{"id":37382,"date":"2020-11-19T07:17:04","date_gmt":"2020-11-19T11:17:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=37382"},"modified":"2020-11-19T07:17:04","modified_gmt":"2020-11-19T11:17:04","slug":"why-did-so-many-odd-batches-of-ballots-go-100-for-biden-in-georgia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=37382","title":{"rendered":"Why did so many \u2018Odd Batches of Ballots\u2019 go 100% for Biden in Georgia?!"},"content":{"rendered":"

Several Georgia Recount Monitors Describe \u2018Odd Batches of Ballots\u2019 That Stood Out \u2013 Pristine Sheets with Perfectly Marked Bubbles \u2013 100% For Joe Biden<\/h1>\n

By Cristina Laila
\nGateway Pundit<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger recently ordered a statewide audit and hand recount amid overwhelming evidence of voter fraud.<\/p>\n

The recount however appears to be rigged because elections officials are not checking signatures and now it is being revealed that the\u00a0state is instructing officials to report original vote totals.<\/a><\/p>\n

So far three Georgia counties have found \u2018missing\u2019 votes for President Trump in the statewide recount.<\/p>\n

Several recount workers, including Democrats, have described odd batches of pristine ballots with perfectly marked bubbles all for Joe Biden.<\/p>\n

One Georgia recount worker\u00a0went on the record in\u00a0Wood v. Raffensperger\u00a0<\/em><\/a>and described an odd batch of ballots that stood out \u2014 pristine sheets with no markings that went 98% to Joe Biden.<\/p>\n

\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

The monitor describes how ballots that had been handled looked worn and had already been written on \u2014 except for a magical pristine batch for Joe Biden.<\/p>\n

The recount worker said this pristine batch of ballots had a different texture and that the markings for the candidates were \u201cunusually uniform\u201d as if marked by a ballot-marking device.<\/p>\n

\u201cMost of the ballots had already been handled; they had been written on by people, and the edges were worn. They showed obvious use. However, one batch stood out. It was pristine. There was a difference in the texture of the paper \u2013 it was as if they were intended for absentee use but had not been used for that purposes. There was a difference in the feel,\u201d One recount worker said on record.<\/p>\n

\u201cThese difference ballots included a slight depressed pre-fold so they could be easily folded and unfolded for use in the scanning machines. There was no markings on the ballots to show where they had come from, or where they had been processed. These stood out.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cIn my 20 years\u2019 of experience of handling ballots, I observed that the markings for the candidates on these ballots were unusually uniform, perhaps even with a ballot-marking device. By my estimate in observing these ballots, approximately 98% constituted votes for Joseph Biden. I only observed 2 ballots as votes for President Donald J. Trump.\u201d<\/p>\n