYou may disable Voice Recognition data collection at any time by visiting the \u201csettings\u201d menu. However, this may prevent you from using all of the Voice Recognition features.\u201d \u2013 Pay the price of privacy, or lose some main features.<\/p>\n

Day also mentions, and this can\u2019t be stressed enough nowadays, that people would become \u201dvery dependent\u201d on television, and I would add modern devices as a whole.\u00a0According to an\u00a0internet trends<\/a>\u00a0study by Bond Capital, the average smartphone user checks their phone 150 times per day. Understandably then, a\u00a02018 study<\/a>\u00a0by Harvard also concluded around 73% of people encounter anxiety issues due to their smartphones.<\/p>\n

Although companies like Apple (who sold their first-ever mac for $666) love to claim that they respect privacy, we can at least resort to the fact that most apps, like Google and Facebook, are continuously gathering data to help with data hoarding and marketing campaigns. Not that this is any revealing news, as revealed by Netflix\u2019s Social Dilemma: \u201dif you\u2019re not paying for the product, you are the product.\u201d<\/p>\n

Day goes further to say that televisions (the closest thing at the time to a modern computer or laptop) \u201dwould be used for purchases\u201d. Since the start of the internet in the \u201960s and \u201980s, companies such as Apple and Amazon have taken to e-commerce, later releasing subsidiary AI technologies such as Alexa and Siri who have sprung to the markets.<\/p>\n

For most of these \u2018assistants\u2019 to work, a continuously active microphone is implanted to know when to hear \u201dhey Siri\u201d or \u201dAlexa\u201d. In response to privacy concerns with authorities, a spokesman said, \u201cAmazon does not disclose customer information in response to government demands unless we\u2019re required to do so to comply with a legally valid and binding order.\u201d<\/p>\n

And in regards to Siri\u2026 the AI \u2018assistant\u2019 was\u00a0seed-funded by DARPA<\/a>\u00a0\u2013 the same government agency responsible for\u00a0long-range missiles<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0death rays<\/a>. Darpa, The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, who work closely with the DoD and the Military, were also responsible for the basic concept of the internet and claim to \u201dmake pivotal investments in breakthrough technologies for national security\u201d.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

New Diseases Will Crop Up<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Claim:\u00a0<\/strong>\u201cHe [Richard Day] said there would be new diseases to appear which had not ever been seen before. Would be very difficult to diagnose and be untreatable \u2014 at least for a long time. No elaboration was made on this, but I remember, not long after hearing this presentation, when I had a puzzling diagnosis to make, I would be wondering, \u201cIs this \u2026 was what he was talking about? Is this a case of what he was talking about?\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201dSome years later, as AIDS ultimately developed, I think AIDS was at least one example of what he was talking about. I now think that AIDS probably was a manufactured disease.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

Today, with Covid-19 apparently on \u2018the rise\u2019, this claim once again seems true. Moreover, the pandemic has served as a huge justification for economic and political changes. As also mentioned by Dr Dunegan, AIDS has served as an example of a hard to treat disease, claiming the lives of tens of millions.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

”Music Will Get Worse”<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Claim:\u00a0<\/strong>\u201cAs regards music, he made a rather straightforward statement like, \u201d Music will get worse .\u201d<\/p>\n

In 1969, Rock music was getting more and more unpleasant. It was interesting just his words the way he expressed it. It would \u201cget worse\u201d\u2026 acknowledging that it was already bad. Lyrics would become more openly sexual.<\/p>\n

No new sugary romantic music would be publicized like that which had been written before that time. All of the old music would be brought back on certain radio stations and records for older people to hear. And all the folks would have sort of their own radio stations to hear.<\/p>\n

Younger people, as it got worse and worse, he seemed to indicate that one group would not hear the other group\u2019s music. Older folks would just refuse to hear the junk that was offered to young people, and the young people would accept the junk because it identified them as their generation and helped them feel distinct from the older generation.<\/p>\n

