Why does that matter? Because agencies are run by unelected, government bureaucrats who are beholden to nobody but the person who appointed them.\u00a0They don\u2019t care what the voters think or want or don\u2019t want.\u00a0They don\u2019t need to care.\u00a0They don\u2019t need your vote to stay in power.\u00a0They only have to appease the politician(s) who appointed them.\u00a0If they just follow the yellow brick road, they will land on the other side of the rainbow.<\/p>\n
Shockingly, some legislators are okay with this, because it allows them to escape any sort of responsibility or blame for an unpopular (or illegal) rule that is implemented by the bureaucrats sitting in the agencies (you know, the ones with no accountability to us voters). But, legislators should not only care, they should actively work to stop the Administrative State, because not only do many of these \u201cregulations\u201d usurp a legislator\u2019s law-making power, but they are wholly unconstitutional!<\/p>\n
You will remember from grade school Social Studies class that our government is comprised of three, co-equal branches: the Legislative branch (senators and assemblymembers who make our laws), the Executive branch (governors and the president who are supposed to enforce our laws), and the Judicial branch (judges and courts which adjudicate our laws). Each branch has its own powers and authorities, as bestowed upon them by our Constitution. Any power that is not delineated in our Constitution is reserved for the people. Remember my long-uttered phrase that, the Constitution was written to keep the government in check, not to keep we the people in check!<\/p>\n
There is no fourth branch of government. There is no branch called the Administrative State. There is no authority in the Constitution to have agencies that make rules\/regulations that employ the force of law. And yet, we see at the federal level as well as at the state level, Executive branches that are chock full of bloated, power-hungry agencies that have given themselves an astonishing amount of never-authorized-by-the-people power. In many cases, those powers are unconstitutional, meaning the agency did not have the authority to make the rule or do the thing they are doing (or trying to do).<\/p>\n
Let me give you a few real-life scenarios so it\u2019s easier to digest.<\/p>\n
For starters,\u00a0my quarantine camp lawsuit<\/a>\u00a0is a perfect example.\u00a0For those not familiar with this case, what happened there is that the NYS Department of Health (DOH) issued an \u201cIsolation & Quarantine Procedures<\/em>\u201d regulation.\u00a0The head of the DOH is a commissioner who is appointed by the Governor.\u00a0Everyone that works for the DOH is unelected. They do not need to listen to voters wants and needs. Quite presumably, if the Commissioner or any of the government workers below him don\u2019t do the bidding of their \u201cboss,\u201d then their days at the DOH would surely be limited.<\/p>\n So, what happened in my quarantine case is that the DOH created a wholly unconstitutional regulation (Rule 2.13) that allowed them to pick and choose which New Yorkers they could lock up or lock down.\u00a0 That could have been forced isolation in your home, or they could have removed you from your home and put you into a quarantine facility of\u00a0their<\/em>\u00a0choosing.\u00a0For however long\u00a0they<\/em>\u00a0wanted. With no notice. With no right to an attorney until after you were locked up. With no procedure for you to regain your freedom once you were incarcerated.<\/p>\n There was no age restriction, so they could have taken you, your child, your grandchild\u2026 And they didn\u2019t even have to prove that you were sick, or that you had even been exposed to a communicable disease! Guilty until proven innocent.<\/p>\n The DOH gave themselves this phenomenal power. If that is unclear what I mean there, I will explain. The DOH wanted this unbridled power to be able to control 19 million New Yorkers with the stroke of a pen, but the NYS Legislature wouldn\u2019t give it to them in the form of failed Assembly bill A416 (because the legislators knew it would be political suicide). So, the DOH simply made Rule 2.13 and gave themselves the power they wanted, anyway.\u00a0No legislative consent given.\u00a0No voter input had.\u00a0Zilch.\u00a0A clear breach of Separation of Powers.\u00a0A clear affront on our Constitution.\u00a0A perfect example of the \u201cRegulation Nation\u201d as run by an Administrative State.<\/p>\n This was the most unconstitutional regulation I had ever read in my 25 years of practicing law. It was an attack on the very basis of our freedom, and a dangerous chipping away at the bedrock of our free society\u2026a government by the people, and for the people. Without question, I knew I had to stop it.<\/p>\n So, I sued Hochul and her DOH on behalf of a group of NYS legislators (Senator George Borrello, Assemblyman Chris Tague, Congressman Mike Lawler) together with a citizens\u2019 group called\u00a0Uniting NYS<\/a>.\u00a0Our argument was clear: the DOH does not possess the power to make a law, and this was surely a law, despite the fact that they called it a regulation or rule.\u00a0It conflicted with the Constitution. It conflicted with NYS law.\u00a0As Assemblyman Tague said at a press conference we held when we first filed our lawsuit in 2022:<\/p>\n This policy\u2019s aim to forcibly isolate law-abiding citizens is reminiscent of actions taken by some of the ugliest tyrannical regimes history has ever known. It has no place standing as law here in New York, let alone anywhere in the United States. Policies as dangerous as this should be debated and scrutinized in a public setting by elected representatives, not quietly slinked through regulatory approvals.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n In July 2022, the Judge ruled in our favor and struck down this stunning display of tyranny.\u00a0You can read that decision\u00a0here<\/a>. Of course Hochul and Attorney General Letitia James appealled the court\u2019s decision so they could try to get back that heinous power. In November of 2023, the appellate court\u00a0dismissed our case<\/a>\u00a0for lack of standing (a true dodging of the merits of a lawsuit if I ever saw one). So, now I am appealing that calamitous decision to the Court of Appeals (our State\u2019s highest court).<\/p>\n I have done numerous interviews about my quarantine lawsuit and this \u201cRegulation Nation\u201d phenomenon, and you can access some of those on my website,\u00a0www.CoxLawyers.com.<\/a>\u00a0One such interview was with Steve Gruber on\u00a0America\u2019s Voice Live,\u00a0<\/em>and can be accessed\u00a0HERE<\/a>.<\/p>\n Republished from the author\u2019s\u00a0Substack<\/a><\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/brownstone.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/image-41.png\")
<\/figure>\n\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/brownstone.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/image-42-800x434.png\")
<\/figure>\n