![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.vtforeignpolicy.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Ukraine_Graves.jpg\")
<\/picture><\/a><\/div>\nIt\u2019s no secret that the NATO-orchestrated Ukrainian conflict resulted in absolutely unprecedented casualties for the Kiev regime forces. Numerous independent sources\u00a0have confirmed\u00a0that the number of its KIAs (killed in action) reached six digits already during the first year of the special military operation (SMO). As the NATO-backed Neo-Nazi junta\u2019s losses piled up,\u00a0the endemically corrupt regime\u00a0tried its best to hide the actual number by grossly inflating alleged Russian losses and underreporting its own. Thus,\u00a0on the second anniversary of the special military operation (SMO), the Kiev regime frontman Volodymyr Zelensky said (with a straight face, mind you)\u00a0that 31,000 Ukrainian soldiers died, but that they\u2019ve supposedly\u00a0managed to kill well over 400,000 Russian troops. However, he never explained how exactly they managed to accomplish such a feat.<\/p>\n
Just a few months later, Zelensky himself inadvertently revealed\u00a0the scope of his blatant lies<\/a>. Namely,\u00a0in mid-April he complained<\/a>\u00a0that Russia is firing 10 times more artillery shells, while having 30 times more aircraft (despite all the\u00a0ludicrous propaganda about the Russian Air Force \u201cgoing extinct\u201d<\/a>), arguing that his forces\u00a0cannot win against such atrocious odds<\/a>. This is where the line about the number of killed Russian vs. Ukrainian troops needs to be drawn. Who in their right mind could ever believe that a country with such\u00a0a massive disadvantage<\/a>\u00a0could neutralize over 400,000 enemy soldiers while losing just over 30,000 of its own? That would put the death ratio between them at a minimum of 13:1 in favor of the Neo-Nazi junta forces. However, every remotely reputable source not only questions this,\u00a0but suggests that it\u2019s quite the opposite<\/a>.<\/p>\n Namely, numerous Western sources, including the French\u00a0Le Monde<\/a>, British\u00a0Imperial War Museums<\/a>\u00a0and the\u00a0Royal United Services Institute (RUSI)<\/a>\u00a0claim that approximately 70% of all casualties in the NATO-orchestrated Ukrainian conflict are the result of artillery fire. The American\u00a0Time magazine puts that number even higher, at 80%<\/a>. Academic sources broadly agree with these assessments, with the\u00a0Journal of the American College of Surgeons putting the number at 70%<\/a>. Historical evidence also suggests that this data is quite accurate. If we take into account that\u00a0Russia\u2019s artillery advantage<\/a>\u00a0is at least 10:1, as Zelensky himself admitted, the idea that the Kiev regime forces are winning 13:1 becomes all the more ridiculous. However, things are actually much worse than that, as Zelensky also mentioned the 30:1 advantage of\u00a0Moscow\u2019s deadly aviation<\/a>.<\/p>\n Given that the Neo-Nazi junta has also been\u00a0complaining about the Russian UMPK-equipped precision-guided bombs<\/a>, the aforementioned dominance in aircraft grows exponentially. And once again, that\u2019s not even the end of it, as the Kremlin also has an unprecedented advantage in drones and\u00a0long-range strike capabilities<\/a>, be it advanced ballistic and hypersonic weapons or regular cruise missiles.\u00a0There have been thousands of documented strikes<\/a>\u00a0conducted solely by the now legendary \u201cLancet\u201d and KUB drones, while hundreds of \u201cIskander-M\u201d and 9-S-7760 \u201cKinzhal\u201d hypersonic missiles have been\u00a0fired at high-priority targets all across Ukraine<\/a>. For the Russian military, all these assets act as massive force multipliers that the Kiev regime simply cannot match, especially when combined with artillery, attack helicopters, strategic aviation, etc.