I remember at the time thinking that would not last very long because even young kids wouldn\u2019t like the junk when they got a chance to hear the older music that was prettier they would gravitate toward it. Unfortunately, I was wrong about that, when the kids get through their teens and into their 20\u2019s some of them improve their taste in music, but unfortunately, he was right.<\/p>\n

They get used to this junk and that\u2019s all they want. A lot of them can\u2019t stand really pretty music. He went on to say that the music would carry a message to the young and nobody would even know the message was there.\u201d [Subliminals messaging]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Since the \u201970s and \u201980s, music has changed dramatically. What was once a steady development in music \u2013 Jazz, Pop, Alternative Rock etc., seems to have taken a U-turn with rising forms of violent music like grime, rap and sexualised pop.<\/p>\n

For\u00a0three weeks<\/a>\u00a0last year, the number one record on the UK charts was WAP \u2013 By Cardi B. The song, whose acronym stood for \u2018Wet Ass P*ssy\u2019, started with:<\/p>\n

\u201dYeah, you fucking with some wet-ass p*ssy
\nBring a bucket and a mop for this wet-ass p*ssy
\nGive me everything you got for this wet-ass p*ssy.\u201d<\/p>\n

Children have also taken the music and similar pieces to TikTok, with the WAP dance becoming a major trend. The trend involved dancing to WAP while humping the floor. Seriously. Unfortunately, if you\u2019re under 18 \u2013 you already knew that.<\/p>\n

As younger generations today continue listening to more demoralizing music, older generations continue to listen to artists like the Beatles and the Eagles. As Richard Day explained, opposing generations would be listening to completely different stations.<\/p>\n

Seeing, reading and hearing things like this (every day now) really does bring Aldous Huxley\u2019s\u00a0Brave New World<\/em>, which included\u00a0sex play<\/em>\u00a0for children, to terrifying proximity.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\"\"
WAP – Music Video by Cardi B<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

Entertainment Will Become More Graphic<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Claim:<\/strong>\u00a0\u201dMovies would gradually be made more explicit as regards sex and language. After all, sex and rough language are real and why pretend that they are not?<\/p>\n

There would be pornographic movies in the theatres, on television. And VCR\u2019s were not around at that time, but he had indicated that these cassettes would be available, and video cassette players would be available for use in the home and pornographic movies would be available for use on these VCRs as well as in the neighborhood theater and on your television. He said something like, \u201cYou\u2019ll see people in the movies doing everything you can think of.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201dHe went on to say that\u2026 and all of this is intended to bring sex out in the open. That was another comment, that was made several times \u2013 the term \u201csex out in the open\u201d.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201dViolence would be made more graphic . This was intended to desensitize people to violence . There might need to be a time when people would witness real violence and be a part of it . Later on it will become clear where this is headed. So there would be more realistic violence in entertainment which would make it easier for people to adjust. People\u2019s attitudes towards death would change and they would not be so fearful of it but more accepting of it, and not be so aghast at the sight of dead people or injured people.<\/p>\n

We don\u2019t need to have a genteel population paralyzed by what they might see. People would just learn to say, \u201cwell, I don\u2019t want that to happen to me\u201d.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Although there was no iPhone or Ipad in 1988, it wouldn\u2019t be wrong to say that is clearly where it was going. In 2019, PornHub\u00a0announced<\/a>\u00a0that they had received over 42 billion visits, averaging over 115 million visitors per day.<\/p>\n

The company wrote: \u2018that\u2019s the equivalent of the populations of Canada, Australia, Poland and the Netherlands all visiting in one day!\u2019<\/p>\n

Gaming has also become increasingly graphic, with games such as GTA V \u2013 a game featuring drugs, terrorism and strippers, becoming a favourite among teenagers. Even seemingly innocent games like Fortnite, have created the image of guns for children at very early ages.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

