![\"\"](\"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Frank-Remington-Dane-County-Circuit-Court-Judge-1024x700-1.jpg\")
Jim Fetzer, Ph.D.<\/a><\/h2>\nWisconsin Dane County Judge Remington rips due process in Sandy Hook appeal:\u00a0<\/u>Calls Wisconsin law \u201cfactually and legally\u201d not applicable in\u00a0litigation!<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\nDenies State of Connecticut Emergency Management website is judicially recognizable evidence on its face<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\nJune 26, 2024<\/strong>\u2013James Fetzer, PhD, University of Minnesota Professor Emeritus, was sued for defamation for his 425-page book\u00a0\u201cNobody Died at Sandy Hook: It was a FEMA Drill to Promote Gun Control\u201d<\/em>\u00a0(3015; 2nd ed., 2016), the redacted edition of which can now be downloaded from Fetzer\u2019s blog.<\/a>\u00a0For background, try reading Kevin Barrett\u2019s masterpiece,\u00a0\u201cThe Legal Lynching of a Truth-Seeker: Jim Fetzer\u2019s Stalinist-Style Show Trial (Expanded)\u201d.<\/a>\u00a0Be prepared to be disillusioned regarding your expectations of what to expert from a court of law (in this case, in Madison, WI).<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/jameshfetzer.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Hook-Redacted-Edition-Cover-300x192.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
Download the book to your computer here:\u00a0NobodyDiedAtSandyHookExpandedRevised_Redacted<\/a><\/em><\/h6>\nIn the litigation that ensued, Judge Remington divided the case into two parts. Remington summarily convicted Fetzer\u00a0without a jury trial<\/em>\u00a0on summary judgment (no jury trial on the facts). Then, he convened a damages jury that ordered Fetzer to pay $450,000 in punitive damages.\u00a0New information warranting the reopening of the case has come to light that caused Professor Fetzer to file to have the judgment set aside.<\/a><\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/jameshfetzer.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/L-366-1-261x300.jpg\")
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/jameshfetzer.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/L-366-3-300x191.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
Extrinsic Fraud occurs when false claims are made about events outside the courtroom. Fraud upon the Court occurs when Officers of the Court, such as the Pozner attorneys and (believe it or not) the presiding judge, allow an extrinsic fraud to be treated as though it were a real event and thereby bias the proceedings. Among Dr. Fetzer\u2019s claims is new evidence of extrinsic fraud, including a FEMA education calendar for\u00a0the FEMA L-366 \u201ccourse\u201d, entitled \u201cPlanning for the Needs of Children in Disasters\u201d,<\/a>\u00a0which was managed from Bridgeport, CT just 18 miles from Newtown CT.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/jameshfetzer.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Rules-of-Civil-Procedure-1--300x87.jpg\")
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/jameshfetzer.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Rules-of-Civil-Procedure-2--300x64.png\")
<\/p>\n
Judicial procedure requires that a Motion by one party be submitted for RESPONSE by the other party and then a REPLY by the originating party. Judge Remington, however, has just denied the new Fetzer petition without requiring the Plaintiff to answer and no opportunity for Fetzere to reply:\u00a0 no hearing, no nothing. Instead he hand wrote the following: \u201cDENIED. \u201cNeither factually or legally meritorious.\u201d Notice he signed (in his own handwriting) even though the Wisconsin Rules of Civil Procedure DEMAND that Dr. Fetzer\u2019s Request for Relief be put on the docket and handled in accordance with the law. The Judge himself is not following the law.<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/jameshfetzer.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Request-for-Relief-DENIED-24-June-2024-250x300.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
Remarkably, the Fetzer motion\u00a0cited Wisconsin and US law on\u00a0<\/strong>summary judgment, due process, and fraud<\/strong>\u00a0as proofs that a judge must follow due process and\u00a0is not permitted to act as both judge and jury.\u00a0<\/strong>Professor Fetzer merely asked that the case proceed. Who does Judge Remington work for? Evidently not\u00a0We The People<\/em>. Judges are only supposed to apply the law, not decide the facts. But, in this case, Judge Remington proclaimed Dr. Fetzer\u2019s new evidence\u2013including proof of Extrinsic Fraud\u2013to be factually incorrect, even though it is judicially recognizable evidence from the State of Connecticut Division of Emergency Management and Homeland Security. Dr. Fetzer intends to appeal.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/jameshfetzer.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/moonrockbooks.com_-1-300x173.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