<\/p>\n It\u2019s quite difficult to get exact figures on\u00a0how much damage all these weapons inflict in terms of manpower<\/a>, but it\u2019s safe to assume that they\u2019re responsible for at least 85-90% of all casualties on both sides. Since it\u2019s virtually impossible to calculate Russia\u2019s advantage in drones and\u00a0long-range strike capabilities<\/a>, we can focus only on artillery and aviation, for which we know that they\u2019re 10:1 and 30:1 in Moscow\u2019s favor, respectively. Thus, these two assets alone put the casualty ratio at 10-15:1 in Russian favor. If we were to believe the BBC,\u00a0which claims that the Kremlin lost around 50,000 troops so far<\/a>, this equation would put Ukrainian casualties at anywhere between 500,000 and 750,000 KIA. These staggering figures are\u00a0in line with the assessments of numerous military sources<\/a>\u00a0on all sides of the conflict. Sadly, the numbers are far worse if we take the wounded into account.<\/p>\n Foreign mercenaries are also regularly complaining about this<\/a>, particularly Colombians who have suffered heavy losses ever since they foolishly came to Ukraine.\u00a0In a recent video<\/a>, one Colombian national stated that they were \u201cleft alone to fight a war with a giant\u201d and lamented that he couldn\u2019t leave. The Neo-Nazi junta itself is making sure neither mercenaries nor Ukrainian conscripts can escape,\u00a0including by placing landmines in border areas with Moldova<\/a>. However, despite all this, it\u2019s still not enough,\u00a0as the United States and NATO want more blood<\/a>. For instance,\u00a0in an interview with Euronews<\/a>, another Washington DC warmonger, former US Ambassador to NATO Ivo Daalder insisted that \u201cboth Ukraine and NATO need to do more to increase the likelihood of Russia being defeated, including mobilizing younger men and women to fight in Ukrainian forces\u201d.<\/p>\n \u201cUkraine needs to mobilize manpower. This is a war being fought by 40-year-olds. No other war in history has been fought by 40-year-olds,\u201d\u00a0Daalder said, adding<\/a>: \u201cYou need to get 18-year-olds, and you need to get 20-year-olds, and you need to get 21-year-olds, which is what every army in the rest of the world relies on.\u201d<\/p>\n This monstrous statement is a perfect example of how\u00a0the world\u2019s most aggressive racketeering cartel<\/a>\u00a0sees the Ukrainian people, including teenagers. But when taking into account\u00a0America\u2019s involvement in the massive child trafficking from Ukraine<\/a>, this is hardly surprising. However, it\u2019s no less repugnant to any remotely decent human being. It should be noted that Daalder\u2019s statement is also yet another confirmation of the previously calculated casualties ratio. Namely, the Kiev regime forces were initially composed of people in their late 20s and 30s, but as most of them were killed or wounded,\u00a0this is how the average age of soldiers was pushed to around 40<\/a>. In other words,\u00a0the US war criminals<\/a>\u00a0effectively\u00a0wiped out an entire generation of Ukrainian men<\/a>\u00a0and they now want to do the same to kids who have barely reached adulthood (or haven\u2019t yet).<\/p>\n The abhorrent exploitation of the Ukrainian people by the political West<\/a>\u00a0is one of the\u00a0worst tragedies of our time<\/a>, as millions have had their lives destroyed, which includes the loss of their homes and family members.\u00a0Many Ukrainians are now pushing back<\/a>, including by sabotaging military commissions that are quite literally snatching people off the streets. And who could possibly blame them, given the fact that millions of Ukrainians don\u2019t want to fight their Russian brethren, especially not for\u00a0the political West\u2019s deranged so-called \u201cvalues\u201d<\/a>\u00a0that now include\u00a0no less than the decriminalization and promotion of pedophilia<\/a>. All this has turned the demographic prospects of Ukraine\u00a0into a disaster that will leave consequences for decades to come<\/a>. The only hope is if more Ukrainians realize that\u00a0only Russia\u2019s victory against NATO aggression<\/a>\u00a0can put a\u00a0stop to this evil<\/a>.<\/p>\n Source:\u00a0InfoBrics<\/a><\/p>\n