by Jon Rappoport<\/p>\n
I\u2019ve been saying this for 9 months. Don\u2019t believe the COVID case numbers. It\u2019s a wall-to-wall scam.<\/p>\n
The situation we\u2019re facing is urgent right now. Red flags. Alarm bells.<\/p>\n
Politicians all over the US and the world are using \u201crising case numbers\u201d to drive people back into lockdowns.<\/p>\n
The news media are trumpeting these reports of case numbers.<\/p>\n
THE CASE NUMBERS COME FROM THE TESTS. AND FROM EYEBALL DIAGNOSIS.<\/p>\n
Eyeball diagnosis can mean a doctor observes the patient has a cough, or chills and fever. That\u2019s all. That\u2019s all a doctor needs to make a diagnosis of COVID. That\u2019s a case number. Ridiculous? Of course it\u2019s ridiculous. It\u2019s a con. Brought to you by the CDC.<\/p>\n
The PCR test, as I\u2019ve explained dozens of times, spits out false-positives like waterfalls. It\u2019s set up to do exactly that.<\/p>\n
Increase testing and you automatically get rising case numbers. That\u2019s the real reason for pushing expanded testing.<\/p>\n
And there you have the scam in a nutshell.<\/p>\n
The fascist public health agencies and the politicians WANT lockdowns. They know the only way to justify the lockdowns is to claim rising case numbers.<\/p>\n
There\u2019s another wrinkle you should be aware of. You\u2019re seeing reports of \u201crising numbers of hospitalizations.\u201d Wherever this is true (and not an outright lie), people could be coming to the hospital for any reason under the sun\u2014including fear that they might \u201chave the virus.\u201d In the US, state hospitals receive federal money for every diagnosed COVID case. These hospitals need money. Simply and arbitrarily writing \u201cCOVID-19\u201d on patient files becomes a way to get that money.<\/p>\n
Occasionally, I receive reports from people who work at hospitals or know people who work at hospitals. The reports usually go this way: \u201cWe\u2019re seeing very serious cases here. People are arriving with unusual symptoms\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n
First of all, this is what hospitals are built for: people who are seriously ill. Some weeks are busier than others. Second, all over the world, there are always people who have unusual symptoms, resulting from a variety of causes. No virus required.<\/p>\n
I recently published a smoking-gun article on the PCR test. This was during the initial furor of the election (another example of fake numbers). For those who missed reading the article, and for new readers, here it is:<\/p>\n
Smoking gun: Fauci states COVID test has fatal flaw; confession from the \u201cbeloved\u201d expert of experts [1]<\/p>\n
The COVID delusion is finished, blown apart.<\/p>\n
OK, here we go. Smoking gun. Jackpot.<\/p>\n
Right from the horse\u2019s mouth. Right from the man we\u2019re told is the number-one COVID expert in the nation. What Fauci says is golden truth.<\/p>\n
Well, how about THIS?<\/p>\n
July 16, 2020, podcast [2], \u201cThis Week in Virology\u201d: Tony Fauci makes a point of saying the PCR COVID test is useless and misleading when the test is run at \u201c35 cycles or higher.\u201d A positive result, indicating infection, cannot be accepted or believed.<\/p>\n
Here, in techno-speak, is an excerpt from Fauci\u2019s key quote (starting at about the 4-minute mark): \u201c\u2026If you get [perform the test at] a cycle threshold of 35 or more\u2026the chances of it being replication-confident [aka accurate] are miniscule\u2026you almost never can culture virus [detect a true positive result] from a 37 threshold cycle\u2026even 36\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n
Each \u201ccycle\u201d of the test is a quantum leap in amplification and magnification of the test specimen taken from the patient.<\/p>\n
Too many cycles, and the test will turn up all sorts of irrelevant material that will be wrongly interpreted as relevant.<\/p>\n
That\u2019s called a false positive.<\/p>\n
What Fauci failed to say on the video is: the FDA, which authorizes the test for public use, recommends the test should be run up to 40 cycles. Not 35.<\/p>\n
Therefore, all labs in the US that follow the FDA guideline are knowingly or unknowingly participating in fraud. Fraud on a monstrous level, because\u2026<\/p>\n
Millions of Americans are being told they are infected with the virus on the basis of a false positive result, and\u2026<\/p>\n
The total number of COVID cases in America\u2014which is based on the test\u2014is a gross falsity.<\/p>\n
The lockdowns and other restraining measures are based on these fraudulent case numbers.<\/p>\n
Let me back up and run that by you again. Fauci says the test is useless when it\u2019s run at 35 cycles or higher. The FDA says run the test up to 40 cycles, in order to determine whether the virus is there. This is the crime in a nutshell.<\/p>\n
If anyone in the White House has a few brain cells to rub together, pick up a giant bullhorn and start revealing the truth to the American people.<\/p>\n
\u201cHello, America, you\u2019ve been tricked, lied to, conned, and taken for a devastating ride. On the basis of fake science, the country was locked down.\u201d<\/p>\n
If anyone in the Congress has a few brain cells operating, pull Fauci into a televised hearing and, in ten minutes, make mincemeat out of the fake science that has driven this whole foul stench-ridden assault on the US economy and its citizens.<\/p>\n
All right, here are two chunks of evidence for what I\u2019ve written above. First, we have a CDC quote on the FDA website, in a document titled [3]: \u201cCDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel For Emergency Use Only.\u201d See page 35. This document is marked, \u201cEffective: 07\/13\/20.\u201d That means, even though the virus is being referred to by its older name, the document is still relevant as of July 2020. \u201cFor Emergency Use Only\u201d refers to the fact that the FDA has certified the PCR test under a traditional category called \u201cEmergency Use Authorization.\u201d<\/p>\n
FDA: \u201c\u2026a specimen is considered positive for 2019-nCoV [virus] if all 2019-nCoV marker (N1, N2) cycle threshold [Ct] growth curves cross the threshold line within 40.00 cycles ( [less than] 40.00 Ct ).\u201d<\/p>\n
Naturally, MANY testing labs reading this guideline would conclude, \u201cWell, to see if the virus is there in a patient, we should run the test all the way to 40 cycles. That\u2019s the official advice.\u201d<\/p>\n
Then we have a New York Times article (August 29\/updated September 17) headlined: \u201cYour coronavirus test is positive. Maybe it shouldn\u2019t be.\u201d [4] Here are money quotes:<\/p>\n
\u201cMost tests set the limit at 40 [cycles]. A few at 37.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSet the limit\u201d would usually mean, \u201cWe\u2019re going to look all the way to 40 cycles, to see if the virus is there.\u201d<\/p>\n
The Times: \u201cThis number of amplification cycles needed to find the virus, called the cycle threshold, is never included in the results sent to doctors and coronavirus patients\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n
Boom. That\u2019s the capper, the grand finale. Labs don\u2019t or won\u2019t reveal their collusion in this crime.<\/p>\n
Get the picture?<\/p>\n
I hope so.<\/p>\n
If a lawyer won\u2019t go to court with all this, or if a judge won\u2019t pay attention and see the light, they should be stripped of their jobs and sent to the Arctic to sell snow.<\/p>\n
SOURCES:<\/p>\n
[1] https:\/\/blog.nomorefakenews.com\/2020\/11\/06\/smoking-gun-fauci-states-covid-test-has-fatal-flaw\/<\/p>\n
[2] https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=a_Vy6fgaBPE<\/p>\n
[3] https:\/\/www.fda.gov\/media\/134922\/download<\/p>\n
[4] nytimes.com\/2020\/08\/29\/health\/coronavirus-testing.html<\/p>\n