Jim Fetzer, Ph.D.,<\/strong>\u00a0a former Marine Corps officer, is\u00a0Distinguished McKnight University Professor on the Duluth Campus of the University of Minnesota<\/a>. He has 40 books, including 24 on traditional scholarly subjects (such as the theoretical foundations of scientific knowledge, of computer science, of cognitive science, and on evolution and mentality) and 12+ in the area of conspiracy research, where amazon.com has banned six of his books\u2013and not because the collaborative research has has published there was wrong but to keep these revelations from becoming well known. The law has been weaponized to insure that does not happen.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
Denies State of Connecticut Emergency Management website is judicially recognizable evidence on its face<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n June 26, 2024<\/strong>\u2013James Fetzer, PhD, University of Minnesota Professor Emeritus, was sued for defamation for his 425-page book\u00a0\u201cNobody Died at Sandy Hook: It was a FEMA Drill to Promote Gun Control\u201d<\/em>\u00a0(3015; 2nd ed., 2016), the redacted edition of which can now be downloaded from Fetzer\u2019s blog.<\/a>\u00a0For background, try reading Kevin Barrett\u2019s masterpiece,\u00a0\u201cThe Legal Lynching of a Truth-Seeker: Jim Fetzer\u2019s Stalinist-Style Show Trial (Expanded)\u201d.<\/a>\u00a0Be prepared to be disillusioned regarding your expectations of what to expert from a court of law (in this case, in Madison, WI).<\/p>\n In the litigation that ensued, Judge Remington divided the case into two parts. Remington summarily convicted Fetzer\u00a0without a jury trial<\/em>\u00a0on summary judgment (no jury trial on the facts). Then, he convened a damages jury that ordered Fetzer to pay $450,000 in punitive damages.\u00a0New information warranting the reopening of the case has come to light that caused Professor Fetzer to file to have the judgment set aside.<\/a><\/p>\n Extrinsic Fraud occurs when false claims are made about events outside the courtroom. Fraud upon the Court occurs when Officers of the Court, such as the Pozner attorneys and (believe it or not) the presiding judge, allow an extrinsic fraud to be treated as though it were a real event and thereby bias the proceedings. Among Dr. Fetzer\u2019s claims is new evidence of extrinsic fraud, including a FEMA education calendar for\u00a0the FEMA L-366 \u201ccourse\u201d, entitled \u201cPlanning for the Needs of Children in Disasters\u201d,<\/a>\u00a0which was managed from Bridgeport, CT just 18 miles from Newtown CT.<\/p>\n Judicial procedure requires that a Motion by one party be submitted for RESPONSE by the other party and then a REPLY by the originating party. Judge Remington, however, has just denied the new Fetzer petition without requiring the Plaintiff to answer and no opportunity for Fetzere to reply:\u00a0 no hearing, no nothing. Instead he hand wrote the following: \u201cDENIED. \u201cNeither factually or legally meritorious.\u201d Notice he signed (in his own handwriting) even though the Wisconsin Rules of Civil Procedure DEMAND that Dr. Fetzer\u2019s Request for Relief be put on the docket and handled in accordance with the law. The Judge himself is not following the law.<\/p>\n Remarkably, the Fetzer motion\u00a0cited Wisconsin and US law on\u00a0<\/strong>summary judgment, due process, and fraud<\/strong>\u00a0as proofs that a judge must follow due process and\u00a0is not permitted to act as both judge and jury.\u00a0<\/strong>Professor Fetzer merely asked that the case proceed. Who does Judge Remington work for? Evidently not\u00a0We The People<\/em>. Judges are only supposed to apply the law, not decide the facts. But, in this case, Judge Remington proclaimed Dr. Fetzer\u2019s new evidence\u2013including proof of Extrinsic Fraud\u2013to be factually incorrect, even though it is judicially recognizable evidence from the State of Connecticut Division of Emergency Management and Homeland Security. Dr. Fetzer intends to appeal.<\/p>\n Jim Fetzer, Ph.D.,<\/strong>\u00a0a former Marine Corps officer, is\u00a0Distinguished McKnight University Professor on the Duluth Campus of the University of Minnesota<\/a>. He has 40 books, including 24 on traditional scholarly subjects (such as the theoretical foundations of scientific knowledge, of computer science, of cognitive science, and on evolution and mentality) and 12+ in the area of conspiracy research, where amazon.com has banned six of his books\u2013and not because the collaborative research has has published there was wrong but to keep these revelations from becoming well known. The law has been weaponized to insure that does not happen.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n <\/p>\n<\/p>\nDownload the book to your computer here:\u00a0NobodyDiedAtSandyHookExpandedRevised_Redacted<\/a><\/em><\/h6>\n
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n