Suppressing Cancer Cures<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Claim: \u201c<\/strong>We can cure almost every cancer right now. Information is on file in the Rockefeller Institute, if it\u2019s ever decided that it should be released. But consider \u2013 if people stop dying of cancer, how rapidly we would become overpopulated. You may as well die of cancer as something else.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201d<\/strong>Efforts at cancer treatment would be geared more toward comfort than toward cure. There was some statement ultimately the cancer cures which were being hidden in the Rockefeller Institute would come to light because independent researchers might bring them out, despite these efforts to suppress them. But at least for the time being, letting people die of cancer was a good thing to do because it would slow down the problem of overpopulation.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Admittedly, I am no doctor and have little authority on these claims. However, one thing that has puzzled me is the money to progress ratio for cancer.<\/p>\n

In 2019\/20, Cancer Research UK alone\u00a0claimed<\/a>\u00a0to have raised over \u00a3656m, equating billions of pounds each decade in cancer research. Simultaneously, treatment has certainly progressed, but, as for a cure, little progress seems to have been made. Day later mentions that cancer cures would be geared towards comfort treatment, rather than cure which arguably still sounds true.<\/p>\n

Studies by\u00a0Evaluate ltd<\/a>, a pharmacological analytics firm, found that Cancer drugs were among some of the highest profiting drugs on the market, with projections of $236.6 billion by 2024. This would increase the\u00a0worldwide market share to nearly 20 per cent of prescription and over-the-counter drugs.<\/p>\n

Day also made the claim that that the existing cancer cures were hidden in the Rockefeller Institute, now known as Rockefeller University which was founded by Oil Tycoon John D. Rockefeller.<\/p>\n

Rockefeller is also known as one of the\u00a0founding<\/a>\u00a0members of the General Education Board, which since 1902, has had major influence over American medical curriculum, investing over $324m or $12bn inflation-adjusted dollars to American schools and universities.<\/p>\n

Whether any coverup could be found is unrealistic, and for now, can only remain in theory.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\"\"<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

Homosexuality Will Be Promoted<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Claim:<\/strong>\u00a0\u201cHomosexuality also was to be encouraged. \u201dPeople will be given permission to be homosexual.\u201d That\u2019s the way it was stated. They won\u2019t have to hide it. And elderly people will be encouraged to continue to have active sex lives into the very old ages, just as long as they can. Everyone will be given permission to have sex, to enjoy however they want. Anything goes.<\/p>\n

This is the way it was put. And, I remember thinking, how arrogant for this individual, or whoever he represents, to feel that they can give or withhold permission for people to do things!.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u2026\u201dWith the power of propaganda you dare not be against homosexuals, otherwise, you get labeled homophobe.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

This statement has come true, and in ways, benefits both the people and the establishment. Unfortunately, in this context, Day talked about the need for a decrease in the population and greater divisions in society. Since homosexual couples don\u2019t tend to have children (unless adopted), it would be better to have more of them.<\/p>\n

Day\u2019s use of the word \u201cpromoted\u201d is spot on. As woke culture continues to assign people into collective groups of gay, straight, non-binary etc., more divisive societal labels have begun to split people apart. Each year, the LGBT+ community is assigned June as \u2018pride month\u2019, hosting marches to celebrate their sexuality. The effects of this mass self-identity campaign have created more identity division than ever. \u201dI am LGBTQQIAAP2SAA\u201d. Such statements really do show the counterproductivity of \u2018creating equality\u2019.<\/p>\n

Attitudes towards homosexuality have also become more liberal, with the 2019 British Social Attitudes survey claiming: \u201dtwo-thirds now say that sex between two adults of the same sex is \u201cnot wrong at all\u201d, an increase of almost 50 percentage points since the question was first asked in 1983\u201d.<\/p>\n

Perhaps Day\u2019s use of the word \u2018propaganda\u2019 is a harsh way to describe promoting homosexuality, and I would add that there isn\u2019t anything necessarily wrong with homosexual relationships, but Dunegan\u2019s depiction of being labelled \u2018homophobe\u2019 if you challenge the narrative fits perfectly with today\u2019s liberal establishment.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

