![\"\"](\"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/GetFile-11.jpg\")
WASHINGTON, DC – NOVEMBER 04: U.S. President Donald Trump speaks on election night in the East Room of the White House in the early morning hours of November 04, 2020 in Washington, DC. Trump spoke shortly after 2am with the presidential race against Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden still too close to call. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla\/Getty Images)<\/p><\/div>\n
By Brian Trusdell\u00a0 | NEWSMAX<\/p>\n
The U.S. Supreme Court indicated it had no interest in intervening in any election result\u00a0challenge by President Donald Trump\u2019s campaign before the constitutionally mandated swearing-in date, giving Pennsylvania officials until two days after Joe Biden\u2019s scheduled inauguration to respond to the latest lawsuit.<\/p>\n
The court has turned away other challenges \u2013 such as one out of Texas and joined by 17 other states \u2013 on procedural grounds such as \u201cstanding,\u201d or the claim of harm. The most recent case out of Pennsylvania disputed Pennsylvania\u2019s Secretary of State\u2019s Kathy Boockvar\u2019s decisions \u2013 upheld by the state Supreme Court \u2013 that loosened state law with regards to signature verification, canvassing observations and voter requirements on ballots.<\/p>\n
“As described above, non-legislative officials, oftentimes at the instigation of partisan third parties, ignored or significantly altered and thereby violated state election law, including, most tremblingly, laws enacted to minimize the risk of fraud in mail voting and thereby protect the integrity of the election process,” the Trump campaign lawsuit reads.<\/p>\n
“The decisions of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, an elected body, also raised serious concerns whether these were partisan attempts to assist the Democratic candidate whose campaign strategy of utilizing mail ballots was well publicized, in comparison to President\u2019s Trump\u2019s well-known strategy to encourage in-person voting.”<\/p>\n