\nby J.D. Tuccille<\/span><\/p>\n
Technocrats running the Great Panic of 2020
\nare taking every advantage to drive
\ntoward Technocracy and scientific dictatorship.
\nSurveillance is a key component
\nbecause monitoring provides the input
\nfor social engineering programs…<\/h3>\n
![\"\"](\"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Screen-Shot-2020-08-08-at-2.57.37-PM.png\")
<\/p>\n
A Pandemic of Surveillance<\/b><\/p>\n
Americans are increasingly monitored, and <\/span>COVID-19<\/span><\/a> health concerns aren\u2019t improving the situation.<\/span> While it documents intrusions that predate the current crisis, the <\/span>Atlas of Surveillance<\/span><\/a> is all too relevant to the age of coronavirus.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Concerns about curtailing contagion help to normalize detailed scrutiny of people’s lives and drive us toward a pervasive surveillance state.<\/span><\/p>\n “The <\/span>Atlas of Surveillance<\/span><\/i> database, containing several thousand data points on over 3,000 city and local police departments and sheriffs’ offices nationwide, allows citizens, journalists, and academics to review details about the technologies police are deploying, and provides a resource to check what devices and systems have been purchased locally,” EFF <\/span>announced<\/span><\/a> on July 13.<\/span><\/p>\n Users can click on the map to see what surveillance technologies are used in specified localities.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n If you want to see what’s going on in your area, the map is searchable by the name of a city, county, or state. The map can also be filtered according to technologies such as,<\/span><\/p>\n body-worn cameras, drones, and automated license plate readers…<\/span><\/p>\n The nearest entry to me is in Prescott Valley, Arizona, where the police department is <\/span>among the hundreds<\/span><\/a> that have partnered with <\/span>Ring<\/span><\/a>, the Amazon-owned doorbell-camera company.<\/span><\/p>\n The <\/span>Ring<\/span><\/i> partnerships<\/span><\/a> don’t give police live feeds, but they can request video recordings regarding a specific time and area.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n While participation by <\/span>Ring<\/span><\/i> customers is voluntary, the partnerships are,<\/span><\/p>\n “a clever workaround for the development of a wholly new surveillance network, without the kind of scrutiny that would happen if it was coming from the police or government,” warns Andrew Guthrie Ferguson, a professor at the University of the District of Columbia’s David A. Clarke School of Law and author of <\/span>The Rise of Big Data Policing<\/span><\/i><\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n Researchers <\/span>find few crimes solved<\/span><\/a> by the voluntary surveillance partnerships, but the home-security marketing of the <\/span>Ring<\/span><\/i> arrangement nudges the culture toward an easier acceptance of a panopticon that operates outside of the full range of civil liberties protections.<\/span><\/p>\n Also easing America’s slide toward a full surveillance state is <\/span>fear<\/b> of the COVID-19 ‘pandemic<\/span><\/a>‘<\/span>…<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Public health officials who, just months ago, fretted about <\/span>overcoming privacy concerns<\/span><\/a> with regard to contact-tracing schemes have turned to governments’ usual solution:\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n threatening harsh penalties for noncompliance…<\/span><\/p>\n “Travelers from certain states landing at New York airports starting Tuesday could face a $2,000 fine for failing to fill out a form that state officials will use to track travelers and ensure they’re following quarantine restrictions,” AP <\/span>reported<\/span><\/a> this week.<\/span><\/p>\n Mandatory tracking forms for travelers to <\/span>New York<\/span><\/i> follow on <\/span>Rockland County’s earlier efforts<\/span><\/a> to compel cooperation with contact tracers.<\/span><\/p>\n “Commissioner of Health Dr. Patricia Schnabel Ruppert urged residents to comply with the Department of Health’s contact tracing efforts and threatened those who do not comply with subpoenas and $2,000 per day fines,” the county <\/span>announced<\/span><\/a> on July 1.<\/span><\/p>\n We can hope that health-related snooping into people’s movements and activities will come to an end when the pandemic passes, but these things have a way of getting embedded in the culture as people become accustomed to them.<\/span><\/p>\n In the name of controlling infection, many private companies are now <\/span>closely monitoring employees<\/span><\/a>, including their proximity to one another in the workplace.<\/span><\/p>\n “Privacy advocates warn the tracing apps are a slippery slope toward ‘normalizing’ an unprecedented new level of employer surveillance,” <\/span>notes<\/span><\/a> Politico<\/span><\/i>.<\/span><\/p>\n “Aggressive expansion of surveillance programs without adequate checks could normalize privacy intrusions and create systems that may later be used for various forms of political and social repression,” <\/span>frets<\/span><\/a> Freedom House<\/span><\/i>.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n That novel invasions of privacy which might once have set off alarms can become <\/span>the new normal<\/span><\/i> is clear from public-private surveillance partnerships of the sort that <\/span>Ring<\/span><\/i> developed with police departments.\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n After the Supreme Court ruled that police need a warrant to access cellphone location data in <\/span>Carpenter v. United States (2018)<\/span><\/i><\/a>, law enforcement quickly started purchasing data from private marketing firms.<\/span><\/p>\n “The Trump administration has bought access to a commercial database that maps the movements of millions of cellphones in America and is using it for immigration and border enforcement,” the <\/span>Wall Street Journal<\/span><\/i> reported<\/span><\/a> earlier this year.\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n “Experts say the information amounts to one of the largest known troves of bulk data being deployed by law enforcement in the U.S. – and that the use appears to be on firm legal footing because the government buys access to it from a commercial vendor.”<\/span><\/p>\n In a growing trend, other agencies, including the <\/span>FBI<\/span><\/a> and the <\/span>IRS<\/span><\/a>, have also turned to private sources to monitor social media posts and track cellphone movements.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n The new surveillance technique is quickly becoming widely established.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Likewise, even after COVID-19 fades to an unpleasant memory, we may find that it has left a legacy of intrusive monitoring of our whereabouts and social connections – all for our own good, we’ll be told.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n For now, the growing incidence of public health surveillance is too new and low-tech to be included in the <\/span>Atlas of Surveillance<\/span><\/i>, which is plenty full as it is.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Selecting “automated license plate readers” reveals dense clusters in California, and in urban areas and along major highways elsewhere.<\/span><\/p>\n Clicking on “drones” reveals that they monitor much of the country – especially east of the Mississippi River and along the West Coast – from the sky.<\/span><\/p>\n A look at “face recognition technology” shows that it is especially popular in Florida and around Washington, D.C.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>Pandemic maps are all the rage, these days, but the latest one from the <\/span>Electronic Frontier Foundation<\/span><\/i> (EFF) is a little different; instead of viral hotspots, it displays a <\/span>plague of official <\/span><\/i>snoopiness<\/i><\/b>, arranged by location and sortable by technology.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n