Clothing Will Become More Seductive<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Claim:<\/strong>\u00a0\u201cClothing styles would be made more stimulating and provocative. Recall back in 1969 was the time of the mini skirt when those mini-skirts were very, very high and revealing. He said, \u201cIt is not just the amount of skin that is exposed that makes clothing sexually seductive, but other, more subtle things are often suggestive,\u201d<\/p>\n

\u2026 \u201cThings like movement, and the cut of clothing, and the kind of fabric, the positioning of accessories on the clothing. \u201cIf a woman has an attractive body, why should she not show it?\u201d was one of the statements. There was no detail on what was meant by \u201cprovocative clothing,\u201d but since that time, if you watched the change in clothing styles, blue jeans are cut in a way that they\u2019re more tight-fitting in the crotch. They form wrinkles. Wrinkles are essentially arrows. Lines, which direct one\u2019s vision to certain anatomic areas.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Achieved loud and clear. I imagine any person born just 50 years ago would be rather surprised by the evolution of provocative fashion, whether good or bad. In the tapes, Lawrence Dunagen describes how at the time \u2013 1988, 20 years after the meeting, this had already been achieved through \u201dtight-fitting\u201d clothes.<\/p>\n

Certainly, 40 years later, clothes have moved from \u201dtight-fitting\u201d wear to crop tops and ripped jeans. These looks are similarly propelled into the media, take a look at any modern-day pop icon and you will find some wildly seductive looks. You could perhaps search up Cardi B\u2019s, 2021 Grammys performance, but dont scream.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

The Family Unit Will Be Dismantled<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Claim:<\/strong>\u00a0\u201cFamilies would be limited in size. We already alluded to not being allowed more than two children. Divorce would be made easier and more prevalent. Most people who marry will marry more than once. More people will not marry. Unmarried people would stay in hotels and even live together. That would be very common \u2013 nobody would even ask questions about it. It would be widely accep<\/span>t<\/span>ed as no different from married people being together.<\/p>\n

More women will work outside the home. More men will be transferred to other cities, and in their jobs, more men would travel. Therefore, it would be harder for families to stay together. This would tend to make the marriage relationship less stable and, therefore, tend to make people less willing to have babies. And, the extended families would be smaller, and more remote.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

According<\/a>\u00a0to the Office of National Statistics, in 1969 \u2013 the time of the meeting, in the UK there was a total of 51,310 divorces. In 1990 ONS figures recorded a total of 153,386. In 2019, those figures dropped to 108,000. Marriages have also\u00a0declined<\/a>,<\/span>\u00a0ranging from around 396,000 in 1996 to 232,000 in 2017.<\/p>\n

Statistics aside, it is pretty clear that attitudes to marriage have changed. Day saying people will \u201cmarry more than once\u201d is becoming seemingly true.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

ID Will Be Widely Required<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Claim:<\/strong>\u00a0People would need permission to travel and they would need a good reason to travel. If you didn\u2019t have a good reason for your travel you would not be allowed to travel, and everyone would need ID.<\/p>\n

This would at first be an ID card you would carry on your person and you must show when you are asked for it. It was already planned that later on some sort of device would be developed to be implanted under the skin that would be coded specifically to identify the individual. This would eliminate the possibility of false ID and also eliminate the possibility of people saying, \u201cWell, I lost my ID.\u201d<\/p>\n

The difficulty about these skin-implanted ID was stated to be getting material that would stay in or under the skin without causing foreign body reaction whereby the body would reject it or cause infection, and that this would have to be material on which information could be recorded and retrieved by some sort of scanner while it was not rejected by the body. Silicon was mentioned.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Arguably, this one seems to be lurking closer and closer. Already, reasonable amounts of ID are required to enter places like hospitals, schools and some businesses. However, with each new terror crisis, like 911, more and more need for Orwellian styles of identification have been implemented to be in place.<\/p>\n

