{"id":173960,"date":"2023-07-02T09:18:34","date_gmt":"2023-07-02T13:18:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=173960"},"modified":"2023-07-02T09:25:39","modified_gmt":"2023-07-02T13:25:39","slug":"a-shocking-analysis-of-election-night-reporting-and-the-companies-that-manufacture-election-results","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=173960","title":{"rendered":"

A Shocking Analysis of Election Night Reporting and the Companies that Manufacture Election Results<\/span><\/b><\/h2>"},"content":{"rendered":"

By Guest Contributor
\nGATEWAY PUNDIT<\/p>\n

This article originally appeared on JoeHoft.com <\/a><\/i>and was republished with permission.<\/i><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/h4>\n

US Election reporting is dependent on a few suspicious companies that provide results that are arguably manufactured.\u00a0<\/strong><\/h4>\n

Post by Erin and David Clements<\/strong><\/p>\n

The number of Americans who believe Biden did not legitimately win the 2020 election has\u00a0grown to 62 percent<\/u><\/a>, with another 6 percent who say they don\u2019t know if he won or not. \u00a0An enormous mountain of evidence, including whistleblower testimony, expert analysis, or proven machine vulnerabilities has awakened a huge majority of American voters to the realization that our elections are largely rigged.<\/p>\n

As independent analysts and auditors improve their understanding of the centralization of election system architecture, the evidence revealed during the initial aftermath of November 3, 2020, is taking on new and vital importance.\u00a0 Case in point, millions of Americans that watched election results witnessed impossible changes to their vote tallies.\u00a0 Millions saw the \u201cF-Curves\u201d demonstrating an inexplicable injection of hundreds of thousands of votes in key races across the country.\u00a0 The F-Curve has come to represent rigged elections and corruption.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

A trusting public relies on \u201cElection Night Reporting\u201d or \u201cENR\u201d to find out who won on election night. But ENR broadcast on election night is not a report of real tallies but a tool to shape perceptions about election results. What was reported on television was perceived as reality and races were called by the media \u2013 outcomes that that any political or judicial institution was loath to challenge after the fact for fear of media bullying.<\/p>\n

Election Night Reporting is another smoking gun that proves our elections are centrally manipulated.<\/p>\n

Sources of Election Night Reporting Data<\/strong><\/h3>\n

There are several places to find ENR data.\u00a0 All secretaries of state (SOSs) report results on their websites and some counties join in reporting efforts. But the real powerhouse in election night reporting comes from a foreign owned, Spain-based company, called Scytl.<\/p>\n

Scytl collects all state ENR data and provides it to Edison Research.\u00a0 Edison works in tandem with all the legacy news agencies that televise election results.\u00a0 The vote tracking features you see on the bottom of the screen during an election on Fox and CNN all come from Scytl-Edison.\u00a0 \u00a0Two corporate entities with no Congressional oversight, one with foreign ownership\u2014have a monopoly on what the public sees on election night.<\/p>\n

This self-evident national security threat wasn\u2019t lost on the media during the Trump administration.\u00a0\u00a0The Guardian warned<\/u><\/a> of the threat posed by Scytl having total control of ENR, and Dominion Voting Systems possessing a near monopoly on tabulation. Those concerns, however, evaporated after Joe Biden was installed.<\/p>\n

The Fraud Curve<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Examples of ENR anomalies include one viewer noticing an exact 19,958 vote switch from Trump to Biden that occurred in Pennsylvania, and another observing 351,000\u00a0votes disappearing<\/u> in the vote totals during the recall election of California governor, Gavin Newsom.<\/p>\n

\n
\n

But what became the most famous and unexplainable ENR phenomenon were the datasets showing thousands of votes being injected for one candidate, while simultaneously showing a negligible or nonexistent increase for the other candidate.\u00a0 This became known as the \u201cF- Curve\u201d or \u201cFraud Curve\u201d in election integrity circles because of the shape the curves made in the plot of total votes for each candidate over the election count:<\/p>\n

\"\"
\u201cF \u2013 Curve\u201d or \u201cFraud Curve\u201d appearing on a plot of cumulative votes for the 2020 Presidential Race in Wisconsin from\u00a0this article<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Unsurprisingly, after the F-Curve materialized in the ENR datasets, the losing candidate would leap ahead to victory \u2013 typically in the middle of the night.\u00a0 The swing states of Wisconsin, Michigan, Georgia, and Pennsylvania all exhibited an F-Curve after each had stopped counting at around 10 pm on November 3, 2020.<\/p>\n

At the TCF Center in Detroit for example, Michigan, surveillance video showed\u00a0a white van delivering thousands of ballots<\/u> in the middle of the night, well after the delivery deadline, at the same time an F-Curve showed up in Michigan\u2019s ENR data.<\/p>\n