Consider this paragraph using another vile creature from the political swamp:<\/p>\n [\u2026]\u00a0 When it comes to Durham, Haspel is likely\u00a0\u201cconfident there has been no serious wrongdoing, and will therefore find a means to cooperate\u201d<\/strong>\u00a0with the investigation, said John Sipher, a 28-year CIA veteran.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Too funny.\u00a0 The spooks and scribes live a life so deeply enmeshed in the world of fraud and lying they cannot even see themselves exposing their own character.\u00a0 Put another way: \u2018if Haspel was confident of serious wrongdoing, she wouldn\u2019t cooperate with the investigation\u2019.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n See, they just can\u2019t help exposing themselves. If it wasn\u2019t serious, it would be funny.\u00a0 These inherently vile liars cannot stop themselves from exposing their nature\u2026. it just flows out.<\/p>\n The good news in the article; and there is a lot of accidentally placed good news within it for those who follow closely; comes from these paragraphs:<\/p>\n [\u2026] Haspel\u2019s plight, though, may depend on how deeply Durham investigates an uncorroborated theory pushed by Trump allies that a key player in the Russia probe, a Russia-linked professor named Joseph Mifsud, was actually a Western intelligence asset sent to discredit the Trump campaign \u2014 and that the CIA, under Brennan, was somehow involved.<\/p>\n Haspel was the CIA\u2019s station chief in London in 2016 when the U.S. Embassy there was made aware of Mifsud\u2019s contact with a Trump campaign adviser, George Papadopoulos, by Australian diplomat Alexander Downer. Haspel was briefed on Downer\u2019s outreach to the embassy, according to a person familiar with the matter, but it\u2019s unclear whether she was then made aware of the FBI\u2019s plans to interview him or knew about the bureau\u2019s use of an informant in London.<\/p>\n [\u2026]\u00a0\u201cIt is unprecedented and inappropriate to do this via Justice Department prosecutors, who will tend to apply the standards of a courtroom to the more nuanced, and often more challenging world of intelligence analysis,\u201d said John McLaughlin, who served as both deputy director and acting director of the CIA from 2000 to 2004.<\/p>\n Sipher asked why such a review would be \u201cdone over the head of\u201d the intelligence community\u2019s inspector general.<\/p>\n [\u2026]\u00a0 Another issue former officials have flagged: It isn\u2019t clear whether Durham has consulted with the\u00a0intelligence community inspector general, Michael Atkinson<\/strong>, as part of his review, which reportedly evolved into a criminal probe in October.<\/p>\n Normally, potential intelligence community misconduct is reviewed by an agency\u2019s internal watchdog, who would then recommend criminal charges if warranted to a U.S. attorney with jurisdiction, noted Greg Brower, a former FBI assistant director.\u00a0(read more)<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n Atkinson was the former head lawyer at the DOJ-NSD and legal counsel to dirty John Carlin, dirty Mary McCord, and dirty Dana Boente.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n Michael Atkinson was involved in the fraudulent creation of the Carter Page FISA application; and not coincidentally he\u2019s the ICIG who manipulated \u2018whistle-blower\u2019 rules to allow CIA gossiper Eric Ciaramella to create his fraudulent hearsay complaint about President Trump and Ukraine.<\/p>\n At this point anyone who was or is confirmed by a corrupt Senate Intelligence Committee consisting of Chairman Richar Burr and Vice-Chair Mark Warner should be considered dirty and compromised. This includes both CIA Director Gina Haspel and ICIG Michael Atkinson.<\/p>\n In essence, if the SSCI confirmed them, we should start from a position the confirmed intel official is dirty, compromised or in alignment with the larger corrupt IC needs for self-preservation.\u00a0 That\u2019s why I\u2019m highly confident President Trump will remove Mike Pompeo after the 2020 election.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n POTUS has to deal with all these creatures, while knowing their larger agenda. Quite a remarkable and untenable position; also disappointing from the aspect of executive trust.<\/p>\n On a positive note, you know what really scares these people?<\/p>\n It ain\u2019t President Trump\u2026.<\/p>\n \u2026.. it\u2019s all of us behind him!<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com\/2019\/05\/brennan-and-haspel.jpg?resize=640%2C653\")
<\/a><\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com\/2019\/10\/icig-michael-atkinson.jpg?resize=285%2C190\")
<\/a>Apparently, if the article is semi-accurate, John Durham and Bill Barr are working around ICIG Michael Atkinson. That would be good news because Atkinson is a dirty cop, completely compromised.<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com\/2018\/02\/president-trump-window-1.jpg?resize=640%2C640\")
<\/a><\/p>\n