In the transcript above, Dunegan mentions the need for skin-implanted ID\u2019s, something far from the public arena in 1988 and ridiculously far from the original meeting he experienced in 1969.<\/p>\n

Currently, in Sweden, under a company called BioHax, thousands have implanted microchips under the skin of their wrists. The chips are used to replace keys, cash and ID in an attempt to make life easier.<\/p>\n

A question that arises, however, is: is the convenience of opening a door 5 seconds earlier.. (wow!), worth the risk that the technology could be used to create a two-tier culture.<\/p>\n

Already, we\u2019ve seen big tech, the mainstream media and other major corporations ban, kick and limit users from doing certain activities for not conforming with establishment narratives like political correctness. When your data becomes cross-referenced, you can imagine how governments and corporations may begin to abuse their powers. As ID progresses, we may see more and more attempts to single out people who question the establishment.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

Food Production Will Be Tightly Controlled<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Claim:\u00a0<\/strong>\u201cFood supplies would come under tight control. If population growth didn\u2019t slow down, food shortages could be created in a hurry and people would realize the dangers of overpopulation.<\/p>\n

Ultimately, whether the population slows down or not the food supply is to be brought under centralized control so that people would have enough to be well-nourished but they would not have enough to support any fugitive from the new system. In other words, if you had a friend or relative who didn\u2019t sign on.<\/p>\n

And growing ones own food would be outlawed. this would be done under some sort of pretext. In the beginning, I mentioned there were two purposes for everything \u2013 one the ostensible purpose and one the real purpose \u2013 and the ostensible purpose here would be that growing your own vegetables was unsafe, it would spread disease or something like that. So the acceptable idea was to protect the consumer but the real idea was to limit the food supply and growing your food would be illigal.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Day\u2019s explanation of centralised food control springs to mind nowadays with the uprising promotion of \u2018clean meats\u2019, the ostensible label for lab-grown, synthetic meats.<\/p>\n

In an interview with Technology Review, Bill Gates, who has been a major shareholder in synthetic meat companies including Beyond Meats, Carbon Engineering and Impossible Foods, claimed:<\/p>\n

\u201dI do think all rich countries should move to 100% synthetic beef. You can get used to the taste difference, and the claim is they\u2019re going to make it taste even better over time. Eventually, that green premium is modest enough that you can sort of change the [behavior of] people or use regulation to totally shift the demand.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Although synthetic meats are claimed to fight climate change because animals (particularly cows) release methane, the underlying issue is that synthetic meat is not by any means a small business venture. Farmer Jones from around the corner is not going to have a synthetic meat lab in his barn.<\/p>\n

As we push towards synthetic meats, pastoral agriculture could well be hijacked by billion-dollar conglomerates.<\/p>\n

Meat isn\u2019t the only industry at risk of centralised control. Already food as a whole has become very centralised, with most major food products being owned by just a small handful of corporations.<\/p>\n

Imagine you walk into a shop looking for chocolate, and you\u2019re given the wide choice between Snickers, Mars, Twix, M&M\u2019s, Maltesers, Galaxy, Dove, Bounty or Milky Way. The reality is: it doesn\u2019t always matter. All of the above-mentioned chocolates are owned by the same company; Mars Inc. Mars is also responsible for your Whiskas and Pedigree pet food, your Orbit and Spearmint gum, Dolmio sauce, Skittles, Uncle Bens, Starbursts, HubbaWubba and a long list of other consumer products.<\/p>\n

Currently, it is estimated that 10 companies: Nestle, PepsiCo, General Mills, Kelloggs, AssociatedBritishFoods, Mondelez, Mars Inc, Danone, Unilever and Coca-Cola, control a vast majority of consumer products.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\"\"<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

Terrorism Will Increase<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Claim:\u00a0<\/strong>\u201cTerrorism would be used widely in Europe and in other parts of the world. Terrorism at that time was thought would not be necessary in the United States. It could become necessary in the United States if the United States did not move rapidly enough into accepting the system. But at least in the foreseeable future it was not planned. And very benignly on their part.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cMaybe terrorism would not be required here, but the implication being that it would be indeed used if it was necessary. Along with this came a bit of a scolding that Americans had had it too good anyway and just a little bit of terrorism would help convince Americans that the world is indeed a dangerous place \u2026 or can be if we don\u2019t relinquish control to the proper authorities.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

In 1988, the same year Dunegan released these tapes, terrorist group Al Queda was founded by Osama Bin Laden during the Soviet-Afgan war. Later in 1994, the Taliban of Afganistan was found, and shortly after in 1999, the Islamic State of Iraq came to life. Since then, countless other terror groups have come to life such as Boko Haram of Nigeria and Al-Shabaab of Somalia.<\/p>\n

Day\u2019s vision of increasing terrorism in Europe and the West has also become reality with major attacks such as 911, Manchester Arena, the Westminster attacks, the Berlin attacks, and the Paris attacks creating mass panic globally.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

Money Will Become Cashless<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Claim: \u201c<\/strong>It would be a single banking system . [It] may have the appearance of being more than one but ultimately and basically it would be one single banking system, so that when you got paid your pay would be entered for you into your account balance and then when you purchased anything at the point of purchase it would be deducted from your account balance and you would actually carry\u00a0n<\/span>o<\/span>thing with you.<\/p>\n

Also computer records can be kept on whatever it was you purchased so that if you were purchasing too much of any particular item and some official wanted to know what you were doing with your money they could go back and review your purchases and determine what you were buying. There was a statement that any purchase of significant size like an automobile, bicycle, a refrigerator, a radio or television or whatever might have some sort of identification on it so it could be traced, so that very quickly anything which was either given away or stolen \u2013 whatever \u2013 authorities would be able to establish who purchased it and when. Computers would allow this to happen.<\/p>\n

And also if you began to show a pattern of saving too much, you might have your pay cut. We would say, \u201cWell, you\u2019re saving instead of spending. You really don\u2019t need all that money.\u201d That basically the idea being to prevent people from accumulating any wealth which might have long range disruptive influence on the system.<\/p>\n

\u201dElectronic payments initially would all be based on different kinds of credit cards\u2026 these were already in use in 1969 to some extent. Not as much as now. But people would have credit cards with the electronic strip on it and once they got used to that then it would be pointed out the advantage of having all of that combined into a single credit card, serving a single monetary system and then they won\u2019t have to carry around all that plastic\u2026<\/p>\n

So the next step would be the single card and then the next step would be to replace the single card with a skin implant. The single card could be lost or stole, give rise to problems; could be exchanged with somebody else to confuse identify. The skin implant on the other hand would be not loseable or counterfeitable or transferrable to another person so you and your accounts would be identified without any possibility of error. And the skin implants would have to be put some place that would be convenient to the skin; for example, your right hand or your forehead.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

I went to get a haircut recently, and when offered a \u00a320 note, the barber said, \u201dsorry, we don\u2019t accept cash anymore\u201d. A pitiful disgrace. Throughout the pandemic (surprise, surprise), the push towards a cashless society has progressed swiftly with the announced claim that cashless will help bring ends to the pandemic.<\/p>\n

According<\/a>\u00a0to LINK, the UK\u2019s largest ATM network, during 2020, 75% of people were using less cash and a further 54% were completely avoiding it.<\/p>\n

Currently, Sweden is leading the game to a fully cashless society. In 2012, Sweden\u2019s biggest 6 banks collaborated to create\u00a0Swish,\u00a0<\/em>a digital payments app that could be used for purchases, and money transactions.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

\u2018As cash usage declines, almost all consumer payments in shops are now made by card. This market is completely dominated by Visa and Mastercard and much of the infrastructure is located outside Sweden\u2019s borders. Unlike Norway and Denmark, Sweden has no card network of its own.\u2019<\/em>\u00a0\u2013 Riksbank (central bank of Sweden)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n